[011]
Wyldchyld
Current Version
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and repetitive talking scenes that slow the narrative; these concerns were strong enough to require direct acknowledgement by the creators. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
to:
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and repetitive talking scenes that slow the narrative; these concerns were strong enough to require direct acknowledgement by the creators. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have to do more work to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and repetitive talking scenes that slow the narrative; these fandom concerns were strong enough to require direct acknowledgement by the creators. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
to:
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and repetitive talking scenes that slow the narrative; these concerns were strong enough to require direct acknowledgement by the creators. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and repetitive talking scenes that slow the narrative; the feeling within the fandom was strong enough for the creators to directly acknowledge the concerns. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
to:
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and repetitive talking scenes that slow the narrative; these fandom concerns were strong enough to require direct acknowledgement by the creators. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and repetitive talking scenes that slow the narrative. The feeling within the fandom was strong enough for the creators to directly acknowledge the concerns. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
to:
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and repetitive talking scenes that slow the narrative; the feeling within the fandom was strong enough for the creators to directly acknowledge the concerns. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and unnecessary talking scenes that slow the narrative. The feeling within the fandom was strong enough for the creators to directly acknowledge the concerns. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
to:
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and repetitive talking scenes that slow the narrative. The feeling within the fandom was strong enough for the creators to directly acknowledge the concerns. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and unnecessary talking scenes that slow the narrative. The feeling within the fandom was strong enough for the creators to directly acknowledge the concerns. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
to:
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to a lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and unnecessary talking scenes that slow the narrative. The feeling within the fandom was strong enough for the creators to directly acknowledge the concerns. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
That leaves the issue of whether or not to comment on Volume 6. The reason Volume 6 would not be a separate entry is because the point of the trope is to identify where the rot kicks in. That\'s been identified as Volume 5, so that\'s the trope\'s entry. What then has to be decided is whether that rot is temporary or permanent, which will just be an additional sentence or two to the existing entry and not a brand new entry all by itself. The Volume 6 entry had ExamplesAreNotArguable problems in its own right that would have prevented it from being a valid example of the trope even if Volume 5 hadn\'t been identified as the Rot-point (it claims it\'s better than Volume 5 but the latter half hasn\'t regained the quality of older volumes, which means it\'s admitting that Volume 5 is the rot-point, not itself), but it can easily be added to the existing V5 entry as an statement on whether or not the rot seems to be temporary or not. For example, as follows:
to:
Aside from some WordCruft clean-up, that leaves the issue of whether or not to comment on Volume 6. The reason Volume 6 would not be a separate entry is because the point of the trope is to identify where the rot kicks in. That\\\'s been identified as Volume 5, so that\\\'s the trope\\\'s entry. What then has to be decided is whether that rot is temporary or permanent, which will just be an additional sentence or two to the existing entry and not a brand new entry all by itself. The Volume 6 entry had ExamplesAreNotArguable problems in its own right that would have prevented it from being a valid example of the trope even if Volume 5 hadn\\\'t been identified as the Rot-point (it claims it\\\'s better than Volume 5 but the latter half hasn\\\'t regained the quality of older volumes, which means it\\\'s admitting that Volume 5 is the rot-point, not itself), but it can easily be added to the existing V5 entry as an statement on whether or not the rot seems to be temporary or not. For example, the final entry could look as follows:
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 is considered by many fans as drastically inferior to the previous ones for different reasons. The primary issues found with it include the lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and unnecessary talking scenes that slow the narrative. Volume 6 is generally considered better than Volume 5; although this suggests the Volume 5 rot may be a temporary blip, the fandom consensus is that the latter half of Volume 6 deteriorated from its strong start and has yet to regain the quality of earlier volumes.
to:
* SeasonalRot: Volume 5 was considered drastically inferior to previous volumes due to lack of well-animated action, the over-reliance on exposition, and unnecessary talking scenes that slow the narrative. The feeling within the fandom was strong enough for the creators to directly acknowledge the concerns. While fans generally agree that Volume 6 has improved from Volume 5, the feeling is that the latter half of the volume deteriorated from its strong start and that the creators still have some more work to do to reclaim the quality of earlier volumes.
