[001]
HighCrate
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
^ If you're referring to the first bullet point, that asks
to:
^ If you\'re referring to the first bullet point, that asks \"is this \'\'feminist\'\' or just not-misogynist,\" not misandrist, so it doesn\'t cover the same point. And the treatment of the male characters is enough of a BaseBreaker that it deserves its own entry.
@Eagal, I could see more being said about the \"it\'s not misandrist\" side of the BrokenBase. How would you suggest summing up the most common counterarguments against the film being misandrist in a sentence or so?
As for {{Anvilicious}}, I\'m inclined to agree that the trope probably does apply, although the way the entry was worded before was, to put it kindly, a mess. I\'m all in favor of trying to arrive at a better-worded entry. Does anyone have any suggestions for how to put it?
@Eagal, I could see more being said about the \"it\'s not misandrist\" side of the BrokenBase. How would you suggest summing up the most common counterarguments against the film being misandrist in a sentence or so?
As for {{Anvilicious}}, I\'m inclined to agree that the trope probably does apply, although the way the entry was worded before was, to put it kindly, a mess. I\'m all in favor of trying to arrive at a better-worded entry. Does anyone have any suggestions for how to put it?
