Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The educational sticker for ''Pteranodon'' calls it "the largest creature that ever flew", this series having circulated before the even larger azhdarchid pterosaurs (some of which had wingspans in excess of 10 metres) were very well-known outside of scientific circles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AccidentallyCorrectWriting: The flesh-eating ''Triceratops'' might qualify, seeing as evidence has surfaced to suggest that the species was actually at least partially omnivorous. Still, it's highly unlikely that living humans would be on the menu (the most prevailing idea for the "omnivorous ''Triceratops'' concept is that it would just occasionally scavenge for some extra protein, whereas here it's messily devouring any living thing that looks at it funny).
to:
* AccidentallyCorrectWriting: The flesh-eating ''Triceratops'' might qualify, seeing as evidence has surfaced to suggest that the species was actually at least partially omnivorous. Still, it's highly unlikely that living humans would be on the menu (the most prevailing idea for the "omnivorous ''Triceratops'' ''Triceratops''" concept is that it would just occasionally scavenge for some extra protein, whereas here it's messily devouring any living thing that looks at it funny).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AccidentallyAccurate: The flesh-eating ''Triceratops'' might qualify, seeing as evidence has surfaced to suggest that the species was actually at least partially omnivorous. Still, it's highly unlikely that living humans would be on the menu (the most prevailing idea for the "omnivorous ''Triceratops'' concept is that it would just occasionally scavenge for some extra protein, whereas here it's messily devouring any living thing that looks at it funny).
to:
* AccidentallyAccurate: AccidentallyCorrectWriting: The flesh-eating ''Triceratops'' might qualify, seeing as evidence has surfaced to suggest that the species was actually at least partially omnivorous. Still, it's highly unlikely that living humans would be on the menu (the most prevailing idea for the "omnivorous ''Triceratops'' concept is that it would just occasionally scavenge for some extra protein, whereas here it's messily devouring any living thing that looks at it funny).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AccidentallyAccurate: The flesh-eating ''Triceratops'' might qualify, seeing as evidence has surfaced to suggest that the species was actually omnivorous. Still, it's highly unlikely that living humans would be on the menu (the most prevailing idea for the "omnivorous ''Triceratops'' concept is that it would just occasionally scavenge for some extra protein, whereas here it's messily devouring any living thing that looks at it funny).
to:
* AccidentallyAccurate: The flesh-eating ''Triceratops'' might qualify, seeing as evidence has surfaced to suggest that the species was actually at least partially omnivorous. Still, it's highly unlikely that living humans would be on the menu (the most prevailing idea for the "omnivorous ''Triceratops'' concept is that it would just occasionally scavenge for some extra protein, whereas here it's messily devouring any living thing that looks at it funny).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AccidentallyAccurate: The flesh-eating ''Triceratops'' might qualify, seeing as evidence has surfaced to suggest that the species was actually omnivorous.
to:
* AccidentallyAccurate: The flesh-eating ''Triceratops'' might qualify, seeing as evidence has surfaced to suggest that the species was actually omnivorous. Still, it's highly unlikely that living humans would be on the menu (the most prevailing idea for the "omnivorous ''Triceratops'' concept is that it would just occasionally scavenge for some extra protein, whereas here it's messily devouring any living thing that looks at it funny).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* UnCanceled: Back in 1991, Eclipse Comics attempted to adapt the trading cards into a three-issue comic book miniseries, but the series was canceled after only the first issue was published. 22 years later, however, IDW Publishing reprinted the original Eclipse Comics issue and finally continued the story in a five-issue miniseries.
to:
* UnCanceled: Back in 1991, Eclipse Comics attempted to adapt the trading cards into a three-issue comic book miniseries, but the series was canceled after only the first issue was published. 22 years later, however, IDW Publishing reprinted the original Eclipse Comics issue and finally continued the story in by publishing four more issues to revive the comic as a five-issue miniseries.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
* AccidentallyAccurate: The flesh-eating ''Triceratops'' might qualify, seeing as evidence has surfaced to suggest that the species was actually omnivorous.
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** ''Trachodon'' is no longer a real genus. It has since been reassigned to ''Edmontosaurus''.
to:
** ''Trachodon'' is no longer a real genus. It has since been reassigned to ''Edmontosaurus''.''Edmontosaurus''.
* UnCanceled: Back in 1991, Eclipse Comics attempted to adapt the trading cards into a three-issue comic book miniseries, but the series was canceled after only the first issue was published. 22 years later, however, IDW Publishing reprinted the original Eclipse Comics issue and finally continued the story in a five-issue miniseries.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: As stated on the main page, Creator/TimBurton was originally going to make a film adaptation of ''Dinosaurs Attack!'', but decided not to because of [[Film/JurassicPark a certain more well-known franchise involving dinosaurs existing in contemporary times]].
* UnCanceled: Back in 1991, Eclipse Comics attempted to adapt the trading cards into a three-issue comic book miniseries, but the series was canceled after only the first issue was published. 22 years later, however, IDW Publishing reprinted the original Eclipse Comics issue and finally continued the story in a five-issue miniseries.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: As stated on the main page, Creator/TimBurton was originally going to make a film adaptation of ''Dinosaurs Attack!'', but decided not to because of [[Film/JurassicPark a certain more well-known franchise involving dinosaurs existing in contemporary times]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Revising one of the examples. The IDW comic has already been released a while ago and the article the link leads to does not exist anymore.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ScienceMarchesOn: Possibly the IDW reboot;if this image is any indication: [[http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/2550]], the dinosaurs will be more realistic in appearance at least.
to:
* ScienceMarchesOn: Possibly ScienceMarchesOn:
** In the IDWreboot;if this image is any indication: [[http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/2550]], Publishing comic book adaptation, some of the dinosaurs will be are portrayed more realistic in appearance at least.realistically.
** In the IDW
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ScienceMarchesOn: Possibly the IDW reboot;if this image is any indication: [[http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/2550]], the dinosaurs will be more realistic in appearance at least.
** ''Trachodon'' is no longer a real genus. It has since been reassigned to ''Edmontosaurus''.
** ''Trachodon'' is no longer a real genus. It has since been reassigned to ''Edmontosaurus''.
