SS13
Since: Jun, 2010
#2: May 5th 2012 at 5:41:32 PM
Isn't placing into Darth Wiki namespace (and cutting the entry in main namespace) enough? I'd say the page is NSFW and lewd as concept page too.
Routerie
Since: Oct, 2011
#3: May 5th 2012 at 6:31:10 PM
I gave the article a quick scan. Which examples are lewd or NWFW?
(I didn't click any of the links, but Web Links Are Not Examples anyway.)
#4: May 5th 2012 at 6:33:31 PM
I read it through. I don't think it's so bad. Some cleanup, maybe, but definitely salvageable. To start off with, I don't think we need all those external links. The funny ones are okay, but not the ones that are less SFW.
The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
Total posts: 4
Major lewdness and NSF Wness. As much as I'd like to keep one of the examples (the one I put in under music a while back) and as funny as some of the comedic examples are, I'd say it really needs an Example Sectionectomy and lock as a definition of the concept.
?