Follow TV Tropes

Ask The Tropers

Go To

Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help. It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread for ongoing cleanup projects.

Ask the Tropers:

Trope Related Question:

Make Private (For security bugs or stuff only for moderators)

CrystalGlacia Since: May, 2009
22nd Apr, 2019 05:22:53 AM

I don't believe there is an official stance, but active voice would seem to fit better with the breezy language of the wiki. Additionally, in modern discourse, passive voice has been increasingly seen as overly stilted and formal, and even most academic writing guides (APA, MLA, Chicago Manual of Style, etc.) now encourage defaulting to active over passive voice because it's clearer and more concise. But it's not like the wiki is exactly an academic source, anyways.

Edited by CrystalGlacia "Jack, you have debauched my sloth."
Tenma-Yuuki Since: Apr, 2016
22nd Apr, 2019 05:53:05 AM

^ True, and active is overall not as wordy compared to passive.

Fighteer MOD (Time Abyss)
22nd Apr, 2019 06:24:52 AM

I concur: active voice is always preferable when talking about actions taken by characters in a work. Also note that we use historical present tense in most contexts.

  • Alice elbows Bob on the forehead, in retaliation for when he tripped her last episode.

Edited by Fighteer "It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Tenma-Yuuki Since: Apr, 2016
22nd Apr, 2019 04:34:54 PM

cool, thanks for clarifying

Top