Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / TheFlash

Go To

[004] LordGro Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
[[quoteblock]]
British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today [[OlderThanPrint since there was British work that we still have access to today]]. That makes Literature/{{Beowulf}}, composed around 700 CE, the UrExample, and subsequently showing British humour as \'\'older than the concept of zero\'\'. Given that nowadays the concept and practice of British humour would solidly fall under {{meta}}-{{postmodernism}}, being as old as it is it could well have invented the stylistic wave of [[UrExample proto]]-{{meta}}-{{postmodernis|m}}t-[[TheAntiNihilist anti-nihilism]], which sounds like bullshit and probably is. [[/quoteblock]]
to:
-->\\\'\\\'British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today [[OlderThanPrint since there was British work that we still have access to today]]. That makes Literature/{{Beowulf}}, composed around 700 CE, the UrExample, and subsequently showing British humour as \\\'\\\'older than the concept of zero\\\'\\\'. Given that nowadays the concept and practice of British humour would solidly fall under {{meta}}-{{postmodernism}}, being as old as it is it could well have invented the stylistic wave of [[UrExample proto]]-{{meta}}-{{postmodernis|m}}t-[[TheAntiNihilist anti-nihilism]], which sounds like bullshit and probably is.\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
* It is confusingly written (\
to:
* It is confusingly written (\\\"British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today since there was British work that we still have access to today\\\")
* There is no certainty about when \\\'\\\'Beowulf\\\'\\\' was composed. Estimates range from 700 CE up to c. 1000 CE.
* \\\'\\\'Beowulf\\\'\\\' is, in any case, not the oldest work of Old English literature, nor of British literature
* The concept of zero could actually be older than 700 CE
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
[[quoteblock]] British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today [[OlderThanPrint since there was British work that we still have access to today]]. That makes Literature/{{Beowulf}}, composed around 700 CE, the UrExample, and subsequently showing British humour as \'\'older than the concept of zero\'\'. Given that nowadays the concept and practice of British humour would solidly fall under {{meta}}-{{postmodernism}}, being as old as it is it could well have invented the stylistic wave of [[UrExample proto]]-{{meta}}-{{postmodernis|m}}t-[[TheAntiNihilist anti-nihilism]], which sounds like bullshit and probably is. [[/quoteblock]]
to:
[[quoteblock]]
British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today [[OlderThanPrint since there was British work that we still have access to today]]. That makes Literature/{{Beowulf}}, composed around 700 CE, the UrExample, and subsequently showing British humour as \\\'\\\'older than the concept of zero\\\'\\\'. Given that nowadays the concept and practice of British humour would solidly fall under {{meta}}-{{postmodernism}}, being as old as it is it could well have invented the stylistic wave of [[UrExample proto]]-{{meta}}-{{postmodernis|m}}t-[[TheAntiNihilist anti-nihilism]], which sounds like bullshit and probably is. [[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
* It is confusingly written (\
to:
* It is confusingly written (\\\"British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today since there was British work that we still have access to today\\\")
* There is no certainty about when \\\'\\\'Beowulf\\\'\\\' was composed. Estimates range from 700 CE up to c. 1000 CE.
* \\\'\\\'Beowulf\\\'\\\' is, in any case, not the oldest work of Old English literature, nor of British literature
* The concept of zero could actually be older than 700 CE
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
-->British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today [[OlderThanPrint since there was British work that we still have access to today]]. That makes Literature/{{Beowulf}}, composed around 700 CE, the UrExample, and subsequently showing British humour as \'\'older than the concept of zero\'\'. Given that nowadays the concept and practice of British humour would solidly fall under {{meta}}-{{postmodernism}}, being as old as it is it could well have invented the stylistic wave of [[UrExample proto]]-{{meta}}-{{postmodernis|m}}t-[[TheAntiNihilist anti-nihilism]], which sounds like bullshit and probably is.
to:
[[quoteblock]] British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today [[OlderThanPrint since there was British work that we still have access to today]]. That makes Literature/{{Beowulf}}, composed around 700 CE, the UrExample, and subsequently showing British humour as \\\'\\\'older than the concept of zero\\\'\\\'. Given that nowadays the concept and practice of British humour would solidly fall under {{meta}}-{{postmodernism}}, being as old as it is it could well have invented the stylistic wave of [[UrExample proto]]-{{meta}}-{{postmodernis|m}}t-[[TheAntiNihilist anti-nihilism]], which sounds like bullshit and probably is. [[/quoteblock]]
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
* It is confusingly written (\
to:
* It is confusingly written (\\\"British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today since there was British work that we still have access to today\\\")
* There is no certainty about when \\\'\\\'Beowulf\\\'\\\' was composed. Estimates range from 700 CE up to c. 1000 CE.
* \\\'\\\'Beowulf\\\'\\\' is, in any case, not the oldest work of Old English literature, nor of British literature
* The concept of zero could actually be older than 700 CE
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
->British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today [[OlderThanPrint since there was British work that we still have access to today]]. That makes Literature/{{Beowulf}}, composed around 700 CE, the UrExample, and subsequently showing British humour as \'\'older than the concept of zero\'\'. Given that nowadays the concept and practice of British humour would solidly fall under {{meta}}-{{postmodernism}}, being as old as it is it could well have invented the stylistic wave of [[UrExample proto]]-{{meta}}-{{postmodernis|m}}t-[[TheAntiNihilist anti-nihilism]], which sounds like bullshit and probably is.
to:
-->British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today [[OlderThanPrint since there was British work that we still have access to today]]. That makes Literature/{{Beowulf}}, composed around 700 CE, the UrExample, and subsequently showing British humour as \\\'\\\'older than the concept of zero\\\'\\\'. Given that nowadays the concept and practice of British humour would solidly fall under {{meta}}-{{postmodernism}}, being as old as it is it could well have invented the stylistic wave of [[UrExample proto]]-{{meta}}-{{postmodernis|m}}t-[[TheAntiNihilist anti-nihilism]], which sounds like bullshit and probably is.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
* It is confusingly written (\
to:
* It is confusingly written (\\\"British humour has been present in works that we still have access to today since there was British work that we still have access to today\\\")
* There is no certainty about when \\\'\\\'Beowulf\\\'\\\' was composed. Estimates range from 700 CE up to c. 1000 CE.
* \\\'\\\'Beowulf\\\'\\\' is, in any case, not the oldest work of Old English literature, nor of British literature
* The concept of zero could actually be older than 700 CE
Top