[009]
TrevMUN
Current Version
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I take serious issue with this guy\'s rationale. Even if he is labeled a curator, I find this to be a serious error in judgment. For one thing, he\'s trying to portray this as a \
to:
I take serious issue with this guy\\\'s rationale. Even if he is labeled a curator, I find this to be a serious error in judgment. For one thing, he\\\'s trying to portray this as a \\\"meme outbreak.\\\" There \\\'\\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\'\\\' no \\\"meme outbreak\\\" here. This is a years-long-standing article that was \\\'\\\'launched\\\'\\\' based on an in-joke from some anime\\\'s fandom, then renamed, then had the image relevant to the character of said in-joke removed and restored several times over the life of this article.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in a character\\\'s former status as the trope namer getting systematically swept under the rug is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months undisturbed that doesn\\\'t even attract natter.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action? That\\\'s something you\\\'d use to justify renaming or redlining a trope. I\\\'m not buying it as a reason to remove a valid (if meta) example.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in a character\\\'s former status as the trope namer getting systematically swept under the rug is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months undisturbed that doesn\\\'t even attract natter.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action? That\\\'s something you\\\'d use to justify renaming or redlining a trope. I\\\'m not buying it as a reason to remove a valid (if meta) example.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I take serious issue with this guy\'s rationale. Even if he is labeled a curator, I find this to be a serious error in judgment. For one thing, he\'s trying to portray this as a \
to:
I take serious issue with this guy\\\'s rationale. Even if he is labeled a curator, I find this to be a serious error in judgment. For one thing, he\\\'s trying to portray this as a \\\"meme outbreak.\\\" There \\\'\\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\'\\\' no \\\"meme outbreak\\\" here. This is a years-long-standing article that was \\\'\\\'launched\\\'\\\' based off an injoke from some anime\\\'s fandom, then renamed, then had the image relevant to the character described removed and restored several times over the life of this article.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in a character\\\'s former status as the trope namer getting systematically swept under the rug is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months undisturbed that doesn\\\'t even attract natter.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action? That\\\'s something you\\\'d use to justify renaming or redlining a trope. I\\\'m not buying it as a reason to remove a valid (if meta) example.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in a character\\\'s former status as the trope namer getting systematically swept under the rug is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months undisturbed that doesn\\\'t even attract natter.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action? That\\\'s something you\\\'d use to justify renaming or redlining a trope. I\\\'m not buying it as a reason to remove a valid (if meta) example.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I take serious issue with this guy\'s rationale. Even if he is labeled a curator, I find this to be a serious error in judgment. For one thing, he\'s trying to portray this as a \
to:
I take serious issue with this guy\\\'s rationale. Even if he is labeled a curator, I find this to be a serious error in judgment. For one thing, he\\\'s trying to portray this as a \\\"meme outbreak.\\\" There \\\'\\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\'\\\' no \\\"meme outbreak\\\" here. This is a years-long-standing article that was \\\'\\\'launched\\\'\\\' based off an injoke from some anime\\\'s fandom, then renamed, then had the image relevant to the character described removed and restored several times.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in that is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months undisturbed that doesn\\\'t even attract natter.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action? That\\\'s something you\\\'d use to justify renaming or redlining a trope. I\\\'m not buying it as a reason to remove a valid (if meta) example.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in that is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months undisturbed that doesn\\\'t even attract natter.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action? That\\\'s something you\\\'d use to justify renaming or redlining a trope. I\\\'m not buying it as a reason to remove a valid (if meta) example.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I take serious issue with this guy\'s rationale. Even if he is labeled a curator, I find this to be a serious error in judgment. For one thing, he\'s trying to portray this as a \
to:
I take serious issue with this guy\\\'s rationale. Even if he is labeled a curator, I find this to be a serious error in judgment. For one thing, he\\\'s trying to portray this as a \\\"meme outbreak.\\\" There \\\'\\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\'\\\' no \\\"meme outbreak\\\" here. This is a years-long-standing article that was \\\'\\\'launched\\\'\\\' based off an injoke from some anime\\\'s fandom, then renamed, then had the image relevant to the character described removed and restored several times.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in that is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months undisturbed and not attracting natter.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action? That\\\'s something you\\\'d use to justify renaming or redlining a trope. I\\\'m not buying it as a reason to remove a valid (if meta) example.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in that is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months undisturbed and not attracting natter.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action? That\\\'s something you\\\'d use to justify renaming or redlining a trope. I\\\'m not buying it as a reason to remove a valid (if meta) example.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I take serious issue with this guy\'s rationale, even if he is labeled a curator. For one thing, he\'s trying to portray this as a \
to:
I take serious issue with this guy\\\'s rationale. Even if he is labeled a curator, I find this to be a serious error in judgment. For one thing, he\\\'s trying to portray this as a \\\"meme outbreak.\\\" There \\\'\\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\'\\\' no \\\"meme outbreak\\\" here. This is a years-long-standing article that was \\\'\\\'launched\\\'\\\' based off an injoke from some anime\\\'s fandom, then renamed, then had the image relevant to the character described removed and restored several times.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in that is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action? That\\\'s something you\\\'d use to justify renaming or redlining a trope. I\\\'m not buying it as a reason to remove a valid (if meta) example.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in that is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action? That\\\'s something you\\\'d use to justify renaming or redlining a trope. I\\\'m not buying it as a reason to remove a valid (if meta) example.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I take issue with this guy\'s rationale, even if he is labeled a curator. There \'\'was\'\' no \
to:
I take serious issue with this guy\\\'s rationale, even if he is labeled a curator. For one thing, he\\\'s trying to portray this as a \\\"meme outbreak.\\\" There \\\'\\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\'\\\' no \\\"meme outbreak\\\" here. This is a years-long-standing article that was \\\'\\\'launched\\\'\\\' based off an injoke from some anime\\\'s fandom, then renamed, then had the image relevant to the character described removed and restored several times.
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in that is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action?
Someone taking note of the irony inherent in that is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' a so-called \\\"meme outbreak,\\\" and it\\\'s not a \\\"meme outbreak\\\" when it\\\'s just one small sub-example that has been there for months.
While we\\\'re on that subject, how the hell is \\\"memes are not tropes\\\" a relevant reason to delete an \\\'\\\'example\\\'\\\' of the trope in action?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
-->3rd Feb \'11 8:27:53 PM curator Camacan 121.44.14.179
to:
-->3rd Feb \\\'11 8:27:53 PM curator \\\'\\\'\\\'Camacan\\\'\\\'\\\' 121.44.14.179
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I take issue with this guy\'s rationale, even if he is labeled a curator. There \'\'was\'\' no \
to:
I take issue with this guy\\\'s rationale, even if he is labeled a curator. There \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' no \\\"meme outbreak\\\" here. It was a years-long-standing article that was \\\'\\\'launched\\\'\\\' based off an injoke from some anime\\\'s fandom. The references to this character retained meta relevancy after the trope was renamed.
