Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* ScienceMarchesOn:
** Pretty much all the dinosaurs are based on pre-Renaissance depictions but are shown being fairly active and lithe, which might be a case of ShownTheirWork since the Dinosaur Renaissance positng such theories was in its infancy in 1974.
** Pretty much all the dinosaurs are based on pre-Renaissance depictions but are shown being fairly active and lithe, which might be a case of ShownTheirWork since the Dinosaur Renaissance positng such theories was in its infancy in 1974.
to:
* ScienceMarchesOn:
AccidentallyCorrectZoology:
** Pretty much all the dinosaurs are based on pre-Renaissance depictions but are shown being fairly active and lithe, which might be a case of ShownTheirWork since the Dinosaur Renaissancepositng posting such theories was in its infancy in 1974.
** Pretty much all the dinosaurs are based on pre-Renaissance depictions but are shown being fairly active and lithe, which might be a case of ShownTheirWork since the Dinosaur Renaissance
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** Pretty much all the dinosaurs are based on pre-Renaissance depictions.
to:
** Pretty much all the dinosaurs are based on pre-Renaissance depictions.depictions but are shown being fairly active and lithe, which might be a case of ShownTheirWork since the Dinosaur Renaissance positng such theories was in its infancy in 1974.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** In "Forbidden Fruit", John identifies the sauropod as a ''Brontosaurus'' without mentioning that it is (at the time) also known as ''Apatosaurus'', which as a scientist, he should have known. Roughly 3 decades later, the two dinosaurs are now recognized as separate genera.
to:
** In "Forbidden Fruit", John identifies the sauropod as a ''Brontosaurus'' without mentioning that it is (at the time) also known as ''Apatosaurus'', which as a scientist, he should have known. Roughly 3 4 decades later, the two dinosaurs are now recognized as separate genera.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** In "Forbidden Fruit", John identifies the sauropod as a ''Brontosaurus'' without mentioning that it is (at the time) also known as ''Apatosaurus'', which as a scientist, he should have known. Roughly 3 decades later, the two dinosaurs are now recognized as separate genera.
to:
** In "Forbidden Fruit", John identifies the sauropod as a ''Brontosaurus'' without mentioning that it is (at the time) also known as ''Apatosaurus'', which as a scientist, he should have known. Roughly 3 decades later, the two dinosaurs are now recognized as separate genera.genera.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ScienceMarchesOn:
** Pretty much all the dinosaurs are based on pre-Renaissance depictions.
** In "Forbidden Fruit", John identifies the sauropod as a ''Brontosaurus'' without mentioning that it is (at the time) also known as ''Apatosaurus'', which as a scientist, he should have known. Roughly 3 decades later, the two dinosaurs are now recognized as separate genera.
** Pretty much all the dinosaurs are based on pre-Renaissance depictions.
** In "Forbidden Fruit", John identifies the sauropod as a ''Brontosaurus'' without mentioning that it is (at the time) also known as ''Apatosaurus'', which as a scientist, he should have known. Roughly 3 decades later, the two dinosaurs are now recognized as separate genera.
