Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WMG / Joker2019

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** However, one major inconsistency remains: the death of the Waynes. In ''Begins'', it was Joe Chill, dressed normally and just wanting Thomas' cash. In ''Joker'' it is still presumably Chill, though he is one of Joker's rioting followers who just shoots them dead out of an EatTheRich philosophy. Although, the film ''is'' still set ThroughTheEyesOfMadness, and thus you experience the same scene through two different viewpoints. Bruce's recalling of the murders is vivid, to the point - grounded and tragic in execution. Arthur's is set in the apex of the chaos, is much more dramatic and abrupt - slower, even, to give a sense of delirium. It is possible that Arthur miscalled the memory of the murder simply because he wasn't there to witness it firsthand, and thus he thinks that Thomas Wayne died in the midst of it as opposed to much later.

to:

** However, one major inconsistency remains: the death of the Waynes. In ''Begins'', it was Joe Chill, dressed normally and just wanting Thomas' cash. In ''Joker'' it is still presumably Chill, though he is one of Joker's rioting followers who just shoots them dead out of an EatTheRich philosophy. Although, the film ''is'' still set ThroughTheEyesOfMadness, and thus you experience the same scene through two different viewpoints. Bruce's recalling of the murders is vivid, to the point - grounded and tragic in execution. Arthur's is set in the apex of the chaos, is much more dramatic and abrupt - slower, even, to give a sense of delirium. It is possible that Arthur miscalled the memory of the murder simply because he wasn't there to witness it firsthand, and thus he thinks that Thomas Wayne died in the midst of it his "big night", as opposed to much later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** However, one major inconsistency remains: the death of the Waynes. In ''Begins'', it was Joe Chill, dressed normally and just wanting Thomas' cash. In ''Joker'' it is still presumably Chill, though he is one of Joker's rioting followers who just shoots them dead out of an EatTheRich philosophy. Although, the film ''is'' still set ThroughTheEyesOfMadness, and thus you experience the same scene through two different viewpoints. Bruce's recalling of the murders is vivid, to the point - grounded and slow in execution. Arthur's is more abrupt and set in the apex of the chaos, possibly due to his belief that Batman and Joker were made for each other. It is possible that Arthur miscalled the memory of the murder simply because he wasn't there to witness it firsthand, and thus he thinks that Thomas Wayne died in the midst of it as opposed to much later.

to:

** However, one major inconsistency remains: the death of the Waynes. In ''Begins'', it was Joe Chill, dressed normally and just wanting Thomas' cash. In ''Joker'' it is still presumably Chill, though he is one of Joker's rioting followers who just shoots them dead out of an EatTheRich philosophy. Although, the film ''is'' still set ThroughTheEyesOfMadness, and thus you experience the same scene through two different viewpoints. Bruce's recalling of the murders is vivid, to the point - grounded and slow tragic in execution. Arthur's is more abrupt and set in the apex of the chaos, possibly due to his belief that Batman is much more dramatic and Joker were made for each other.abrupt - slower, even, to give a sense of delirium. It is possible that Arthur miscalled the memory of the murder simply because he wasn't there to witness it firsthand, and thus he thinks that Thomas Wayne died in the midst of it as opposed to much later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** However, one major inconsistency remains: the death of the Waynes. In ''Begins'', it was Joe Chill, dressed normally and just wanting Thomas' cash. In ''Joker'' it is still presumably Chill, though he is one of Joker's rioting followers who just shoots them dead out of an EatTheRich philosophy. Although, the film ''is'' still set ThroughTheEyesOfMadness, and thus you experience the same scene through two different viewpoints. Bruce's recalling of the murders is vivid, to the point - grounded and slow in execution. Arthur's is more abrupt and set in the apex of the chaos, possibly due to his belief that Batman and Joker were made for each other. It is possible that Arthur miscalled the memory of the murder simply because he wasn't there to witness it firsthand, and thus he thinks that Thomas Wayne died in the midst of it as opposed to much later.

Added: 34

Changed: 38

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!Pre-release

to:

!!Pre-release
[[folder:Pre-release]]




!!Post-release

to:

\n!!Post-release[[/folder]]

[[folder:Post-release]]


Added DiffLines:


[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Yet another option: When the Joker has a HeelRealization, he will say "I get what I fucking deserve."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Arthur is schizophrenic. He started having bizarre thoughts after the mental program was cut and he was witbout meds. He attacked his mother, but called an ambulance and it was ruled an accident. Then he smothered her in the hospital. This was only found in the autopsy, but it wasn't definitive and two detectives were sent to talk with him. He was arrested after he tried to run away and was hit by a car, was found insane at the hospital, and was sent to Arkham.

to:

Arthur is schizophrenic. He started having bizarre thoughts after the mental program was cut and he was witbout without meds. He attacked his mother, but called an ambulance and it was ruled an accident. Then he smothered her in the hospital. This was only found in the autopsy, but it wasn't definitive and two detectives were sent to talk with him. He was arrested after he tried to run away and was hit by a car, was found insane at the hospital, and was sent to Arkham.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The cinematographer states [[https://www.slashfilm.com/joker-cinematographer-interview/ Sophie survived the film.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: It wasn't all in his head. Only most of it.]]
Arthur is schizophrenic. He started having bizarre thoughts after the mental program was cut and he was witbout meds. He attacked his mother, but called an ambulance and it was ruled an accident. Then he smothered her in the hospital. This was only found in the autopsy, but it wasn't definitive and two detectives were sent to talk with him. He was arrested after he tried to run away and was hit by a car, was found insane at the hospital, and was sent to Arkham.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Let's get nuts: Arthur is the prelude to Ledger's Joker. It's hard to disentangle the events of Joker from Arthur's delusions, but let's say both the Joker riots and Arthur's five minutes of fame happened (though there may not be a direct link between the two). By Batman Begins, most people have moved on to newer problems, but Ledger's Joker looks back to them for inspiration. He even models himself on Arthur Fleck, adopting his lank-haired look and high voice, albeit injected with a great deal of his personal menace. For him, Fleck is the archetypal “bad day”, a reminder of the time Gotham society almost tore itself apart in line with Joker 2's beliefs. While there's a dramatic difference in the depiction of the Waynes' deaths between the two universes, Fleck's delusions of grandeur might suggest his tangential role in those events may have been nothing more than a “joke” he later tells himself as a form of internal revenge on the Waynes. So the version we see in the Nolanverse is the real one. On a meta level, this gives Joker a “sequel” of its own and unites the two most adjacent cinematic versions of the Joker, with a little nod to Gotham's multi-Joker backstory along the way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: The woman on the train whom Arthur had inadvertently rescued is Harleen Quinzel]]
The woman harassed by the Wall Street Three was inspired to become a clown rioter after Arthur's unintentional rescue, and will be even further roused by Arthur's murder of Murray Franklin, coming to idolise him, or perhaps even feel a little bit sorry for him. After Arthur's murder of his Arkham psychiatrist, she will come in as a replacement and attempt to either help him recover (in turn transforming her into Harley Quinn), or enable him further down his nihilistic path (also transforming her into Harley Quinn).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Alternatively, it'll reverse the line, with Arthur trying to goad Batman into killing him, only for Batman to reply that it's ''not'' what Arthur deserves and says that he wants to help him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: If there is a sequel, someone will turn "You get what you fucking deserve" back on the Joker]]
Batman, another hero, or a rival villain will do an IronicEcho like, "Joker, you get what you fucking deserve" before killing or beating up the Joker.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ah, but Lex Luthor being rich and privileged would work for him as a {{Contrasting Sequel Protagonist}}/{{Contrasting Sequel Villain}}. He can be played sympathetically by taking nods from portrayals such as the Silver Age's Superboy and Lextor (where he becomes a legit hero to a planet, starts a family, only to lose it all in a series of events that significantly include Superman) stories, {{Smallville}}, ''Lex Luthor: Man of Steel'' (calling attention to how terrifing Clark is as both an alien and as something mankind can never reach, show him genuinely caring for his sister Lena, seeking to build the future if only through his way).

to:

** Ah, but Lex Luthor being rich and privileged would work for him as a {{Contrasting Sequel Protagonist}}/{{Contrasting Sequel Villain}}. Antagonist}}. He can be played sympathetically by taking nods from portrayals such as the Silver Age's Superboy ''Superboy'' and Lextor (where he becomes a legit hero to a planet, starts a family, only to lose it all in a series of events that significantly include Superman) stories, {{Smallville}}, ''Smallville'', and ''Lex Luthor: Man of Steel'' (calling attention to how terrifing Clark is as both an alien and as something mankind can never reach, show him genuinely caring for his sister Lena, seeking to build the future if only through his way).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The Joker could've just walked out of Sophie's apartment with no further trouble from him only for Sophie to lose her life in the riot that consumed Gotham. Her death would still be tied to Joker that way, while recognizing how she was someone he wouldn't hurt (at least back then).




to:

** Ah, but Lex Luthor being rich and privileged would work for him as a {{Contrasting Sequel Protagonist}}/{{Contrasting Sequel Villain}}. He can be played sympathetically by taking nods from portrayals such as the Silver Age's Superboy and Lextor (where he becomes a legit hero to a planet, starts a family, only to lose it all in a series of events that significantly include Superman) stories, {{Smallville}}, ''Lex Luthor: Man of Steel'' (calling attention to how terrifing Clark is as both an alien and as something mankind can never reach, show him genuinely caring for his sister Lena, seeking to build the future if only through his way).

Added: 1208

Changed: 108

Removed: 1159

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: Wayne is Arthur's Father.]]

He's way, way too specific in his denial to Arthur in the bathroom. All he has to say is that he never slept with Penny and that would be that. And yet he chooses to layer on the entirely separate and irrelevant detail of him being adopted in addition. Why and how in the hell would the owner and Director of a massive international conglomerate like Wayne Enterprises at all be so aware of the private life of a low-level employee (Wayne hardly even knows or cares about much higher-level people in his company, like the finance professionals Arthur killed), unless he had more to do with her than he's letting on? Furthermore the idea that Penny had a narcissist personality disorder flies in the face of the flashback showing she was battered by her 'boyfriend'. A real narcissist would never take physical abuse lying down as she did, so the medical record and the idea she imagined her relationship with Thomas is immediately suspect.

[[WMG: The Joker from this movie isn't the same one from the other movies.]]

He isn't nearly smart enough. The other, smarter Joker may want people to think they are the same person and so under-estimate his intelligence.

to:

[[WMG: Wayne is Arthur's Father.]]

He's way, way too specific in his denial to Arthur in the bathroom. All he has to say is that he never slept with Penny and that would be that. And yet he chooses to layer on the entirely separate and irrelevant detail of him being adopted in addition. Why and how in the hell would the owner and Director of a massive international conglomerate like Wayne Enterprises at all be so aware of the private life of a low-level employee (Wayne hardly even knows or cares about much higher-level people in his company, like the finance professionals Arthur killed), unless he had more to do with her than he's letting on? Furthermore the idea that Penny had a narcissist personality disorder flies in the face of the flashback showing she was battered by her 'boyfriend'. A real narcissist would never take physical abuse lying down as she did, so the medical record and the idea she imagined her relationship with Thomas is immediately suspect.

[[WMG: The Joker from this movie isn't the same one from the other movies.]]

He isn't nearly smart enough. The other, smarter Joker may want people to think they are the same person and so under-estimate his intelligence.
!!Pre-release




to:

In particular, Murray will say "You talkin' to me?!" to Arthur.



!!Post-release
[[WMG: Wayne is Arthur's Father.]]

He's way, way too specific in his denial to Arthur in the bathroom. All he has to say is that he never slept with Penny and that would be that. And yet he chooses to layer on the entirely separate and irrelevant detail of him being adopted in addition. Why and how in the hell would the owner and Director of a massive international conglomerate like Wayne Enterprises at all be so aware of the private life of a low-level employee (Wayne hardly even knows or cares about much higher-level people in his company, like the finance professionals Arthur killed), unless he had more to do with her than he's letting on? Furthermore the idea that Penny had a narcissist personality disorder flies in the face of the flashback showing she was battered by her 'boyfriend'. A real narcissist would never take physical abuse lying down as she did, so the medical record and the idea she imagined her relationship with Thomas is immediately suspect.

[[WMG: The Joker from this movie isn't the same one from the other movies.]]

He isn't nearly smart enough. The other, smarter Joker may want people to think they are the same person and so under-estimate his intelligence.



[[WMG: The real reason that Murry invited Arthur on the show.]]

to:

[[WMG: The real reason that Murry Murray invited Arthur on the show.]]



One of them is a blonde woman name Harleen Quinzel.

to:

One of them is a blonde woman name named Harleen Quinzel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


He's way, way too specific in his denial to Arthur in the bathroom. All he has to say is that he never slept with Penny and that would be that. And yet he chooses to layer on the entirely separate and irrelevant detail of him being adopted in addition. Why and how in the hell would the owner and Director of a massive international conglomerate like Wayne Enterprises at all be so aware of the private life of a low-level employee (Wayne hardly even knows or cares about much higher-level people in his company, like the finance professionals Arthur killed), unless he had more to do with her than he's letting off? Furthermore the idea that Penny was had a narcissist personality disorder flies in the face of the flashback showing she was battered by her 'boyfriend', a real narcissist would never take physical abuse lying down as she did, so the medical record and the idea she imagined her relationship with Thomas is immediately suspect.

to:

He's way, way too specific in his denial to Arthur in the bathroom. All he has to say is that he never slept with Penny and that would be that. And yet he chooses to layer on the entirely separate and irrelevant detail of him being adopted in addition. Why and how in the hell would the owner and Director of a massive international conglomerate like Wayne Enterprises at all be so aware of the private life of a low-level employee (Wayne hardly even knows or cares about much higher-level people in his company, like the finance professionals Arthur killed), unless he had more to do with her than he's letting off? on? Furthermore the idea that Penny was had a narcissist personality disorder flies in the face of the flashback showing she was battered by her 'boyfriend', a 'boyfriend'. A real narcissist would never take physical abuse lying down as she did, so the medical record and the idea she imagined her relationship with Thomas is immediately suspect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: The Joker will be the GreaterScopeVillain of this universe.]]
In contrast to past depictions, Arthur will actually remain in Arkham and rarely or never fight Batman face to face. However, his influence will still be felt in Gotham, even years later, through the horde of imitators he inspired--essentially inventing the concept of costumed supervillainy--some of whom got their start as part of his followers. As the Joker, Arthur will sometimes get involved in the going-ons of Gotham's criminal underworld--but never directly and he relies on a network of intermediaries to get what he wants done, instructing them with messages smuggled out to them from the asylum.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*[[spoiler: Confirmed]]. Cinematographer Lawrence Asher revealed [[spoiler: [[https://www.slashfilm.com/joker-cinematographer-interview/ in an interview with /Film]] that Todd Phillips told him that Arthur did NOT kill Sophie]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Jossed. [[spoiler:The film makes it pretty obvious that Arthur's interactions with Sophie were hallucinations.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Keep in mind, at that point in the movie, Arthur becomes more and more violent, so it's not impossible.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: The clown protestors will become an alternate version of [[WesternAnimation/BatmanBeyond the Jokerz]]]]
As the years go by, they'll gradually shift into crime and start modeling themselves more closely after their inspiration. By the time Batman shows up, they'll have become a powerful street gang that has long abandoned any pretense about being social reform and has developed a cult-like devotion to Arthur.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


He's way, way to specific in his denial to Arthur in the bathroom. All he has to say is that he never slept with Penny and that would be that. And yet he chooses to layer on the entirely separate and irrelevant detail of him being adopted in addition. Why and how in the hell would the owner and Director of a massive international conglomerate like Wayne Enterprises at all be so aware of the private life of a low-level employee (Wayne hardly even knows or cares about much higher-level people in his company, like the finance professionals Arthur killed), unless he had more to do with her than he's letting off? Furthermore the idea that Penny was had a narcissist personality disorder flies in the face of the flashback showing she was battered by her 'boyfriend', a real narcissist would never take physical abuse lying down as she did, so the medical record and the idea she imagined her relationship with Thomas is immediately suspect.

to:

He's way, way to too specific in his denial to Arthur in the bathroom. All he has to say is that he never slept with Penny and that would be that. And yet he chooses to layer on the entirely separate and irrelevant detail of him being adopted in addition. Why and how in the hell would the owner and Director of a massive international conglomerate like Wayne Enterprises at all be so aware of the private life of a low-level employee (Wayne hardly even knows or cares about much higher-level people in his company, like the finance professionals Arthur killed), unless he had more to do with her than he's letting off? Furthermore the idea that Penny was had a narcissist personality disorder flies in the face of the flashback showing she was battered by her 'boyfriend', a real narcissist would never take physical abuse lying down as she did, so the medical record and the idea she imagined her relationship with Thomas is immediately suspect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


He's way, way to specific in his denial to Arthur in the bathroom. All he has to say is that he never slept with Penny and that would be that. and yet he chooses to layer on the entirely separate and irrelevant detail of him being adopted in addition. Why and how in the hell would the owner and Director of a massive international conglomerate like Wayne Enterprises at all be so aware of the private life of a low-level employee (Wayne hardly even knows or cares about much higher-level people in his company, like the finance professionals Arthur killed), unless he had more to do with her than he's letting off? Furthermore the idea that Penny was had a narcissist personality disorder flies in the face of the flashback showing she was battered by her 'boyfriend', a real narcissist would never take physical abuse lying down as she did, so the medical record and the idea she imagined her relationship with Thomas is immediately suspect.

to:

He's way, way to specific in his denial to Arthur in the bathroom. All he has to say is that he never slept with Penny and that would be that. and And yet he chooses to layer on the entirely separate and irrelevant detail of him being adopted in addition. Why and how in the hell would the owner and Director of a massive international conglomerate like Wayne Enterprises at all be so aware of the private life of a low-level employee (Wayne hardly even knows or cares about much higher-level people in his company, like the finance professionals Arthur killed), unless he had more to do with her than he's letting off? Furthermore the idea that Penny was had a narcissist personality disorder flies in the face of the flashback showing she was battered by her 'boyfriend', a real narcissist would never take physical abuse lying down as she did, so the medical record and the idea she imagined her relationship with Thomas is immediately suspect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: Wayne is Arthur's Father.]]

He's way, way to specific in his denial to Arthur in the bathroom. All he has to say is that he never slept with Penny and that would be that. and yet he chooses to layer on the entirely separate and irrelevant detail of him being adopted in addition. Why and how in the hell would the owner and Director of a massive international conglomerate like Wayne Enterprises at all be so aware of the private life of a low-level employee (Wayne hardly even knows or cares about much higher-level people in his company, like the finance professionals Arthur killed), unless he had more to do with her than he's letting off? Furthermore the idea that Penny was had a narcissist personality disorder flies in the face of the flashback showing she was battered by her 'boyfriend', a real narcissist would never take physical abuse lying down as she did, so the medical record and the idea she imagined her relationship with Thomas is immediately suspect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Sadly, adoption centers aren't perfect. Even people who obviously shouldn't have children still somehow get to adopt. Same goes for people who are sponsors for foster children.

to:

** Sadly, adoption centers aren't perfect. Even people who obviously shouldn't have children still somehow get to adopt. Same goes for people who are sponsors for foster children.
children. Furthermore, Gotham is a corrupt city during the events of the story, so this shouldn't come off as a shock.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Sadly, adoption centers aren't perfect. Even people who obviously shouldn't have children still somehow get to adopt. Same goes for people who are sponsors for foster children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: Arthur's father was named "Thomas Wayne", but it wasn't the same Thomas Wayne as in the story.]]
"Thomas Wayne" isn't exactly an unusual name. It could be that Penny did have a relationship with someone named Thomas Wayne, but later confused him for Bruce's father due to mental illness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Why not? As previous scenes have shown, Arthur WouldntHurtAChild, and unlike the rest of of his possible victims, Sophie's daughter never wronged him in any way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[spoiler:This is just her way of breaking up with Arthur. She pretends she doesn't know him and changes her apartment number in order to get rid of him. She is aware of his mental illness and delusions. She wants Arthur to THINK it was all a delusion so he'll go away and move on. She was attracted to his quirkiness at first, but later lost interest.]]

to:

[[spoiler:This is just her way of breaking up with Arthur. She pretends she doesn't know him and changes her apartment number in order to get rid of him. She is aware of his mental illness and delusions. She wants Arthur to THINK it was all a delusion so he'll go away and move on. She was attracted to his quirkiness and abnormal behavior at first, but later lost interest.]]

Top