[003]
DarthRevansNeighbor
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Concerning the recent warning edit (\'\'\'All spoilers for the first five volumes are unmarked. Examples from Volume 6 can be spoiler tagged if deemed necessary.\'\'\'): As far as I am aware, ALL spoilers are supposed to be left unmarked on Nightmare Fuel pages and there is a [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15046601260A53602600 clean up in progress]] to remove all spoiler tags from NightmareFuel pages. Essentially the rule is: \
to:
Concerning the recent warning edit (\\\'\\\'\\\'All spoilers for the first five volumes are unmarked. Examples from Volume 6 can be spoiler tagged if deemed necessary.\\\'\\\'\\\'): As far as I am aware, [[Administrivia/SpoilersOff ALL spoilers are supposed to be left unmarked]] on Nightmare Fuel pages and there is a [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15046601260A53602600 clean up in progress]] to remove all spoiler tags from NightmareFuel pages. Essentially the rule is: \\\"No spoiler-tags on NightmareFuel. No ifs, ands, or buts.\\\" So why would RWBY volume 6 be an exception and some spoilers still be covered? It seems contraindicative and goes against TV tropes policy. I think that warning should be deleted but I would like to hear other opinions before removing it.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Concerning the recent warning edit (\'\'\'All spoilers for the first five volumes are unmarked. Examples from Volume 6 can be spoiler tagged if deemed necessary.\'\'\'): As far as I am aware, ALL spoilers are supposed to be left unmarked on Nightmare Fuel pages and there is a [[ https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15046601260A53602600 ]] to remove all spoiler tags from NightmareFuel pages. Essentially the rule is: \
to:
Concerning the recent warning edit (\\\'\\\'\\\'All spoilers for the first five volumes are unmarked. Examples from Volume 6 can be spoiler tagged if deemed necessary.\\\'\\\'\\\'): As far as I am aware, ALL spoilers are supposed to be left unmarked on Nightmare Fuel pages and there is a [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15046601260A53602600 clean up in progress]] to remove all spoiler tags from NightmareFuel pages. Essentially the rule is: \\\"No spoiler-tags on NightmareFuel. No ifs, ands, or buts.\\\" So why would RWBY volume 6 be an exception and some spoilers still be covered? It seems contraindicative and goes against TV tropes policy. I think that warning should be deleted but I would like to hear other opinions before removing it.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Concerning the recent warning edit (\'\'\'All spoilers for the first five volumes are unmarked. Examples from Volume 6 can be spoiler tagged if deemed necessary.\'\'\'): As far as I am aware, ALL spoilers are supposed to be left unmarked on Nightmare Fuel pages and there is a [[clean up in process https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15046601260A53602600]] to remove all spoiler tags from NightmareFuel pages. Essentially the rule is: \
to:
Concerning the recent warning edit (\\\'\\\'\\\'All spoilers for the first five volumes are unmarked. Examples from Volume 6 can be spoiler tagged if deemed necessary.\\\'\\\'\\\'): As far as I am aware, ALL spoilers are supposed to be left unmarked on Nightmare Fuel pages and there is a [[ https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15046601260A53602600 ]] to remove all spoiler tags from NightmareFuel pages. Essentially the rule is: \\\"No spoiler-tags on NightmareFuel. No ifs, ands, or buts.\\\" So why would RWBY volume 6 be an exception and some spoilers still be covered? It seems contraindicative and goes against TV tropes policy. I think that warning should be deleted but I would like to hear other opinions before removing it.
