Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WebVideo / Lindybeige

Go To

OR

Added: 1640

Changed: 1620

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CallThatAFormation: One of his biggest pet peeves in movies. If a medieval/ancient battle scene shows people dueling individually rather than fighting in formation, expect him to gripe about it.

to:

* CallThatAFormation: One of his biggest pet peeves in movies. If a medieval/ancient battle scene shows people dueling individually rather than fighting in formation, expect him to gripe about it. In reviwing ''Ironclad'' he is pleasantly surprised to see the defenders form a shield wall as the enemy is about to break in, only for them to immediateately fall into disarray and engage the enemy in a series of duels.
--> "When is a fight choreographer going to have the audacity to show people fighting in groups with clear front lines? If people split up into many duels like this the casualities for ''both'' sides are going to be horrendous, which is what real people seek to avoid. But filmmakers like to show as many people being butchered as quickly as possible, and so that's what we get. Lots of action, kill off ''all'' the minor characters on ''both'' sides, so that it all boils down to a face-off between the main hero and main villain."



** Gladiator nets, for example, are single-use, mean you can't hold something in that hand, and would make you vulnerable in any kind of massed battle.
** Knife-throwing (and by extension [[StockNinjaWeaponry shuriken throwing]]) may be cool and an impressive skill, but it's not very efficient and has relatively few applications in combat. First, the ammunition is knives--preferably purpose-made throwing knives--rather than arrows or stones, and may be expensive or inconvenient to procure. Second, the range isn't very good, and they're useless if you can't get them to [[TheBladeAlwaysLandsPointyEndIn land pointy-end in]]. Thirdly, they don't really cause ''that'' much damage because their energy transfer isn't very efficient, and killing someone outright with a throwing knife is very unlikely. They can be good weapons of surprise to distract your opponent if you're closing in with your main weapon, or alternately if you're fleeing, but you aren't going to be silently and instantly killing off enemy sentries one by one as you often see in fiction, or get the same use out of them in open combat as you'd get from a bow and arrow, javelins, a sling, or even just throwing ''rocks''.

to:

** Gladiator nets, for example, In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pESyj0qkxlo Nets - not such a great idea in battle]], he says that gladiator nets are single-use, mean you can't hold something in that hand, and would make you vulnerable in any kind of massed battle.
battle where you had better be holding a shield.
** Knife-throwing (and by extension [[StockNinjaWeaponry shuriken throwing]]) may be cool and an impressive skill, but according to his video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8fhPJvH1FY Throwing knives (again)]], it's not very efficient and has relatively few applications in combat. First, the ammunition is knives--preferably purpose-made throwing knives--rather than arrows or stones, and may be expensive or inconvenient to procure. Second, the range isn't very good, and they're useless if you can't get them to [[TheBladeAlwaysLandsPointyEndIn land pointy-end in]]. Thirdly, they don't really cause ''that'' much damage because their energy transfer isn't very efficient, and killing someone outright with a throwing knife is very unlikely. They can be good weapons of surprise to distract your opponent if you're closing in with your main weapon, or alternately if you're fleeing, but you aren't going to be silently and instantly killing off enemy sentries one by one as you often see in fiction, or get the same use out of them in open combat as you'd get from a bow and arrow, javelins, a sling, or even just throwing ''rocks''.''rocks''.
* In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3wIYWG-cz4 Cinquedea - Venice's five-fingered dagger of mild doom]], he opines that the short, broad blade of the cinquedea is not very good for thrusting, and that while it may have some use as a short but sturdy weapon to parry full-sized swords, he suspects its popularity probably had more to do with fashion and its wide blade being a good canvas for decoration.



* HollywoodCostuming: A frequent peeve of his, as demonstrated in his ''Ironclad'' review, pointing out modern metal rivets and eyelets on supposedly medieval clothing, and obvious use of fiberglass and knitting for helmets and mail armor.

to:

* HollywoodCostuming: A frequent peeve of his, as demonstrated in his ''Ironclad'' review, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pGKiOi76cI Ironclad: Part Two - costumes]], pointing out modern metal rivets and eyelets on supposedly medieval clothing, and obvious use of fiberglass and knitting for helmets and mail armor.



* HollywoodTactics: Taken apart in many of his reviews, where he notes suicidal mistakes in siege techniques, battle formations, and strategy.

to:

* HollywoodTactics: Taken apart in many of his reviews, where he notes suicidal mistakes in siege techniques, battle formations, and strategy. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4-MkDLJJeA Ironclad: part five - tactics]] is a fine example, as he criticizes John's artillery placement too far from the walls to do much damage, trying to storm the castle walls with a useless charge across open ground instead of gradually advancing under mantlets and cover, sending men up on scaling ladders while endangering their lives by continuing the catapult barrage on that wall section (something Kenneth Branagh also did in his Henry V), and stopping for a breather under the gate which is the place most exposed to the defenders' fire. The defenders are stupid too, since their best idea to keep the enemy from forcing open the gate is to have just four guys lean against it, which is too little too late against a battering ram when they should have reinforced it with more beams earlier when they had the chance.



* TheSiege: Discusses how sieges were much more common than battles throughout history, and explains major differences in the scale and context of sieges between the ancient world and the Middle Ages.

to:

* RedShirts: Displays his GenreSavvy in Ironclad: Part 5:
--> "Our heroes deploy to meet the attack, and--top marks! They've actually formed a shield wall! That's rare in a film, but...ah, can you see the mistake they've made here? All the men in the front wall here are [[HelmetsAreHardlyHeroic wearing helmets]]. That means that they're minor characters. In the front row. Final big battle. Yep, they're dead!"
* TheSiege: Discusses how In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IO-CooA4_Y A point about sieges]] he basically makes the point that sieges were much more common than common, and battles throughout history, were rare. In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iq1EHbWTbFU Sieges and Siege-craft]], he explains major differences in the scale and context of sieges between the ancient world and the Middle Ages.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HollywoodTorches: Has a whole video series called [[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM5bKwQUA08ye59tygnx8vG8JbFwJ4_Pj Lindybeige about Torches]] nitpicking apart the inaccurate ways that movies use fire and torches. They randomly stick torches and braziers on walls and depict them burning even during the daytime, despite the fact that real torches burn out, produce a lot of smoke, are expensive, and by no means a good way of lighting an interior. He even notices a scene in ''Series/TheLastKingdom'' where they [[SpecialEffectsFailure failed to conceal]] the gas pipe that was feeding a wall torch.

to:

* HollywoodTorches: Has a whole video series called [[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM5bKwQUA08ye59tygnx8vG8JbFwJ4_Pj Lindybeige about Torches]] nitpicking apart the inaccurate ways that movies use fire and torches. They randomly stick torches and braziers on walls and depict them burning even during the daytime, despite the fact that real torches burn out, produce a lot of smoke, are expensive, and by no means a good way of lighting an interior. He even notices a scene in ''Series/TheLastKingdom'' where they [[SpecialEffectsFailure [[SpecialEffectFailure failed to conceal]] the gas pipe that was feeding a wall torch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HollywoodTorches: Has a whole video series called [[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM5bKwQUA08ye59tygnx8vG8JbFwJ4_Pj Lindybeige about Torches]] nitpicking apart the inaccurate ways that movies use fire and torches. They randomly stick torches and braziers on walls and depict them burning even during the daytime, despite the fact that real torches burn out, produce a lot of smoke, are expensive, and by no means a good way of lighting an interior. He even notices a scene in ''Series/TheLastKingdom'' where they failed to conceal the gas pipe that was feeding a wall torch.

to:

* HollywoodTorches: Has a whole video series called [[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM5bKwQUA08ye59tygnx8vG8JbFwJ4_Pj Lindybeige about Torches]] nitpicking apart the inaccurate ways that movies use fire and torches. They randomly stick torches and braziers on walls and depict them burning even during the daytime, despite the fact that real torches burn out, produce a lot of smoke, are expensive, and by no means a good way of lighting an interior. He even notices a scene in ''Series/TheLastKingdom'' where they [[SpecialEffectsFailure failed to conceal conceal]] the gas pipe that was feeding a wall torch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HollywoodTorches: Has a whole video about how movies randomly put torches on walls and depict them burning even during the daytime, despite the fact that real torches burn out, produce a lot of smoke, are expensive, and by no means a good way of lighting an interior. He even notices a scene in ''Series/TheLastKingdom'' where they failed to conceal the gas pipe that was feeding a wall torch.

to:

* HollywoodTorches: Has a whole video series called [[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM5bKwQUA08ye59tygnx8vG8JbFwJ4_Pj Lindybeige about how Torches]] nitpicking apart the inaccurate ways that movies use fire and torches. They randomly put stick torches and braziers on walls and depict them burning even during the daytime, despite the fact that real torches burn out, produce a lot of smoke, are expensive, and by no means a good way of lighting an interior. He even notices a scene in ''Series/TheLastKingdom'' where they failed to conceal the gas pipe that was feeding a wall torch.

Added: 106

Changed: 137

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* KatanasAreJustBetter: In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLWzH_1eZsc The Katana]] he argues that they're not: A katana is just another kind of sword, not some magical always-superior superweapon.

to:

* KatanasAreJustBetter: In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLWzH_1eZsc The Katana]] he argues that they're not: A katana is just another kind of sword, not some magical always-superior superweapon.not, and does his best to deflate the hype, though perhaps he goes a little far in the other direction.
--> "Katanas are sharpened iron bars with handles on the end, they're for hitting people, get used to it."

Added: 199

Changed: 156

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* KatanasAreJustBetter: Argues that they're not: A katana is just another kind of sword, not some magical always-superior superweapon.

to:

* KabukiSounds: Humorously added to the intro of his video about the katana.
* KatanasAreJustBetter: Argues In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLWzH_1eZsc The Katana]] he argues that they're not: A katana is just another kind of sword, not some magical always-superior superweapon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HorseArcher: Lindy's video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4b5IclFJ8Q Horse archers - the unbeatable troops?]] looks at why horse archers, while useful, were not some kind of game-breaking super unit as they are sometimes depicted to be in war games. For one thing, like all cavalry, they're rubish at holding ground against an enemy attack or storming fortifications; that's something that only infantry can do well. As for counters, they're vulnerable to foot archers. Archers on foot can be packed together into denser formations than horsemen because horses require a lot of space, so their volume of fire can be greater. Horse archers also have a shorter accurate range than the foot archers because they're trying to aim while bouncing around on horseback, and the lightly or unarmored horses they're riding make them a bigger target than men on foot. They're great at harassing and wearing down the enemy, they can scout, they can attack groups of enemies on the march, but they're meant to be used as one ''part'' of a balanced army rather than dominating all areas of combat by themselves.

to:

* HorseArcher: Lindy's video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4b5IclFJ8Q Horse archers - the unbeatable troops?]] looks at why horse archers, while useful, were not some kind of game-breaking super unit as they are sometimes depicted to be in war games. For one thing, like all cavalry, they're rubish rubbish at holding ground against an enemy attack or storming fortifications; that's something that only infantry can do well. As for counters, they're vulnerable to foot archers. Archers on foot can be packed together into denser formations than horsemen because horses require a lot of space, so their volume of fire can be greater. Horse archers also have a shorter accurate range than the foot archers because they're trying to aim while bouncing around on horseback, and the lightly or unarmored horses they're riding make them a bigger target than men on foot. They're great at harassing and wearing down the enemy, they can scout, they can attack groups of enemies on the march, but they're meant to be used as one ''part'' of a balanced army rather than dominating all areas of combat by themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HorseArcher: Lindy's video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4b5IclFJ8Q Horse archers - the unbeatable troops?]] looks at why horse archers, while useful, were not some kind of game-breaking super unit as they are sometimes depicted to be in war games. For one thing, like all cavalry, they're rubish at holding ground against an enemy attack or storming fortifications; that's something that only infantry can do well. As for counters, they're vulnerable to foot archers. Archers on foot can be packed together into denser formations than horsemen because horses require a lot of space, so their volume of fire can be greater. Horse archers also have a shorter accurate range than the foot archers because they're trying to aim while bouncing around on horseback, and the lightly or unarmored horses they're riding make them a bigger target than men on foot. They're great at harassing and wearing down the enemy, they can scout, they can attack groups of enemies on the march, but they're meant to be used as one ''part'' of a balanced army rather than dominating all areas of combat by themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Knife-throwing (and by extension [[StockNinjaWeaponry shuriken throwing]]) may be cool and an impressive skill, but it's not very efficient and has relatively few applications in combat. First, the ammunition is knives--preferably purpose-made throwing knives--rather than arrows or stones, and may be expensive or inconvenient to procure. Second, the range isn't very good, and they're useless if you can't get them to [[TheBladeAlwaysLandsPointyEndIn land pointy-end in]]. Thirdly, they don't really cause ''that'' much damage because their energy transfer isn't very efficient, and killing someone outright with a throwing knive is very unlikely. They can be good weapons of surprise to distract your opponent if you're closing in with your main weapon, or alternately if you're fleeing, but you aren't going to be silently picking off enemy sentries one by one, or using them in open combat the way you could a bow and arrow, javelins, a sling, or even by throwing ''rocks''.

to:

** Knife-throwing (and by extension [[StockNinjaWeaponry shuriken throwing]]) may be cool and an impressive skill, but it's not very efficient and has relatively few applications in combat. First, the ammunition is knives--preferably purpose-made throwing knives--rather than arrows or stones, and may be expensive or inconvenient to procure. Second, the range isn't very good, and they're useless if you can't get them to [[TheBladeAlwaysLandsPointyEndIn land pointy-end in]]. Thirdly, they don't really cause ''that'' much damage because their energy transfer isn't very efficient, and killing someone outright with a throwing knive knife is very unlikely. They can be good weapons of surprise to distract your opponent if you're closing in with your main weapon, or alternately if you're fleeing, but you aren't going to be silently picking and instantly killing off enemy sentries one by one, one as you often see in fiction, or using get the same use out of them in open combat the way you could as you'd get from a bow and arrow, javelins, a sling, or even by just throwing ''rocks''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Knife-throwing (and by extension [[StockNinjaWeaponry shuriken throwing) may be cool and an impressive skill, but it's not very efficient and has relatively few applications in combat. First, the ammunition is knives--preferably purpose-made throwing knives--rather than arrows or stones, and may be expensive or inconvenient to procure. Second, the range isn't very good, and they're useless if you can't get them to [[TheBladeAlwaysLandsPointyEndIn land pointy-end in]]. Thirdly, they don't really cause ''that'' much damage because their energy transfer isn't very efficient, and killing someone outright with a throwing knive is very unlikely. They can be good weapons of surprise to distract your opponent if you're closing in with your main weapon, or alternately if you're fleeing, but you aren't going to be silently picking off enemy sentries one by one, or using them in open combat the way you could a bow and arrow, javelins, a sling, or even by throwing ''rocks''.

to:

** Knife-throwing (and by extension [[StockNinjaWeaponry shuriken throwing) throwing]]) may be cool and an impressive skill, but it's not very efficient and has relatively few applications in combat. First, the ammunition is knives--preferably purpose-made throwing knives--rather than arrows or stones, and may be expensive or inconvenient to procure. Second, the range isn't very good, and they're useless if you can't get them to [[TheBladeAlwaysLandsPointyEndIn land pointy-end in]]. Thirdly, they don't really cause ''that'' much damage because their energy transfer isn't very efficient, and killing someone outright with a throwing knive is very unlikely. They can be good weapons of surprise to distract your opponent if you're closing in with your main weapon, or alternately if you're fleeing, but you aren't going to be silently picking off enemy sentries one by one, or using them in open combat the way you could a bow and arrow, javelins, a sling, or even by throwing ''rocks''.

Added: 1444

Changed: 151

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BoringButPractical: A big proponent of using whatever is most reliable and efficient, even if it's not as sexy as the fancy or exotic options. He frequently points out that ''rocks'' can be highly effective as thrown weapons, and the ammunition's dirt cheap. Slings do one better, and the ammunition is pebbles.



* CoolButInefficient: Points out that many weapons are cool in theory but not very useful in practice. Gladiator nets, for example, are single-use, mean you can't hold something in that hand, and would make you vulnerable in any kind of massed battle.

to:

* CoolButInefficient: Points out that many weapons are cool in theory but not very useful in practice. practice:
**
Gladiator nets, for example, are single-use, mean you can't hold something in that hand, and would make you vulnerable in any kind of massed battle.battle.
** Knife-throwing (and by extension [[StockNinjaWeaponry shuriken throwing) may be cool and an impressive skill, but it's not very efficient and has relatively few applications in combat. First, the ammunition is knives--preferably purpose-made throwing knives--rather than arrows or stones, and may be expensive or inconvenient to procure. Second, the range isn't very good, and they're useless if you can't get them to [[TheBladeAlwaysLandsPointyEndIn land pointy-end in]]. Thirdly, they don't really cause ''that'' much damage because their energy transfer isn't very efficient, and killing someone outright with a throwing knive is very unlikely. They can be good weapons of surprise to distract your opponent if you're closing in with your main weapon, or alternately if you're fleeing, but you aren't going to be silently picking off enemy sentries one by one, or using them in open combat the way you could a bow and arrow, javelins, a sling, or even by throwing ''rocks''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
stressed over whether to have Wild Hair and Einstein Hair listed together under Messy Hair, but couldn't come up with something clever or illustrative for Wild Hair and just left it.

Added DiffLines:

* EinsteinHair: Lindy possesses both a knowledgeable, professorial aspect and an unkempt mess that's being routed by his forehead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


For a weapon-focused show that compliments many of Lindy's points, see WebVideo/{{Skallagrim}}.

to:

For a weapon-focused show two weapons shows that compliments many of Lindy's points, fans also like, see WebVideo/{{Skallagrim}}.
''WebVideo/{{Skallagrim}}'' and ''WebVideo/ScholaGladiatoria''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/HelenOfTroy''

to:

* ''Film/HelenOfTroy''''Film/HelenOfTroy'' (2003 mini-series)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CulturalPosturing: Lloyd is preposterously British and ostentatiously English. While he generally gives all cultures the consideration they deserve based on their historical or local context, it shows most notably in any discussion of [[ArcherArchetype longbows]] or [[UsefulNotes/TheHomeFront World War 2]].
-->"If you want to shoot [[TakeThat a frenchman]] who's not very far away, you might want to clock him with a really big heavy stick. So, you'd just use a simple cylinder of wood for an arrow shaft, and thwack him. But if he's a very long way away, you might select one of your specialist 'shooting frenchmen who are a long way away' arrows, which would be perhaps barreled, and it's called a flight arrow: arrows designed to go a very long way away."

Added: 65

Removed: 74

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AcceptableTargets: The French. Never misses an opportunity to diss them.



* SticksToTheBack: Not exactly, but he talks about how scabbards worn on the back are not at all practical, since you can't get the tip of a long sword to clear the throat of the scabbard before your arm gets stuck, and there's no evidence they were used in historical times. In his review of ''Series/TheLastKingdom'' he pauses, highlights the offending weapon in red as a siren rings, and yells "Back-scabbard alert!"

to:

* SticksToTheBack: Not exactly, but he talks about how scabbards worn on the back are not at all practical, since you can't get the tip of a long sword to clear the throat of the scabbard before your arm gets stuck, and there's no evidence they were used in historical times. In his review of ''Series/TheLastKingdom'' he pauses, highlights the offending weapon in red as a siren rings, and yells "Back-scabbard alert!"alert!"
* TakeThat: Lindy never misses an opportunity to diss the French.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AcceptableTargets: The French. Never misses an opportunity to diss them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CallThatAFormation: One of his biggest pet peeves in movies. If a medieval/ancient battle scene shows people dueling individually rather than fighting in formation, expect him to gripe about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheSiege: Discusses how sieges were much more common than battles throughout history, and discusses major differences in the scale and context of sieges between the ancient world and the Middle Ages.

to:

* TheSiege: Discusses how sieges were much more common than battles throughout history, and discusses explains major differences in the scale and context of sieges between the ancient world and the Middle Ages.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HollywoodTorches: Has a whole video about how movies randomly put torches on walls and depict them burning even during the daytime, despite the fact that real torches burn out, produce a lot of smoke, are expensive, and by no means a good way of lighting an interior.

to:

* HollywoodTorches: Has a whole video about how movies randomly put torches on walls and depict them burning even during the daytime, despite the fact that real torches burn out, produce a lot of smoke, are expensive, and by no means a good way of lighting an interior. He even notices a scene in ''Series/TheLastKingdom'' where they failed to conceal the gas pipe that was feeding a wall torch.

Added: 694

Changed: 19

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/KingdomOfHeaven''




to:

* ''Film/{{Troy}}''


Added DiffLines:

* ArrowsOnFire: Addressed in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTd_0FRAwOQ this video]], where he discusses why they ''didn't'' use fire arrows in open battles despite how it's always shown in movies because it's a silly idea for anything except sieges and naval warfare. All the modifications to the arrow necessary for it to stay burning when it's shot reduce its range and penetrating power, and you can't really set a man on fire through his clothes or armor before he puts it out. They also can't be fired at anywhere near the same rate as regular arrows. In short, they're useless as anti-personnel weapons, and only good for setting buildings and ships on fire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/HelenOfTroy''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

For a weapon-focused show that compliments many of Lindy's points, see WebVideo/{{Skallagrim}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HollywoodTorches: Has a whole video about how movies randomly put torches on walls and depict them burning even during the daytime, despite the fact that real torches burn out, produce a lot of smoke, are expensive, and by no means a good way of lighting an interior.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SticksToTheBack: Not exactly, but he talks about how scabbards worn on the back are not at all practical, since you can't get the tip of a long sword to clear the throat of the scabbard before your arm gets stuck, and there's no evidence they were used in historical times. In his review of the last kingdom he pauses, highlights the offending weapon in red as a siren rings, and yells "Back-scabbard alert!"

to:

* SticksToTheBack: Not exactly, but he talks about how scabbards worn on the back are not at all practical, since you can't get the tip of a long sword to clear the throat of the scabbard before your arm gets stuck, and there's no evidence they were used in historical times. In his review of the last kingdom ''Series/TheLastKingdom'' he pauses, highlights the offending weapon in red as a siren rings, and yells "Back-scabbard alert!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SticksToTheBack: Not exactly, but he talks about how scabbards worn on the back are not at all practical, since you can't get the tip of a long sword to clear the throat of the scabbard before your arm gets stuck, and there's no evidence they were used in historical times. In his review of the last kingdom he pauses, highlights the offending weapon with a siren noise, and yells "Back-scabbard alert!"

to:

* SticksToTheBack: Not exactly, but he talks about how scabbards worn on the back are not at all practical, since you can't get the tip of a long sword to clear the throat of the scabbard before your arm gets stuck, and there's no evidence they were used in historical times. In his review of the last kingdom he pauses, highlights the offending weapon with in red as a siren noise, rings, and yells "Back-scabbard alert!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HollywoodTactics: Taken apart in many of his reviews, where he notes suicidal mistakes

to:

* HollywoodTactics: Taken apart in many of his reviews, where he notes suicidal mistakes in siege techniques, battle formations, and strategy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HollywoodHistory: Takes apart the inaccuracies of movies such as ''Film/{{Braveheart}}'' and ''Film/BlackDeath'', which make huge errors in their depiction of geography, chronology, religion, and representation of historical events and customs.

to:

* HollywoodHistory: Takes apart the inaccuracies of movies such as ''Film/{{Braveheart}}'' and ''Film/BlackDeath'', which make huge errors in their depiction of events, geography, chronology, religion, and representation of historical events clothing, language, and customs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/{{Ironclad}}

to:

* ''Film/{{Ironclad}}''Film/{{Ironclad}}''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:350:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/lindybeige_sword.jpg]]
[[caption-width-right:350:Lindybeige gives you the scoop.]]

Nikolas Lloyd, known online as '''Lindybeige''', is a YouTube personality from the United Kingdom whose show focuses on ancient and medieval warfare and technology, but occasionally addresses other subjects such as politics and evolutionary psychology. He often likes to talk about whether certain tropes used in films, television, and video games are realistic or not, and tears into inaccurate works with his characteristically sarcastic sense of humor. As of June 2016 he has 241,599 subscribers.

----

!!Works discussed or reviewed by Lindybeige:
* ''Film/BlackDeath''
* ''Film/{{Braveheart}}''
* ''Film/{{Gladiator}}''
* ''Film/{{Ironclad}}
* ''Series/TheLastKingdom''

----
!!Tropes appearing on Lindybeige's channel:

* AudibleSharpness: Discusses in one video how most scabbards were made of wood and leather, which hardly make a sound when the sword is drawn from them, and that you wouldn't want to make a *schwing!* sound whenever you draw your sword because that would mean metal grinding on metal, and give you a dull edge.
* TheCoconutEffect: Talks about various sound effects such as gun noises that Hollywood does unrealistically because that's what people want to hear.
* CoolButInefficient: Points out that many weapons are cool in theory but not very useful in practice. Gladiator nets, for example, are single-use, mean you can't hold something in that hand, and would make you vulnerable in any kind of massed battle.
* TheDungAges: Another one of his pet peeves, since it's not at all accurate:
--> "''Film/{{Ironclad}}'' shows us the familiar Hollywood image of Medieval Times in which all peasants are covered in mud, and [[RealIsBrown everyone wears brown]]--Unless they're baddies, [[EvilWearsBlack in which case they wear black]]."
* GutturalGrowler: Parodied in his ''Film/{{Ironclad}}'' review, where he has someone announce each section in an exaggerated bass growl.
* HollywoodCostuming: A frequent peeve of his, as demonstrated in his ''Ironclad'' review, pointing out modern metal rivets and eyelets on supposedly medieval clothing, and obvious use of fiberglass and knitting for helmets and mail armor.
* HollywoodHistory: Takes apart the inaccuracies of movies such as ''Film/{{Braveheart}}'' and ''Film/BlackDeath'', which make huge errors in their depiction of geography, chronology, religion, and representation of historical events and customs.
* HollywoodTactics: Taken apart in many of his reviews, where he notes suicidal mistakes
* KatanasAreJustBetter: Argues that they're not: A katana is just another kind of sword, not some magical always-superior superweapon.
* TheSiege: Discusses how sieges were much more common than battles throughout history, and discusses major differences in the scale and context of sieges between the ancient world and the Middle Ages.
* SticksToTheBack: Not exactly, but he talks about how scabbards worn on the back are not at all practical, since you can't get the tip of a long sword to clear the throat of the scabbard before your arm gets stuck, and there's no evidence they were used in historical times. In his review of the last kingdom he pauses, highlights the offending weapon with a siren noise, and yells "Back-scabbard alert!"

Top