Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / DisneyLiveActionRemakes

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AuthorsSavingThrow: The remakes are often a pretext to "fix" plot lines or characters 's behavior that became contentious as time went by. For instance in ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'', nobody seems to remember there was a prince (The Beast) that lives nearby, because the Enchantress 's curse, this time, include rendering the townspeople amnesiac about this detail. The fairy Godmother in ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and the genie ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'' uses spells that prevent to recognize Cinderella at the ball, or Aladdin as the prince Ali. In ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'', [[spoiler: a very different climax prevent Jasmine to have to go through GoGoEnslavement and ShowSomeLeg, instead, she actively take part in action in a pursuit to take the lamp back.]] In ''Film/{{Dumbo|2019}}'', [[spoiler: a different ending sees Dumbo and his mother return to wilderness, due to today controversies about animals in circus.]]

to:

* AuthorsSavingThrow: The remakes are often a pretext to "fix" plot lines or characters 's behavior that became contentious as time went by. For instance in ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'', nobody seems to remember there was a prince (The Beast) that lives nearby, because the Enchantress 's curse, this time, include rendering the townspeople amnesiac about this detail. The fairy Godmother in ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and the genie in ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'' uses spells that prevent to recognize Cinderella at the ball, or Aladdin as the prince Ali. In ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'', [[spoiler: a very different climax prevent Jasmine to have to go through GoGoEnslavement and ShowSomeLeg, instead, she actively take part in action in a pursuit to take the lamp back.]] In ''Film/{{Dumbo|2019}}'', [[spoiler: a different ending sees Dumbo and his mother return to wilderness, due to today controversies about animals in circus.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AuthorsSavingThrow: The remakes are often a pretext to "fix" plot lines or characters 's behavior that became contentious as time went by. For instance in ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'', nobody seems to remember there was a prince (The Beast) that lives nearby, because the Enchantress 's curse, this time, include rendering the townspeople amnesiac about this detail. The fairy Godmother in ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and the genie ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'' uses spells that prevent to recognize Cinderella at the ball, or Aladdin as the prince Ali. In ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'', [|spoiler: a very different climax prevent Jasmine to have to go through GoGoEnslavement and ShowSomeLeg, instead, she actively take part in action in a pursuit to take the lamp back.]] In ''Film/{{Dumbo|2019}}'', [[spoiler: a different ending sees Dumbo and his mother return to wilderness, due to today controversies about animals in circus.]]

to:

* AuthorsSavingThrow: The remakes are often a pretext to "fix" plot lines or characters 's behavior that became contentious as time went by. For instance in ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'', nobody seems to remember there was a prince (The Beast) that lives nearby, because the Enchantress 's curse, this time, include rendering the townspeople amnesiac about this detail. The fairy Godmother in ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and the genie ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'' uses spells that prevent to recognize Cinderella at the ball, or Aladdin as the prince Ali. In ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'', [|spoiler: [[spoiler: a very different climax prevent Jasmine to have to go through GoGoEnslavement and ShowSomeLeg, instead, she actively take part in action in a pursuit to take the lamp back.]] In ''Film/{{Dumbo|2019}}'', [[spoiler: a different ending sees Dumbo and his mother return to wilderness, due to today controversies about animals in circus.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AuthorsSavingThrow: The remakes are often a pretext to "fix" plot lines or characters 's behavior that became contentious as time went by. For instance in ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'', nobody seems to remember there was a prince (The Beast) that lives nearby, because the Enchantress 's curse, this time, include rendering the townspeople amnesiac about this detail. The fairy Godmother in ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and the genie ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'' uses spells that prevent to recognize Cinderella at the ball, or Aladdin as the prince Ali. In ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'', [spoiler a very different climax prevent Jasmine to have to go through GoGoEnslavement and ShowSomeLeg, instead, she actively take part in action in a pursuit to take the lamp back.] In ''Film/{{Dumbo|2019}}'', [spoiler: a different ending sees Dumbo and his mother return to wilderness, due to today controversies about animals in circus.]

to:

* AuthorsSavingThrow: The remakes are often a pretext to "fix" plot lines or characters 's behavior that became contentious as time went by. For instance in ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'', nobody seems to remember there was a prince (The Beast) that lives nearby, because the Enchantress 's curse, this time, include rendering the townspeople amnesiac about this detail. The fairy Godmother in ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and the genie ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'' uses spells that prevent to recognize Cinderella at the ball, or Aladdin as the prince Ali. In ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'', [spoiler [|spoiler: a very different climax prevent Jasmine to have to go through GoGoEnslavement and ShowSomeLeg, instead, she actively take part in action in a pursuit to take the lamp back.] ]] In ''Film/{{Dumbo|2019}}'', [spoiler: [[spoiler: a different ending sees Dumbo and his mother return to wilderness, due to today controversies about animals in circus.]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AuthorsSavingThrow: The remakes are often a pretext to "fix" plot lines or characters 's behavior that became contentious as time went by. For instance in ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'', nobody seems to remember there was a prince (The Beast) that lives nearby, because the Enchantress 's curse, this time, include rendering the townspeople amnesiac about this detail. The fairy Godmother in ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and the genie ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'' uses spells that prevent to recognize Cinderella at the ball, or Aladdin as the prince Ali. In ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'', [[spoiler a very different climax prevent Jasmine to have to go through GoGoEnslavement and ShowSomeLeg, instead, she actively take part in action in a pursuit to take the lamp back.]] In ''Film/{{Dumbo|2019}}'', [[spoiler: a different ending sees Dumbo and his mother return to wilderness, due to today controversies about animals in circus.]]

to:

* AuthorsSavingThrow: The remakes are often a pretext to "fix" plot lines or characters 's behavior that became contentious as time went by. For instance in ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'', nobody seems to remember there was a prince (The Beast) that lives nearby, because the Enchantress 's curse, this time, include rendering the townspeople amnesiac about this detail. The fairy Godmother in ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and the genie ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'' uses spells that prevent to recognize Cinderella at the ball, or Aladdin as the prince Ali. In ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'', [[spoiler [spoiler a very different climax prevent Jasmine to have to go through GoGoEnslavement and ShowSomeLeg, instead, she actively take part in action in a pursuit to take the lamp back.]] ] In ''Film/{{Dumbo|2019}}'', [[spoiler: [spoiler: a different ending sees Dumbo and his mother return to wilderness, due to today controversies about animals in circus.]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*AuthorsSavingThrow: The remakes are often a pretext to "fix" plot lines or characters 's behavior that became contentious as time went by. For instance in ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'', nobody seems to remember there was a prince (The Beast) that lives nearby, because the Enchantress 's curse, this time, include rendering the townspeople amnesiac about this detail. The fairy Godmother in ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and the genie ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'' uses spells that prevent to recognize Cinderella at the ball, or Aladdin as the prince Ali. In ''Film/{{Aladdin|2019}}'', [[spoiler a very different climax prevent Jasmine to have to go through GoGoEnslavement and ShowSomeLeg, instead, she actively take part in action in a pursuit to take the lamp back.]] In ''Film/{{Dumbo|2019}}'', [[spoiler: a different ending sees Dumbo and his mother return to wilderness, due to today controversies about animals in circus.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SoOkayItsAverage: Popular consensus is that Disney has yet to release a remake that is both a good movie on it's own ''and'' absolutely necessary. The closest movie to achieve this so far is ''Film/{{The Jungle Book|2016}}''.

to:

* SoOkayItsAverage: Popular consensus is that Disney has yet to release a remake that is both a good movie on it's its own ''and'' absolutely necessary. The closest movie to achieve this so far is ''Film/{{The Jungle Book|2016}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SoOkayItsAverage: Popular consensus is that Disney has yet to release a remake that is both a good movie on it's own ''and'' absolutely necessary. The closest movie to achieve this so far is ''Film/TheJungleBook2016''.

to:

* SoOkayItsAverage: Popular consensus is that Disney has yet to release a remake that is both a good movie on it's own ''and'' absolutely necessary. The closest movie to achieve this so far is ''Film/TheJungleBook2016''.''Film/{{The Jungle Book|2016}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CriticProof: No matter how much the critics hark on the remakes for being unoriginal and bland, they always end up being at least mild successes, simply because of the nostalgic value attached to them.


Added DiffLines:

* SoOkayItsAverage: Popular consensus is that Disney has yet to release a remake that is both a good movie on it's own ''and'' absolutely necessary. The closest movie to achieve this so far is ''Film/TheJungleBook2016''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having sexist/racist elements), while classic Disney fans dislike them for considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas. Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.

to:

* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they these fans hate the old old, original movies for being corny, outdated and having [[UnfortunateImplications slightly sexist/racist elements), elements]]), while classic Disney fans dislike them for considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas. Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FirstInstallmentWins: ''Maleficent'' is the film with the largest fandom. This is due to it being an AlternateContinuity rather than a straight-up remake. There's a lot of FanficFuel in it as well.

Changed: 1413

Removed: 1957

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I don't see how "Being a remake" is an inherent flaw.


* FranchiseOriginalSin:
** ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist.
** ''Film/Cinderella2015'' received some complaints for being a retread of the original instead of a PerspectiveFlip or clear AlternateContinuity like ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'', however this was overshadowed by praise for seeing the classic Disney film in live action. Since then, however, a common complaint of the remakes is that they're just that: remakes. They've received complaints by many Disney purists that Disney just wants to overshadow their animation with live-action, while many more accepting viewers still see them as redundant.

to:

* FranchiseOriginalSin:
**
FranchiseOriginalSin: ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist.
** ''Film/Cinderella2015'' received some complaints for being a retread of the original instead of a PerspectiveFlip or clear AlternateContinuity like ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'', however this was overshadowed by praise for seeing the classic Disney film in live action. Since then, however, a common complaint of the remakes is that they're just that: remakes. They've received complaints by many Disney purists that Disney just wants to overshadow their animation with live-action, while many more accepting viewers still see them as redundant.
antagonist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: Beast from ''Beauty and the Beast'' and Genie from ''Film/Aladdin2019'' have similar designs to Stranger and Abe from ''VideoGame/Oddworld''.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: Beast from ''Beauty and the Beast'' and Genie from ''Film/Aladdin2019'' have similar designs to Stranger and Abe from ''VideoGame/Oddworld''.''VideoGame/{{Oddworld}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: Beast from ''Beauty and the Beast'' and Genie from ''Film/Aladdin2019'' have similar designs to Stranger and Abe from ''VideoGame/Oddworld''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hopefully this would become dated someday?


* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having sexist/racist elements), while classic Disney fans dislike them for considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original). Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.

to:

* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having sexist/racist elements), while classic Disney fans dislike them for considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original).ideas. Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.

Added: 1957

Changed: 1413

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FranchiseOriginalSin: ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist.

to:

* FranchiseOriginalSin: FranchiseOriginalSin:
**
''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist.antagonist.
** ''Film/Cinderella2015'' received some complaints for being a retread of the original instead of a PerspectiveFlip or clear AlternateContinuity like ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'', however this was overshadowed by praise for seeing the classic Disney film in live action. Since then, however, a common complaint of the remakes is that they're just that: remakes. They've received complaints by many Disney purists that Disney just wants to overshadow their animation with live-action, while many more accepting viewers still see them as redundant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
You know it's something completely different to adapt a story to a new medium than go back to an already made movie like remaking your own film you made 20 years ago, scene by scene.


* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having sexist/racist elements), while classic Disney fans dislike them for considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original even though a majority of Disney's animated works are adaptations and therefore not original themselves). Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.

to:

* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having sexist/racist elements), while classic Disney fans dislike them for considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original even though a majority of Disney's animated works are adaptations and therefore not original themselves).original). Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.

Added: 1663

Changed: 1607

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FranchiseOriginalSin: ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist.

to:

* FandomRivalry: ''Film/{{Tron}}'' fans are not pleased on how Disney has approved of over ''20'' live-action remakes while they're left in the dark because of ''Film/{{Tomorrowland}}'' bombing at the box office. ''Franchise/StarWars'' fans also have some resentment after more live-action remakes were approved in the wake of ''Film/{{Solo}}'' failing as well (but despite online rumors, no proposed films in that franchise have been cancelled).
* FranchiseOriginalSin: ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist. antagonist.
* MemeticMutation: Facebook comments often have people replying on how Disney will remake ''all'' of its films in live-actions, even unreleased ones, given there are 55+ movies, and over 20 confirmed remakes as of January 2019.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not everyone finds the changes unnecessary.


* FranchiseOriginalSin: ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its unnecessary changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist.

to:

* FranchiseOriginalSin: ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its unnecessary changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having sexist/racist elements), while classic Disney fans dislike them for considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original). Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.

to:

* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having sexist/racist elements), while classic Disney fans dislike them for considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original).original even though a majority of Disney's animated works are adaptations and therefore not original themselves). Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
As the YMMV page for the movie shows there are people who do believe the changes were an improvement so the opinion of one should not be used as the opinion of all.


* FranchiseOriginalSin: ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its unnecessary changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist. ''Beauty and the Beast'''s changes, on the other hand, mostly just weighed the movie down--while doing little to actually ''improve'' it.

to:

* FranchiseOriginalSin: ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its unnecessary changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist. ''Beauty and the Beast'''s changes, on the other hand, mostly just weighed the movie down--while doing little to actually ''improve'' it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EpilepticTrees: A lot of theories about the "Disney Universe" come to fruition with these remakes, considering even though most of the time periods don't match, the movies still can be considered to all exist in the same universe due to similar aesthetics, writing, etc etc.

to:

* EpilepticTrees: A lot of theories about the "Disney Universe" come to fruition with these remakes, considering even though most of the time periods don't match, the movies still can be considered to all exist in the same universe due to similar aesthetics, writing, etc etc.etc.
* FranchiseOriginalSin: ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' got a lot of criticism for its unnecessary changes, which many viewers saw as gratuitous [[PanderingToTheBase pandering]] to adult fans who had trivial complaints about [[Disney/BeautyAndTheBeast the original]]. [[note]] Just to name a few: the movie goes out of its way to justify the Beast's servants being transfigured alongside him, it explains why the local villagers don't remember who the Prince is, it gives Gaston and the Beast {{Freudian Excuse}}s to "explain" their personalities, and it plays up the feminist themes to a degree that many people saw as forced and {{anvilicious}}.[[/note]] To a degree, this was also true of ''Film/Cinderella2015'' and ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'', which were much less divisive. Among other things, ''Cinderella'' gave Lady Tremaine additional backstory to explain her hatred of Ella, and ''The Jungle Book'' changed King Louie into a ''Gigantopithecus'' to placate people who complained about [[MisplacedWildlife an orangutan being in India]]. But those small changes were mostly overshadowed by larger changes that actually made for stronger stories; ''Cinderella'' gave the FlatCharacter the Prince considerable CharacterDevelopment to make his relationship with Ella feel like an actual relationship, and ''The Jungle Book'' greatly streamlined the original's meandering narrative while giving Shere Khan a far more prominent role as antagonist. ''Beauty and the Beast'''s changes, on the other hand, mostly just weighed the movie down--while doing little to actually ''improve'' it.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
About fans or critics praising it such audiences don't think it measures up. Not just disappointment.


* EpilepticTrees: A lot of theories about the "Disney Universe" come to fruition with these remakes, considering even though most of the time periods don't match, the movies still can be considered to all exist in the same universe due to similar aesthetics, writing, etc etc.
* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material]] (which even the animated films are sometimes guilty of when it comes to their own source material), [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks being too similar thus making fans wonder why bother remaking the film]] (especially if it's a relatively recent film), [[WTHCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for [[AdaptationPersonalityChange making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as]] (again even the animated films are sometimes guilty of this when it comes to their own source material). Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.

to:

* EpilepticTrees: A lot of theories about the "Disney Universe" come to fruition with these remakes, considering even though most of the time periods don't match, the movies still can be considered to all exist in the same universe due to similar aesthetics, writing, etc etc.
* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material]] (which even the animated films are sometimes guilty of when it comes to their own source material), [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks being too similar thus making fans wonder why bother remaking the film]] (especially if it's a relatively recent film), [[WTHCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for [[AdaptationPersonalityChange making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as]] (again even the animated films are sometimes guilty of this when it comes to their own source material). Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.
etc.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having [[UnfortunateImplications sexist/racist elements]]), while classic Disney fans dislike them for considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original). Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.

to:

* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having [[UnfortunateImplications sexist/racist elements]]), elements), while classic Disney fans dislike them for considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original). Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material,]] [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks being too similar thus making fans wonder why bother remaking the film]] (especially if it's a relatively recent film), [[WTHCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for [[AdaptationPersonalityChange making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as]]. Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.

to:

* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material,]] material]] (which even the animated films are sometimes guilty of when it comes to their own source material), [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks being too similar thus making fans wonder why bother remaking the film]] (especially if it's a relatively recent film), [[WTHCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for [[AdaptationPersonalityChange making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as]].as]] (again even the animated films are sometimes guilty of this when it comes to their own source material). Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having [[UnfortunateImplications sexist/racist elements]]), while classic Disney fans dislike them for being soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original). Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.

to:

* BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they consider they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having [[UnfortunateImplications sexist/racist elements]]), while classic Disney fans dislike them for being considering them soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original). Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.



* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material,]] [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks being too similar thus making fans wonder why bother remaking the film]] (especially if it's a relatively recent film), [[WhatTheHellCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for [[AdaptationPersonalityChange making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as]]. Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.

to:

* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material,]] [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks being too similar thus making fans wonder why bother remaking the film]] (especially if it's a relatively recent film), [[WhatTheHellCastingAgency [[WTHCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for [[AdaptationPersonalityChange making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as]]. Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material,]] [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks being too similar thus making fans wonder why bother remaking the film]] (especially if it's a relatively recent film), [[WhatTheHellCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as. Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.

to:

* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material,]] [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks being too similar thus making fans wonder why bother remaking the film]] (especially if it's a relatively recent film), [[WhatTheHellCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for [[AdaptationPersonalityChange making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as.as]]. Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material,]] [[WhatTheHellCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as. Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.

to:

* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material,]] [[ItsTheSameNowItSucks being too similar thus making fans wonder why bother remaking the film]] (especially if it's a relatively recent film), [[WhatTheHellCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as. Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EpilepticTrees: A lot of theories about the "Disney Universe" come to fruition with these remakes, considering even though most of the time periods don't match, the movies still can be considered to all exist in the same universe due to similar aesthetics, writing, etc etc.

to:

* EpilepticTrees: A lot of theories about the "Disney Universe" come to fruition with these remakes, considering even though most of the time periods don't match, the movies still can be considered to all exist in the same universe due to similar aesthetics, writing, etc etc.etc.
* HypeBacklash: Nearly every adaptation gets a lot of flak when they're finally released for multiple reasons. The most common complaints are for the movies being [[TheyChangedItNowItSucks far too different than the original animated adaptation they're based on and/or the original source material,]] [[WhatTheHellCastingAgency bad/very questionable casting choices for roles,]] a heavy reliance on auto tune for musical numbers, with some of them feeling forced, and for making the characters far too different than how they originally appeared as. Many of the critics rarely consider them to be better than the original.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EpilecticTrees: A lot of theories about the "Disney Universe" come to fruition with these remakes, considering even though most of the time periods don't match, the movies still can be considered to all exist in the same universe due to similar aesthetics, writing, etc etc.

to:

* EpilecticTrees: EpilepticTrees: A lot of theories about the "Disney Universe" come to fruition with these remakes, considering even though most of the time periods don't match, the movies still can be considered to all exist in the same universe due to similar aesthetics, writing, etc etc.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*BrokenBase: A very big one concerning these movies. You'll have people who love them for the depth they bring to the old Disney films (and oftentimes, they hate the old movies for being corny, outdated and having [[UnfortunateImplications sexist/racist elements]]), while classic Disney fans dislike them for being soulless imitations of the movies they loved for years, and are feeling Disney is really running out of ideas (to the point that as of now Disney's current slate only consists of remakes, sequels, and Star Wars/Marvel stuff -ie nothing original). Some also feel it's another attempt to minimize 2D's influence in current Disney, considering how as of yet there's no word of live action remakes of the Pixar or current CGI Disney movies.
*EpilecticTrees: A lot of theories about the "Disney Universe" come to fruition with these remakes, considering even though most of the time periods don't match, the movies still can be considered to all exist in the same universe due to similar aesthetics, writing, etc etc.

Top