[003]
Wyldchyld
Current Version
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
While the heroes are sympathetic to Robyn and what Ironwood to find a way of working with her, they\'ve chosen a side -- they\'re currently on Ironwood\'s side. As a result, they don\'t meet the trope requirements.
to:
While the heroes are sympathetic to Robyn and want Ironwood to find a way of working with her, they\\\'ve chosen a side -- they\\\'re currently on Ironwood\\\'s side. As a result, they don\\\'t meet the trope requirements.
Changed line(s) 2 from:
to:
* BothSidesHaveAPoint: Downplayed. There is considerable tension between the Atlesian military and Robyn\\\'s Huntresses, with neither side willing to admit that the other has valid reasons to mistrust them.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
- A series with elements of multiple genres being primarily classified as only one of these genres is usually not an example of this trope.
- The works of an author that primarily works in one genre being grouped together in a bookstore regardless of genre is not an example of this trope: That\'s the bookstore trying to make it easier for patrons to find the works of a particular author by grouping them all together.
- A work of sci-fi or fantasy doing well at the box office or in book sales is not an aversion of this trope. This specifically relates to critical acclaim or perceived artistic merit.
- Similarly, a bunch of examples were complaining about individual works\' categorization within the sci fi/fantasy/horror spectrum. That\'s not really the point of this trope.
- By that same token: Please recognize that there is a difference between \
- The works of an author that primarily works in one genre being grouped together in a bookstore regardless of genre is not an example of this trope: That\'s the bookstore trying to make it easier for patrons to find the works of a particular author by grouping them all together.
- A work of sci-fi or fantasy doing well at the box office or in book sales is not an aversion of this trope. This specifically relates to critical acclaim or perceived artistic merit.
- Similarly, a bunch of examples were complaining about individual works\' categorization within the sci fi/fantasy/horror spectrum. That\'s not really the point of this trope.
- By that same token: Please recognize that there is a difference between \
to:
*A series with elements of multiple genres being primarily classified as only one of these genres is usually not an example of this trope.
*The works of an author that primarily works in one genre being grouped together in a bookstore regardless of genre is not an example of this trope: That\\\'s the bookstore trying to make it easier for patrons to find the works of a particular author by grouping them all together.
*A work of sci-fi or fantasy doing well at the box office or in book sales is not an aversion of this trope. This specifically relates to critical acclaim or perceived artistic merit.
*Similarly, a bunch of examples were complaining about individual works\\\' categorization within the sci fi/fantasy/horror spectrum. That\\\'s not really the point of this trope.
*By that same token: Please recognize that there is a difference between \\\"Popcorn\\\" fiction (That is, fiction that only seeks to entertain) and fiction that attempts for broader artistic merit. There is nothing wrong with a work being \\\"popcorn\\\" but these works tend to be judged by different merits than works aiming for artistic significance. I bring this up because this trope is about genre fiction being perceived as only consisting of popcorn works, not of the popcorn works of sci fi and fantasy not being given equal footing with non-popcorn works of other genres.
The Star Wars section is a gigantic mess, someone please clean this thing up.
*The works of an author that primarily works in one genre being grouped together in a bookstore regardless of genre is not an example of this trope: That\\\'s the bookstore trying to make it easier for patrons to find the works of a particular author by grouping them all together.
*A work of sci-fi or fantasy doing well at the box office or in book sales is not an aversion of this trope. This specifically relates to critical acclaim or perceived artistic merit.
*Similarly, a bunch of examples were complaining about individual works\\\' categorization within the sci fi/fantasy/horror spectrum. That\\\'s not really the point of this trope.
*By that same token: Please recognize that there is a difference between \\\"Popcorn\\\" fiction (That is, fiction that only seeks to entertain) and fiction that attempts for broader artistic merit. There is nothing wrong with a work being \\\"popcorn\\\" but these works tend to be judged by different merits than works aiming for artistic significance. I bring this up because this trope is about genre fiction being perceived as only consisting of popcorn works, not of the popcorn works of sci fi and fantasy not being given equal footing with non-popcorn works of other genres.
The Star Wars section is a gigantic mess, someone please clean this thing up.
