Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Analysis / MultiplayerOnlineBattleArena

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
* 1. Too rare to categorize. Pretty much exclusive to fencing-based heroes.\\\\
\\\\
* 2. Who\'s Smite? I assume you meant Leoric. Some potential here, since heroes with giant maces are likely to have low attack speed but high attack damage. That\'s a solid connective thread.\\\\
\\\\
* 3. Too rare. I\'ll also note that Illidan isn\'t using tonfas, but rather twin warglaives (basically big double-sided swords) with a grip between the blades rather than off the sides, so that\'s not even an example.\\\\
\\\\
to:
* 1. Too rare to categorize. Pretty much exclusive to fencing-based heroes.

* 2. Who\\\'s Smite? I assume you meant Leoric. Some potential here, since heroes with giant maces are likely to have low attack speed but high attack damage. That\\\'s a solid connective thread.

* 3. Too rare. I\\\'ll also note that Illidan isn\\\'t using tonfas, but rather twin warglaives (basically big double-sided swords) with a grip between the blades rather than off the sides, so that\\\'s not even an example.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
1. Too rare to categorize. Pretty much exclusive to fencing-based heroes.\\\\
to:
* 1. Too rare to categorize. Pretty much exclusive to fencing-based heroes.\\\\\\\\
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
2. Who\'s Smite? I assume you meant Leoric. Some potential here, since heroes with giant maces are likely to have low attack speed but high attack damage. That\'s a solid connective thread.\\\\
to:
* 2. Who\\\'s Smite? I assume you meant Leoric. Some potential here, since heroes with giant maces are likely to have low attack speed but high attack damage. That\\\'s a solid connective thread.\\\\\\\\
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
3. Too rare. I\'ll also note that Illidan isn\'t using tonfas, but rather twin warglaives (basically big double-sided swords) with a grip between the blades rather than off the sides, so that\'s not even an example.\\\\
to:
* 3. Too rare. I\\\'ll also note that Illidan isn\\\'t using tonfas, but rather twin warglaives (basically big double-sided swords) with a grip between the blades rather than off the sides, so that\\\'s not even an example.\\\\\\\\
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
4. It should noted under a BareFistedMonk-type example rather than just unarmed combat. There\'s a lot more commonality between the playstyles of Lee Sin and Kharazim than there is with Udyr - namely being a FragileSpeedster and dashing around. That\'s a strong connection.
to:
* 4. It should noted under a BareFistedMonk-type example rather than just unarmed combat. There\\\'s a lot more commonality between the playstyles of Lee Sin and Kharazim than there is with Udyr - namely being a FragileSpeedster and dashing around. That\\\'s a strong connection.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
1. Too rare to categorize. Pretty much exclusive to fencing-based heroes.
2. Who\'s Smite? I assume you meant Leoric. Some potential here, since heroes with giant maces are likely to have low attack speed but high attack damage. That\'s a solid connective thread.
3. Too rare. I\'ll also note that Illidan isn\'t using tonfas, but rather twin warglaives (basically big double-sided swords) with a grip between the blades rather than off the sides, so that\'s not even an example.
to:
1. Too rare to categorize. Pretty much exclusive to fencing-based heroes.\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\
2. Who\\\'s Smite? I assume you meant Leoric. Some potential here, since heroes with giant maces are likely to have low attack speed but high attack damage. That\\\'s a solid connective thread.\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\
3. Too rare. I\\\'ll also note that Illidan isn\\\'t using tonfas, but rather twin warglaives (basically big double-sided swords) with a grip between the blades rather than off the sides, so that\\\'s not even an example.\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\
Top