Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Recap / LawAndOrderS6E12Trophy

Go To

OR

Added: 276

Removed: 149

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
An Amoral Attorney who is a DA belongs under the subtrope Persecuting Prosecutor.


* AmoralAttorney: Diana Hawthorne. She framed Andrew Dillard for serial murder, just so that Jack [=McCoy=] could get a promotion for convicting him.


Added DiffLines:

* PersecutingProsecutor: Diana Hawthorne. She hid exculpatory evidence and suborned perjury from the handwriting expert in order to convict the innocent Andrew Dillard for serial murder, all so that Jack [=McCoy=], her boss and lover, could get a promotion for convicting him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DeathOfAChild: The episode starts with a dead 12-year-old, a second one follows, and a SerialKiller of children who had murdered 5 years ago is exposed.


Added DiffLines:

* OutlivingOnesOffspring: Both children murdered in this episode have surviving parents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


On the stand, [=McCoy=] insists that he didn't know what Hawthorne had done, that he would not have condoned it had he known, and that her actions were not standard practice. He says that he's not paid to win; his only goal is to fight for justice and the truth. Fox asks if [=McCoy=] convicted Hank Chappel of murder ((see: [[Recap/LawAndOrderS5E17ActOfGod Act of God (episode)]]), and [=McCoy=] has to admit that he did, even though Chappel turned out to be innocent. Fox reiterates that [=McCoy=] convicted an innocent man without Hawthorne's help. [=McCoy=] insists that he didn't find any evidence that Chappel was anything other than the perpetrator.

to:

On the stand, [=McCoy=] insists that he didn't know what Hawthorne had done, that he would not have condoned it had he known, and that her actions were not standard practice. He says that he's not paid to win; his only goal is to fight for justice and the truth. Fox asks if [=McCoy=] convicted Hank Chappel of murder ((see: [[Recap/LawAndOrderS5E17ActOfGod (see: episode "[[Recap/LawAndOrderS5E17ActOfGod Act of God (episode)]]), God]]"), and [=McCoy=] has to admit that he did, even though Chappel turned out to be innocent. Fox reiterates that [=McCoy=] convicted an innocent man without Hawthorne's help. [=McCoy=] insists that he didn't find any evidence that Chappel was anything other than the perpetrator.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Directed by Creator/MarthaMitchell

Written by Creator/JeremyRLittman & Creator/EdZuckerman
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HalfwayPlotSwitch: The episode starts with the [=SVU=] looking for a killer. Before the halfway point, they catch the killer, only to learn he was also responsible for murders that someone else had been convicted for, leading to the discovery of evidence tampering, with the confrontation with the attorney responsible being the focus of the last third of the episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmoralAttorney: Diana Hawthorne. She framed Andrew Dillard for serial murder, just so that Jack McCoy could get a promotion for convicting him.

to:

* AmoralAttorney: Diana Hawthorne. She framed Andrew Dillard for serial murder, just so that Jack McCoy [=McCoy=] could get a promotion for convicting him.

Added: 57

Changed: 19

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PoliticallyIncorrectVillain: Subverted with Andrew Dillard. He's a racist bastard, but he's not the actual killer.
* SerialKiller: Andrew Dillard, a racist nutjob, is imprisoned for murdering several young black boys. It turns out the actual killer is [[KnightTemplar Simon Brooks]], a black security guard and religious fanatic. He considered the boys to be sinners, for doing things like shoplifting or looking at porn, and subsequently killed them.

to:

* PoliticallyIncorrectVillain: Subverted [[SubvertedTrope Subverted]] with Andrew Dillard. He's a racist bastard, but he's not the actual killer.
* SerialKiller: Andrew Dillard, a racist nutjob, is imprisoned for murdering several young black boys. It turns out the actual killer is [[KnightTemplar Simon Brooks]], a black security guard and religious fanatic. He considered the boys to be sinners, for doing things like shoplifting or looking at porn, and subsequently killed them.them.
* WouldHurtAChild: Simon Brooks is a serial child killer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PoliticallyIncorrectVilain: Subverted with Andrew Dillard. He's a racist bastard, but he's not the actual killer.

to:

* PoliticallyIncorrectVilain: PoliticallyIncorrectVillain: Subverted with Andrew Dillard. He's a racist bastard, but he's not the actual killer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[=McCoy=] tells Kincaid that she could have won the case and didn't need to take the deal. Kincaid jokes that she thought taking the deal was what [=McCoy=] wanted. She chuckles, and they walk off.

to:

[=McCoy=] tells Kincaid that she could have won the case and didn't need to take the deal. Kincaid jokes that she thought taking the deal was what [=McCoy=] wanted. She chuckles, and they walk off.off.

!!!This episode contains examples of:

* AmoralAttorney: Diana Hawthorne. She framed Andrew Dillard for serial murder, just so that Jack McCoy could get a promotion for convicting him.
* AxCrazy: [[SerialKiller Simon Brooks]]. He's a deranged religious fanatic who murders young black boys for their "sins", like shoplifting and looking at dirty magazines.
* FramingTheGuiltyParty: Diana Hawthorne, believing that Andrew Dillard is a serial killer, makes the evidence against him look better than it actually is. [[SubvertedTrope The subversion comes]] when it turns out that Dillard is actually innocent of the murders.
* KnightTemplar: Simon Brooks murders children for sinning while wearing religious iconography (crosses, hats). He considers it a form of sacrilege, which is what elevates his victims from everyday sinners to deserving of death.
* PoliticallyIncorrectVilain: Subverted with Andrew Dillard. He's a racist bastard, but he's not the actual killer.
* SerialKiller: Andrew Dillard, a racist nutjob, is imprisoned for murdering several young black boys. It turns out the actual killer is [[KnightTemplar Simon Brooks]], a black security guard and religious fanatic. He considered the boys to be sinners, for doing things like shoplifting or looking at porn, and subsequently killed them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[=McCoy=] asks if the cops verified the story. Curtis says that Brooks knew details of the murders only the killer would know, he had trophies from the kills, and he was ID'd in lineups by witnesses. [=McCoy=] wonders why the killings stopped when Dillard was arrested. Briscoe says that, when Dillard was charged, Brooks told his mother what had happened, and she put him on anti-psychosis medications. This stopped him from killing anyone until recently, when she died and he went off his medicine. [=McCoy=] is disturbed by his conviction of an innocent man.

to:

[=McCoy=] asks if the cops verified the story. Curtis says that Brooks knew details of the murders only the killer would know, he had trophies from the kills, and he was ID'd in lineups by witnesses. [=McCoy=] wonders why the killings stopped when Dillard was arrested. Briscoe says that, when Dillard was charged, Brooks told his mother what had happened, and she put him on anti-psychosis anti-psychotic medications. This stopped him from killing anyone until recently, when she died and he went off his medicine. [=McCoy=] is disturbed by his conviction of an innocent man.



Dillard tells [=McCoy=] that the last five years of his life were hellish. [=McCoy=] apologizes. Dillard says that he spent all his time hiding in his cell, because he thought the black inmates would have attacked him for killing black people. [=McCoy=] says that the evidence pointed at Dillard, but Dillard's lawyer says that they're claiming that [=McCoy=] knew Dillard was innocent but prosecuted him anyway. He shows a statement taken by a detective a few months before the trial; a witness saw one of the murder victims walking into Central Park with a black man. When she saw Brooks on the news, she recognized him and called the lawyer. The defense never got a copy of the statement, even though all potentially exculpatory evidence has to be turned over to the defense. [=McCoy=] says he never saw the statement before. Dillard smiles and says that his lawyer specializes in wrongful prosectuion, and the lawyer says that the statement is the basis for a $50 million dollar lawsuit.

to:

Dillard tells [=McCoy=] that the last five years of his life were hellish. [=McCoy=] apologizes. Dillard says that he spent all his time hiding in his cell, because he thought the black inmates would have attacked him for killing black people. [=McCoy=] says that the evidence pointed at Dillard, but Dillard's lawyer says that they're claiming that [=McCoy=] knew Dillard was innocent but prosecuted him anyway. He shows a statement taken by a detective a few months before the trial; a witness saw one of the murder victims walking into Central Park with a black man. When she saw Brooks on the news, she recognized him and called the lawyer. The defense never got a copy of the statement, even though all potentially exculpatory evidence has to be turned over to the defense. [=McCoy=] says he never saw the statement before. Dillard smiles and says that his lawyer specializes in wrongful prosectuion, prosecution, and the lawyer says that the statement is the basis for a $50 million dollar lawsuit.



Judge Walter Schreiber denies the motion by Hawthorne and her lawyer, Gerald Fox, to dismiss the charges. Hawthorne complies that she was just following [=McCoy's=] orders.

to:

Judge Walter Schreiber denies the motion by Hawthorne and her lawyer, Gerald Fox, to dismiss the charges. Hawthorne complies says that she was just following [=McCoy's=] orders.



Kincaid asks if Hawthorne swore an oath to uphold the law, and Hawthorne says that she was just following how [=McCoy=] implemented that same oath. She maintains that she never concealed evidence or suborn perjury. Fox objects when Kincaid begins to berate her over her actions. Kincaid says that Hawthorne got a lucrative job as a defense lawyer after the case. Hawthorne protests that the job came a year later, and she didn't plan for it; she left the district attorney's office because she didn't feel comfortable working with [=McCoy=] after they broke up. Kincaid then wonders if Hawthorne was tempted to do what she did to help out [=McCoy=], who was her boss and lover.

to:

Kincaid asks if Hawthorne swore an oath to uphold the law, and Hawthorne says that she was just following how [=McCoy=] implemented that same oath. She maintains that she never concealed evidence or suborn suborned perjury. Fox objects when Kincaid begins to berate her over her actions. Kincaid says that Hawthorne got a lucrative job as a defense lawyer after the case. Hawthorne protests that the job came a year later, and she didn't plan for it; she left the district attorney's office because she didn't feel comfortable working with [=McCoy=] after they broke up. Kincaid then wonders if Hawthorne was tempted to do what she did to help out [=McCoy=], who was her boss and lover.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Kincaid talks to Detective Monfredo, the detective who talked to a witness who saw one of the victims with Brooks. Monfredo remembers the interview perfectly. He says that he gave the statement to the District Attorney but the witness vanished; he thinks the witness might have had some issue preventing her from testifying. He says that he personally handed it to Hawthorne, [=McCoy's=] assistant.

to:

Kincaid talks to Detective Monfredo, the detective who talked to a the witness who saw one of gave the victims with Brooks.statement. Monfredo remembers the interview perfectly. He says that he gave the statement to the District Attorney but the witness vanished; he thinks the witness might have had some issue preventing her from testifying. He says that he personally handed it to Hawthorne, [=McCoy's=] assistant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->"I killed those boys. I killed all those boys. You just gave Dillard the credit."\\

to:

->"I ->"[[WhamLine I killed those boys. I killed all those boys. You just gave Dillard the credit."\\]]"\\



[=McCoy=] tells Kincaid that she could have won the case and didn't need to take the deal. Kincaid jokes that she thought taking the deal was what [=McCoy=] wanted. She chuckles, and they walk off.

to:

[=McCoy=] tells Kincaid that she could have won the case and didn't need to take the deal. Kincaid jokes that she thought taking the deal was what [=McCoy=] wanted. She chuckles, and they walk off.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Late that night, Kincaid says that the file has everything but the detective's statement. [=McCoy=] looks doomed, saying that it doesn't matter whether the statement is there or not; Dillard will destroy him either way. Kincaid says she's being deposed, and wonders why. [=McCoy=] says that Dillard will want to show a pattern. He asks her what she'll say if Dillard's lawyer asks if [=McCoy=] has ever concealed exculpatory evidence. She can't answer. Eventually she cites a case in which [=McCoy=] withheld a witness statement. [=McCoy=] says that, based on a technicality, he didn't have to turn over the statement; Kincaid says that the judge disagreed. [=McCoy=] again asks what she'll say if Dillard's lawyer asks if [=McCoy=] ever concealed exculpatory evidence.

to:

Late that night, Kincaid says that the file has everything but the detective's statement. [=McCoy=] looks doomed, saying that it doesn't matter whether the statement is there or not; Dillard will destroy him either way. Kincaid says she's being deposed, and wonders why. [=McCoy=] says that Dillard will want to show a pattern. He asks her what she'll say if Dillard's lawyer asks if [=McCoy=] has ever concealed exculpatory evidence. She can't answer. Eventually she cites a case in which [=McCoy=] withheld a witness statement.statement (see: [[Recap/LawAndOrderS5E6Competence Competence (episode)]]). [=McCoy=] says that, based on a technicality, he didn't have to turn over the statement; Kincaid says that the judge disagreed. [=McCoy=] again asks what she'll say if Dillard's lawyer asks if [=McCoy=] ever concealed exculpatory evidence.

Top