Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / RWBYSolitas

Go To

[022] Wyldchyld Current Version
Changed line(s) 17 from:
n
What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\'t mean he\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism of him has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is. Depending on how the Atlas arc plays out, I could see an argument being made that Ironwood is an in-universe deconstruction of the BigGood trope rather than a genuine BigGood example -- he so desperately wants to be, but his actions get deconstructed by other protagonists in-universe, and he doesn\'t have the impact of the people of Remnant that he wants (he wants them to feel safe, but his actions make them feel the opposite, and allow the villains to manipulate him to magnify that problem and make people blame Atlas for the fall of Beacon).
to:
What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\\\'t mean he\\\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism of him has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is. Depending on how the Atlas arc plays out, I could see an argument being made that Ironwood is an in-universe deconstruction of the BigGood trope rather than a genuine BigGood example -- he so desperately wants to be, but his actions get deconstructed by other protagonists in-universe, and he doesn\\\'t have the impact of the people of Remnant that he wants (for example, he wants them to feel safe, but his actions make them feel the opposite, and allow the villains to manipulate him to magnify that problem and make people blame Atlas for the fall of Beacon).
Changed line(s) 17 from:
n
What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\'t mean he\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism of him has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is. Depending on how the Atlas arc plays out, I could see an argument being made that Ironwood is an in-universe deconstruction of the BigGood trope rather than a genuine BigGood example -- he so desperately wants to be, but his actions get deconstructed in-universe, and he doesn\'t have the impact of the people of Remnant that he wants (he wants them to feel safe, but his actions make them feel the opposite, and allow the villains to manipulate him to magnify that problem and make people blame Atlas for the fall of Beacon).
to:
What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\\\'t mean he\\\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism of him has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is. Depending on how the Atlas arc plays out, I could see an argument being made that Ironwood is an in-universe deconstruction of the BigGood trope rather than a genuine BigGood example -- he so desperately wants to be, but his actions get deconstructed by other protagonists in-universe, and he doesn\\\'t have the impact of the people of Remnant that he wants (he wants them to feel safe, but his actions make them feel the opposite, and allow the villains to manipulate him to magnify that problem and make people blame Atlas for the fall of Beacon).
Changed line(s) 17 from:
n
What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\'t mean he\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism of him has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is. Depending on how the Atlas arc plays out, I could see an argument being made that Ironwood is an in-universe deconstruction of the BigGood trope rather than a genuine BigGood example -- he so desperately wants to be, but his actions get deconstruction in-universe, and he doesn\'t have the impact of the people of Remnant that he wants (he wants them to feel safe, but his actions make them feel the opposite, and allow the villains to manipulate him to magnify that problem and make people blame Atlas for the fall of Beacon).
to:
What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\\\'t mean he\\\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism of him has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is. Depending on how the Atlas arc plays out, I could see an argument being made that Ironwood is an in-universe deconstruction of the BigGood trope rather than a genuine BigGood example -- he so desperately wants to be, but his actions get deconstructed in-universe, and he doesn\\\'t have the impact of the people of Remnant that he wants (he wants them to feel safe, but his actions make them feel the opposite, and allow the villains to manipulate him to magnify that problem and make people blame Atlas for the fall of Beacon).
Changed line(s) 17 from:
n
What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\'t mean he\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism of him has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is.
to:
What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\\\'t mean he\\\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism of him has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is. Depending on how the Atlas arc plays out, I could see an argument being made that Ironwood is an in-universe deconstruction of the BigGood trope rather than a genuine BigGood example -- he so desperately wants to be, but his actions get deconstruction in-universe, and he doesn\\\'t have the impact of the people of Remnant that he wants (he wants them to feel safe, but his actions make them feel the opposite, and allow the villains to manipulate him to magnify that problem and make people blame Atlas for the fall of Beacon).
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
That\'s the situation we see in this story. Ironwood\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \'army\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\'s held the most power of all the protagonists, but he has never played a BigGood role. The role of BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \'there will be no victory in strength\' and that the key lies with a \'simple soul\' (which we think is Ruby).
to:
That\\\'s the situation we see in this story. Ironwood\\\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \\\'army\\\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\\\'s held the most power of all the protagonists, but he has never played a BigGood role. The role of BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\\\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \\\'there will be no victory in strength\\\' and that the key lies with a \\\'simple soul\\\' (which we think is Ruby). And the protagonists warn Ironwood that, while he wants the world to look to him for reassurance, they will instead look to him in fear -- because his might does not represent safety to the people, it represents war.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
That\'s the situation we see in this story. Ironwood\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \'army\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\'s held the most power of all the protagonists. The role of BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \'there will be no victory in strength\' and that the key lies with a \'simple soul\' (which we think is Ruby).
to:
That\\\'s the situation we see in this story. Ironwood\\\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \\\'army\\\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\\\'s held the most power of all the protagonists, but he has never played a BigGood role. The role of BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\\\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \\\'there will be no victory in strength\\\' and that the key lies with a \\\'simple soul\\\' (which we think is Ruby).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Ironwood holding two seats on the council and controlling the only army in the whole of the story\'s setting does not automatically make him a BigGood; a character who is TheLeader of the most powerful protagonist force certainly can be a BigGood, but they\'re not automatically that trope. It\'s trope shoehorning to act like that\'s all that\'s needed for a character to be a BigGood. There\'s more to the trope than just that, which is why a story with only one BigGood will often not give the role to the most physically and/or politically powerful leader in the setting -- the BigGood in these stories, will usually be TheMentor instead, with the story\'s role being defined by wisdom and experience instead of physical might.
to:
Ironwood holding two seats on the council and controlling the only army in the whole of the story\\\'s setting does not automatically make him a BigGood; a character who is TheLeader of the most powerful protagonist force certainly can be a BigGood, but they\\\'re not automatically that trope. It\\\'s trope shoehorning to act like that\\\'s all that\\\'s needed for a character to be a BigGood. There\\\'s more to the trope than just that, which is why a story with only one BigGood will often not give the role to the most physically and/or politically powerful leader in the setting -- the BigGood in these stories will usually be TheMentor instead, with the story\\\'s role being defined by wisdom and experience instead of physical might.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Ironwood holding two seats on the council and controlling the only army in the whole of the story\'s setting does not automatically make him a BigGood; a character who is TheLeader of the most powerful protagonist force certainly can be a BigGood, but they\'re not automatically that trope. It\'s trope shoehorning to act like that\'s all that\'s needed for a character to be a BigGood. There\'s more to the trope than just that. Indeed, a BigGood in a story doesn\'t even need to be the protagonist with the most power in the setting -- it\'s very common for a story with only one BigGood to assign that role to TheMentor instead of the most powerful protagonist.
to:
Ironwood holding two seats on the council and controlling the only army in the whole of the story\\\'s setting does not automatically make him a BigGood; a character who is TheLeader of the most powerful protagonist force certainly can be a BigGood, but they\\\'re not automatically that trope. It\\\'s trope shoehorning to act like that\\\'s all that\\\'s needed for a character to be a BigGood. There\\\'s more to the trope than just that, which is why a story with only one BigGood will often not give the role to the most physically and/or politically powerful leader in the setting -- the BigGood in these stories, will usually be TheMentor instead, with the story\\\'s role being defined by wisdom and experience instead of physical might.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Ironwood\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \'army\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\'s held the most power of all the protagonists. The role of BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \'there will be no victory in strength\' and that the key lies with a \'simple soul\' (which we think is Ruby).
to:
That\\\'s the situation we see in this story. Ironwood\\\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \\\'army\\\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\\\'s held the most power of all the protagonists. The role of BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\\\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \\\'there will be no victory in strength\\\' and that the key lies with a \\\'simple soul\\\' (which we think is Ruby).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Ironwood holding two seats on the council and controlling the only army in the whole of the story\'s setting does not automatically make him a BigGood, and it\'s trope shoehorning to act like that\'s all that\'s needed for a character to be a BigGood.
to:
Ironwood holding two seats on the council and controlling the only army in the whole of the story\\\'s setting does not automatically make him a BigGood; a character who is TheLeader of the most powerful protagonist force certainly can be a BigGood, but they\\\'re not automatically that trope. It\\\'s trope shoehorning to act like that\\\'s all that\\\'s needed for a character to be a BigGood. There\\\'s more to the trope than just that. Indeed, a BigGood in a story doesn\\\'t even need to be the protagonist with the most power in the setting -- it\\\'s very common for a story with only one BigGood to assign that role to TheMentor instead of the most powerful protagonist.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
But the BigGood doesn\'t have to be TheLeader. They certainly can be, and they certainly can be the protagonist with the greatest physical power (which is what you\'re latching onto with Ironwood) but doesn\'t automatically qualify someone for the trope. There\'s more to the trope than just that, and a BigGood doesn\'t even have to have that aspect of physical power to qualify.
to:
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
In this story, the role of BigGood has been defined by the fact that the BigBad\'s adversary is Ozpin (well, technically Ozma, but Ozpin and Ozma are troped as one being because they\'s how they\'ve functioned in the Ozpin identity). The other headmasters were subordinate to Ozpin not because they had less power than him (indeed, the entire point of Ironwood\'s role in the story has been partially to show that he has greater political and physical power than Ozpin) but because Ozpin has the greatest knowledge, wisdom and experience with dealing with the threat of the BigBad. Even with the transfer from Ozpin to Oscar, Ozma\'s message (to Oscar) has been about guiding the world. The God of Light\'s message to Ozma was about guiding humanity. Ozma\'s entire back story indicates that he tends to lose his way when he\'s TheLeader and that he functions best as TheMentor; that the purpose of the BigGood in this story is to be TheMentor.
to:
In this story, the role of BigGood has been defined by the fact that the BigBad\\\'s adversary is Ozpin (well, technically Ozma, but Ozpin and Ozma are troped as one being because they\\\'s how they\\\'ve functioned in the Ozpin identity). The other headmasters were subordinate to Ozpin not because they had less power than him (indeed, the entire point of Ironwood\\\'s role in the story has been partially to show that he has greater political and physical power than Ozpin) but because Ozpin has the greatest knowledge, wisdom and experience with dealing with the threat of the BigBad. Even with the transfer from Ozpin to Oscar, Ozma\\\'s message (to Oscar) has been about guiding the world. The God of Light\\\'s message to Ozma was about guiding humanity. Ozma\\\'s entire back story indicates that he tends to lose his way when he\\\'s TheLeader and that he functions best as TheMentor, that the purpose of the BigGood trope in this story is to be TheMentor to the entire world when the world needs mentoring and guidance.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
In this story, the role of BigGood has been defined by the fact that the BigBad\'s adversary is Ozpin (well, technically Ozma, but Ozpin and Ozma are troped as one being because they\'s how they\'ve functioned in the Ozpin identity). The other headmasters were subordinate to Ozpin not because they had less power than him (indeed, the entire point of Ironwood\'s role in the story has been partially to show that he has greater political and physical power than Ozpin) but because Ozpin has the greatest knowledge, wisdom and experience with dealing with the threat of the BigBad. Even with the transfer from Ozpin to Oscar, Ozma\'s message (to Oscar) has been about guiding the world. The God of Light\'s message to Ozma was about guiding humanity. Ozma\'s entire back story indicates that he tends to lose his way when he\'s TheLeader.
to:
In this story, the role of BigGood has been defined by the fact that the BigBad\\\'s adversary is Ozpin (well, technically Ozma, but Ozpin and Ozma are troped as one being because they\\\'s how they\\\'ve functioned in the Ozpin identity). The other headmasters were subordinate to Ozpin not because they had less power than him (indeed, the entire point of Ironwood\\\'s role in the story has been partially to show that he has greater political and physical power than Ozpin) but because Ozpin has the greatest knowledge, wisdom and experience with dealing with the threat of the BigBad. Even with the transfer from Ozpin to Oscar, Ozma\\\'s message (to Oscar) has been about guiding the world. The God of Light\\\'s message to Ozma was about guiding humanity. Ozma\\\'s entire back story indicates that he tends to lose his way when he\\\'s TheLeader and that he functions best as TheMentor; that the purpose of the BigGood in this story is to be TheMentor.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
In this story, the role of the BigGood has been defined by the fact that the BigBad\'s adversary is Ozpin (well, technically Ozma, but Ozpin and Ozma are troped as one being because they\'s how they\'ve functioned in the Ozpin identity). The other headmasters were subordinate to Ozpin not because they had less power than him (indeed, the entire point of Ironwood\'s role in the story has been partially to show that he has greater political and physical power than Ozpin) but because Ozpin has the greatest knowledge, wisdom and experience with dealing with the threat of the BigBad. Even with the transfer from Ozpin to Oscar, Ozma\'s message (to Oscar) has been about guiding the world. The God of Light\'s message to Ozma was about guiding humanity. Ozma\'s entire back story indicates that he tends to lose his way when he\'s TheLeader.
to:
In this story, the role of BigGood has been defined by the fact that the BigBad\\\'s adversary is Ozpin (well, technically Ozma, but Ozpin and Ozma are troped as one being because they\\\'s how they\\\'ve functioned in the Ozpin identity). The other headmasters were subordinate to Ozpin not because they had less power than him (indeed, the entire point of Ironwood\\\'s role in the story has been partially to show that he has greater political and physical power than Ozpin) but because Ozpin has the greatest knowledge, wisdom and experience with dealing with the threat of the BigBad. Even with the transfer from Ozpin to Oscar, Ozma\\\'s message (to Oscar) has been about guiding the world. The God of Light\\\'s message to Ozma was about guiding humanity. Ozma\\\'s entire back story indicates that he tends to lose his way when he\\\'s TheLeader.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Ironwood\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \'army\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\'s held the most power of all the protagonists. The role of the BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \'there will be no victory in strength\' and that the key lies with a \'simple soul\' (which we think is Ruby).
to:
Ironwood\\\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \\\'army\\\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\\\'s held the most power of all the protagonists. The role of BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\\\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \\\'there will be no victory in strength\\\' and that the key lies with a \\\'simple soul\\\' (which we think is Ruby).
Changed line(s) 19 from:
n
What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\'t mean he\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is.
to:
What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\\\'t mean he\\\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism of him has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is.
Changed line(s) 17 from:
to:

What I would say is that Ironwood does seem to see himself as a BigGood and he does seem to want to be a BigGood, but that doesn\\\'t mean he\\\'s actually playing the role -- indeed, the in-universe criticism has really been because of the difference that exists between what he wants to be and what he really is.
Changed line(s) 13 from:
n
There\'s another problem with defining Ironwood was a \'BigGood\' and that\'s the actual story role that we\'re seeing the show setting up for him -- which is a growing level of power consolidation that concerns the protagonists who are in the know, and creates the sense of growing dictatorial tendancies that may or may not be setting up Ironwood for a great fall. This is not the role of someone who is playing a BigGood, but of a subordinate to a BigGood who thinks they know better than the BigGood -- usually in stories, they come a cropper and have to eat humble pie, and while we have no idea if that really is what will happen to Ironwood, the role that\'s played out for him in the first six volumes has been this very character path.
to:
There\\\'s another problem with defining Ironwood as a \\\'BigGood\\\' and that\\\'s the actual story role that we\\\'re seeing the show setting up for him -- which is a growing level of power consolidation that concerns the protagonists who are in the know, and creates the sense of growing dictatorial tendencies that may or may not be setting up Ironwood for a great fall. This is not the role of someone who is playing a BigGood, but of a subordinate to a BigGood who thinks they know better than the BigGood -- usually in stories, they come a cropper and have to eat humble pie, and while we have no idea if that really is what will happen to Ironwood, the role that\\\'s played out for him in the first six volumes has been this instead of a path towards becoming a BigGood.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
As far as both the story set-ups, and the behaviour of the villains, are concerned, Ozpin remains the story\'s single BigGood. Even without Vale behind and in the body of a fourteen-year-old boy, the villains worry about what he\'s doing and what he\'s planning. The BigBad shows no particular concern about any threat Ironwood presents as the guy in charge of Atlas -- the only concern the villains ever express about him is that they don\'t want Atlas and Vacuo to team up, which suggests that Ironwood is not a BigGood to them because they\'re worrying about two kingdoms and two kingdom leaders tag-teaming, not the actions or threat level of a single kingdom or a single kingdom\'s leader. Meanwhile, Ozpin\'s mere presence causes the villains to panic and even causes the BigBad to change her plans.
to:
As far as both the story set-ups, and the behaviour of the villains, are concerned, Ozpin remains the story\\\'s single BigGood. Even without Vale behind him and in the body of a fourteen-year-old boy, the villains worry about what he\\\'s doing and what he\\\'s planning. The BigBad shows no particular concern about any threat Ironwood presents as the guy in charge of Atlas -- the only concern the villains ever express about him is that they don\\\'t want Atlas and Vacuo to team up, which suggests that Ironwood is not a BigGood to them because they\\\'re worrying about two kingdoms and two kingdom leaders tag-teaming, not the actions or threat level of a single kingdom or a single kingdom\\\'s leader. Meanwhile, Ozpin\\\'s mere presence causes the villains to panic and even causes the BigBad to change her plans.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Ironwood\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \'army\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\'s held the most power of all the protagonists. The role of the BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \'there will be no victory in strength\'.
to:
Ironwood\\\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \\\'army\\\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\\\'s held the most power of all the protagonists. The role of the BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\\\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \\\'there will be no victory in strength\\\' and that the key lies with a \\\'simple soul\\\' (which we think is Ruby).
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Ironwood\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \'army\' of Huntsmen. The role of the BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \'there will be no victory in strength\'.
to:
Ironwood\\\'s situation has not changed from the very first moment he was introduced to the show -- he has always had two seats on the council and he has always commanded the only army in the entire setting on top of his \\\'army\\\' of Huntsmen. He has therefore always been the character that\\\'s held the most power of all the protagonists. The role of the BigGood in this story has been defined by wisdom and experience, not by physical might. Indeed, that very point has been discussed in-universe multiple times, including the idea that physical might isn\\\'t the key to stopping the BigBad. Even the pilot episode warns \\\'there will be no victory in strength\\\'.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Ironwood holding two seats on the council and controlling the only army in the whole of the story\'s setting does not automatically make him a BigGood, and it\'s trope shoehorning to use only that to make him a BigGood.
to:
Ironwood holding two seats on the council and controlling the only army in the whole of the story\\\'s setting does not automatically make him a BigGood, and it\\\'s trope shoehorning to act like that\\\'s all that\\\'s needed for a character to be a BigGood.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I never said a show can\'t have more than one BigGood.
to:
I never said a show can\\\'t have more than one BigGood. I am, however, saying that this particular show only has one BigGood so far.
Changed line(s) 17 from:
n
Sometimes a BigGood can be TheLeader. In this story, the message has been that the role of BigGood is played by TheMentor instead -- which is another valid role for a BigGood to take.
to:
Sometimes a BigGood can be TheLeader. In this story, the message has been that the role of BigGood is played by TheMentor instead.
Top