Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
renamed trope
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* OnceOriginalNowOverdone: Some readers feel that her plots and characters are cliched in a "seen-it-a-million-times" way. Jane Austen practically ''[[TropeMakers invented]]'' [[TropeMakers these romance arc tropes]].
to:
* OnceOriginalNowOverdone: OnceOriginalNowCommon: Some readers feel that her plots and characters are cliched in a "seen-it-a-million-times" way. Jane Austen practically ''[[TropeMakers invented]]'' [[TropeMakers these romance arc tropes]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: Some readers feel that her plots and characters are cliched in a "seen-it-a-million-times" way. Jane Austen practically invented these romance arc tropes.
to:
* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: OnceOriginalNowOverdone: Some readers feel that her plots and characters are cliched in a "seen-it-a-million-times" way. Jane Austen practically invented ''[[TropeMakers invented]]'' [[TropeMakers these romance arc tropes.tropes]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Alphabetization
Added line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* CrossoverShip: It's definitely a thing in Jane Austen's fandom to PairTheSpares, very often cross-novels. It helps that the world of Jane Austen's books is always very similar — pastoral and almost-idyllic version of Regency England. It's not uncommon for characters like good-natured but stupid and extremely wealthy Mr Rushworth of ''Mansfield Park'' to be paired with Miss Bingley from ''Pride and Prejudice'' who was always after money. Some ship him with Mary Bennet, who is thought to deserve more attention and a wealthy husband.
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* CrossoverShip: It's definitely a thing in Jane Austen's fandom to PairTheSpares, very often cross-novels. It helps that the world of Jane Austen's books is always very similar — pastoral and almost-idyllic version of Regency England. It's not uncommon for characters like good-natured but stupid and extremely wealthy Mr Rushworth of ''Mansfield Park'' to be paired with Miss Bingley from ''Pride and Prejudice'' who was always after money. Some ship him with Mary Bennet, who is thought to deserve more attention and a wealthy husband.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: Some readers feel that her plots and characters are cliched in a "seen-it-a-million-times" way. Jane Austen practically invented these romance arc tropes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: Modern readers sometimes sneer at her emphasis on marriage, forgetting that in Austen's day women who didn't marry could end up forgotten at best, starving in the streets at worst. Austen herself, interestingly, never married, and was forced to live off the charity of relatives -- and not luxuriously.
to:
* CrossoverShip: It's definitely a thing in Jane Austen's fandom to PairTheSpares, very often cross-novels. It helps that the world of Jane Austen's books is always very similar — pastoral and almost-idyllic version of Regency England. It's not uncommon for characters like good-natured but stupid and extremely wealthy Mr Rushworth of ''Mansfield Park'' to be paired with Miss Bingley from ''Pride and Prejudice'' who was always after money. Some ship him with Mary Bennet, who is thought to deserve more attention and a wealthy husband.
* ValuesDissonance: Modern readers sometimes sneer at her emphasis on marriage, forgetting that in Austen's day women who didn't marry could end up forgotten at best, starving in the streets at worst. Austen herself, interestingly, never married, and was forced to live off the charity of relatives -- and notluxuriously.luxuriously.
----
* ValuesDissonance: Modern readers sometimes sneer at her emphasis on marriage, forgetting that in Austen's day women who didn't marry could end up forgotten at best, starving in the streets at worst. Austen herself, interestingly, never married, and was forced to live off the charity of relatives -- and not
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HoYay: Has [[HoYay/JaneAusten her own page]] now.
* ValuesDissonance: Modern readers sometimes sneer at her emphasis on marriage, forgetting that in Austen's day women who didn't marry could end up forgotten at best, starving in the streets at worst. Austen herself, interestingly, never married, and was forced to live off the charity of relatives -- and not luxuriously.
* ValuesDissonance: Modern readers sometimes sneer at her emphasis on marriage, forgetting that in Austen's day women who didn't marry could end up forgotten at best, starving in the streets at worst. Austen herself, interestingly, never married, and was forced to live off the charity of relatives -- and not luxuriously.