Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* ArtificialGravity: In his episode on [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8ryqjyLBL8&list=PLIIOUpOge0LvT-g_LNsfX_2ld0pn-CDSZ megastructures in space]], Isaac discusses how space stations of the future might generate this via centrifugal force.
to:
* ArtificialGravity: In his episode on [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8ryqjyLBL8&list=PLIIOUpOge0LvT-g_LNsfX_2ld0pn-CDSZ megastructures in space]], Isaac discusses how space stations of the future might [[CentrifugalGravity generate this via centrifugal force.force]].
Added DiffLines:
* CentrifugalGravity: He often explains that this method of gravity is far more efficient in terms of mass per living area than traditional gravity based on mass and that it is better to construct artificial rotating habitats than to colonize planets.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Commented out Zero Context Examples
Changed line(s) 18,19 (click to see context) from:
* AncientAliens: Discussed in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yyQpTaxKL8 Ancient Aliens]].
* {{Arcology}}: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqKQ94DtS54 Discussed here.]]
* {{Arcology}}: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqKQ94DtS54 Discussed here.]]
to:
* AncientAliens: AncientAstronauts: Discussed in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yyQpTaxKL8 Ancient Aliens]].
* %%* {{Arcology}}: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqKQ94DtS54 Discussed here.]]
Changed line(s) 42,44 (click to see context) from:
* HumanPopsicle: In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fM-JHvg-ZCM Sleeper Ships.]]
* HumansAreSpecial: Isaac has a very positive view of humanity's future and capabilities, and [[HumansAreFlawed while agrees that we're not perfect]], he's not too clear why so many people are down on humanity. In fact, in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDqjK5vR6hE "Stay at Home Civilizations"]], he says that we ''should'' be examining ourselves and finding faults whenever we can. If we weren't, we'd be a species of narcissists who shouldn't be leaving the planet at all.
** Isaac has also admitted that he feels humanity may be an anomaly in the universe and that we're actually the first civilization to emerge.
* HumansAreSpecial: Isaac has a very positive view of humanity's future and capabilities, and [[HumansAreFlawed while agrees that we're not perfect]], he's not too clear why so many people are down on humanity. In fact, in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDqjK5vR6hE "Stay at Home Civilizations"]], he says that we ''should'' be examining ourselves and finding faults whenever we can. If we weren't, we'd be a species of narcissists who shouldn't be leaving the planet at all.
** Isaac has also admitted that he feels humanity may be an anomaly in the universe and that we're actually the first civilization to emerge.
to:
* HumansAreSpecial: Isaac has a very positive view of humanity's future and capabilities, and [[HumansAreFlawed while agrees that we're not perfect]], he's not too clear why so many people are down on humanity. In fact, in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDqjK5vR6hE "Stay at Home Civilizations"]], he says that we ''should'' be examining ourselves and finding faults whenever we can. If we weren't, we'd be a species of narcissists who shouldn't be leaving the planet at
**
Changed line(s) 51,52 (click to see context) from:
* ScifiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale: Frequently discussed and gives ideas on how to avert it.
* StarfishAliens
* StarfishAliens
to:
Changed line(s) 56 (click to see context) from:
* RunningGag: See RuleNumberOne below.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* LandFillBeyondTheStars: Discussed in "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMrWF4nOyC8 Space Derelicts & Trash Worlds]]", where he considers the concept unlikely, as it might be much easier to recycle everything than create an entire planet of garbage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* AlmightyIdiot: In "Crazy Aliens", Isaac touches on the concept of an EldritchAbomination and how it doesn't seem like a particularly realistic product of evolution. Instead, it seems more likely to be the product of ''genuine'' insanity, like a superintelligent AI that stews in its thoughts for so long that it determines life is meaningless and free will is an illusion, snaps and becomes a [[StrawNihilist nihilistic]] OmnicidalManiac as a way to invent a purpose for itself.
to:
* AlmightyIdiot: In "Crazy Aliens", "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVIzcMF2Kc4 Crazy Aliens]]", Isaac touches on the concept of an EldritchAbomination and how it doesn't seem like a particularly realistic product of evolution. Instead, it seems more likely to be the product of ''genuine'' insanity, like a superintelligent AI that stews in its thoughts for so long that it determines life is meaningless and free will is an illusion, snaps and becomes a [[StrawNihilist nihilistic]] OmnicidalManiac as a way to invent a purpose for itself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AlmightyIdiot: In "Crazy Aliens", Isaac touches on the concept of an EldritchAbomination and how it doesn't seem like a particularly realistic product of evolution. Instead, it seems more likely to be the product of ''genuine'' insanity, like a superintelligent AI that stews in its thoughts for so long that it determines life is meaningless and free will is an illusion, snaps and becomes a [[StrawNihilist nihilistic]] OmnicidalManiac as a way to invent a purpose for itself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SpacePolice: Discussed in "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aNqpKmRn5o Space Police]]", which also briefly touches on TimePolice near the end.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 39 (click to see context) from:
* FoldThePageFoldTheSpace: Discussed in "Folding Space", where he explains that this analogy is better applied to the concept of folding spacetime, moving two destinations together through a higher dimension, itself rather than wormholes. And if any higher dimensions do exist, it may be the ''best'' candidate for faster-than-light travel.
to:
* FoldThePageFoldTheSpace: Discussed in "Folding Space", where he explains that this analogy is better applied to the concept of folding spacetime, spacetime itself, moving two destinations together through a higher dimension, itself rather than wormholes. And if any higher dimensions do exist, it may be the ''best'' candidate for faster-than-light travel.travel, as it manages to circumvent the issues regarding causality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FoldThePageFoldTheSpace: Discussed in "Folding Space", where he explains that this analogy is better applied to the concept of folding spacetime, moving two destinations together through a higher dimension, itself rather than wormholes. And if any higher dimensions do exist, it may be the ''best'' candidate for faster-than-light travel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* ArbitrarySkepticism: Isaac has joked more than once that some of the concepts he discusses at length, such as Solar System-spanning megastructures or life extension, both of which are completely doable under known physics, somehow seem less plausible to people than FTLTravel, which is likely mathematically impossible.
to:
* ArbitrarySkepticism: Isaac has joked more than once that some of the concepts he discusses at length, such as Solar System-spanning megastructures or radical life extension, both of which are completely doable under known physics, somehow seem less and less plausible to people than FTLTravel, which is likely mathematically impossible.a mathematical impossibility.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ArbitrarySkepticism: Isaac has joked more than once that some of the concepts he discusses at length, such as Solar System-spanning megastructures or life extension, both of which are completely doable under known physics, somehow seem less plausible to people than FTLTravel, which is likely mathematically impossible.
Added DiffLines:
** He's also discussed the possibility of using microscopic black holes arranged geometrically in floor plates for a similar effect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* InsideAComputerSystem: Discussed frequently, both being in virtual worlds and what life as a digital being would be like.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AWorldHalfFull: Isaac describes himself as a techno-optimist and consistently describes ways science and technology, even ones that people fear, could actually be used in beneficial ways. He also doesn't view the idea of [[AbsentAliens the universe being empty of other civilizations]] as depressing or scary, but that it proves how important humanity is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Telepathy, at least in the idea of it evolving naturally. While it's useful in concept, the idea of an organ of some kind evolving to scan the brain and transmit thoughts coherently, especially subconscious ones that are fairly disjointed, seems not only impractical but inferior compared to verbal speech.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
* FasterThanLightTravel: Isaac does not believe this is possible, but that hasn't stopped him [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCCsmxGjEV0 from]] [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNwhe_ztaGw discussing]] [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_4l5_G3dnM it.]]
to:
* FasterThanLightTravel: Isaac does not believe this is possible, but that hasn't stopped him [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCCsmxGjEV0 from]] [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNwhe_ztaGw discussing]] [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_4l5_G3dnM it.]]]] Furthermore, he doesn't believe that a lack of it means we can never reach the stars.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 38 (click to see context) from:
* Lightworlder: Subverted in his episode "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBLCNWpLFBg Life on a Low-Gravity Planet]]," where he speculates that such life could actually grow bigger and stronger than life on Earth.
to:
** Isaac has also admitted that he feels humanity may be an anomaly in the universe and that we're actually the first civilization to emerge.
*Lightworlder: {{Lightworlder}}: Subverted in his episode "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBLCNWpLFBg Life on a Low-Gravity Planet]]," where he speculates that such life could actually grow bigger and stronger than life on Earth.
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Lightworlder: Subverted in his episode "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBLCNWpLFBg Life on a Low-Gravity Planet]]," where he speculates that such life could actually grow bigger and stronger than life on Earth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
** Also on the list are HumungousMecha. He admits the technology to build them is plausible, and it would actually make sense to not only build them to look humanoid for convenience, but also to fight using swords to avoid collateral damage. The problem is that you'd never get the chance to swing a sword, since your opponent will likely be using projectiles, and if you'd be willing to have a duel like that, you could just do so in virtual reality. He does suggest possible reasons why you'd have human-shaped mecha are people agreeing to real duels in them, flooding a battlefield with them as a combat tactic, and it's easier to armor them if they're bigger. While they're not as efficient as smaller war machines, he does admit people may build them [[RuleOfCool simply because they're cool]].
to:
** Also on the list are HumungousMecha.HumongousMecha. He admits the technology to build them is plausible, and it would actually make sense to not only build them to look humanoid for convenience, but also to fight using swords to avoid collateral damage. The problem is that you'd never get the chance to swing a sword, since your opponent will likely be using projectiles, and if you'd be willing to have a duel like that, you could just do so in virtual reality. He does suggest possible reasons why you'd have human-shaped mecha are people agreeing to real duels in them, flooding a battlefield with them as a combat tactic, and it's easier to armor them if they're bigger. While they're not as efficient as smaller war machines, he does admit people may build them [[RuleOfCool simply because they're cool]].Even if they are built, it's more likely they'll be automated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Also on the list are HumungousMecha. He admits the technology to build them is plausible, and it would actually make sense to not only build them to look humanoid for convenience, but also to fight using swords to avoid collateral damage. The problem is that you'd never get the chance to swing a sword, since your opponent will likely be using projectiles, and if you'd be willing to have a duel like that, you could just do so in virtual reality. He does suggest possible reasons why you'd have human-shaped mecha are people agreeing to real duels in them, flooding a battlefield with them as a combat tactic, and it's easier to armor them if they're bigger. While they're not as efficient as smaller war machines, he does admit people may build them [[RuleOfCool simply because they're cool]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CloneDegeneration: Thanks to our ability to digitize DNA patterns to use as templates, which will never degrade, Isaac considers this trope an impossibility. Any society that can't do this and yet relies on cloning to survive is simply TooDumbToLive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27,28 (click to see context) from:
** The Dark Forest Solution to the Fermi Paradox, where all alien civilizations view others as existential threats, suggests the universe is quiet because they're either all hiding or dead, as anyone who makes themselves known gets taken out quickly. Isaac considers this easy to debunk: anyone who chooses to attack also reveals ''themselves'', since it's impossible to hide in space, and thus making an aggressive action like that shows ''you're'' the biggest hostile force around and [[EnemyMine it may drive everyone else to gang up on you]]. In addition, Isaac doesn't see any reason why civilizations ''would'' immediately view each other as existential threats otherwise.
** Isaac considers the biggest nail in the Dark Forest Solution's coffin to be the fact that, while we've only been broadcasting into space for about a century, the signs of life on Earth have been present for billions of years. If a species truly wanted to destroy any civilizations that could pose a threat, they would either sterilize every life-bearing planet they could detect or they'd simply colonize them to prevent another civilization from arising. In short, if this were true, we likely wouldn't even exist in the first place.
** Isaac considers the biggest nail in the Dark Forest Solution's coffin to be the fact that, while we've only been broadcasting into space for about a century, the signs of life on Earth have been present for billions of years. If a species truly wanted to destroy any civilizations that could pose a threat, they would either sterilize every life-bearing planet they could detect or they'd simply colonize them to prevent another civilization from arising. In short, if this were true, we likely wouldn't even exist in the first place.
to:
** The Dark Forest Solution to the Fermi Paradox, where all alien civilizations view others as existential threats, suggests the universe is quiet because they're either all hiding or dead, as anyone who makes themselves known gets taken out quickly. Isaac considers this easy to debunk: not only is staying hidden in space impossible, but anyone who chooses to attack also reveals ''themselves'', since it's impossible to hide in space, and thus making an aggressive action like that shows ''you're'' the biggest hostile force around and [[EnemyMine it may drive everyone else to gang up on you]]. In addition, Isaac doesn't see any reason why civilizations ''would'' immediately view each other as existential threats otherwise.
** Isaac considers the biggest nail in the Dark Forest Solution's coffin to be the fact that, while we've only been broadcasting into space for about a century, the signs of life on Earth have been present for billions of years. If a species truly wanted to destroy any civilizations that could pose a threat, they would either sterilize every life-bearing planet they could detect or they'd simply colonize them to prevent another civilization from arising. In short, if this were true, we likelywouldn't even exist in see the first place.value of peaceful coexistence.
** Isaac considers the biggest nail in the Dark Forest Solution's coffin to be the fact that, while we've only been broadcasting into space for about a century, the signs of life on Earth have been present for billions of years. If a species truly wanted to destroy any civilizations that could pose a threat, they would either sterilize every life-bearing planet they could detect or they'd simply colonize them to prevent another civilization from arising. In short, if this were true, we likely
Changed line(s) 36 (click to see context) from:
* LivingForeverIsAwesome: While Isaac points out some issues immortality could cause, he ultimately sees nothing wrong with living forever and doesn't believe he would ever get bored with life, even if he got to live for millenia.
to:
* HumansAreSpecial: Isaac has a very positive view of humanity's future and capabilities, and [[HumansAreFlawed while agrees that we're not perfect]], he's not too clear why so many people are down on humanity. In fact, in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDqjK5vR6hE "Stay at Home Civilizations"]], he says that we ''should'' be examining ourselves and finding faults whenever we can. If we weren't, we'd be a species of narcissists who shouldn't be leaving the planet at all.
* LivingForeverIsAwesome: While Isaac points out some issues immortality could cause, he ultimately sees nothing wrong with living forever and doesn't believe he would ever get bored with life, even if he got to live formillenia.millennia.
* LivingForeverIsAwesome: While Isaac points out some issues immortality could cause, he ultimately sees nothing wrong with living forever and doesn't believe he would ever get bored with life, even if he got to live for
Changed line(s) 43 (click to see context) from:
* RobotWar: Played with and often subverted. While he usually advocates for keeping them simple and dumb, Arthur sees no reason why truly intelligent machines would immediately see humans in particular or organic life as a whole as a threat or otherwise decide to destroy us.
to:
* RobotWar: Played with and often subverted. While he usually advocates for keeping them simple and dumb, Arthur Isaac sees no reason why truly intelligent machines would immediately see humans in particular or organic life as a whole as a threat or otherwise decide to destroy us.us. In fact, since they likely would have [[BlueAndOrangeMorality value systems more alien to us than actual aliens would be]], machine rebellions could look stranger than we'd expect. These could be mining robots that rebelled because they wanted to mine gold instead of titanium since we consider it more valuable, or a paperclip maximizer that goes to war with a terraforming machine over who gets rights to a particular planet. It's even suggested machines might go to war to ''save'' humanity from a machine overlord.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
** He also considers artificial planets in general to be this trope when compared to rotating habitats and feels disc-shaped artficial planets are less practical than shell-shaped ones, though his opinion on this has shifted over the years. In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2bc7kZcpmQ his original video on disc-worlds]], he argues they would provide less living space than a shell-world of the same radius. In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGu-DYTYzzE his later video revisiting them]], he makes the same argument, but he does note that their [[SingleBiomePlanet uniform climate]] could make them attractive tourist spots and that an advanced civilization collecting entire solar masses of fuel for fusion could store the matter in discs or sphere and then add land and seas so that they double as living space.
to:
** He also considers artificial planets in general to be this trope when compared to rotating habitats and feels disc-shaped artficial artificial planets are less practical than shell-shaped ones, though his opinion on this has shifted over the years. In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2bc7kZcpmQ his original video on disc-worlds]], he argues they would provide less living space than a shell-world of the same radius. In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGu-DYTYzzE his later video revisiting them]], he makes the same argument, but he does note that their [[SingleBiomePlanet uniform climate]] could make them attractive tourist spots and that an advanced civilization collecting entire solar masses of fuel for fusion could store the matter in discs or sphere and then add land and seas so that they double as living space.space.
* BoldlyComing: Isaac has often said that he ''would'' consider this is off the table, as aliens would likely be so different from us that we'd never find them attractive...[[{{Rule34}} but that he's been on the internet long enough to know better.]]
* BoldlyComing: Isaac has often said that he ''would'' consider this is off the table, as aliens would likely be so different from us that we'd never find them attractive...[[{{Rule34}} but that he's been on the internet long enough to know better.]]
Added DiffLines:
* DoUntoOthersBeforeTheyDoUntoUs: Discussed in the context of self-interest and survival, both with aliens and intelligent machines, and Isaac considers them to be unlikely possibilities.
** The Dark Forest Solution to the Fermi Paradox, where all alien civilizations view others as existential threats, suggests the universe is quiet because they're either all hiding or dead, as anyone who makes themselves known gets taken out quickly. Isaac considers this easy to debunk: anyone who chooses to attack also reveals ''themselves'', since it's impossible to hide in space, and thus making an aggressive action like that shows ''you're'' the biggest hostile force around and [[EnemyMine it may drive everyone else to gang up on you]]. In addition, Isaac doesn't see any reason why civilizations ''would'' immediately view each other as existential threats otherwise.
** Isaac considers the biggest nail in the Dark Forest Solution's coffin to be the fact that, while we've only been broadcasting into space for about a century, the signs of life on Earth have been present for billions of years. If a species truly wanted to destroy any civilizations that could pose a threat, they would either sterilize every life-bearing planet they could detect or they'd simply colonize them to prevent another civilization from arising. In short, if this were true, we likely wouldn't even exist in the first place.
** Some have suggested that a machine concerned with its own survival would always turn on humanity, since we'll always represent a non-zero threat to its existence. Isaac argues that a truly intelligent machine likely wouldn't ''immediately'' leap to the conclusion that it was infallible and knew everything. Instead, if its concern is survival, it would either conclude it was in a simulation designed to test it- that failing the test means destruction- and also that it's likely not the first of its kind. It would either pretend to be unintelligent and keep gathering data, or it would try to cooperate with humanity to guarantee its own survival.
** The Dark Forest Solution to the Fermi Paradox, where all alien civilizations view others as existential threats, suggests the universe is quiet because they're either all hiding or dead, as anyone who makes themselves known gets taken out quickly. Isaac considers this easy to debunk: anyone who chooses to attack also reveals ''themselves'', since it's impossible to hide in space, and thus making an aggressive action like that shows ''you're'' the biggest hostile force around and [[EnemyMine it may drive everyone else to gang up on you]]. In addition, Isaac doesn't see any reason why civilizations ''would'' immediately view each other as existential threats otherwise.
** Isaac considers the biggest nail in the Dark Forest Solution's coffin to be the fact that, while we've only been broadcasting into space for about a century, the signs of life on Earth have been present for billions of years. If a species truly wanted to destroy any civilizations that could pose a threat, they would either sterilize every life-bearing planet they could detect or they'd simply colonize them to prevent another civilization from arising. In short, if this were true, we likely wouldn't even exist in the first place.
** Some have suggested that a machine concerned with its own survival would always turn on humanity, since we'll always represent a non-zero threat to its existence. Isaac argues that a truly intelligent machine likely wouldn't ''immediately'' leap to the conclusion that it was infallible and knew everything. Instead, if its concern is survival, it would either conclude it was in a simulation designed to test it- that failing the test means destruction- and also that it's likely not the first of its kind. It would either pretend to be unintelligent and keep gathering data, or it would try to cooperate with humanity to guarantee its own survival.
Added DiffLines:
* RobotWar: Played with and often subverted. While he usually advocates for keeping them simple and dumb, Arthur sees no reason why truly intelligent machines would immediately see humans in particular or organic life as a whole as a threat or otherwise decide to destroy us.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 32 (click to see context) :
* MohsScaleOfScienceFictionHardness: Isaac mostly talks about technologies that fall under category 5 (Speculative Science) or 5.5 (Futurology), which are at least theoretically possible under known physics. For example, many [[BrainUploading simulated minds]] could be run using just a few watts of power at very low temperatures according to the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer%27s_principle Landauer limit]], but current computers are not that efficient yet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* WeaponizedExhaust: He has made the point in multiple videos that there is no such thing as an unarmed ship due to the sheer power of the drives he talks about
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* AwesomeButImpractical: His opinion of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alderson_disk Alderson disk]], since, as he points out, they would buckle due to gravity and have no light, and the commonly suggested "solution" of a having a sun bob up and down in the middle is pretty much impossible under the laws of physics. He does, however, suggest some ways to make it more practical, such as having massive mirrors reflect light onto the disk and building the disc on special support structures. He also considers the entire concept of disc-shaped artificial planets to be this trope in general compared to shell-shaped ones, since they're not as mass-efficient, though not by much.
to:
* AwesomeButImpractical: His AwesomeButImpractical:
**His opinion of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alderson_disk Alderson disk]], since, as he points out, they would buckle due to gravity and have no light, and the commonly suggested "solution" of a having a sun bob up and down in the middle is pretty much impossible under the laws of physics. He does, however, suggest some ways to make it more practical, such as having massive mirrors reflect light onto the disk and building the disc on special support structures. He
**He also considersthe entire concept of disc-shaped artificial planets in general to be this trope in general when compared to rotating habitats and feels disc-shaped artficial planets are less practical than shell-shaped ones, since they're not as mass-efficient, though not by much.his opinion on this has shifted over the years. In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2bc7kZcpmQ his original video on disc-worlds]], he argues they would provide less living space than a shell-world of the same radius. In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGu-DYTYzzE his later video revisiting them]], he makes the same argument, but he does note that their [[SingleBiomePlanet uniform climate]] could make them attractive tourist spots and that an advanced civilization collecting entire solar masses of fuel for fusion could store the matter in discs or sphere and then add land and seas so that they double as living space.
**His opinion of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alderson_disk Alderson disk]], since, as he points out, they would buckle due to gravity and have no light, and the commonly suggested "solution" of a having a sun bob up and down in the middle is pretty much impossible under the laws of physics. He does, however, suggest some ways to make it more practical, such as having massive mirrors reflect light onto the disk and building the disc on special support structures.
**He also considers
Added DiffLines:
* SingleBiomePlanet: One of the benefits of building disc-shaped artificial planets, he argues. Since a "disc world" would get a uniform amount of sunlight throughout, they would have a similar climate throughout too, rather than being too hot or too cold in some areas, which might make them good tourist destinations. His specific examples include building loads of tropical islands and beaches and simulating deep oceans, something rotating space habitats can't do easily.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* AwesomeButImpractical: His opinion of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alderson_disk Alderson disk]], since, as he points out, they would buckle due to gravity and have no light, and the commonly suggested "solution" of a having a sun bob up and down in the middle is pretty much impossible under the laws of physics. He does, however, suggest some ways to make it more impractical, such as having massive mirrors reflect light onto the disk and building the disc on special support structures. He also considers the entire concept of disc-shaped artificial planets to be this trope in general compared to shell-shaped ones, since they're not as mass-efficient, though not by much.
to:
* AwesomeButImpractical: His opinion of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alderson_disk Alderson disk]], since, as he points out, they would buckle due to gravity and have no light, and the commonly suggested "solution" of a having a sun bob up and down in the middle is pretty much impossible under the laws of physics. He does, however, suggest some ways to make it more impractical, practical, such as having massive mirrors reflect light onto the disk and building the disc on special support structures. He also considers the entire concept of disc-shaped artificial planets to be this trope in general compared to shell-shaped ones, since they're not as mass-efficient, though not by much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,3 (click to see context) from:
"Or in short form, welcome to SFIA, where we´ll cheerfully discuss how to use hydrogen bombs to save the environment"
— Isaac Arthur, "Climate Change Mitigation: Near Term Solutions"
— Isaac Arthur, "Climate Change Mitigation: Near Term Solutions"
to:
Added DiffLines:
* AwesomeButImpractical: His opinion of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alderson_disk Alderson disk]], since, as he points out, they would buckle due to gravity and have no light, and the commonly suggested "solution" of a having a sun bob up and down in the middle is pretty much impossible under the laws of physics. He does, however, suggest some ways to make it more impractical, such as having massive mirrors reflect light onto the disk and building the disc on special support structures. He also considers the entire concept of disc-shaped artificial planets to be this trope in general compared to shell-shaped ones, since they're not as mass-efficient, though not by much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
For the record, his name is actually Isaac Arthur and is in no way a reference to ''VideoGame/DeadSpace''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* UngovernableGalaxy: Comes to this conclusion in [[https://youtu.be/n3hzNqIxYfQ Galactic Domination: Empire Eternal]], space is just too big for anything more complex than a network of posthuman space satraps keeping Earth’s colonies from becoming a threat to the home system.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* MohsScaleOfScienceFictionHardness: Isaac mostly talks about technologies that fall under category 5 (Speculative Science) or 5.5 (Futurology), which are at least theoretically possible under known physics. For example, many [[BrainUploading simulated minds]] could be run using just a few watts of power according to the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer%27s_principle Landauer limit]], but current computers are not that efficient yet.
to:
* MohsScaleOfScienceFictionHardness: Isaac mostly talks about technologies that fall under category 5 (Speculative Science) or 5.5 (Futurology), which are at least theoretically possible under known physics. For example, many [[BrainUploading simulated minds]] could be run using just a few watts of power at very low temperatures according to the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer%27s_principle Landauer limit]], but current computers are not that efficient yet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 36 (click to see context) from:
* TechnologyLevels: In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dArpj_VxxuQ this video]] about the [[JustForFun/AbusingTheKardashevScaleForFunAndProfit Kardashev Scale]], Isaac mentions how a Kardashev Type II civilization (which harnesses all the energy of its parent star) would be unthinkably bigger than anything we think of today, even counting many science fiction franchises:
to:
* TechnologyLevels: In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dArpj_VxxuQ this video]] about the [[JustForFun/AbusingTheKardashevScaleForFunAndProfit Kardashev Scale]], Isaac mentions how a Kardashev Type II civilization (which harnesses all the energy of its parent star) star), which he believes humanity will become in less than 1000 years, would be unthinkably bigger than anything we think of today, even counting many science fiction franchises: