Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / SheatheYourSword

Go To

[009] cherrychels Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I agree with [=XFllo=] and [=RoundRobin=]\'s removals. I think these are misuses and the Cersei example involves some FlameBait. Cersei is a villain but the character has fans, has been on-screen as a major character and developed for eight years, and it feels uncomfortable to say the site of a person (even fictional) becoming all bloodied and broken is satisfying -- and to argue that it should have been worse. I don\'t doubt this is how some feel but, as the example is currently written, it does seem FlameBait-y.
to:
I agree with [=XFllo=] and [=RoundRobin=]\\\'s removals. I think these are misuses and the Cersei example involves some FlameBait. Cersei is a villain but the character has fans, has been on-screen as a major character and developed for eight years, and it feels uncomfortable to say the sight of a person (even fictional) becoming all bloodied and broken is satisfying -- and to argue that it should have been worse. I don\\\'t doubt this is how some feel but, as the example is currently written, it does seem FlameBait-y.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I agree with [=XFllo=] and [=RoundRobin=]\'s removals. I think these are misuses and the Cersei example involves some FlameBait. Cersei is a villain but the character has fans, has been on-screen as a major character for eight years, and it feels uncomfortable to say the site of a person (even fictional) becoming all bloodied and broken is satisfying -- and to argue that it should have been worse. I don\'t doubt this is how some feel but, as the example is currently written, it does seem FlameBait-y.
to:
I agree with [=XFllo=] and [=RoundRobin=]\\\'s removals. I think these are misuses and the Cersei example involves some FlameBait. Cersei is a villain but the character has fans, has been on-screen as a major character and developed for eight years, and it feels uncomfortable to say the site of a person (even fictional) becoming all bloodied and broken is satisfying -- and to argue that it should have been worse. I don\\\'t doubt this is how some feel but, as the example is currently written, it does seem FlameBait-y.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As for the HarsherInHindsight example, because it\'s comparing the end of a fictional character\'s arc to the real problems an actor is facing, it feels like misuse because they\'re not connected in a plotline or an event (ie. it\'s not like that one Buffy episode getting pulled because of Columbine, that \'\'was\'\' confirmed to be the case if I remember right). This feels like it\'s jumping to conclusions, or making connections between two events where a connection may not exist. I don\'t think it\'s appropriate to call having to check into rehab an exile -- they aren\'t being barred/banned from any place by seeking help.
to:
As for the HarsherInHindsight example, because it\\\'s comparing the end of a fictional character\\\'s arc to the real problems an actor is facing, it feels like misuse because they\\\'re not connected in a plotline or an event (ie. it\\\'s not like that one Buffy episode getting pulled because of Columbine, that \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' confirmed to be the case if I remember right). This feels like it\\\'s jumping to conclusions, or making connections between two events where a connection may not exist. I don\\\'t think it\\\'s appropriate to call having to check into rehab an exile -- per the definition of exile, they aren\\\'t being barred/banned from any place by seeking help.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As for the HarsherInHindsight example, because it\'s comparing the end of a fictional character\'s arc to the real problems an actor is facing, it feels like misuse because they\'re not connected in a plotline or an event (ie. it\'s not like that one Buffy episode getting pulled because of Columbine, that \'\'was\'\' confirmed to be the case if I remember right). This feels like it\'s jumping to conclusions, or making connections between two events where a connection may not exist. I don\'t think it\'s appropriate to call having to check into rehab a sort of exile -- they aren\'t being barred from any place by seeking help.
to:
As for the HarsherInHindsight example, because it\\\'s comparing the end of a fictional character\\\'s arc to the real problems an actor is facing, it feels like misuse because they\\\'re not connected in a plotline or an event (ie. it\\\'s not like that one Buffy episode getting pulled because of Columbine, that \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' confirmed to be the case if I remember right). This feels like it\\\'s jumping to conclusions, or making connections between two events where a connection may not exist. I don\\\'t think it\\\'s appropriate to call having to check into rehab an exile -- they aren\\\'t being barred/banned from any place by seeking help.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As for the HarsherInHindsight example, because it\'s comparing the end of a fictional character\'s arc to the real problems an actor is facing, it feels like misuse because they\'re not connected in a plotline or an event (ie. it\'s not like that one Buffy episode getting pulled because of Columbine, that \'\'was\'\' confirmed to be the case if I remember right). This feels like it\'s jumping to conclusions, or making connections between two events where a connection may not exist. I don\'t think it\'s appropriate to call having to check into rehab a sort of exile
to:
As for the HarsherInHindsight example, because it\\\'s comparing the end of a fictional character\\\'s arc to the real problems an actor is facing, it feels like misuse because they\\\'re not connected in a plotline or an event (ie. it\\\'s not like that one Buffy episode getting pulled because of Columbine, that \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' confirmed to be the case if I remember right). This feels like it\\\'s jumping to conclusions, or making connections between two events where a connection may not exist. I don\\\'t think it\\\'s appropriate to call having to check into rehab a sort of exile -- they aren\\\'t being barred from any place by seeking help.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As for the HarsherInHindsight example, because it\'s comparing the end of a fictional character\'s arc to the real problems an actor is facing, it feels like misuse because they\'re not connected in a plotline or an event (ie. it\'s not like that one Buffy episode getting pulled because of Columbine, that \'\'was\'\' confirmed to be the case if I remember right). This feels like it\'s jumping to conclusions, or making connections between two events where a connection may not exist.
to:
As for the HarsherInHindsight example, because it\\\'s comparing the end of a fictional character\\\'s arc to the real problems an actor is facing, it feels like misuse because they\\\'re not connected in a plotline or an event (ie. it\\\'s not like that one Buffy episode getting pulled because of Columbine, that \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' confirmed to be the case if I remember right). This feels like it\\\'s jumping to conclusions, or making connections between two events where a connection may not exist. I don\\\'t think it\\\'s appropriate to call having to check into rehab a sort of exile
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Neither example sits well with me, personally. I can see why some would think this and I think they were added in good faith but they do feel like misuses and I think the RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment should apply here -- especially when dealing with a real-life individual\'s struggles.
to:
Neither example sits well with me, personally. I think they were added in good faith but they do feel like misuses and I think the RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment should apply here -- especially when dealing with a real-life individual\\\'s struggles.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I agree with [=XFllo=] and [=RoundRobin=]\'s removals. I think these are misuses and the Cersei example involves some FlameBait. Cersei is a villain but the character has fans, has been on-screen as a major character for eight years, and it feels uncomfortable to say the site of a person (even fictional) becoming all bloodied and broken is satisfying -- and to argue that it should have been worse. I don\'t doubt this is how some feel but this does seem FlameBait-y.
to:
I agree with [=XFllo=] and [=RoundRobin=]\\\'s removals. I think these are misuses and the Cersei example involves some FlameBait. Cersei is a villain but the character has fans, has been on-screen as a major character for eight years, and it feels uncomfortable to say the site of a person (even fictional) becoming all bloodied and broken is satisfying -- and to argue that it should have been worse. I don\\\'t doubt this is how some feel but, as the example is currently written, it does seem FlameBait-y.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Neither example sits well with me, personally. I can see why some would think this and I think they were added in good faith but they do feel like misuses and I think the RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment should apply here.
to:
Neither example sits well with me, personally. I can see why some would think this and I think they were added in good faith but they do feel like misuses and I think the RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment should apply here -- especially when dealing with a real-life individual\\\'s struggles.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As for the HarsherInHindsight example, because it\'s comparing the end of a fictional character\'s arc to the real problems an actor is facing, it feels like misuse because they\'re not connected in a plotline or an event (ie. it\'s not like that one Buffy episode getting pulled because of Columbine, that \'\'was\'\' confirmed to be the case, if I remember right). This feels like it\'s jumping to conclusions, or making connections between two events where a connection may not exist.
to:
As for the HarsherInHindsight example, because it\\\'s comparing the end of a fictional character\\\'s arc to the real problems an actor is facing, it feels like misuse because they\\\'re not connected in a plotline or an event (ie. it\\\'s not like that one Buffy episode getting pulled because of Columbine, that \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' confirmed to be the case if I remember right). This feels like it\\\'s jumping to conclusions, or making connections between two events where a connection may not exist.

Neither example sits well with me, personally. I can see why some would think this and I think they were added in good faith but they do feel like misuses and I think the RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment should apply here.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I agree with XFllo and [=RoundRobin=]\'s removals. I think these are misuses and the Cersei example involves some FlameBait. Cersei is a villain but the character has fans, has been on-screen as a major character for eight years, and it feels uncomfortable to say the site of a person (even fictional) becoming all bloodied and broken is satisfying -- and to argue that it should have been worse. I don\'t doubt this is how some feel but this does seem FlameBait-y.
to:
I agree with [=XFllo=] and [=RoundRobin=]\\\'s removals. I think these are misuses and the Cersei example involves some FlameBait. Cersei is a villain but the character has fans, has been on-screen as a major character for eight years, and it feels uncomfortable to say the site of a person (even fictional) becoming all bloodied and broken is satisfying -- and to argue that it should have been worse. I don\\\'t doubt this is how some feel but this does seem FlameBait-y.
Top