Discussion History Main / GagPenis

If it angers you that your actions would get you seen as a \\\"Wikipedia Deletionist\\\" by someone else, then maybe you should reflect more closely on what you\\\'ve done and not do it in the future. I\\\'ve laid out my case on the BiggerIsBetterInBed discussion page as to why I see your behavior as the hallmark of one.

Looking at what Fighteer said and comparing it to what you said, saying that you \\\"misspoke\\\" is an understatement. Fighteer didn\\\'t say that RealLife examples \\\"are supposed to, by and large, be cut regardless of validity.\\\" He said they\\\'re fine as long as they don\\\'t attract nattering, don\\\'t overwhelm the article, or don\\\'t invite legal action. That aside, I have a very different approach to RealLife sections than you do. My opinion is like that of Tropers/{{suedenim}}\\\'s on that page: \\\"A good Real Life section is both fun and useful. I love reading the ones that make you think \\\'Huh, as weird as this trope is, there\\\'s \\\'\\\'some\\\'\\\' TruthInTelevision to it.\\\'\\\"

I honestly don\\\'t care whether or not it was decided in a forum discussion that BiggerIsBetterInBed was suffering from TropeDecay. That\\\'s not the point of why I did what I did or why I\\\'ve said what I\\\'ve said.

I don\\\'t care whether or not a mod (Madrugada) followed up with edits of his own without changing any of yours. Unlike \\\'\\\'you\\\'\\\', he didn\\\'t mass-delete examples; most of his own massive edit was merely revising and rewording existing paragraphs and examples.

Trying to turn it around on me and saying \\\"Now it\\\'s your turn!\\\" dodges the original fact of the matter--that you thoughtlessly went around the Wiki, not just on the trope page in question, deleting any example attributed to one trope that could have easily been attributed to another trope that \\\'\\\'you knew damn well\\\'\\\' existed.

Your justification for doing all this is based on a \\\"misspoken\\\" interpretation of what a moderator said, which comes off more like a personal belief of yours that the Wiki should not have any RealLife examples ever, even if they are harmless by Fighteer\\\'s standards. You\\\'ll note that my very first reply to you here said this: \\\'\\\'\\\"Leave the ones that fit, delete only the ones that don\\\'t. Better yet, if you know of a trope where the others could be added, move them there. You know, like what you should have done in the first place.\\\"\\\'\\\'

Challenging me to \\\"prove\\\" that the examples you blanket-deleted from another trope fit under this trope in light of what I\\\'ve said is meaningless, because I already said what should be done, rather than deleting the entire section outright (as you would do), is to sort through the RealLife section and remove what doesn\\\'t fit. What I wanted to hear \\\'\\\'first and foremost\\\'\\\' was if your statement that RealLife examples should almost always be cut had any basis in Wiki guidelines. Since it most certainly doesn\\\'t, I \\\'\\\'won\\\'t\\\'\\\' leave the task of sorting these examples out to you.

If it angers you that your actions would get you seen as a \\\"Wikipedia Deletionist\\\" by someone else, then maybe you should reflect more closely on what you\\\'ve done and not do it in the future. I\\\'ve laid out my case on the BiggerIsBetterInBed discussion page as to why I see your behavior as the hallmark of one.

Looking at what Fighteer said and comparing it to what you said, saying that you \\\"misspoke\\\" is an understatement. Fighteer didn\\\'t say that RealLife examples \\\"are supposed to, by and large, be cut regardless of validity.\\\" He said they\\\'re fine as long as they don\\\'t attract nattering, don\\\'t overwhelm the article, or don\\\'t invite legal action. That aside, I think very different on RealLife sections than you do. My opinion is like that of Tropers/{{suedenim}}\\\'s on that page: \\\"A good Real Life section is both fun and useful. I love reading the ones that make you think \\\'Huh, as weird as this trope is, there\\\'s \\\'\\\'some\\\'\\\' TruthInTelevision to it.\\\'\\\"

I honestly don\\\'t care whether or not it was decided in a forum discussion that BiggerIsBetterInBed was suffering from TropeDecay. That\\\'s not the point of why I did what I did or why I\\\'ve said what I\\\'ve said.

I don\\\'t care whether or not a mod (Madrugada) followed up with edits of his own without changing any of yours. Unlike \\\'\\\'you\\\'\\\', he didn\\\'t mass-delete examples; most of his own massive edit was merely revising and rewording existing paragraphs and examples.

Trying to turn it around on me and saying \\\"Now it\\\'s your turn!\\\" dodges the original fact of the matter--that you thoughtlessly went around the Wiki, not just on the trope page in question, deleting any example attributed to one trope that could have easily been attributed to another trope that \\\'\\\'you knew damn well\\\'\\\' existed.

Your justification for doing all this is based on a \\\"misspoken\\\" interpretation of what a moderator said, which comes off more like a personal belief of yours that the Wiki should not have any RealLife examples ever, even if they are harmless by Fighteer\\\'s standards. You\\\'ll note that my very first reply to you here said this: \\\'\\\'\\\"Leave the ones that fit, delete only the ones that don\\\'t. Better yet, if you know of a trope where the others could be added, move them there. You know, like what you should have done in the first place.\\\"\\\'\\\'

Challenging me to \\\"prove\\\" that the examples you blanket-deleted from another trope fit under this trope in light of what I\\\'ve said is meaningless, because I already said what should be done, rather than deleting the entire section outright (as you would do), is to sort through the RealLife section and remove what doesn\\\'t fit. What I wanted to hear \\\'\\\'first and foremost\\\'\\\' was if your statement that RealLife examples should almost always be cut had any basis in Wiki guidelines. Since it most certainly doesn\\\'t, I \\\'\\\'won\\\'t\\\'\\\' leave the task of sorting these examples out to you.

If it angers you that your actions would get you seen as a \\\"Wikipedia Deletionist\\\" by someone else, then maybe you should reflect more closely on what you\\\'ve done and not do it in the future. I\\\'ve laid out my case on the BiggerIsBetterInBed discussion page as to why I see your behavior as the hallmark of one.

Looking at what Fighteer said and comparing it to what you said, saying that you \\\"misspoke\\\" is an understatement. Fighteer didn\\\'t say that RealLife examples \\\"are supposed to, by and large, be cut regardless of validity.\\\" He said they\\\'re fine as long as they don\\\'t attract nattering, don\\\'t overwhelm the article, or don\\\'t invite legal action. That aside, I think very different on RealLife sections than you do. My opinion is like that of Tropers/{{suedenim}}\\\'s on that page: \\\"A good Real Life section is both fun and useful. I love reading the ones that make you think \\\'Huh, as weird as this trope is, there\\\'s \\\'\\\'some\\\'\\\' TruthInTelevision to it.\\\'\\\"

I honestly don\\\'t care whether or not it was decided in a forum discussion that BiggerIsBetterInBed was suffering from TropeDecay. That\\\'s not the point of why I did what I did or why I\\\'ve said what I\\\'ve said.

I don\\\'t care whether or not a mod (Madrugada) followed up with edits of his own without changing any of yours. Unlike \\\'\\\'you\\\'\\\', he didn\\\'t mass-delete examples; most of his own massive edit was merely revising and rewording existing paragraphs and examples.

Trying to turn it around on me and saying \\\"Now it\\\'s your turn!\\\" dodges the original fact of the matter--that you thoughtlessly went around the Wiki, not just on the trope page in question, deleting any example attributed to one trope that could have easily been attributed to another trope that \\\'\\\'you knew damn well\\\'\\\' existed.

Your justification for doing all this is based on a \\\"misspoken\\\" interpretation of what a moderator said, which comes off more like a personal belief of yours that the Wiki should not have any RealLife examples ever, even if they are harmless by Fighteer\\\'s standards. You\\\'ll note that my very first reply to you here said this: \\\'\\\'\\\"Leave the ones that fit, delete only the ones that don\\\'t. Better yet, if you know of a trope where the others could be added, move them there. You know, like what you should have done in the first place.\\\"\\\'\\\'

Challenging me to \\\"prove\\\" that the examples you blanket-deleted from another trope fit under this trope in light of what I\\\'ve said is meaningless, because I already said what should be done, rather than deleting the entire section outright (as you would do), is to sort through the RealLife section and remove what didn\\\'t fit. What I wanted to hear \\\'\\\'first and foremost\\\'\\\' was if your statement that RealLife examples should almost always be cut had any basis in Wiki guidelines. Since it most certainly doesn\\\'t, I won\\\'t leave the task of sorting these examples out to you.

If it angers you that your actions would get you seen as a \\\"Wikipedia Deletionist\\\" by someone else, then maybe you should reflect more closely on what you\\\'ve done and not do it in the future. I\\\'ve laid out my case on the BiggerIsBetterInBed discussion page as to why I see your behavior as the hallmark of one.

Looking at what Fighteer said and comparing it to what you said, saying that you \\\"misspoke\\\" is an understatement. Fighteer didn\\\'t say that RealLife examples \\\"are supposed to, by and large, be cut regardless of validity.\\\" He said they\\\'re fine as long as they don\\\'t attract nattering, don\\\'t overwhelm the article, or don\\\'t invite legal action. That aside, I think very different on RealLife sections than you do. My opinion is like that of Tropers/{{suedenim}}\\\'s on that page: \\\"A good Real Life section is both fun and useful. I love reading the ones that make you think \\\'Huh, as weird as this trope is, there\\\'s \\\'\\\'some\\\'\\\' TruthInTelevision to it.\\\'\\\"

I honestly don\\\'t care whether or not it was decided that BiggerIsBetterInBed was deemed to suffer TropeDecay. That\\\'s not the point of why I did what I did or why I\\\'ve said what I\\\'ve said.

I don\\\'t care whether or not a mod (Madrugada) followed up with edits of his own without changing any of yours. Unlike \\\'\\\'you\\\'\\\', he didn\\\'t mass-delete examples; most of his own massive edit was merely revising and rewording existing paragraphs and examples.

Trying to turn it around on me and saying \\\"Now it\\\'s your turn!\\\" dodges the original fact of the matter--that you thoughtlessly went around the Wiki, not just on the trope page in question, deleting any example attributed to one trope that could have easily been attributed to another trope that \\\'\\\'you knew damn well\\\'\\\' existed.

Your justification for doing all this is based on a \\\"misspoken\\\" interpretation of what a moderator said, which comes off more like a personal belief of yours that the Wiki should not have any RealLife examples ever, even if they are harmless by Fighteer\\\'s standards. You\\\'ll note that my very first reply to you here said this: \\\'\\\'\\\"Leave the ones that fit, delete only the ones that don\\\'t. Better yet, if you know of a trope where the others could be added, move them there. You know, like what you should have done in the first place.\\\"\\\'\\\'

Challenging me to \\\"prove\\\" that the examples you blanket-deleted from another trope fit under this trope in light of what I\\\'ve said is meaningless, because I already said what should be done, rather than deleting the entire section outright (as you would do), is to sort through the RealLife section and remove what didn\\\'t fit. What I wanted to hear \\\'\\\'first and foremost\\\'\\\' was if your statement that RealLife examples should almost always be cut had any basis in Wiki guidelines. Since it most certainly doesn\\\'t, I won\\\'t leave the task of sorting these examples out to you.

If it angers you that your actions would get you seen as a \\\"Wikipedia Deletionist\\\" by someone else, then maybe you should reflect more closely on what you\\\'ve done and not do it in the future. I\\\'ve laid out my case on the BiggerIsBetterInBed discussion page as to why I see your behavior as the hallmark of one.

Looking at what Fighteer said and comparing it to what you said, saying that you \\\"misspoke\\\" is an understatement. Fighteer didn\\\'t say that RealLife examples \\\"are supposed to, by and large, be cut regardless of validity.\\\" He said they\\\'re fine as long as they don\\\'t attract nattering, don\\\'t overwhelm the article, or don\\\'t invite legal action. That aside, I think very different on RealLife sections than you do. My opinion is like Tropers/{{suedenim}}\\\'s on that page; \\\"A good Real Life section is both fun and useful. I love reading the ones that make you think \\\'Huh, as weird as this trope is, there\\\'s \\\'\\\'some\\\'\\\' TruthInTelevision to it.\\\'\\\"

I honestly don\\\'t care whether or not it was decided that BiggerIsBetterInBed was deemed to suffer TropeDecay. That\\\'s not the point of why I did what I did or why I\\\'ve said what I\\\'ve said.

I don\\\'t care whether or not a mod (Madrugada) followed up with edits of his own without changing any of yours. Unlike \\\'\\\'you\\\'\\\', he didn\\\'t mass-delete examples; most of his own massive edit was merely revising and rewording existing paragraphs and examples.

Trying to turn it around on me and saying \\\"Now it\\\'s your turn!\\\" dodges the original fact of the matter--that you thoughtlessly went around the Wiki, not just on the trope page in question, deleting any example attributed to one trope that could have easily been attributed to another trope that \\\'\\\'you knew damn well\\\'\\\' existed.

Your justification for doing all this is based on a \\\"misspoken\\\" interpretation of what a moderator said, which comes off more like a personal belief of yours that the Wiki should not have any RealLife examples ever, even if they are harmless by Fighteer\\\'s standards. You\\\'ll note that my very first reply to you here said this: \\\'\\\'\\\"Leave the ones that fit, delete only the ones that don\\\'t. Better yet, if you know of a trope where the others could be added, move them there. You know, like what you should have done in the first place.\\\"\\\'\\\'

Challenging me to \\\"prove\\\" that the examples you blanket-deleted from another trope fit under this trope in light of what I\\\'ve said is meaningless, because I already said what should be done, rather than deleting the entire section outright (as you would do), is to sort through the RealLife section and remove what didn\\\'t fit. What I wanted to hear \\\'\\\'first and foremost\\\'\\\' was if your statement that RealLife examples should almost always be cut had any basis in Wiki guidelines. Since it most certainly doesn\\\'t, I won\\\'t leave the task of sorting these examples out to you.

If it angers you that your actions would get you seen as a \\\"Wikipedia Deletionist\\\" by someone else, then maybe you should reflect more closely on what you\\\'ve done and not do it in the future. I\\\'ve laid out my case on the BiggerIsBetterInBed discussion page as to why I see your behavior as the hallmark of one.

Looking at what Fighteer said and comparing it to what you said, saying that you \\\"misspoke\\\" is an understatement. Fighteer didn\\\'t say that RealLife examples \\\"are supposed to, by and large, be cut regardless of validity.\\\" He said they\\\'re fine as long as they don\\\'t attract nattering, don\\\'t overwhelm the article, or don\\\'t invite legal action. That aside, I think very different on RealLife sections than you do. My opinion is like Tropers/{{suedenim}} on that page; \\\"A good Real Life section is both fun and useful. I love reading the ones that make you think \\\'Huh, as weird as this trope is, there\\\'s \\\'\\\'some\\\'\\\' TruthInTelevision to it.\\\'\\\"

I honestly don\\\'t care whether or not it was decided that BiggerIsBetterInBed was deemed to suffer TropeDecay. That\\\'s not the point of why I did what I did or why I\\\'ve said what I\\\'ve said.

I don\\\'t care whether or not a mod (Madrugada) followed up with edits of his own without changing any of yours. Unlike \\\'\\\'you\\\'\\\', he didn\\\'t mass-delete examples; most of his own massive edit was merely revising and rewording existing paragraphs and examples.

Trying to turn it around on me and saying \\\"Now it\\\'s your turn!\\\" dodges the original fact of the matter--that you thoughtlessly went around the Wiki, not just on the trope page in question, deleting any example attributed to one trope that could have easily been attributed to another trope that \\\'\\\'you knew damn well\\\'\\\' existed.

Your justification for doing all this is based on a \\\"misspoken\\\" interpretation of what a moderator said, which comes off more like a personal belief of yours that the Wiki should not have any RealLife examples ever, even if they are harmless by Fighteer\\\'s standards. You\\\'ll note that my very first reply to you here said this: \\\'\\\'\\\"Leave the ones that fit, delete only the ones that don\\\'t. Better yet, if you know of a trope where the others could be added, move them there. You know, like what you should have done in the first place.\\\"\\\'\\\'

Challenging me to \\\"prove\\\" that the examples you blanket-deleted from another trope fit under this trope in light of what I\\\'ve said is meaningless, because I already said what should be done, rather than deleting the entire section outright (as you would do), is to sort through the RealLife section and remove what didn\\\'t fit. What I wanted to hear \\\'\\\'first and foremost\\\'\\\' was if your statement that RealLife examples should almost always be cut had any basis in Wiki guidelines. Since it most certainly doesn\\\'t, I won\\\'t leave the task of sorting these examples out to you.

If it angers you that your actions would get you seen as a \\\"Wikipedia Deletionist\\\" by someone else, then maybe you should reflect more closely on what you\\\'ve done and not do it in the future. I\\\'ve laid out my case on the BiggerIsBetterInBed discussion page as to why I see your behavior as the hallmark of one.

Looking at what Fighteer said and comparing it to what you said, saying that you \\\"misspoke\\\" is an understatement. Fighteer didn\\\'t say that RealLife examples \\\"are supposed to, by and large, be cut regardless of validity.\\\" He said they\\\'re fine as long as they don\\\'t attract nattering, don\\\'t overwhelm the article, or don\\\'t invite legal action. That aside, I think very different on RealLife sections than you do. My opinion is like Tropers/TeutonicTomboyTGirl on that page; \\\"A good Real Life section is both fun and useful. I love reading the ones that make you think \\\'Huh, as weird as this trope is, there\\\'s \\\'\\\'some\\\'\\\' TruthInTelevision to it.\\\'\\\"

I honestly don\\\'t care whether or not it was decided that BiggerIsBetterInBed was deemed to suffer TropeDecay. That\\\'s not the point of why I did what I did or why I\\\'ve said what I\\\'ve said.

I don\\\'t care whether or not a mod (Madrugada) followed up with edits of his own without changing any of yours. Unlike \\\'\\\'you\\\'\\\', he didn\\\'t mass-delete examples; most of his own massive edit was merely revising and rewording existing paragraphs and examples.

Trying to turn it around on me and saying \\\"Now it\\\'s your turn!\\\" dodges the original fact of the matter--that you thoughtlessly went around the Wiki, not just on the trope page in question, deleting any example attributed to one trope that could have easily been attributed to another trope that \\\'\\\'you knew damn well\\\'\\\' existed.

Your justification for doing all this is based on a \\\"misspoken\\\" interpretation of what a moderator said, which comes off more like a personal belief of yours that the Wiki should not have any RealLife examples ever, even if they are harmless by Fighteer\\\'s standards. You\\\'ll note that my very first reply to you here said this: \\\'\\\'\\\"Leave the ones that fit, delete only the ones that don\\\'t. Better yet, if you know of a trope where the others could be added, move them there. You know, like what you should have done in the first place.\\\"\\\'\\\'

Challenging me to \\\"prove\\\" that the examples you blanket-deleted from another trope fit under this trope in light of what I\\\'ve said is meaningless, because I already said what should be done, rather than deleting the entire section outright (as you would do), is to sort through the RealLife section and remove what didn\\\'t fit. What I wanted to hear \\\'\\\'first and foremost\\\'\\\' was if your statement that RealLife examples should almost always be cut had any basis in Wiki guidelines. Since it most certainly doesn\\\'t, I won\\\'t leave the task of sorting these examples out to you.

If it angers you that your actions would get you seen as a \\\"Wikipedia Deletionist\\\" by someone else, then maybe you should reflect more closely on what you\\\'ve done and not do it in the future. I\\\'ve laid out my case on the BiggerIsBetterInBed discussion page as to why I see your behavior as the hallmark of one.

Looking at what Fighteer said and comparing it to what you said, saying that you \\\"misspoke\\\" is an understatement. Fighteer didn\\\'t say that RealLife examples \\\"are supposed to, by and large, be cut regardless of validity.\\\" He said they\\\'re fine as long as they don\\\'t attract nattering, don\\\'t overwhelm the article, or don\\\'t invite legal action. That aside, I think very different on RealLife sections than you do. My opinion is like TeutonicTomboyTGirl on that page; \\\"A good Real Life section is both fun and useful. I love reading the ones that make you think \\\'Huh, as weird as this trope is, there\\\'s \\\'\\\'some\\\'\\\' TruthInTelevision to it.\\\'\\\"

I honestly don\\\'t care whether or not it was decided that BiggerIsBetterInBed was deemed to suffer TropeDecay. That\\\'s not the point of why I did what I did or why I\\\'ve said what I\\\'ve said.

I don\\\'t care whether or not a mod (Madrugada) followed up with edits of his own without changing any of yours. Unlike \\\'\\\'you\\\'\\\', he didn\\\'t mass-delete examples; most of his own massive edit was merely revising and rewording existing paragraphs and examples.

Trying to turn it around on me and saying \\\"Now it\\\'s your turn!\\\" dodges the original fact of the matter--that you thoughtlessly went around the Wiki, not just on the trope page in question, deleting any example attributed to one trope that could have easily been attributed to another trope that \\\'\\\'you knew damn well\\\'\\\' existed.

Your justification for doing all this is based on a \\\"misspoken\\\" interpretation of what a moderator said, which comes off more like a personal belief of yours that the Wiki should not have any RealLife examples ever, even if they are harmless by Fighteer\\\'s standards. You\\\'ll note that my very first reply to you here said this: \\\'\\\'\\\"Leave the ones that fit, delete only the ones that don\\\'t. Better yet, if you know of a trope where the others could be added, move them there. You know, like what you should have done in the first place.\\\"\\\'\\\'

Challenging me to \\\"prove\\\" that the examples you blanket-deleted from another trope fit under this trope in light of what I\\\'ve said is meaningless, because I already said what should be done, rather than deleting the entire section outright (as you would do), is to sort through the RealLife section and remove what didn\\\'t fit. What I wanted to hear \\\'\\\'first and foremost\\\'\\\' was if your statement that RealLife examples should almost always be cut had any basis in Wiki guidelines. Since it most certainly doesn\\\'t, I won\\\'t leave the task of sorting these examples out to you.