[006]
DaibhidC
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The \'\'Discworld/InterestingTimes\'\' one actually makes sense - since it\'s currently near the \'\'end\' of the Century of the Fruitbat, Cohen is probably working on the assumption that, if it\'s not the Century of the Anchovy yet, he hasn\'t hit a hundred.
to:
The \\\'\\\'Discworld/InterestingTimes\\\'\\\' one actually makes sense - since it\\\'s currently near the \\\'\\\'end\\\'\\\' of the Century of the Fruitbat, Cohen is probably working on the assumption that, if it\\\'s not the Century of the Anchovy yet, he hasn\\\'t hit a hundred.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The \'\'Discworld/InterestingTimes\'\' one actually makes sense - if it\'s still the Century of the Fruitbat, Cohen is probably about ninety. If it\'s the Century of the Anchovy, he\'s likely to be closer to a hundred.
to:
The \\\'\\\'Discworld/InterestingTimes\\\'\\\' one actually makes sense - since it\\\'s currently near the \\\'\\\'end\\\' of the Century of the Fruitbat, Cohen is probably working on the assumption that, if it\\\'s not the Century of the Anchovy yet, he hasn\\\'t hit a hundred.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The \'\'Discworld/InterestingTimes\'\' one actually makes sense - if it\'s still the Century of the Fruitbat, Cohen is probably about ninety. If it\'s the Century of the Anchovy, he\'s more likely to be a hundred.
to:
The \\\'\\\'Discworld/InterestingTimes\\\'\\\' one actually makes sense - if it\\\'s still the Century of the Fruitbat, Cohen is probably about ninety. If it\\\'s the Century of the Anchovy, he\\\'s likely to be closer to a hundred.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Holy crap, no. No, no, a googleplex of no. Every story is disputed by someone. I think the best way to handle it is a three sentence limit for negative comments. Lets face it, if it goes beyond 3 sentences it\'s a rant not a comment.
to:
Holy crap, no. No, no, a Googolplex of no. Every story is disputed by someone. I think the best way to handle it is a three sentence limit for negative comments. Lets face it, if it goes beyond 3 sentences it\\\'s a rant not a comment.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Holy crap, no. No, no, a googleplex of no. Every story is disputed by someone. I think the best way to handle it is a three sentence limit for negative cooments. Lets face it, if it goes beyond 3 sentences it\'s a rant not a comment.
to:
Holy crap, no. No, no, a googleplex of no. Every story is disputed by someone. I think the best way to handle it is a three sentence limit for negative comments. Lets face it, if it goes beyond 3 sentences it\\\'s a rant not a comment.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Holy crap, no. No, no, a googleplex of no. Every story is disputed by someone. I think the best way to handle it is a three sentence limit. Lets face it, if it goes beyond 3 sentences it\'s a rant not a comment.
to:
Holy crap, no. No, no, a googleplex of no. Every story is disputed by someone. I think the best way to handle it is a three sentence limit for negative cooments. Lets face it, if it goes beyond 3 sentences it\\\'s a rant not a comment.
