[004]
piearty
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I just noticed that it\'s kind of obvious in [[http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=168 this strip]] that Scott knows a heckuva lot more about FMA than HP. I dunno, just a random thought.
to:
I just noticed that it\\\'s kind of obvious in [[http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=168 this strip]] that Scott knows a heckuva lot more about FMA than HP. In fact, I doubt he knows anything about HP other than from PopculturalOsmosis. I dunno, just a random thought.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->\'\'\
to:
-->\\\'\\\'\\\"Trying to prove that a trope is realistic, and thus should not be criticised, in order to prove that tropes don\\\'t have to be realistic to be good tools is not very logical.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Didn\\\'t I just say that I was \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' trying to prove that this trope is always realistic? I\\\'m pretty sure I did:
\\\"Regardless of what you may claim, it\\\'s not a lengthy dissertation (or, shockingly enough, a soapbox) that starfighters are always realistic. It\\\'s a short notice that, yes, this trope can be plausibly done even in \\\"hard\\\" science fiction, regardless of what the naysayers claim. Again: Tropes Are Not Bad.\\\"
There\\\'s a miles-wide difference between what you said I was saying, and what I actually said.
-->\\\'\\\'\\\"It would be nice if you at least changed your comment to something more generic, instead of specifically calling out Atomic Rocket or accusing people who try to add one line (without deleting any of yours, to be noted) of trying to use the trope as their soapbox when you have no evidence that this was their intention.\\\"\\\'\\\'
I may do that, then, since Atomic Rocket is just one in a group of interlinking sites making such claims.
However, given what has happened on this trope page since you launched it, what happened on the OldSchoolDogfighting page long before, and the general attitude Atomic Rocket takes toward this trope, I think I have more than adequate reason to suspect their intentions when people make edits like that.
Didn\\\'t I just say that I was \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' trying to prove that this trope is always realistic? I\\\'m pretty sure I did:
\\\"Regardless of what you may claim, it\\\'s not a lengthy dissertation (or, shockingly enough, a soapbox) that starfighters are always realistic. It\\\'s a short notice that, yes, this trope can be plausibly done even in \\\"hard\\\" science fiction, regardless of what the naysayers claim. Again: Tropes Are Not Bad.\\\"
There\\\'s a miles-wide difference between what you said I was saying, and what I actually said.
-->\\\'\\\'\\\"It would be nice if you at least changed your comment to something more generic, instead of specifically calling out Atomic Rocket or accusing people who try to add one line (without deleting any of yours, to be noted) of trying to use the trope as their soapbox when you have no evidence that this was their intention.\\\"\\\'\\\'
I may do that, then, since Atomic Rocket is just one in a group of interlinking sites making such claims.
However, given what has happened on this trope page since you launched it, what happened on the OldSchoolDogfighting page long before, and the general attitude Atomic Rocket takes toward this trope, I think I have more than adequate reason to suspect their intentions when people make edits like that.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->\'\'\
to:
-->\\\'\\\'\\\"Trying to prove that a trope is realistic, and thus should not be criticised, in order to prove that tropes don\\\'t have to be realistic to be good tools is not very logical.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Didn\\\'t I just say that I was \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' trying to prove that this trope is always realistic? I\\\'m pretty sure I did:
\\\"Regardless of what you may claim, it\\\'s not a lengthy dissertation (or, shockingly enough, a soapbox) that starfighters are always realistic. It\\\'s a short notice that, yes, this trope can be plausibly done even in \\\"hard\\\" science fiction, regardless of what the naysayers claim. Again: Tropes Are Not Bad.\\\"
There\\\'s a miles-wide difference between what you said I was saying, and what I actually said.
-->\\\'\\\'\\\"It would be nice if you at least changed your comment to something more generic, instead of specifically calling out Atomic Rocket or accusing people who try to add one line (without deleting any of yours, to be noted) of trying to use the trope as their soapbox when you have no evidence that this was their intention.\\\"\\\'\\\'
I may do that, then, since Atomic Rocket is just one in a group of interlinking sites making such claims.
However, given what has happened on this trope page since you launched it, what happened on the OldSchoolDogfighting page long before, and the general attitude Atomic Rocket takes toward this trope, I think I have more than adequate reason to suspect their intentions when they do this.
Didn\\\'t I just say that I was \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' trying to prove that this trope is always realistic? I\\\'m pretty sure I did:
\\\"Regardless of what you may claim, it\\\'s not a lengthy dissertation (or, shockingly enough, a soapbox) that starfighters are always realistic. It\\\'s a short notice that, yes, this trope can be plausibly done even in \\\"hard\\\" science fiction, regardless of what the naysayers claim. Again: Tropes Are Not Bad.\\\"
There\\\'s a miles-wide difference between what you said I was saying, and what I actually said.
-->\\\'\\\'\\\"It would be nice if you at least changed your comment to something more generic, instead of specifically calling out Atomic Rocket or accusing people who try to add one line (without deleting any of yours, to be noted) of trying to use the trope as their soapbox when you have no evidence that this was their intention.\\\"\\\'\\\'
I may do that, then, since Atomic Rocket is just one in a group of interlinking sites making such claims.
However, given what has happened on this trope page since you launched it, what happened on the OldSchoolDogfighting page long before, and the general attitude Atomic Rocket takes toward this trope, I think I have more than adequate reason to suspect their intentions when they do this.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
-->\'\'\
to:
-->\\\'\\\'\\\"Trying to prove that a trope is realistic, and thus should not be criticised, in order to prove that tropes don\\\'t have to be realistic to be good tools is not very logical.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Didn\\\'t I just say that I was \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' trying to prove a trope is always realistic and with the paragraph? I\\\'m pretty sure I did:
\\\"Regardless of what you may claim, it\\\'s not a lengthy dissertation (or, shockingly enough, a soapbox) that starfighters are always realistic. It\\\'s a short notice that, yes, this trope can be plausibly done even in \\\"hard\\\" science fiction, regardless of what the naysayers claim. Again: Tropes Are Not Bad.\\\"
There\\\'s a miles-wide difference between what you said I was saying, and what I actually said.
-->\\\'\\\'\\\"It would be nice if you at least changed your comment to something more generic, instead of specifically calling out Atomic Rocket or accusing people who try to add one line (without deleting any of yours, to be noted) of trying to use the trope as their soapbox when you have no evidence that this was their intention.\\\"\\\'\\\'
I may do that, then, since Atomic Rocket is just one in a group of interlinking sites making such claims.
However, given what has happened on this trope page since you launched it, what happened on the OldSchoolDogfighting page long before, and the general attitude Atomic Rocket takes toward this trope, I think I have more than adequate reason to suspect their intentions when they do this.
Didn\\\'t I just say that I was \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' trying to prove a trope is always realistic and with the paragraph? I\\\'m pretty sure I did:
\\\"Regardless of what you may claim, it\\\'s not a lengthy dissertation (or, shockingly enough, a soapbox) that starfighters are always realistic. It\\\'s a short notice that, yes, this trope can be plausibly done even in \\\"hard\\\" science fiction, regardless of what the naysayers claim. Again: Tropes Are Not Bad.\\\"
There\\\'s a miles-wide difference between what you said I was saying, and what I actually said.
-->\\\'\\\'\\\"It would be nice if you at least changed your comment to something more generic, instead of specifically calling out Atomic Rocket or accusing people who try to add one line (without deleting any of yours, to be noted) of trying to use the trope as their soapbox when you have no evidence that this was their intention.\\\"\\\'\\\'
I may do that, then, since Atomic Rocket is just one in a group of interlinking sites making such claims.
However, given what has happened on this trope page since you launched it, what happened on the OldSchoolDogfighting page long before, and the general attitude Atomic Rocket takes toward this trope, I think I have more than adequate reason to suspect their intentions when they do this.
