Tropes Media Browse Indexes Forums Videos Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Tools
Cut List New Edits Edit Reasons Launches Images List Crowner Activity Un-typed Pages Recent Page Type Changes Changelog
Tips
Creating New Redirects Cross Wicking Tips for Editing Text Formatting Rules Glossary Edit Reasons Handling Spoilers Word Cruft Administrivia FAQ
Tropes HQ
About Us Contact Us Advertise DMCA Notice Privacy Policy Report Bug
Go Ad-Free Changelog
  • Show Spoilers
  • Night Vision
  • Sticky Header
  • Highlight Links
 

Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / ParlorGames

Go To
[006] crazysamaritan MOD Current Version
29th Jul '17 at 04:30:14 PM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1468253031027303100

TRS moved this page to ParlorGames.
to:
oops
[005] ChrisX
6th Nov '16 at 12:07:11 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And in the same time, people like to mistake about 'what is presented' and 'what we guess/believe from what's presented'. All I'm saying is to make the line between those clear. Let's use this incident as an example. Which one is 'fact'? Which one is 'guesswork'? And what would need to be shown so it is no longer a guesswork but fact (that deserves addition to the page)?
to:
And in the same time, people like to mistake about \'what is presented\' and \'what we guess/believe from what\'s presented\'. All I\'m saying is to make the line between those clear. Let\'s use this incident as an example. Which one is \'fact\'? Which one is \'guesswork\'? And what would need to be shown so it is no longer a guesswork but fact (that deserves addition to the page)?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The above example as Faso said is a good example. Katya has shady business. That's... OK. Maybe we don't know the context yes, but it's still just that: Katya has shady business. But apparently to these guys, 'having shady business' is apparently enough for them to mark her 'Corrupt'. If this is a guesswork, explain how, because it felt more like 'jumping to conclusions', and I thought the way to prevent this, is to regulate the standards so people don't just happily jump the gun, but see the context first.
to:
The above example as Faso said is a good example. Katya has shady business. That\'s... OK. Maybe we don\'t know the context yes, but it\'s still just that: Katya has shady business. But apparently to these guys, \'having shady business\' is apparently enough for them to mark her \'Corrupt\'. If this is a guesswork, explain how, because it felt more like \'jumping to conclusions\', and I thought the way to prevent this, is to regulate the standards so people don\'t just happily jump the gun, but see the context first before they hit the edit button.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Otherwise, I just fear that anything that slights the moral standards of these people will get easily slapped with negative tropes like CorruptCorporateExecutive by these irresponsible people.
to:
I\'m actually fine with whatever good actions taken, but I\'d like to know if there\'s a flaw in my methods.
[004] ChrisX
6th Nov '16 at 12:05:26 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And in the same time, people like to mistake about 'what is presented' and 'what we guess/believe from what's presented'. All I'm saying is to make the line between those clear. Let's use this incident as an example. Which one is 'fact'? Which one is 'guesswork'? And what would need to be shown so it is no longer a guesswork but fact (that deserves addition to the page)?
to:
And in the same time, people like to mistake about \'what is presented\' and \'what we guess/believe from what\'s presented\'. All I\'m saying is to make the line between those clear. Let\'s use this incident as an example. Which one is \'fact\'? Which one is \'guesswork\'? And what would need to be shown so it is no longer a guesswork but fact (that deserves addition to the page)?
Changed line(s) 2 from:
to:
The above example as Faso said is a good example. Katya has shady business. That\'s... OK. Maybe we don\'t know the context yes, but it\'s still just that: Katya has shady business. But apparently to these guys, \'having shady business\' is apparently enough for them to mark her \'Corrupt\'. If this is a guesswork, explain how, because it felt more like \'jumping to conclusions\', and I thought the way to prevent this, is to regulate the standards so people don\'t just happily jump the gun, but see the context first.
[003] ChrisX
6th Nov '16 at 12:02:12 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And in the same time, people like to mistake about 'what is presented' and 'what we guess/believe from what's presented'. All I'm saying is to make the line between those clear. Let's use this incident as an example. Which one is 'fact'? Which one is 'guesswork'? And what would need to be shown so it is no longer a guesswork but fact (that deserves addition to the page)?
to:
And in the same time, people like to mistake about \'what is presented\' and \'what we guess/believe from what\'s presented\'. All I\'m saying is to make the line between those clear. Let\'s use this incident as an example. Which one is \'fact\'? Which one is \'guesswork\'? And what would need to be shown so it is no longer a guesswork but fact (that deserves addition to the page)?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Otherwise, I just fear that anything that slights the moral standards of these people will get easily slapped with negative tropes like CorruptCorporateExecutive by irresponsible people.
to:
Otherwise, I just fear that anything that slights the moral standards of these people will get easily slapped with negative tropes like CorruptCorporateExecutive by these irresponsible people.
[002] ChrisX
6th Nov '16 at 12:01:58 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And in the same time, people like to mistake about 'what is presented' and 'what we guess/believe from what's presented'. All I'm saying is to make the line between those clear. Let's use this incident as an example. Which one is 'fact'? Which one is 'guesswork'? And what would need to be shown so it is no longer a guesswork but fact (that deserves addition to the page)?
to:
And in the same time, people like to mistake about \'what is presented\' and \'what we guess/believe from what\'s presented\'. All I\'m saying is to make the line between those clear. Let\'s use this incident as an example. Which one is \'fact\'? Which one is \'guesswork\'? And what would need to be shown so it is no longer a guesswork but fact (that deserves addition to the page)?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Otherwise, I just fear that anything that slights the moral standards of these people will get easily slapped with negative tropes like CorruptCorporateExecutive.
to:
Otherwise, I just fear that anything that slights the moral standards of these people will get easily slapped with negative tropes like CorruptCorporateExecutive by irresponsible people.
[001] ChrisX
5th Nov '16 at 11:41:19 PM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And in the same time, people like to mistake about 'what is presented' and 'what we guess/believe from what's presented'. All I'm saying is to make the line between those clear. Let's use this incident as an example.
to:
And in the same time, people like to mistake about \'what is presented\' and \'what we guess/believe from what\'s presented\'. All I\'m saying is to make the line between those clear. Let\'s use this incident as an example. Which one is \'fact\'? Which one is \'guesswork\'? And what would need to be shown so it is no longer a guesswork but fact (that deserves addition to the page)?

Important Links

Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Go Ad Free!
Crucial Browsing
Resources
Top