[004]
Emu0
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
to:
\"complained about romance options\" is fudging, though. It could mean literally anything. Frankly, dancing around the issue like that sounds more political. You can say the word \"gay\"; it\'s not inherently political.
\"Lack of\" or something similar actually says what the fandom/devs responded to (without sounding particularly personal), isn\'t a particularly contentious statement (they literally had half as many options as everyone else), and adds all of two words.
RainbowPhoenix:
Then they\'re the ones making leaps of logic. If they legitimately don\'t get why people were upset that gay men, again, got half as many options as everyone else and both options were side characters, they probably don\'t want to understand in the first place. The people who asked what was wrong were not asking to be enlightened, they wanted to paint the LGBT fanbase as whiny.
\"Lack of\" or something similar actually says what the fandom/devs responded to (without sounding particularly personal), isn\'t a particularly contentious statement (they literally had half as many options as everyone else), and adds all of two words.
RainbowPhoenix:
Then they\'re the ones making leaps of logic. If they legitimately don\'t get why people were upset that gay men, again, got half as many options as everyone else and both options were side characters, they probably don\'t want to understand in the first place. The people who asked what was wrong were not asking to be enlightened, they wanted to paint the LGBT fanbase as whiny.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
to:
\"complained about romance options\" is fudging, though. It could mean literally anything. Frankly, dancing around the issue like that sounds more political. You can say the word \"gay\" without automatically turning preachy.
\"Lack of\" or something similar actually says what the fandom/devs responded to (without sounding particularly personal), isn\'t a particularly contentious statement (they literally had half as many options as everyone else), and adds all of two words.
RainbowPhoenix:
Then they\'re the ones making leaps of logic. If they legitimately don\'t get why people were upset that gay men, again, got half as many options as everyone else and both options were side characters, they probably don\'t want to understand in the first place. The people who asked what was wrong were not asking to be enlightened, they wanted to paint the LGBT fanbase as whiny.
\"Lack of\" or something similar actually says what the fandom/devs responded to (without sounding particularly personal), isn\'t a particularly contentious statement (they literally had half as many options as everyone else), and adds all of two words.
RainbowPhoenix:
Then they\'re the ones making leaps of logic. If they legitimately don\'t get why people were upset that gay men, again, got half as many options as everyone else and both options were side characters, they probably don\'t want to understand in the first place. The people who asked what was wrong were not asking to be enlightened, they wanted to paint the LGBT fanbase as whiny.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
to:
\"complained about romance options\" is fudging, though. It could mean literally anything. Frankly, dancing around the issue like that sounds more political. You can say the word \"gay\" without automatically turning preachy.
\"Lack of\" or something similar actually says what the fandom/devs responded to (without sounding particularly personal), isn\'t a particularly contentious statement (they literally had half as many options as everyone else), and adds all of two words.
RainbowPhoenix:
Then they\'re the ones making leaps of logic. If they legitimately don\'t get why people were upset that gay men, again, got half as many options as everyone else and both options were side characters, they probably don\'t want to understand in the first place. The people who asked what was wrong did not want to be enlightened, they wanted to paint you as unfairly complaining.
\"Lack of\" or something similar actually says what the fandom/devs responded to (without sounding particularly personal), isn\'t a particularly contentious statement (they literally had half as many options as everyone else), and adds all of two words.
RainbowPhoenix:
Then they\'re the ones making leaps of logic. If they legitimately don\'t get why people were upset that gay men, again, got half as many options as everyone else and both options were side characters, they probably don\'t want to understand in the first place. The people who asked what was wrong did not want to be enlightened, they wanted to paint you as unfairly complaining.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
to:
Matt:
\"complained about romance options\" is fudging, though. It could mean literally anything. Frankly, dancing around the issue like that sounds more political. You can say the word \"gay\" without automatically turning preachy.
\"Lack of\" or something similar actually says what the fandom/devs responded to (without sounding particularly personal), isn\'t a particularly contentious statement (they literally had half as many options as everyone else), and adds all of two words.
RainbowPhoenix:
Then they\'re the ones making leaps of logic. If they legitimately don\'t get why people were upset that gay men, again, got half as many options as everyone else and both options were side characters, they probably don\'t want to understand in the first place.
\"complained about romance options\" is fudging, though. It could mean literally anything. Frankly, dancing around the issue like that sounds more political. You can say the word \"gay\" without automatically turning preachy.
\"Lack of\" or something similar actually says what the fandom/devs responded to (without sounding particularly personal), isn\'t a particularly contentious statement (they literally had half as many options as everyone else), and adds all of two words.
RainbowPhoenix:
Then they\'re the ones making leaps of logic. If they legitimately don\'t get why people were upset that gay men, again, got half as many options as everyone else and both options were side characters, they probably don\'t want to understand in the first place.
