Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / CinemassacresMonsterMadness

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: While the effort to port previous seasons of "Monster Madness" to Youtube from Jame's old site was very appreciated, the decision to replace implemented video clips, with still shots for copyright reasons in the review was ''very'' divisive; especially since they often affect the flow of the script. He would later upload compilations that kept the original clips.

to:

* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: While the effort to port previous seasons of "Monster Madness" to Youtube from Jame's James' old site was very appreciated, the decision to replace implemented video clips, with still shots for copyright reasons in the review was ''very'' divisive; especially since they often affect the flow of the script. He would later upload compilations that kept the original clips.

Added: 571

Changed: 341

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: In his ''[=GodzillaThon=]'' review for ''Film/KingKongVsGodzilla'', he states that, despite his dislike for unnecessary film remakes, he would love to see the two face off again but with the benefit of modern special effects. About seven years later, ''Film/GodzillaVsKong'' was announced by Creator/WarnerBros and Creator/LegendaryPictures.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: HilariousInHindsight:
**
In his ''[=GodzillaThon=]'' review for ''Film/KingKongVsGodzilla'', he states that, despite his dislike for unnecessary film remakes, he would love to see the two face off again but with the benefit of modern special effects. About seven years later, ''Film/GodzillaVsKong'' was announced by Creator/WarnerBros and Creator/LegendaryPictures.Creator/LegendaryPictures.
** In his review of ''Film/TheStuff'', he compares it to the river of slime from ''Film/GhostbustersII'', commenting that ''Ghostbusters 3'' will never happen. About a decade later ''Film/GhostbustersAfterlife'' would come out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: While the effort to port previous seasons of "Monster Madness" to Youtube from Jame's old site was very appreciated, the decision to replace implemented video clips, with still shots for copyright reasons in the review was ''very'' divisive; especially since they often affect the flow of the script.

to:

* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: While the effort to port previous seasons of "Monster Madness" to Youtube from Jame's old site was very appreciated, the decision to replace implemented video clips, with still shots for copyright reasons in the review was ''very'' divisive; especially since they often affect the flow of the script. He would later upload compilations that kept the original clips.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: While the effort to port previous seasons of "Monster Madness" to Youtube from Jame's old site was very appreciated, the decision to replace implemented video clips of the movies Jame's is reviewing, with still shots for copyright reasons was ''very'' divisive, especially since they often affect the flow of the review.

to:

* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: While the effort to port previous seasons of "Monster Madness" to Youtube from Jame's old site was very appreciated, the decision to replace implemented video clips of the movies Jame's is reviewing, clips, with still shots for copyright reasons in the review was ''very'' divisive, divisive; especially since they often affect the flow of the review.script.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: While the effort to port previous seasons of "Monster Madness" to Youtube from Jame's old site was very appreciated, the decision to replace implemented video clips of the movies Jame's is reviewing, with still shots for copyright reasons was ''very'' divisive.

to:

* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: While the effort to port previous seasons of "Monster Madness" to Youtube from Jame's old site was very appreciated, the decision to replace implemented video clips of the movies Jame's is reviewing, with still shots for copyright reasons was ''very'' divisive.divisive, especially since they often affect the flow of the review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SeasonalRot: A few of the later yearly Monster Madnesses have a more mixed reception, usually due to changing drastically from the formula due to the inclusion of other people. In particular, "Monster Madness 9", due to being more of a podcast-like format between James and Creator/MikeMatei for most of the episodes rather than James alone discussing the films, "Monster Madness 2019", for the similar reason of using the "Rental Reviews" cast and format, and the 2021 revival season "Around the World", due to the scripts being written by a committee, making the reviews seem disingenuous (as well playing a big part causing a major plagiarism kerfuffle when one of the writers was exposed as having copied most of his material from several other sources).

to:

* SeasonalRot: A few of the later yearly Monster Madnesses have a more mixed reception, usually due to changing drastically from the formula due to the inclusion of other people. In particular, "Monster Madness 9", due to being more of a podcast-like format between James and Creator/MikeMatei for most of the episodes rather than James alone discussing the films, "Monster Madness 2019", for the similar reason of using the "Rental Reviews" cast and format, and the 2021 revival season "Around the World", due to the scripts being written by a committee, making the reviews seem disingenuous (as well playing a big part causing a major plagiarism kerfuffle when one of the writers was exposed as having copied most of his material from several other sources).sources).
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: While the effort to port previous seasons of "Monster Madness" to Youtube from Jame's old site was very appreciated, the decision to replace implemented video clips of the movies Jame's is reviewing, with still shots for copyright reasons was ''very'' divisive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: For ''Around the World'', a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with the ''Film/TwentyEightDaysLater'' episode, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of this review began to surface. The production team would later admit upfront that the script writer for said episode had indeed been engaging in plagiarism for not only that review, but several other episodes he had worked on, resulting in his firing and good chunk of the series having to be hastily rewritten on short notice.

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: For ''Around the World'', a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with the ''Film/TwentyEightDaysLater'' episode, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of this review began to surface. The production team would later admit upfront up front that the episode's script writer for said episode had indeed been engaging in plagiarism for not only that review, but several other episodes he had worked on, resulting in his firing and a good chunk of the series having to be hastily rewritten on short notice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SeasonalRot: A few of the later yearly Monster Madnesses have a more mixed reception, usually due to changing drastically from the formula due to the inclusion of other people. In particular, "Monster Madness 9", due to being more of a podcast-like format between James and Creator/MikeMatei for most of the episodes rather than James alone discussing the films, "Monster Madness 2019", for the similar reason of using the "Rental Reviews" cast and format, and the revival season "Around the World", due to the scripts being written by a committee, making the reviews seem disingenuous.

to:

* SeasonalRot: A few of the later yearly Monster Madnesses have a more mixed reception, usually due to changing drastically from the formula due to the inclusion of other people. In particular, "Monster Madness 9", due to being more of a podcast-like format between James and Creator/MikeMatei for most of the episodes rather than James alone discussing the films, "Monster Madness 2019", for the similar reason of using the "Rental Reviews" cast and format, and the 2021 revival season "Around the World", due to the scripts being written by a committee, making the reviews seem disingenuous.disingenuous (as well playing a big part causing a major plagiarism kerfuffle when one of the writers was exposed as having copied most of his material from several other sources).

Added: 588

Changed: 8

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: For ''Around the World'', a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with the ''Film/TwentyEightDaysLater'' episode, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of this review began to surface. The production team would later admit upfront that the script writer for said episode had indeed been engaging in plagiarization for not only that review, but several other episodes he had worked on, resulting in his firing and good chunk of the series having to be hastily rewritten on short notice.
* HilariousInHindsight: In his ''[=GodzillaThon=]'' review for ''Film/KingKongVsGodzilla'', he states that, despite his dislike for unnecessary film remakes, he would love to see the two face off again but with the benefit of modern special effects. About seven years later, ''Film/GodzillaVsKong'' was announced by Creator/WarnerBros and Creator/LegendaryPictures.

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: For ''Around the World'', a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with the ''Film/TwentyEightDaysLater'' episode, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of this review began to surface. The production team would later admit upfront that the script writer for said episode had indeed been engaging in plagiarization plagiarism for not only that review, but several other episodes he had worked on, resulting in his firing and good chunk of the series having to be hastily rewritten on short notice.
* HilariousInHindsight: In his ''[=GodzillaThon=]'' review for ''Film/KingKongVsGodzilla'', he states that, despite his dislike for unnecessary film remakes, he would love to see the two face off again but with the benefit of modern special effects. About seven years later, ''Film/GodzillaVsKong'' was announced by Creator/WarnerBros and Creator/LegendaryPictures.Creator/LegendaryPictures.
* SeasonalRot: A few of the later yearly Monster Madnesses have a more mixed reception, usually due to changing drastically from the formula due to the inclusion of other people. In particular, "Monster Madness 9", due to being more of a podcast-like format between James and Creator/MikeMatei for most of the episodes rather than James alone discussing the films, "Monster Madness 2019", for the similar reason of using the "Rental Reviews" cast and format, and the revival season "Around the World", due to the scripts being written by a committee, making the reviews seem disingenuous.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: For ''Around the World'', a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with the ''Film/28DaysLater'' episode, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of this review began to surface. The production team would later admit upfront that the script writer for said episode had indeed been engaging in plagiarization for not only that review, but several other episodes he had worked on, resulting in his firing and good chunk of the series having to be hastily rewritten on short notice.

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: For ''Around the World'', a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with the ''Film/28DaysLater'' ''Film/TwentyEightDaysLater'' episode, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of this review began to surface. The production team would later admit upfront that the script writer for said episode had indeed been engaging in plagiarization for not only that review, but several other episodes he had worked on, resulting in his firing and good chunk of the series having to be hastily rewritten on short notice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: For ''Around the World'', a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with his ''28 Days Later'' review, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of this review began to surface.

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: For ''Around the World'', a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with his ''28 Days Later'' review, the ''Film/28DaysLater'' episode, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of this review began to surface.surface. The production team would later admit upfront that the script writer for said episode had indeed been engaging in plagiarization for not only that review, but several other episodes he had worked on, resulting in his firing and good chunk of the series having to be hastily rewritten on short notice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: For Monster Madness 2021, a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with his ''28 Days Later'' review, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of this review began to surface.

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: For Monster Madness 2021, ''Around the World'', a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with his ''28 Days Later'' review, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of this review began to surface.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: For Monster Madness 2021, a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with his 28 Days Later review, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of said review began to surface.

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: For Monster Madness 2021, a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with his 28 ''28 Days Later Later'' review, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of said this review began to surface.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HarsherInHindsight: For Monster Madness 2021, a good chunk of the movies reviewed are mocked for being ripoffs of other horror films. Starting with his 28 Days Later review, however, accusations of plagiarism in the script of said review began to surface.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BrokenBase:
** ''Monster Madness X'' only uses screenshots as opposed to full video in exchange for being able to present it on Website/YouTube, which became the standard for his movie reviews in general from there on. Some people would have preferred to see full video, while others are willing to tolerate the new format to be able to view it on [=YouTube=].
** ''Monster Madness 2019'' gained even more of a divisive reaction. The biggest points of contention were that it was done in the "Rental Reviews" style, and that some of the movies featured had already been reviewed in past Monster Madness videos. Was it a great way to revitalize a classic Cinemassacre staple with a new look from the RR cast, or was it a lazy mess that ruined what made past Monster Madness marathons special while adding nothing new to the previously reviewed movies?
* HilariousInHindsight: In his ''[=GodzillaThon=]'' review for ''Film/KingKongVsGodzilla'', he states that, despite his dislike for unnecessary film remakes, he would love to see the two face off again but with the benefit of modern special effects. About seven years later, ''Film/GodzillaVsKong'' was announced by Creator/WarnerBros and Creator/LegendaryPictures.

Top