Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / MassEffectAndromeda

Go To

[005] Emu0 Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I have an idea for making the Applicability entry a bit more concise that I wanted to run by SkidTroper if he's still around:

The kett are a combination of all four types of ScaryDogmaticAliens, with a strongly collectivist culture and a cult-like mentality that borrows imagery from Christianity/Gnosticism. As a result, some people interpret the kett as a TakeThat of both Communism and either Christianity or religious extremism in general.

Like I said, I won't change it without permission, but it's still kind of vague and speculative.
to:
Does anyone even want the entry on the N7 Day Trailer debacle up?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does anyone actually want the
to:
I have an idea for making the Applicability entry a bit more concise that I wanted to run by SkidTroper if he\'s still around:

The kett are a combination of all four types of ScaryDogmaticAliens, with a strongly collectivist culture and a cult-like mentality that borrows imagery from Christianity/Gnosticism. As a result, some people interpret the kett as a TakeThat of both Communism and either Christianity or religious extremism in general.

Like I said, I won\'t change it without permission, but it\'s still kind of vague and speculative.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does anyone actually want the
to:
Does anyone actually want the \"N7 day trailer only features FemShep\" debacle on the page? I tried to edit it and make it \"neutral\" because the original poster obviously had a bone to pick, but I guess it still came off as skewed. I can put in the other side if that\'s the problem.

Granted, I have no idea why people complained in the first place, but I guess someone cared enough to put that entry up multiple times.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does anyone actually want the
to:
Does anyone actually want the \"N7 day trailer only features FemShep\" debacle on the page? I tried to edit it and make it \"neutral\" because the original poster obviously had a bone to pick with the trailer, but I guess it still came off as skewed. I can put in the other side if that\'s the problem.

Granted, I have no idea why people complained in the first place, but I guess someone cared enough to put that entry up multiple times.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
NightmareFuel is an opinion trope that can be added by ONE person. It doesn't reflect any universal fanbase opinion, and is very easily abused. It's really baffling to say that you don't know how to clean up a page and then give an example of trope misuse right after. That RIGHT THERE is where we start cleaning up, by removing a bad example.
to:
NightmareFuel is an opinion trope that can be added by ONE person. It doesn\'t reflect any universal fanbase opinion, and is very easily abused. It\'s really baffling to say that you don\'t know how to clean up a page and then give an example of trope misuse right after. That RIGHT THERE is where we start cleaning up, by removing a bad example.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Vishkar doesn't need to pet the dog. WE need tropers to stop exaggerating when they trope things.
to:
Vishkar doesn\'t need to pet the dog. WE need tropers to stop exaggerating when they trope things.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Also, every single instance of when you said
to:
Also, every single instance of when you said \"I felt\" or \"I believe\" is followed by things that SHOULD NOT BE added to the page. Those are guesses and leaps in logic. Even worse, in this particular case, it\'s guessing whose only purpose is to invent a reason why a bad trope example is true instead of just removing the bad example.

It would be like if I added an example that said \"Pharah looks like a cat\" and then you or someone else then based all their tropes on making up reasons why that\'s true instead of just deleting it.
Top