Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Film / MarieAntoinette

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Lazer, having
to:
Lazer, having \"as much detail as we can\" \'\'\'is a bad thing\'\'\'. That\'s what I\'ve been trying to tell you for weeks now. Three words: Administrivia/ClearConciseWitty. \'\'In that order.\'\' The practice of the wiki is typically to have as LITTLE detail as possible while still getting across the basic gist of a specific trope. The proper attitude in this case would not be \"Oh wow, there\'s a lot of detail about Overwatch. Let\'s create a new page to add more\". It would be \"Let\'s see what we can cut out or describe in shorter terms\".

You\'re also splitting hairs now. You \'\'technically\'\' didn\'t do the original thing you proposed to do, but it\'s basically the same thing. You \'\'\'made a new page for Overwatch as an organization because YOU decided that there\'s eventually going to be need for a second page\'\'\'\'. There\'s no need for one now, as you just admitted, but you made one for tropes that haven\'t happened yet. Even worse, you made entire FOLDERS for characters who have almost no tropes to their names.

More troubling though, is that you think \"I wasn\'t satisfied with this\" is a justification for making such a major change to a page. Any page is a community project, and with as much opposition you\'ve had for making even SMALL contributions to a page, you should be more wary of making big changes without discussion. Instead, the way it looks right now, it very much seems like you\'ve just decided arguing with us is \"too tiresome\" and so you\'re not going to bother and just do whatever you want.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Lazer, aving
to:
Lazer, having \"as much detail as we can\" \'\'\'is a bad thing\'\'\'. That\'s what I\'ve been trying to tell you for weeks now. Three words: ClearConciseWitty. \'\'In that order.\'\' The practice of the wiki is typically to have as LITTLE detail as possible while still getting across the basic gist of a specific trope. The proper attitude in this case would not be \"Oh wow, there\'s a lot of detail about Overwatch. Let\'s create a new page to add more\". It would be \"Let\'s see what we can cut out or describe in shorter terms\".

You\'re also splitting hairs now. You \'\'technically\'\' didn\'t do the original thing you proposed to do, but it\'s basically the same thing. You \'\'\'made a new page for Overwatch as an organization because YOU decided that there\'s eventually going to be need for a second page\'\'\'\'. There\'s no need for one now, as you just admitted, but you made one for tropes that haven\'t happened yet. Even worse, you made entire FOLDERS for characters who have almost no tropes to their names.

More troubling though, is that you think \"I wasn\'t satisfied with this\" is a justification for making such a major change to a page. Any page is a community project, and with as much opposition you\'ve had for making even SMALL contributions to a page, you should be more wary of making big changes without discussion. Instead, the way it looks right now, it very much seems like you\'ve just decided arguing with us is \"too tiresome\" and so you\'re not going to bother and just do whatever you want.
Top