Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: When Erlend strikes Kristin after an argument, the episode is portrayed as a bad thing for Erlend to have done...not because domestic violence is inherently wrong, but because Kristin comes from well-born people, and as such, is above that kind of treatment. A peasant could strike his peasant wife and nobody think twice about it.
to:
* ValuesDissonance: When Erlend strikes Kristin after an argument, the episode is portrayed as a bad thing for Erlend to have done...not because domestic violence is inherently wrong, but because Kristin comes from well-born people, and as such, is above that kind of treatment. A peasant could strike his peasant wife and nobody think twice about it.treatment.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
female-on-male violence isn't exactly great either
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: When Erlend strikes Kristin after an argument, the episode is portrayed as a bad thing for Erlend to have done...not because male-on-female violence is inherently wrong, but because Kristin comes from well-born people, and as such, is above that kind of treatment. A peasant could strike his peasant wife and nobody think twice about it.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ValuesDissonance: When Erlend strikes Kristin after an argument, the episode is portrayed as a bad thing for Erlend to have done...not because male-on-female violence is inherently wrong, but because Kristin comes from well-born people, and as such, is above that kind of treatment. A peasant could strike his peasant wife and nobody think twice about it.
