Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
YMMV
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* FanNickname: "Bamber Gasmask" for Bamber Gascoigne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Newspaper reports in 1994 have listed Creator/StephenFry, Clive Anderson, David Baddiel, Peter Snow, Jonathan Dimbleby and Emma Freud as potential candidates to moderate the revival. Jeremy Paxman initially refused the role as he felt it was Bamber Gascoigne's show, but after a chance meeting where Gascoigne said he was asked months ago but turned it down, he changed his mind.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Newspaper reports in 1994 have listed Creator/StephenFry, Clive Anderson, David Baddiel, Peter Snow, Jonathan Dimbleby and Emma Freud as potential candidates to moderate the revival. Jeremy Paxman initially refused the role as he felt it was Bamber Gascoigne's show, but after a chance meeting where with Gascoigne said where he told him he was asked months ago but turned it down, he changed his mind.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Newspaper reports in 1994 have listed Creator/StephenFry, Clive Anderson, David Baddiel, Peter Snow, Jonathan Dimbleby and Emma Freud as potential candidates to moderate the revival. Jeremy Paxman initially refused the role as he felt it was Bamber Gascoigne's show, but after a chance meeting where Gascoigne said he was asked months ago but turned it down, he changed his mind.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
* MissingEpisode: As ever for game shows from before 1980, many episodes from the Bamber Gascoigne era have been destroyed, to the point that in a 2002 "40 years of ''University Challenge''" retrospective, several Gascoigne-era clips (such as Manchester's Communist-themed protest from 1975) had to use re-created audio in place of actual archive recordings.
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** In 1975, a Manchester team including future ''Times'' columnist David Aaronovitch[[note]] whose father, Sam Aaronovitch, was a senior member of the Communist Party of Great Britain[[/note]] protested at the rule allowing multiple Oxbridge colleges to enter (each university can field up to five teams per year) by answering every question with the name of a revolutionary figure ("Trotsky", "Karl Marx", "Lenin", or "Che Guevara") in the hope of rendering the show unbroadcastable. The episode aired anyway, and went down in history as one of the competition's more memorable moments. Manchester were, however, effectively banned from ''University Challenge'' for at least a decade.
to:
** In 1975, a Manchester team including future ''Times'' columnist David Aaronovitch[[note]] whose father, Sam Aaronovitch, was a senior member of the Communist Party of Great Britain[[/note]] protested at the rule allowing multiple Oxbridge colleges to enter (each university can field up to five teams per year) by answering every question with the name of a revolutionary figure ("Trotsky", "Karl Marx", "Lenin", or "Che Guevara") in the hope of rendering the show unbroadcastable. The episode aired anyway, anyway (recording was halted, the Manchester team were read the riot act by the producer, and they reverted to playing the game properly thereafter, though they finished with just 40 points), and went down in history as one of the competition's more memorable moments. moments.[[note]] Not that it was enough to save the tape of the episode from being wiped.[[/note]] Manchester were, however, effectively banned from ''University Challenge'' for at least a decade.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** In 1975, a Manchester team including future ''Times'' columnist David Aaronovitch[[note]] whose father, Sam Aaronovitch, was a senior member of the Communist Party of Great Britain[[/note]] protested at the ruling allowing multiple Oxbridge colleges to enter the same competition (each can field up to five teams) by answering every question with the name of a revolutionary figure ("Trotsky", "Karl Marx", "Lenin", or "Che Guevara") in the hope of rendering the show unbroadcastable. The episode aired anyway, and went down in history as one of the competition's more memorable moments. Manchester were, however, effectively banned from ''University Challenge'' for at least a decade.
to:
** In 1975, a Manchester team including future ''Times'' columnist David Aaronovitch[[note]] whose father, Sam Aaronovitch, was a senior member of the Communist Party of Great Britain[[/note]] protested at the ruling rule allowing multiple Oxbridge colleges to enter the same competition (each university can field up to five teams) teams per year) by answering every question with the name of a revolutionary figure ("Trotsky", "Karl Marx", "Lenin", or "Che Guevara") in the hope of rendering the show unbroadcastable. The episode aired anyway, and went down in history as one of the competition's more memorable moments. Manchester were, however, effectively banned from ''University Challenge'' for at least a decade.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* WriterRevolt: More like contestant revolt.
** In 1975, a Manchester team including future ''Times'' columnist David Aaronovitch[[note]] whose father, Sam Aaronovitch, was a senior member of the Communist Party of Great Britain[[/note]] protested at the ruling allowing multiple Oxbridge colleges to enter the same competition (each can field up to five teams) by answering every question with the name of a revolutionary figure ("Trotsky", "Karl Marx", "Lenin", or "Che Guevara") in the hope of rendering the show unbroadcastable. The episode aired anyway, and went down in history as one of the competition's more memorable moments. Manchester were, however, effectively banned from ''University Challenge'' for at least a decade.
** There was also the incident where a New Hall, Cambridge contestant protested that the question should have been worded "what is it for?", not "what is it?" as the literal answer to the latter is "an oak leaf", whereas the question writer's intended answer was what the oak leaf sign ''signified''.
** Questioning of the given answer has occurred at least a couple more times besides.
** In 1975, a Manchester team including future ''Times'' columnist David Aaronovitch[[note]] whose father, Sam Aaronovitch, was a senior member of the Communist Party of Great Britain[[/note]] protested at the ruling allowing multiple Oxbridge colleges to enter the same competition (each can field up to five teams) by answering every question with the name of a revolutionary figure ("Trotsky", "Karl Marx", "Lenin", or "Che Guevara") in the hope of rendering the show unbroadcastable. The episode aired anyway, and went down in history as one of the competition's more memorable moments. Manchester were, however, effectively banned from ''University Challenge'' for at least a decade.
** There was also the incident where a New Hall, Cambridge contestant protested that the question should have been worded "what is it for?", not "what is it?" as the literal answer to the latter is "an oak leaf", whereas the question writer's intended answer was what the oak leaf sign ''signified''.
** Questioning of the given answer has occurred at least a couple more times besides.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FanNickname: "Bamber Gasmask" for Bamber Gascoigne.
