Follow TV Tropes

Live Blogs Opinionated Guide to The Last Airbender
Korval2011-09-23 19:10:02

Go To


Book one. Nice, Shyamalan, nice. How `bout you wait until your movie doesn't cost your studio twenty million dollars before you start getting ready for a sequel, you presumptuous ass.
Todd in the Shadows, The Last Airbender Review

So, Avatar: The Last Airbender was made into a movie; you might have heard of this. Because James Cameron made a little film around the same time also called Avatar (you might have heard of that), the filmmakers decided to drop the "Avatar" from the title of their movie. Thus, it's just called The Last Airbender.

It is pretty universally agreed upon that this is a terrible movie. Whether you watched the show or not, the general consensus is that this film is garbage. And now I'm going to watch it, because it makes a nice companion piece to my liveblog/review of the show.

I personally feel that it is unfair to judge any adaptation solely by what it is adapting. A movie must ultimately stand on its own, sink or swim based on its merits as a piece of cinema. At the same time, it is an adaptation; it is important to be able to look at what it is adapting, changing, modifying, or removing. It's important to look at how those changes affect the film.

In order to accomplish both, I am going to bifurcate myself into two people for the duration of the review. All of my knowledge of the series will be dumped into text of this color, while analysis of the film as a film will be in this text color.

Before we get started, some interesting info. This film was directed by one M. Night Shyamalan, who is most famous for once being a promising film director who has slowly descended into crap in his latest work. So again, like James Cameron (Zing!). I'm familiar with some of M. Night's work. By which, I mean I watched Unbreakable and The Sixth Sense. I don't seek out crappy movies, so I've avoided his more recent stuff due to bad press. So I don't know much about his descent into badness.

The story behind this movie's creation, at least as I heard it, was that one of M. Night's children was a fan of the show and eventually got him to make this. Which is proof enough why children should never be trusted with anything.

As in my last liveblog, this presents my opinion of this move. As before, you should find that most of these opinions do at least have some evidential support, even if you disagree with the conclusion. Granted, since pretty much everyone hates this movie, you're probably not going to find much praise in the following pages.

Comments

Ghilz Since: Dec, 1969
Sep 23rd 2011 at 7:51:22 PM
Hope you will cover how crappy the bending looks in the film compared to the show. You've also skipped nice chances to mock the special effects. Like when Katara cgi-bends a ball of water that keeps dripping but never shrinks or loses mass.
Korval Since: Dec, 1969
Sep 24th 2011 at 6:54:49 PM
Oh, trust me: the bending will get it's due. I'm just saving it for the proper time.
205.204.248.70 Since: Dec, 1969
Oct 11th 2011 at 10:55:58 AM
Korval: "Oh yeah, I'm sure there are plenty of Inuits with blue eyes."

In the cartoon, the benders have eye colors related to the element they bend. It has nothing to do with the ethnicity they're based on. Katara's eyes are blue in the cartoon because the color blue is associated with water.

It really doesn't matter, though, because if you have time to put all those fake tattoos on Noah Ringer, how hard can it be to put some blue contact lenses on a couple of Inuits?
JusticeMan Since: Dec, 1969
Dec 8th 2011 at 9:03:50 PM
And he cant even say that because as Gene Yang (noted Chinese-American nerd icon) noted, the casting cure specifically asked for (and I quote) z"Caucasian or any other ethnicnity." Although that may be Hollywood's fault and not Shamalan's, as you said his argument falls apart because THE MOVIE FALLS APART!
Top