[001]
matruz
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I agree with you all about Eren and Gabi's case, however I'm still unconvinced Floch is an example: According to a mod, MoralEventHorizon is reserved for ''villainous'' characters whose actions push them beyond redemption; For all we know, Floch, can't be considered a villain ''yet'', we only know him as the sole survivor of Erwin's suicidal charge and other than chewing Eren and Mikasa for choosing to save Armin over Erwin, there's not much characterization from him at this point. You could also make the argument that Floch's actions aren't unwarranted, as he is being encouraged by Eren's rampage to enact revenge for the thousands of deaths caused by Marley's infiltrators. His actions are wrong, but far from pushing into the
to:
I agree with you all about Eren and Gabi\'s case, however I\'m still unconvinced Floch is an example: According to a mod, MoralEventHorizon is reserved for \'\'villainous\'\' characters whose actions push them beyond redemption; For all we know, Floch, can\'t be considered a villain \'\'yet\'\', we only know him as the sole survivor of Erwin\'s suicidal charge and other than chewing Eren and Mikasa for choosing to save Armin over Erwin (and being also a CommanderContrarian), there\'s not much characterization from him at this point. You could also make the argument that Floch\'s actions aren\'t unwarranted, as he is being encouraged by Eren\'s rampage to enact revenge for the thousands of deaths caused by Marley\'s infiltrators. His actions are wrong, but far from pushing into the \"vile\" territory.
I\'d say to wait until we see more from Floch to determine if he truly is a villainous character as [=JRads=] seems to suggest.
I\'d say to wait until we see more from Floch to determine if he truly is a villainous character as [=JRads=] seems to suggest.
