[004]
harotype
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Aside from the fact that editing something back after another troper changes it is the definition of an edit war, how can you argue that the same guy who\'s a famous example of UglyGuyHotWife is supposed to be TallDarkAndHandome?
to:
Aside from the fact that editing something back after another troper changes it is the definition of an edit war, how can you argue that the same guy who\\\'s a famous example of UglyGuyHotWife is supposed to be TallDarkAndHandsome?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
to:
Aside from the fact that editing something back after another troper changes it is the definition of an edit war, how can you argue that the same guy who\\\'s a famous example of UglyGuyHotWife is supposed to be TallDarkAndHandome?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
As I said, debonair is not a noun. And it since it\'s clearly not played straight, isn\'t agreed as a subversion, and is only meant to apply to the actors and is long since covered in HistoricalBeautyUpgrade, maybe there isn\'t a point in trying to force this one?
to:
As I said, debonair is not a noun. And it since it\\\'s clearly not played straight, isn\\\'t agreed as a subversion, and is only meant to apply to the actors and is long since better covered in HistoricalBeautyUpgrade, maybe there isn\\\'t a point in trying to force this one?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
As I said, debonair is not a noun. And it since it\'s clearly not played straight, isn\'t agreed as a subversion, and is only meant to apply to the actors and is long since covered in HistoricalBeautyUgrade, maybe there isn\'t a point in trying to force this one?
to:
As I said, debonair is not a noun. And it since it\\\'s clearly not played straight, isn\\\'t agreed as a subversion, and is only meant to apply to the actors and is long since covered in HistoricalBeautyUpgrade, maybe there isn\\\'t a point in trying to force this one?
