Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** The babies are geniuses and apparently have the muscle mass and dexterity to manipulate perform martial arts and build electronic devices. Yet they do not seem to be potty trained, since [=BabyCo=] has a diaper disposal service.
to:
** The babies are geniuses and apparently have the muscle mass and dexterity to manipulate manipulate, perform martial arts arts, and build electronic devices. Yet they do not seem to be potty trained, since [=BabyCo=] has a diaper disposal service.
Deleted line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) :
* HilariousInHindsight: Jon Voight donning a blonde wig for part of the sequel becomes this when you realize he became a vocal supporter of Donald Trump during his successful election to president in 2016.
** Funnily enough, among his co-stars is Scott Baio, another vocal Trump advocate.
** Funnily enough, among his co-stars is Scott Baio, another vocal Trump advocate.
Deleted line(s) 13 (click to see context) :
* SnarkBait: Well, why the hell else would you watch this tripe?
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* FridgeLogic: Why, exactly, does [=BabyCo=] ''need'' a secret lab beneath the city? Aside from the obvious question of how a child care company has the resources to make such a thing, from what we see they aren't doing anything illegal. Their testing methods appear to amount to monitoring the kids in controlled environments, using computers to analyze what they do at play in greater depth, and keeping them isolated from the outside world, all in order to prove their methods of educating the babies during their early years eventually produces children of demonstratably superior intelligence. There's no reason they couldn't just use the children of company employees and ask them to live at the office to keep the kids contained. Why is this some sort of secret conspiracy?
to:
* FridgeLogic: FridgeLogic:
** Why, exactly, does [=BabyCo=] ''need'' a secret lab beneath the city? Aside from the obvious question of how a child care company has the resources to make such a thing, from what we see they aren't doing anything illegal. Their testing methods appear to amount to monitoring the kids in controlled environments, using computers to analyze what they do at play in greater depth, and keeping them isolated from the outside world, all in order to prove their methods of educating the babies during their early years eventually produces children of demonstratably superior intelligence. There's no reason they couldn't just use the children of company employees and ask them to live at the office to keep the kids contained. Why is this some sort of secretconspiracy?conspiracy?
** The babies are geniuses and apparently have the muscle mass and dexterity to manipulate perform martial arts and build electronic devices. Yet they do not seem to be potty trained, since [=BabyCo=] has a diaper disposal service.
** Why, exactly, does [=BabyCo=] ''need'' a secret lab beneath the city? Aside from the obvious question of how a child care company has the resources to make such a thing, from what we see they aren't doing anything illegal. Their testing methods appear to amount to monitoring the kids in controlled environments, using computers to analyze what they do at play in greater depth, and keeping them isolated from the outside world, all in order to prove their methods of educating the babies during their early years eventually produces children of demonstratably superior intelligence. There's no reason they couldn't just use the children of company employees and ask them to live at the office to keep the kids contained. Why is this some sort of secret
** The babies are geniuses and apparently have the muscle mass and dexterity to manipulate perform martial arts and build electronic devices. Yet they do not seem to be potty trained, since [=BabyCo=] has a diaper disposal service.
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* IdiotPlot: Bigtime. For starters, a two-year-old is able to escape a secret underground lab by building some sort of gun that jams electronic devices, made from toys the lab provided him, and no one is able to detect his escape. In fact, [=BabyCo=] in general employs some of the dumbest people on the planet that they are continually outsmarted by babies.
to:
* IdiotPlot: Bigtime. For starters, a two-year-old is able to escape a secret underground lab by building some sort of gun that jams electronic devices, made from toys the lab provided him, and no one is able to detect his escape. In fact, [=BabyCo=] in general employs some of the dumbest dumbest, most incompetent people on the planet planet, that they are continually outsmarted by babies.babies, even if they are supposed to be geniuses. Sly escapes the lab by using electronic components (from toys [=BabyCo=] just leaves lying around for him to play with) to build a gun that can jam electronic devices, which he uses to shut down security cameras, and no one thinks this is strange, despite the fact Sly has escaped several times before. The various henchmen they send to recapture him through the film aren't very bright, either.
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* AwesomeMusic: [[SubvertedTrope Badly subverted]]; the soundtrack of the first sequel tries ''way'' too hard to sound epic throughout a film that is decidedly anything but despite its many attempts.
Added DiffLines:
** Funnily enough, among his co-stars is Scott Baio, another vocal Trump advocate.
Added DiffLines:
* AwesomeMusic: [[SubvertedTrope Badly subverted]]; the soundtrack of the first sequel tries ''way'' too hard to sound epic throughout a film that is decidedly anything but despite its many attempts.
Added DiffLines:
* HilariousInHindsight: Jon Voight donning a blonde wig for part of the sequel becomes this when you realize he became a vocal supporter of Donald Trump during his successful election to president in 2016.
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
* WTHCastingAgency: Respected actors such as Creator/KathleenTurner, Creator/KimCattrall, Creator/ChristopherLloyd, Creator/DomDeLuise and Jon Voight all committed to parts in the first two films. To say that their talents are not used well in either would be an understatement.
to:
* WTHCastingAgency: Respected actors such as Creator/KathleenTurner, Creator/KimCattrall, Creator/ChristopherLloyd, Creator/DomDeLuise and Jon Voight all committed to parts in the first two films. To say that their talents are not used well in either would be an understatement.understatement.
----
----
Deleted line(s) 8 (click to see context) :
* PolishTheTurd: As of May 2015, ''Baby Geniuses 2'' currently holds a 1.9 rating on Website/IMDb. While its rating has mostly held steady (it's at 2.0/10 as of November 2018), positive reviews have inexplicably started appearing in July 2014 and have gotten plenty of up votes, all while burying the any negative reviews by giving them unhelpful responses. Whether this is being done by [[AstroTurf people related to the production]] or {{troll}}s is unclear. Of course, it may be possible that it could be by some people who, whether due to the passage of time or something else, genuinely ''like'' the movie. Not that anyone's scrambling to add VindicatedByCable to this entry.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* {{Squick}}: Bill Biscane of the sequel is revealed to be the ''MUCH'' older brother of the [[NotAllowedToGrowUp forever young]] Kahuna. ItMakesJustAsMuchSenseInContext.
to:
* {{Squick}}: Bill Biscane of the sequel is revealed to be the ''MUCH'' older brother of the [[NotAllowedToGrowUp [[NeverGrewUp forever young]] Kahuna. ItMakesJustAsMuchSenseInContext.
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
* FridgeLogic: Why, exactly, does [=BabyCo=] ''need'' a secret lab beneath the city? Aside from the obvious question of how a child care company has the resources to make such a thing, from what we see they aren't doing anything illegal. Their testing methods appear to amount to monitoring the kids in controlled environments, using computers to examine what they do at play in greater depth, and keeping them isolated from the outside world, all in order to prove their methods of educating the babies produce children of superior intelligence. There's no reason they couldn't just use the children of company employees and ask them to live at the office to keep the kids contained. Why is this some sort of secret conspiracy?
** You get this movie is horrible, right?
** You get this movie is horrible, right?
to:
* FridgeLogic: Why, exactly, does [=BabyCo=] ''need'' a secret lab beneath the city? Aside from the obvious question of how a child care company has the resources to make such a thing, from what we see they aren't doing anything illegal. Their testing methods appear to amount to monitoring the kids in controlled environments, using computers to examine analyze what they do at play in greater depth, and keeping them isolated from the outside world, all in order to prove their methods of educating the babies produce during their early years eventually produces children of demonstratably superior intelligence. There's no reason they couldn't just use the children of company employees and ask them to live at the office to keep the kids contained. Why is this some sort of secret conspiracy?
** You get this movie is horrible, right?conspiracy?
** You get this movie is horrible, right?
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* PolishTheTurd: As of May 2015, ''Baby Geniuses 2'' currently holds a 1.9 rating on Website/IMDb. While its rating has held steady, positive reviews have inexplicably started appearing in July 2014 and have gotten plenty of up votes, all while burying the any negative reviews by giving them unhelpful responses. Whether this is being done by [[AstroTurf people related to the production]] or {{troll}}s is unclear. Of course, it may be possible that it could be by some people who, whether due to the passage of time or something else, genuinely ''like'' the movie. Not that anyone's scrambling to add VindicatedByCable to this entry.
to:
* PolishTheTurd: As of May 2015, ''Baby Geniuses 2'' currently holds a 1.9 rating on Website/IMDb. While its rating has mostly held steady, steady (it's at 2.0/10 as of November 2018), positive reviews have inexplicably started appearing in July 2014 and have gotten plenty of up votes, all while burying the any negative reviews by giving them unhelpful responses. Whether this is being done by [[AstroTurf people related to the production]] or {{troll}}s is unclear. Of course, it may be possible that it could be by some people who, whether due to the passage of time or something else, genuinely ''like'' the movie. Not that anyone's scrambling to add VindicatedByCable to this entry.
Added DiffLines:
** You get this movie is horrible, right?
Added DiffLines:
* SnarkBait: Well, why the hell else would you watch this tripe?
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
* WTHCastingAgency: Respected actors such as Creator/KathleenTurner, Creator/KimCattral, Creator/ChristopherLloyd, Creator/DomDeLuise and Jon Voight all committed to parts in the first two films. To say that their talents are not used well in either would be an understatement.
to:
* WTHCastingAgency: Respected actors such as Creator/KathleenTurner, Creator/KimCattral, Creator/KimCattrall, Creator/ChristopherLloyd, Creator/DomDeLuise and Jon Voight all committed to parts in the first two films. To say that their talents are not used well in either would be an understatement.
Showing 15 edit(s) of 79
