Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 90,91 (click to see context) from:
-->-- ''Film/{{Anon}}''
to:
-->-- ''Film/{{Anon}}''
''Film/Anon2018''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
-->-- '''Black Mage,''' ''WebComic/EightBitTheater, [[http://www.nuklearpower.com/2008/06/24/episode-1008-charmed-im-sure/ Strip #1008]]''
to:
-->-- '''Black Mage,''' ''WebComic/EightBitTheater, Mage''', ''Webcomic/EightBitTheater'', [[http://www.nuklearpower.com/2008/06/24/episode-1008-charmed-im-sure/ Strip #1008]]''
#1008]]
Changed line(s) 15,26 (click to see context) from:
-->--''Webcomic/LeftoverSoup'' [[http://www.leftoversoup.com/archive.php?num=139 #139]]
->'''Makoto''': Can high school students even participate in the stock market? \\
'''Byakuya''': My name is Byakuya Togami.\\
'''Makoto''': [[LampshadeHanging (Was that... an answer to the question?)]]
-->--''VisualNovel/DanganronpaTriggerHappyHavoc''
->'''Kurt''': Why does it all keep coming back to-- how does the ''soulsword'' fit in? \\
'''Amanda''': Well... That's it exactly, Kurt.\\
'''Kurt''': ...You do realise that this is part of why we broke up, Amanda? Your inability to give me a straight answer about ''anything''.
-->--''ComicBook/{{Nightcrawler}}'' #10
->'''Makoto''': Can high school students even participate in the stock market? \\
'''Byakuya''': My name is Byakuya Togami.\\
'''Makoto''': [[LampshadeHanging (Was that... an answer to the question?)]]
-->--''VisualNovel/DanganronpaTriggerHappyHavoc''
->'''Kurt''': Why does it all keep coming back to-- how does the ''soulsword'' fit in? \\
'''Amanda''': Well... That's it exactly, Kurt.\\
'''Kurt''': ...You do realise that this is part of why we broke up, Amanda? Your inability to give me a straight answer about ''anything''.
-->--''ComicBook/{{Nightcrawler}}'' #10
to:
->'''Kurt''':
->'''Kurt:''' Why does it all keep coming back to-- how does the ''soulsword'' fit in? \\
Changed line(s) 29,30 (click to see context) from:
'''Bishop:''' He's not [[CloudCuckooLander some kind of madman]], then?\\
''({{beat}})''\\
''({{beat}})''\\
to:
'''Bishop:''' He's not [[CloudCuckooLander [[{{Cloudcuckoolander}} some kind of madman]], then?\\
''({{beat}})''\\''[{{Beat}}]''\\
Changed line(s) 32,81 (click to see context) from:
-->-- ''Series/DoctorWho'', "Flesh and Stone"
->'''Jeremy Paxman''': You stated in your statement that "The leader of the Opposition had said that I" -- that is, you -- "personally told Mr Lewis[[note]]Director of the prison service[[/note]] that the Governor of Parkhurst should be suspended immediately, and when Mr Lewis objected, as it was an operational matter, I threatened to instruct him to do it." Derek Lewis says "Howard had certainly told me that the Governor of Parkhurst should be suspended and had threatened to overrule me." Are you saying Mr Lewis is lying?
->'''Michael Howard''': I have given a full account of this and the position is what I told the House of Commons, and let me tell you what the position is--
->'''Paxman''': [''interrupting''] So you are saying Lewis lied.
->'''Howard''': Let me tell you exactly what the position is. I was entitled to be consulted --
->'''Paxman''': Yes.
->'''Howard''': --And I was consulted. I was entitled to express and opinion, I did express an opinion. I was not entitled to instruct Derek Lewis what to do, and I did not instruct him what to do.
->'''Paxman''': Well, his ver--
->'''Howard''': And you will understand and recall that Mr Marriot was not suspended. He was moved, and Derek Lewis told the Select Committee of the House of Commons that it was his opinion, Derek Lewis's opinion, that he should be moved immediately. That is what happened.
->'''Paxman''':-- Mr Lewis says "I told him what we had decided about Marriot, and why. He" -- that is, you -- "exploded. Simply moving the Governor was politically unpalatable. It sounded indecisive, it would be seen as a fudge. If I did not change my mind and suspend Marriot, he would have to consider overruling me."
->'''Howard''': Mr Marriot--
->'''Paxman''': You can't both be right.
->'''Howard''': Mr Marriot was not suspended. I was entitled to express my views, I was entitled to be consulted.
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': I was not entitled to instruct Derek Lewis, and I did not instruct him. And --
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': -- the truth of the matter is that Mr Marriot was not suspended.
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': Not -- I did not overrule Derek Lewis --
->'''Paxman''': Did you ''threaten'' to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': I took advice on what I could and could not do --
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him, Mr Howard?
->'''Howard''': And I acted scrupulously in accordance with that advice. I did not overrule Derek Lewis --
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': Mr Marriott was not suspended --
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': I have accounted for my decision to dismiss Derek Lewis --
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': -- in great detail, before the House of Commons.
->'''Paxman''': I note you're not answering the question whether you ''threatened'' to overrule him.
->'''Howard''': Well, the important aspect of, of this, which is very clear to bear in mind --
->'''Paxman''': I'm sorry, I'm going to be frightfully rude, but I -- [''laughs''] Sorry, it's a quite straight yes or no -
->'''Howard''': You can put the question, and I will give you -
->'''Paxman''': It's a straight yes or no answer. Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''':- [''Beat''] I discussed this matter with Derek Lewis. I gave him the benefit of my opinion. I gave him the benefit of my opinion in strong language. But I did not instruct him, because I was not entitled to instruct him. I was entitled to express my opinion, and that is what I did.
->'''Paxman''': With respect, that is not answering the question of whether you threatened to overrule him.
->'''Howard''': ...It's dealing with the relevant point, which is what I was entitled to do, and what I was not entitled to do. And I have dealt with this in detail before the House of Commons and before the Select Committee.
->'''Paxman''': With respect, you haven't answered the question [of] whether you threatened to overrule him.
->'''Howard''': Well, you see, the question is, what was I entitled to do, and what was I not entitled to do? I was not entitled to instruct him, and I did not do that.
->'''Paxman''': ... Right. We'll leave that aspect there.
-->--''Series/{{Newsnight}}'', The Paxman/Howard exchange in all its cat-shaking-a-mouse glory, transcribed from the [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwlsd8RAoqI original]]
->''Commentary: Your ability to speak without saying anything is truly remarkable, Master.''
-->--'''HK-51''', ''VideoGame/StarWarsTheOldRepublic''
->'''Bucky''': Where did they[[note]]the Nazis[[/note]] lay their hands on the Flash Gordon tech?
->'''Captain America''': You wouldn't believe me if I told you, chum. Let's just say that there's more sides fighting in this war than anyone will ever know.
-->-- ''ComicBook/TheUltimates''
->'''Jeremy Paxman''': You stated in your statement that "The leader of the Opposition had said that I" -- that is, you -- "personally told Mr Lewis[[note]]Director of the prison service[[/note]] that the Governor of Parkhurst should be suspended immediately, and when Mr Lewis objected, as it was an operational matter, I threatened to instruct him to do it." Derek Lewis says "Howard had certainly told me that the Governor of Parkhurst should be suspended and had threatened to overrule me." Are you saying Mr Lewis is lying?
->'''Michael Howard''': I have given a full account of this and the position is what I told the House of Commons, and let me tell you what the position is--
->'''Paxman''': [''interrupting''] So you are saying Lewis lied.
->'''Howard''': Let me tell you exactly what the position is. I was entitled to be consulted --
->'''Paxman''': Yes.
->'''Howard''': --And I was consulted. I was entitled to express and opinion, I did express an opinion. I was not entitled to instruct Derek Lewis what to do, and I did not instruct him what to do.
->'''Paxman''': Well, his ver--
->'''Howard''': And you will understand and recall that Mr Marriot was not suspended. He was moved, and Derek Lewis told the Select Committee of the House of Commons that it was his opinion, Derek Lewis's opinion, that he should be moved immediately. That is what happened.
->'''Paxman''':-- Mr Lewis says "I told him what we had decided about Marriot, and why. He" -- that is, you -- "exploded. Simply moving the Governor was politically unpalatable. It sounded indecisive, it would be seen as a fudge. If I did not change my mind and suspend Marriot, he would have to consider overruling me."
->'''Howard''': Mr Marriot--
->'''Paxman''': You can't both be right.
->'''Howard''': Mr Marriot was not suspended. I was entitled to express my views, I was entitled to be consulted.
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': I was not entitled to instruct Derek Lewis, and I did not instruct him. And --
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': -- the truth of the matter is that Mr Marriot was not suspended.
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': Not -- I did not overrule Derek Lewis --
->'''Paxman''': Did you ''threaten'' to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': I took advice on what I could and could not do --
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him, Mr Howard?
->'''Howard''': And I acted scrupulously in accordance with that advice. I did not overrule Derek Lewis --
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': Mr Marriott was not suspended --
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': I have accounted for my decision to dismiss Derek Lewis --
->'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''': -- in great detail, before the House of Commons.
->'''Paxman''': I note you're not answering the question whether you ''threatened'' to overrule him.
->'''Howard''': Well, the important aspect of, of this, which is very clear to bear in mind --
->'''Paxman''': I'm sorry, I'm going to be frightfully rude, but I -- [''laughs''] Sorry, it's a quite straight yes or no -
->'''Howard''': You can put the question, and I will give you -
->'''Paxman''': It's a straight yes or no answer. Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''':- [''Beat''] I discussed this matter with Derek Lewis. I gave him the benefit of my opinion. I gave him the benefit of my opinion in strong language. But I did not instruct him, because I was not entitled to instruct him. I was entitled to express my opinion, and that is what I did.
->'''Paxman''': With respect, that is not answering the question of whether you threatened to overrule him.
->'''Howard''': ...It's dealing with the relevant point, which is what I was entitled to do, and what I was not entitled to do. And I have dealt with this in detail before the House of Commons and before the Select Committee.
->'''Paxman''': With respect, you haven't answered the question [of] whether you threatened to overrule him.
->'''Howard''': Well, you see, the question is, what was I entitled to do, and what was I not entitled to do? I was not entitled to instruct him, and I did not do that.
->'''Paxman''': ... Right. We'll leave that aspect there.
-->--''Series/{{Newsnight}}'', The Paxman/Howard exchange in all its cat-shaking-a-mouse glory, transcribed from the [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwlsd8RAoqI original]]
->''Commentary: Your ability to speak without saying anything is truly remarkable, Master.''
-->--'''HK-51''', ''VideoGame/StarWarsTheOldRepublic''
->'''Bucky''': Where did they[[note]]the Nazis[[/note]] lay their hands on the Flash Gordon tech?
->'''Captain America''': You wouldn't believe me if I told you, chum. Let's just say that there's more sides fighting in this war than anyone will ever know.
-->-- ''ComicBook/TheUltimates''
to:
-->-- ''Series/DoctorWho'', "Flesh "[[Recap/DoctorWhoS31E5FleshAndStone Flesh and Stone"
Stone]]"
->'''JeremyPaxman''': Paxman:''' You stated in your statement that "The leader of the Opposition had said that I" -- that is, you -- "personally told Mr Mr. Lewis[[note]]Director of the prison service[[/note]] that the Governor of Parkhurst should be suspended immediately, and when Mr Mr. Lewis objected, as it was an operational matter, I threatened to instruct him to do it." Derek Lewis says "Howard had certainly told me that the Governor of Parkhurst should be suspended and had threatened to overrule me." Are you saying Mr Mr. Lewis is lying?
->'''Michael Howard''':lying?\\
'''Michael Howard:''' I have given a full account of this and the position is what I told the House of Commons, and let me tell you what the positionis--
->'''Paxman''': [''interrupting'']is--\\
'''Paxman:''' ''[interrupting]'' So you are saying Lewislied.
->'''Howard''':lied.\\
'''Howard:''' Let me tell you exactly what the position is. I was entitled to beconsulted --
->'''Paxman''': Yes.
->'''Howard''': --Andconsulted--\\
'''Paxman:''' Yes.\\
'''Howard:''' --and I was consulted. I was entitled to express and opinion, I did express an opinion. I was not entitled to instruct Derek Lewis what to do, and I did not instruct him what todo.
->'''Paxman''':do.\\
'''Paxman:''' Well, hisver--
->'''Howard''':ver--\\
'''Howard:''' And you will understand and recall thatMr Mr. Marriot was not suspended. He was moved, and Derek Lewis told the Select Committee of the House of Commons that it was his opinion, Derek Lewis's opinion, that he should be moved immediately. That is what happened.
->'''Paxman''':-- Mrhappened.\\
'''Paxman:''' Mr. Lewis says "I told him what we had decided about Marriot, and why. He" -- that is, you -- "exploded. Simply moving the Governor was politically unpalatable. It sounded indecisive, it would be seen as a fudge. If I did not change my mind and suspend Marriot, he would have to consider overruling me."
->'''Howard''': Mr Marriot--
->'''Paxman''':"\\
'''Howard:''' Mr. Marriot--\\
'''Paxman:''' You can't both beright.
->'''Howard''': Mrright.\\
'''Howard:''' Mr. Marriot was not suspended. I was entitled to express my views, I was entitled to beconsulted.
->'''Paxman''':consulted.\\
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrulehim?
->'''Howard''':him?\\
'''Howard:''' I was not entitled to instruct Derek Lewis, and I did not instruct him.And --
->'''Paxman''':And--\\
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrulehim?
->'''Howard''': -- thehim?\\
'''Howard:''' --the truth of the matter is thatMr Mr. Marriot was not suspended.
->'''Paxman''':suspended.\\
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrulehim?
->'''Howard''':him?\\
'''Howard:''' Not -- I did not overrule DerekLewis --
->'''Paxman''':Lewis--\\
'''Paxman:''' Did you ''threaten'' to overrulehim?
->'''Howard''':him?\\
'''Howard:''' I took advice on what I could and could notdo --
->'''Paxman''':do--\\
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrule him,Mr Howard?
->'''Howard''': AndMr. Howard?\\
'''Howard:''' --and I acted scrupulously in accordance with that advice. I did not overrule DerekLewis --
->'''Paxman''':Lewis--\\
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrulehim?
->'''Howard''': Mrhim?\\
'''Howard:''' Mr. Marriott was notsuspended --
->'''Paxman''':suspended--\\
'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrulehim?
->'''Howard''':him?\\
'''Howard:''' I have accounted for my decision to dismiss DerekLewis --
->'''Paxman''':Lewis--\\
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrulehim?
->'''Howard''': -- inhim?\\
'''Howard:''' --in great detail, before the House ofCommons.
->'''Paxman''':Commons.\\
'''Paxman:''' I note you're not answering the question whether you ''threatened'' to overrulehim.
->'''Howard''':him.\\
'''Howard:''' Well, the important aspect of, of this, which is very clear to bear inmind --
->'''Paxman''':mind--\\
'''Paxman:''' I'm sorry, I'm going to be frightfully rude, butI -- [''laughs''] I-- ''[laughs]'' Sorry, it's a quite straight yes 'yes' or no -
->'''Howard''':'no'--\\
'''Howard:''' You can put the question, and I will giveyou -
->'''Paxman''':you--\\
'''Paxman:''' It's a straightyes 'yes' or no 'no' answer. Did you threaten to overrule him?
->'''Howard''':- [''Beat'']him?\\
'''Howard:''' ''[{{Beat}}]'' I discussed this matter with Derek Lewis. I gave him the benefit of my opinion. I gave him the benefit of my opinion in strong language. But I did not instruct him, because I was not entitled to instruct him. I was entitled to express my opinion, and that is what Idid.
->'''Paxman''':did.\\
'''Paxman:''' With respect, that is not answering the question of whether you threatened to overrulehim.
->'''Howard''': ...him.\\
'''Howard:''' ...It's dealing with the relevant point, which is what I was entitled to do, and what I was not entitled to do. And I have dealt with this in detail before the House of Commons and before the SelectCommittee.
->'''Paxman''':Committee.\\
'''Paxman:''' With respect, you haven't answered the question [of] whether you threatened to overrulehim.
->'''Howard''':him.\\
'''Howard:''' Well, you see, the question is, what was I entitled to do, and what was I not entitled to do? I was not entitled to instruct him, and I did not dothat.
->'''Paxman''': ...that.\\
'''Paxman:''' ...Right. We'll leave that aspect there.
-->--''Series/{{Newsnight}}'', The -->-- ''Series/{{Newsnight}}'', the Paxman/Howard exchange in all its cat-shaking-a-mouse glory, transcribed from the [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwlsd8RAoqI original]]
->''Commentary: ->''"Commentary: Your ability to speak without saying anything is truly remarkable, Master.''
-->--'''HK-51''',"''
-->-- '''HK-51''', ''VideoGame/StarWarsTheOldRepublic''
->'''Bucky''': ->'''Bucky:''' Where did they[[note]]the Nazis[[/note]] lay their hands on the Flash Gordon tech?
->'''Captain America''':tech?\\
'''Captain America:''' You wouldn't believe me if I told you, chum. Let's just say that there's more sides fighting in this war than anyone will ever know.
-->--''ComicBook/TheUltimates''
''ComicBook/TheUltimates2002''
->'''Jeremy
->'''Michael Howard''':
'''Michael Howard:''' I have given a full account of this and the position is what I told the House of Commons, and let me tell you what the position
->'''Paxman''': [''interrupting'']
'''Paxman:''' ''[interrupting]'' So you are saying Lewis
->'''Howard''':
'''Howard:''' Let me tell you exactly what the position is. I was entitled to be
->'''Paxman''': Yes.
->'''Howard''': --And
'''Paxman:''' Yes.\\
'''Howard:''' --and I was consulted. I was entitled to express and opinion, I did express an opinion. I was not entitled to instruct Derek Lewis what to do, and I did not instruct him what to
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' Well, his
->'''Howard''':
'''Howard:''' And you will understand and recall that
->'''Paxman''':-- Mr
'''Paxman:''' Mr. Lewis says "I told him what we had decided about Marriot, and why. He" -- that is, you -- "exploded. Simply moving the Governor was politically unpalatable. It sounded indecisive, it would be seen as a fudge. If I did not change my mind and suspend Marriot, he would have to consider overruling me.
->'''Howard''': Mr Marriot--
->'''Paxman''':
'''Howard:''' Mr. Marriot--\\
'''Paxman:''' You can't both be
->'''Howard''': Mr
'''Howard:''' Mr. Marriot was not suspended. I was entitled to express my views, I was entitled to be
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrule
->'''Howard''':
'''Howard:''' I was not entitled to instruct Derek Lewis, and I did not instruct him.
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrule
->'''Howard''': -- the
'''Howard:''' --the truth of the matter is that
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrule
->'''Howard''':
'''Howard:''' Not -- I did not overrule Derek
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' Did you ''threaten'' to overrule
->'''Howard''':
'''Howard:''' I took advice on what I could and could not
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrule him,
->'''Howard''': And
'''Howard:''' --and I acted scrupulously in accordance with that advice. I did not overrule Derek
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrule
->'''Howard''': Mr
'''Howard:''' Mr. Marriott was not
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman''': Did you threaten to overrule
->'''Howard''':
'''Howard:''' I have accounted for my decision to dismiss Derek
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' Did you threaten to overrule
->'''Howard''': -- in
'''Howard:''' --in great detail, before the House of
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' I note you're not answering the question whether you ''threatened'' to overrule
->'''Howard''':
'''Howard:''' Well, the important aspect of, of this, which is very clear to bear in
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' I'm sorry, I'm going to be frightfully rude, but
->'''Howard''':
'''Howard:''' You can put the question, and I will give
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' It's a straight
->'''Howard''':- [''Beat'']
'''Howard:''' ''[{{Beat}}]'' I discussed this matter with Derek Lewis. I gave him the benefit of my opinion. I gave him the benefit of my opinion in strong language. But I did not instruct him, because I was not entitled to instruct him. I was entitled to express my opinion, and that is what I
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' With respect, that is not answering the question of whether you threatened to overrule
->'''Howard''': ...
'''Howard:''' ...It's dealing with the relevant point, which is what I was entitled to do, and what I was not entitled to do. And I have dealt with this in detail before the House of Commons and before the Select
->'''Paxman''':
'''Paxman:''' With respect, you haven't answered the question [of] whether you threatened to overrule
->'''Howard''':
'''Howard:''' Well, you see, the question is, what was I entitled to do, and what was I not entitled to do? I was not entitled to instruct him, and I did not do
->'''Paxman''': ...
'''Paxman:''' ...Right. We'll leave that aspect there.
-->--'''HK-51''',
-->-- '''HK-51''', ''VideoGame/StarWarsTheOldRepublic''
->'''Captain America''':
'''Captain America:''' You wouldn't believe me if I told you, chum. Let's just say that there's more sides fighting in this war than anyone will ever know.
-->--
Changed line(s) 83,84 (click to see context) from:
'''Blameless Marad:''' Well, it depends on who you mean by "They"... and what "they" might want to blame me for.\\
'''Aloy:''' (sigh) Talking to you is tiring.\\
'''Aloy:''' (sigh) Talking to you is tiring.\\
to:
'''Blameless Marad:''' Well, it depends on who you mean by "They"..."they"... and what "they" might want to blame me for.\\
'''Aloy:'''(sigh) ''[sighs]'' Talking to you is tiring.\\
'''Aloy:'''
Changed line(s) 88,89 (click to see context) from:
->'''Anon:''' You ask a lot of questions.
->'''Sol:''' You don't answer them.
->'''Sol:''' You don't answer them.
to:
->'''Anon:''' You ask a lot of questions.
->'''Sol:'''questions.\\
'''Sol:''' You don't answer them.
->'''Sol:'''
'''Sol:''' You don't answer them.
Changed line(s) 96,102 (click to see context) from:
-->-- “The Election of 1800,” ''Theatre/{{Hamilton}}''
->'''Sabine:''' How do you find a way of answering questions without giving any answers?
->'''Hera:''' Do you really want me to answer that?
-->-- ''WesternAnimation/StarWarsRebels'', "Out of Darkness"
->''"The Answer to the Great Question of Life, the Universe and Everything is...forty-two."''
->'''Sabine:''' How do you find a way of answering questions without giving any answers?
->'''Hera:''' Do you really want me to answer that?
-->-- ''WesternAnimation/StarWarsRebels'', "Out of Darkness"
->''"The Answer to the Great Question of Life, the Universe and Everything is...forty-two."''
to:
-->-- “The ''Theatre/{{Hamilton}}'', "The Election of 1800,” ''Theatre/{{Hamilton}}''
1800"
->'''Sabine:''' How do you find a way of answering questions without giving anyanswers?
->'''Hera:'''answers?\\
'''Hera:''' Do you really want me to answer that?
-->-- ''WesternAnimation/StarWarsRebels'',"Out "[[Recap/StarWarsRebelsS1E05OutOfDarkness Out of Darkness"
Darkness]]"
->''"The Answer to the Great Question of Life, the Universe and Everything is... forty-two."''
->'''Sabine:''' How do you find a way of answering questions without giving any
->'''Hera:'''
'''Hera:''' Do you really want me to answer that?
-->-- ''WesternAnimation/StarWarsRebels'',
->''"The Answer to the Great Question of Life, the Universe and Everything is... forty-two."''
Changed line(s) 105,107 (click to see context) from:
->'''Snagglepuss''': Aren't you guys supposed to be 3 million years in the past?\\
'''Fred''': Barney and I are raising money.\\
'''Snagglepuss''': That didn't answer my question.
'''Fred''': Barney and I are raising money.\\
'''Snagglepuss''': That didn't answer my question.
to:
Changed line(s) 110,112 (click to see context) from:
->'''Sara''': What makes the difference between "old-fashioned" and "traditional"?\\
'''Lavinia''': One is better than the other.\\
'''Sara''': ''(thinking)'' [[LampshadeHanging That's not an answer]]!
'''Lavinia''': One is better than the other.\\
'''Sara''': ''(thinking)'' [[LampshadeHanging That's not an answer]]!
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
->'''Sara''': What makes the difference between "old-fashioned" and "traditional"?\\
'''Lavinia''': One is better than the other.\\
'''Sara''': ''(thinking)'' [[LampshadeHanging That's not an answer]]!
-->-- ''VisualNovel/ALittleLilyPrincess''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
->'''Snagglepuss''': Aren't you guys supposed to be 3 million years in the past?\\
'''Fred''': Barney and I are raising money.\\
'''Snagglepuss''': That didn't answer my question.
-->-- [[https://twitter.com/jwcartoonist/status/1606111431329464323?s=46&t=uqn_MT7vH32HUOZ5blT3Ag JWCartoonist replying to HannaBarberaCap]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
->''"The Answer to the Great Question of Life, the Universe and Everything is...forty-two."''
-->-- '''Deep Thought''', ''Literature/TheHitchhikersGuideToTheGalaxy1''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
->'''Sabine:''' How do you find a way of answering questions without giving any answers?
->'''Hera:''' Do you really want me to answer that?
-->-- ''WesternAnimation/StarWarsRebels'', "Out of Darkness"
->'''Hera:''' Do you really want me to answer that?
-->-- ''WesternAnimation/StarWarsRebels'', "Out of Darkness"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
->'''UsefulNotes/JamesMadison:''' [Aaron Burr]'s very attractive in the North. New Yorkers like his chances.\\
'''UsefulNotes/ThomasJefferson:''' He's not very forthcoming on any particular stances.\\
'''Madison:''' Ask him a question, it glances off, he obfuscates, he dances.\\
'''Jefferson:''' And they say [[GoingNative I'm a Francophile]]? At least they know I know where France is!
-->-- “The Election of 1800,” ''Theatre/{{Hamilton}}''
'''UsefulNotes/ThomasJefferson:''' He's not very forthcoming on any particular stances.\\
'''Madison:''' Ask him a question, it glances off, he obfuscates, he dances.\\
'''Jefferson:''' And they say [[GoingNative I'm a Francophile]]? At least they know I know where France is!
-->-- “The Election of 1800,” ''Theatre/{{Hamilton}}''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 75 (click to see context) from:
->Commentary: Your ability to speak without saying anything is truly remarkable, Master.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) from:
-->--''Webcomic/LeftoverSoup'' http://www.leftoversoup.com/archive.php?num=139
to:
-->--''Webcomic/LeftoverSoup'' http://www.[[http://www.leftoversoup.com/archive.php?num=139
php?num=139 #139]]
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
'''Byakuya''': My name is Byakuya Togami. \\
to:
'''Byakuya''': My name is Byakuya Togami. \\
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
'''Amanda''': Well... That's it exactly, Kurt. \\
to:
'''Amanda''': Well... That's it exactly, Kurt. \\
