Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / CensorSuds

Go To

Changed line(s) 5 from:
to:

🙄
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
↑[[https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2]]…
to:
https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2
to:
↑[[https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2]]…
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
[[https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2]]…
to:
https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2
to:
[[https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2]]…
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
[[YouKeepUsingThatWord I do not think it means what you think it means]]:
to:
https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
[[https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2 I do not think it means what you think it means]]:
to:
[[YouKeepUsingThatWord I do not think it means what you think it means]]:
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]Well \'\'of course\'\' he\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Two sentences later:
to:
[[https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2 I do not think it means what you think it means]]:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\'s kinda only one person who gets \'\'this\'\' defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]Well \\\'\\\'of course\\\'\\\' he\\\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
😏:
to:
Two sentences later:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]there\'s kinda only one person who gets \'\'this\'\' defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]Well \'\'of course\'\' he\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
[[https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2 I do not think it means what you think it means]]:
to:
😏:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\'s kinda only one person who gets \'\'this\'\' defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]Well \'\'of course\'\' he\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2:[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\'s kinda only one person who gets \'\'this\'\' defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]Well \\\'\\\'of course\\\'\\\' he\\\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]

[[https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2 I do not think it means what you think it means]]:

[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
@Tropers/{{Shaoken}}:

@Tropers/{{Hawkatana}}:

Meanwhile, strawmen and ad-hominems are Good Faith 101 - right?😏:

[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\'s kinda only one person who gets \'\'this\'\' defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]Well \\\'\\\'of course\\\'\\\' he\\\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]https://youtu.be/emhy-RV3oq4?t=2:[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Meanwhile, ad hominems are Good Faith 101 - right?😏:
to:
Meanwhile, strawmen and ad-hominems are Good Faith 101 - right?😏:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
But I assume that such a strawman is Good Faith 101, right?😏:
to:
Meanwhile, ad hominems are Good Faith 101 - right?😏:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Meanwhile, strawmen like this are Good Faith 101 - right?😏:
to:
But I assume that such a strawman is Good Faith 101, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Meanwhile, statements like this are Good Faith 101 - right?😏:
to:
Meanwhile, strawmen like this are Good Faith 101 - right?😏:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
to:
Changed line(s) 1 from:
to:
Changed line(s) 2 from:
to:
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
@Tropers:{{Hawkatana}}:
to:
@Tropers/{{Hawkatana}}:
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
to:
@Tropers:{{Hawkatana}}:
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
to:
Changed line(s) 0 from:
to:
@Tropers/{{Shaoken}}:
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]Well \'\'of course\'\' he\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
to:
Meanwhile, statements like this are Good Faith 101 - right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that strawman attacks are Good Faith 101, right?😏:
to:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Meanwhile, strawman attacks are Good Faith 101 - right?😏:
to:
But I assume that strawman attacks are Good Faith 101, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But strawman attacks are Good Faith 101, right?😏:
to:
Meanwhile, strawman attacks are Good Faith 101 - right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that strawman attacks are as faithful as arguments get, right?😏:
to:
But strawman attacks are Good Faith 101, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that left-field ad hominems and over-the-top strawmen are as faithful as arguments get, right?😏:
to:
But I assume that strawman attacks are as faithful as arguments get, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that extreme strawmen and unprovoked ad hominems are as faithful as can be, right?😏:
to:
But I assume that left-field ad hominems and over-the-top strawmen are as faithful as arguments get, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that strawmen and ad hominems are Good Faith 101, right?😏:
to:
But I assume that extreme strawmen and unprovoked ad hominems are as faithful as can be, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that extreme strawmen and unprovoked ad hominems are as faithful as it gets, right?😏:
to:
But I assume that strawmen and ad hominems are Good Faith 101, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an overboard strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
to:
But I assume that extreme strawmen and unprovoked ad hominems are as faithful as it gets, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
to:
But I assume that an overboard strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]\'\'of course\'\' he\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]Well \\\'\\\'of course\\\'\\\' he\\\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
to:
But I assume that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]there\'s kinda only one person who gets \'\'this\'\' defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come?😏:
to:
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
to:
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
to:
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
to:
But I assume that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]Well \'\'of course\'\' he\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]\\\'\\\'of course\\\'\\\' he\\\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\'s kinda only one person who gets \'\'this\'\' defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But an extreme strawman + an unprovoked ad hominem = Good Faith 101, right?😏:
to:
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is as faithful as they come, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But extreme strawman + unprovoked ad hominem = Good Faith 101, right?😏
to:
But an extreme strawman + an unprovoked ad hominem = Good Faith 101, right?😏:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Meanwhile, an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?😕
to:
But extreme strawman + unprovoked ad hominem = Good Faith 101, right?😏
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]Well \'\'of course\'\' he\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]Meanwhile, an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?😕[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\'s kinda only one person who gets \'\'this\'\' defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]Well \\\'\\\'of course\\\'\\\' he\\\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]

Meanwhile, an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?😕

[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]Well \'\'of course\'\' he\'s not arguing in good faith. I just thought I\'d point out the history behind the case. At this stage, there\'s kinda only one person who gets \'\'this\'\' defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]

Meanwhile, an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?😕
to:
[[quoteblock]]Well \\\'\\\'of course\\\'\\\' he\\\'s not arguing in good faith.[[/quoteblock]]Meanwhile, an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?😕[[quoteblock]]At this stage, there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?😕
to:
Meanwhile, an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?😕
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?
to:
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?😕
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I tend to be wary of any argument-advice with an extreme strawman and/or unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
But I assume that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I tend to be wary of argument-advice with extreme strawmen and/or unprovoked ad hominems. But that\'s just me.
to:
I tend to be wary of any argument-advice with an extreme strawman and/or unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I tend to be wary of argument-advice with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
I tend to be wary of argument-advice with extreme strawmen and/or unprovoked ad hominems. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Somehow, I can\'t help but feel that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem isn\'t exactly the best kind of argument-advice. But that\'s just me.
to:
I tend to be wary of argument-advice with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Somehow, I don\'t think argument-advice works too well with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
Somehow, I can\\\'t help but feel that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem isn\\\'t exactly the best kind of argument-advice. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Somehow, I doubt we should be taking argument-advice when it wraps-up with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
Somehow, I don\\\'t think argument-advice works too well with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I don\'t think it\'s the best idea to give argument-advice with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
Somehow, I doubt we should be taking argument-advice when it wraps-up with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For some reason, I tend to be quite wary of any argument-advice that concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
I don\\\'t think it\\\'s the best idea to give argument-advice with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For some reason, I tend to be extremely wary of any argument-advice that concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
For some reason, I tend to be quite wary of any argument-advice that concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For some reason, I can\'t help but feel it\'s not the best idea to take argument-advice when it concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
For some reason, I tend to be extremely wary of any argument-advice that concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I don\'t think it\'s wise to take argument-advice in the form of an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
For some reason, I can\\\'t help but feel it\\\'s not the best idea to take argument-advice when it concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For some reason, I can\'t help but feel it\'s not the best idea to take argument-advice when it concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
I don\\\'t think it\\\'s wise to take argument-advice in the form of an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For some reason, I can\'t help but feel that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem isn\'t exactly the best argument-advice to give. But that\'s just me.
to:
For some reason, I can\\\'t help but feel it\\\'s not the best idea to take argument-advice when it concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For some reason, I can\'t help but feel it\'s not the best idea to give argument-advice in the form of an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
For some reason, I can\\\'t help but feel that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem isn\\\'t exactly the best argument-advice to give. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For some reason, I can\'t help but think it\'s not the best idea to take argument-advice when the advisor concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
For some reason, I can\\\'t help but feel it\\\'s not the best idea to give argument-advice in the form of an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For some reason, I don\'t think it\'s the best idea to take argument-advice when the advisor concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\'s just me.
to:
For some reason, I can\\\'t help but think it\\\'s not the best idea to take argument-advice when the advisor concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101, right?
to:
For some reason, I don\\\'t think it\\\'s the best idea to take argument-advice when the advisor concludes with an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem. But that\\\'s just me.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101, right?
to:
But an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101, right?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]Well \'\'of course\'\' he\'s not arguing in good faith. I just thought I\'d point out the history behind the case. At this stage, there\'s kinda only one person who gets \'\'this\'\' defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]Well \\\'\\\'of course\\\'\\\' he\\\'s not arguing in good faith. I just thought I\\\'d point out the history behind the case. At this stage, there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats to judges[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]Well of course he\'s not arguing in good faith. I just thought I\'d point out the history behind the case. At this stage, there\'s kinda only one person who gets this defensive towards Vic, and it\'s the kind who sends death threats[[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]Well \\\'\\\'of course\\\'\\\' he\\\'s not arguing in good faith. I just thought I\\\'d point out the history behind the case. At this stage, there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
@Tropers/{{Hawkatana}}:
to:
Changed line(s) 2 from:
to:
[[quoteblock]]Well of course he\\\'s not arguing in good faith. I just thought I\\\'d point out the history behind the case. At this stage, there\\\'s kinda only one person who gets this defensive towards Vic, and it\\\'s the kind who sends death threats[[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?
to:
But I assume that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101, right?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is Good Faith 101?
to:
But I assume that an extreme strawman and unprovoked ad hominem is Good Faith 101?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But an extreme, unprovoked strawman? That\'s just Good Faith 101. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QuygM0YB8
to:
But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is Good Faith 101?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And an extreme, unprovoked strawman is Good Faith 101? Got it.
to:
But an extreme, unprovoked strawman? That\\\'s just Good Faith 101. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QuygM0YB8
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Nor is an extreme, unprovoked strawman.
to:
And an extreme, unprovoked strawman is Good Faith 101? Got it.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is Good Faith 101?
to:
Nor is an extreme, unprovoked strawman.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is Good Faith 101 - right?
to:
But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is Good Faith 101?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that extreme, unprovoked strawmen are Good Faith 101 - right?
to:
But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is Good Faith 101 - right?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that extreme, unprovoked strawmen are Good Faith 101?
to:
But I assume that extreme, unprovoked strawmen are Good Faith 101 - right?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Meanwhile - extreme, unprovoked strawmen are Good Faith 101. Right?
to:
But I assume that extreme, unprovoked strawmen are Good Faith 101?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is Good Faith 101 - right?
to:
Meanwhile - extreme, unprovoked strawmen are Good Faith 101. Right?
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman.
to:

But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is Good Faith 101 - right?
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n

Somehow - I doubt it\'s smart to take good-faith lessonsassume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman.
to:
assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is the epitome of good faith - right?
to:
Somehow - I doubt it\\\'s smart to take good-faith lessonsassume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Meanwhile - an extreme, unprovoked strawman is the epitome of good faith. Right?
to:
But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is the epitome of good faith - right?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But I assume that an extreme, unprovoked strawman is the epitome of good faith - right?
to:
Meanwhile - an extreme, unprovoked strawman is the epitome of good faith. Right?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
to:
Top