Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / RealisticDictionIsUnrealistic

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Some literary work has an ambiance that's simply incompatible with natural speech; for example, FairyTales.

to:

Some literary work has an ambiance that's simply incompatible with natural speech; for example, FairyTales.
{{Fairy Tale}}s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[/folder]]

to:

*CNN did this with a blown up transcript of a Sarah Palin speech- not one of her actual deliberate "backwoods down-homey" efforts- but a perfectly normal speech. They dropped Gs and phonetically spelled "gonna" and "wanna" to make her look uneducated.[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


People in fiction don't speak like we do. In Real Life people stutter, pause, repeat themselves, correct themselves, go off on tangents, have verbal tics, use, like, filler words, trail off, drone on, mumble or slur their words, repeat themselves, talk over each other, use bad grammar, and more.

to:

People in fiction don't speak like we do. In Real Life real life people stutter, pause, repeat themselves, correct themselves, go off on tangents, have verbal tics, use, like, filler words, trail off, drone on, mumble or slur their words, repeat themselves, talk over each other, use bad grammar, and more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Although ''Webcomic/{{Homestuck}}'' also applies for the first kind, other characters fit here. Tavros has a tendency to speak very awkwardly with lots of 'uhh's 'err's, to highlight his nervous, dorky personality, while Roxy is [[HardDrinkingPartyGirl perpetually drunk]] and has a tendency to make spelling errors she sometimes corrects. So what happens when [[http://www.mspaintadventures.com/?s=6&p=002999 the very awkward Tavros tries to troll the incredibly eloquent Dave?]] One of the most popular SugarWiki/FunnyMoments in the entire series:

to:

* Although ''Webcomic/{{Homestuck}}'' also applies for the first kind, other characters fit here. Tavros has a tendency to speak very awkwardly with lots of 'uhh's 'err's, to highlight his nervous, dorky personality, while Roxy is [[HardDrinkingPartyGirl perpetually drunk]] and has a tendency to make spelling errors she sometimes corrects. So what happens when [[http://www.mspaintadventures.com/?s=6&p=002999 [[https://www.homestuck.com/story/1099 the very awkward Tavros tries to troll the incredibly eloquent Dave?]] One of the most popular SugarWiki/FunnyMoments in the entire series:

Changed: 113

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''VisualNovel/DokiDokiLiteratureClub'' has examples both ways. It mostly has no voice acting, and contains unrealistically good diction in the written dialogue, but when there's a brief voice acted bit by [[spoiler: Monika]] before the end credits, she sounds, like, a lot more hesitant and stuff than in writing. (She also sounds unpolished like that in writing when she [[SelfDemonstrating/{{Monika}} visits TV Tropes]].) The side stories in ''DDLC Plus'' also contain such written hesitations, although not to the point of being all the way realistic.

to:

* ''VisualNovel/DokiDokiLiteratureClub'' has examples both ways. It mostly has no voice acting, and contains unrealistically good diction in the written dialogue, but when there's a brief voice acted bit by [[spoiler: Monika]] before the end credits, she sounds, like, a lot more hesitant and stuff than in writing. (She also sounds unpolished like that in writing when she [[SelfDemonstrating/{{Monika}} visits TV Tropes]].) The side stories in ''DDLC Plus'' also contain such written hesitations, hesitations -- possibly because they're more straight-up storytelling and not a genre parody pastiche like the main game -- although not to the point of being all the way realistic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The ''VideoGame/{{Mother}}'' series is noted, especially in its original Japanese iteration, for being written the way people realistically speak -- with pauses, stutters, and other conversational fumbles. For the first two games, Creator/ShigesatoItoi didn't know how to use a computer, so he dictated all of the game's dialogue out loud to a programmer. He would often go over sentences several times to ensure that they sounded "right", and sometimes redo whole segments of the script if he was unsatisfied with them. This was a key difficulty in localizing ''VideoGame/EarthBound'' and, to a similar extent, the FanTranslation of ''VideoGame/{{Mother 3}}''.


Added DiffLines:

* ''WebAnimation/{{Mappy}}'' has the characters realistically pause, ramble, and repeat themselves during dialogue.

Changed: 131

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''VisualNovel/DokiDokiLiteratureClub'' has examples both ways. It mostly has no voice acting, and contains unrealistically good diction in the written dialogue, but when there's a brief voice acted bit by [[spoiler: Monika]] before the end credits, she sounds, like, a lot more hesitant and stuff than in writing. (She also sounds unpolished like that in writing when she [[SelfDemonstrating/{{Monika}} visits TV Tropes]].)

to:

* ''VisualNovel/DokiDokiLiteratureClub'' has examples both ways. It mostly has no voice acting, and contains unrealistically good diction in the written dialogue, but when there's a brief voice acted bit by [[spoiler: Monika]] before the end credits, she sounds, like, a lot more hesitant and stuff than in writing. (She also sounds unpolished like that in writing when she [[SelfDemonstrating/{{Monika}} visits TV Tropes]].)) The side stories in ''DDLC Plus'' also contain such written hesitations, although not to the point of being all the way realistic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''VisualNovel/DokiDokiLiteratureClub'' has examples both ways. It mostly has no voice acting, and contains unrealistically good diction in the written dialogue, but when there's a brief voice acted bit by [[spoiler: Monika]] before the end credits, she sounds, like, a lot more hesitant and stuff than in writing. She also sounds unpolished like that in writing when she [[SelfDemonstrating/{{Monika}} visits TV Tropes]].

to:

* ''VisualNovel/DokiDokiLiteratureClub'' has examples both ways. It mostly has no voice acting, and contains unrealistically good diction in the written dialogue, but when there's a brief voice acted bit by [[spoiler: Monika]] before the end credits, she sounds, like, a lot more hesitant and stuff than in writing. She (She also sounds unpolished like that in writing when she [[SelfDemonstrating/{{Monika}} visits TV Tropes]].)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Visual Novels]]
* ''VisualNovel/DokiDokiLiteratureClub'' has examples both ways. It mostly has no voice acting, and contains unrealistically good diction in the written dialogue, but when there's a brief voice acted bit by [[spoiler: Monika]] before the end credits, she sounds, like, a lot more hesitant and stuff than in writing. She also sounds unpolished like that in writing when she [[SelfDemonstrating/{{Monika}} visits TV Tropes]].
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Averted ''entirely'' by the Phone Guy in ''VideoGame/FiveNightsAtFreddys'' during his recordings for the player. He stutters, hesitates, stumbles over some words, repeats himself, goes silent as if to think, trails off during sentences, offers random interjections of 'okay?', says 'um' and 'uh' quite a bit, and generally really does sound like some guy who's just recording a message for the player without a script and just going off the top of his head. The one exception is when he tells the company introduction since he's [[SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome probably reading it from a piece of paper]].

to:

* Averted ''entirely'' by ''VideoGame/FiveNightsAtFreddys'': In the Phone Guy in ''VideoGame/FiveNightsAtFreddys'' first and second games, during his recordings for the player. He player, Phone Guy stutters, hesitates, stumbles over some words, repeats himself, goes silent as if to think, trails off during sentences, offers random interjections of 'okay?', says 'um' and 'uh' quite a bit, and generally really does sound like some guy who's just recording a message for the player without a script and just going off the top of his head. The one exception is when In the third game, he tells speaks much more precisely in the recovered training tapes, likely because he's reading from a script - which also applies to the company introduction since he's [[SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome probably reading it from a piece of paper]].intro and disclaimer in the first game, the only thing he gets through flawlessly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!Spontaneous Eloquent Monologue (CharacterFilibuster)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Like, ''Series/MySoCalledLife'' liked to use "like" a lot, to make it, like, sound more, like, real. It worked, like, really well.

to:

* Like, ''Series/MySoCalledLife'' liked to use "like" "{{like| is like a comma}}" a lot, to make it, like, sound more, like, real. It worked, like, really well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


People in fiction don't speak like we do. In Real Life, people repeat themselves, stutter, pause, correct themselves, go off on tangents, have verbal tics, use, like, filler words, trail off, drone on, mumble or slur their words, repeat themselves, talk over each other, use bad grammar, and more.

to:

People in fiction don't speak like we do. In Real Life, Life people stutter, pause, repeat themselves, stutter, pause, correct themselves, go off on tangents, have verbal tics, use, like, filler words, trail off, drone on, mumble or slur their words, repeat themselves, talk over each other, use bad grammar, and more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In fiction, characters always communicate in well-formed sentences. Sometimes they go further and speak with Creator/WilliamShakespeare-like eloquence, using [[TalksLikeASimile similes]] and metaphors that most people in real life aren't clever enough to come up with on the spot or even at all. They never stumble over their words or say the wrong thing (unless it's important to the plot). Even "realistic" dialogue is relatively free of errors and padding. It's almost as if it was written by a professional.

to:

In fiction, characters always communicate in well-formed sentences.sentences, and everyone takes their turn. Sometimes they go further and speak with Creator/WilliamShakespeare-like eloquence, using [[TalksLikeASimile similes]] and metaphors that most people in real life aren't clever enough to come up with on the spot or even at all. They never stumble over their words or say the wrong thing (unless it's important to the plot). Even "realistic" dialogue is relatively free of errors and padding. It's almost as if it was written by a professional.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
fixing


[[spoiler:Western Animation]]

to:

[[spoiler:Western [[folder:Western Animation]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/TenThingsIHateAboutYou'':
** The movie justifies this with Kat, who's established as a very intelligent girl; she gets into a good college and name drops classical authors such as Sylvia Plath, Charlotte Bronte and Simone de Beauvoir. Ironically when she attempts a poem in iambic pentameter for class, it's not that good.
** Sometimes Kat's polar opposite sister Bianca slips into this too, despite otherwise speaking like a ValleyGirl.
--> "Can we for two seconds ignore the fact that you're severely unhinged and discuss my need for a night of teenage normalcy?"
** There's a subversion with the guidance counselor Ms Perky, who's attempting to write an erotic novel. She keeps overusing words and has to ask a co-worker to look up more synonyms. Of course, Kat gives her one.


Added DiffLines:

[[spoiler:Western Animation]]
* ''WesternAnimation/TheWeekenders'' is a WorldOfSnark, where everyone is capable of making a witty comeback or engaging in SnarkToSnarkCombat. It's lampshaded when Tino wins "Most Sarcastic" in the Year Book Awards. There's also an episode dealing with the gang making fun of their friend Tish - the brainy one, prone to SesquipedalianLoquaciousness - and hinting that some of her speech patterns (she's a big Shakespeare fan for one) have rubbed off on her.
--> '''Tino:''' You are teetering on the precipice with that [[ItMakesSenseInContext 'pumpkin pie']] thing, my friend!
--> '''Carver:''' Precipice? Man, you are dishing the Tish.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Averted ''entirely'' by the Phone Guy in ''VideoGame/FiveNightsAtFreddys'' during his recordings for the player. He stutters, hesitates, stumbles over some words, repeats himself, goes silent as if to think, trails off during sentences, offers random interjections of 'okay?', says 'um' and 'uh' quite a bit, and generally really does sound like some guy who's just recording a message for the player without a script and just going off the top of his head. The one exception is when he tells the company introduction since he's [[RealityEnsues probably reading it from a piece of paper]].

to:

* Averted ''entirely'' by the Phone Guy in ''VideoGame/FiveNightsAtFreddys'' during his recordings for the player. He stutters, hesitates, stumbles over some words, repeats himself, goes silent as if to think, trails off during sentences, offers random interjections of 'okay?', says 'um' and 'uh' quite a bit, and generally really does sound like some guy who's just recording a message for the player without a script and just going off the top of his head. The one exception is when he tells the company introduction since he's [[RealityEnsues [[SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome probably reading it from a piece of paper]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/EddieIzzard uses a lot of placeholders and verbal stumbling in his stand-up delivery, though the routines themselves are pretty meticulously prepared. It works quite well.

to:

* Creator/EddieIzzard uses a lot of placeholders and verbal stumbling in his her stand-up delivery, though the routines themselves are pretty meticulously prepared. It works quite well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/SafeHaven'' has a suprisingly realistic diction for a romantic film, with a lot of stammering, talking over each other, repetition of words, and natural delivery. It's an interesting contrast with the [[Film/AWalkToRemember many,]] [[Film/TheNotebook many,]] [[Film/MessageInABottle many]] [[Literature/TheLastSong other]] ''Creator/NicholasSparks'' adaptations, which are infamous for having modern and unrealistic PurpleProse. It also stands out as noticeably different from the book it's adapting, which is pretty much your standard Sparks novel.

to:

* ''Literature/SafeHaven'' has a suprisingly realistic diction for a romantic film, with a lot of stammering, talking over each other, repetition of words, and natural delivery. It's an interesting contrast with the [[Film/AWalkToRemember many,]] [[Film/TheNotebook many,]] [[Film/MessageInABottle many]] [[Literature/TheLastSong other]] ''Creator/NicholasSparks'' Creator/NicholasSparks adaptations, which are infamous for having modern and unrealistic PurpleProse. It also stands out as noticeably different from the book it's adapting, which is pretty much your standard Sparks novel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/SafeHaven'' has a suprisingly realistic diction for a romantic film, with a lot of stammering, talking over each other, repetition of words, and natural delivery. It's an interesting contrast with the [[Film/AWalkToRemember many,]] [[Film/TheNotebook many,]] [[Film/MessageInABottle many]] [[Literature/TheLastSong other]] ''Creator/NicholasSparks'' adaptations, which are infamous for having modern and unrealistic PurpleProse. It also stands out as noticeably different from the book it's adapting, which is pretty much your standard Sparks novel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The first incarnation of the Doctor in ''Series/DoctorWho,'' whose speech pattern came from the fact that Creator/WilliamHartnell kept flubbing his lines. Since the brand-new video technology was [[TechnologyMarchesOn positively archaic]] at the time(edits would be performed by literally taking a razor blade to the magnetic tape, which was difficult to do when the frames couldn't actually be seen with ease[[note]]the emergence of computerized editing software in the 80's made it far easier to do this[[/note]]), all video recordings were done "live" like a stage play and reshoots were very rare and costly, meaning the gaffes were just left in. This also led to other very visible flubs, like a moment in ''The Web Planet'' where an actor in a monster costume with limited visibility walks directly into a studio camera while it's recording.

to:

* The first incarnation of the Doctor in ''Series/DoctorWho,'' whose speech pattern came from the fact that Creator/WilliamHartnell kept flubbing his lines. Since the brand-new video technology was [[TechnologyMarchesOn positively archaic]] at the time(edits time (edits would be performed by literally taking a razor blade to the magnetic tape, which was difficult to do when the frames couldn't actually be seen with ease[[note]]the ease like on a film strip[[note]]the emergence of computerized editing software in the 80's made it far easier to do this[[/note]]), all video recordings were done "live" like a stage play and reshoots were very rare and costly, meaning the gaffes were just left in. This also led to other very visible flubs, like a moment in ''The Web Planet'' where an actor in a monster costume with limited visibility walks directly into a studio camera while it's recording.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The first incarnation of the Doctor in ''Series/DoctorWho,'' whose speech pattern came from the fact that Creator/WilliamHartnell kept flubbing his lines. Since the brand-new video technology was positively archaic by the standards of the Adobe Premiere era (edits would be performed by literally taking a razor blade to the magnetic tape), all video recordings were done "live" like a stage play and reshoots were very rare and costly, meaning the gaffes were just left in. This also led to other very visible flubs, like a moment in ''The Web Planet'' where an actor in a monster costume with limited visibility walks directly into a studio camera while it's recording.

to:

* The first incarnation of the Doctor in ''Series/DoctorWho,'' whose speech pattern came from the fact that Creator/WilliamHartnell kept flubbing his lines. Since the brand-new video technology was [[TechnologyMarchesOn positively archaic by archaic]] at the standards of the Adobe Premiere era (edits time(edits would be performed by literally taking a razor blade to the magnetic tape), tape, which was difficult to do when the frames couldn't actually be seen with ease[[note]]the emergence of computerized editing software in the 80's made it far easier to do this[[/note]]), all video recordings were done "live" like a stage play and reshoots were very rare and costly, meaning the gaffes were just left in. This also led to other very visible flubs, like a moment in ''The Web Planet'' where an actor in a monster costume with limited visibility walks directly into a studio camera while it's recording.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In fiction, characters always communicate in well-formed sentences. Sometimes they go further and speak with Creator/WilliamShakespeare-like eloquence, using [[TalksLikeASimile similes]] and metaphors that most people in real life aren't clever enough to come up with on the spot or even at all. They never stumble over their words or say the wrong thing (unless it's important to the plot that they do). Even "realistic" dialogue is relatively free of errors and padding. It's almost as if it was written by a professional.

to:

In fiction, characters always communicate in well-formed sentences. Sometimes they go further and speak with Creator/WilliamShakespeare-like eloquence, using [[TalksLikeASimile similes]] and metaphors that most people in real life aren't clever enough to come up with on the spot or even at all. They never stumble over their words or say the wrong thing (unless it's important to the plot that they do).plot). Even "realistic" dialogue is relatively free of errors and padding. It's almost as if it was written by a professional.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** NeilFlynn as The Janitor improvises quite a bit of his dialogue and goes off on some pretty in-depth and quite wacky/surreal stories of questionable authenticity. Of course, there's plenty of outtakes where, in his attempts, he just completely derails.

to:

** NeilFlynn Creator/NeilFlynn as The Janitor improvises quite a bit of his dialogue and goes off on some pretty in-depth and quite wacky/surreal stories of questionable authenticity. Of course, there's plenty of outtakes where, in his attempts, he just completely derails.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----
[[BrickJoke Repet]][[NonSequitur ition]]. [[TheStinger Er, wait...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note that this trope is an AcceptableBreakFromReality; real dialogue can be unreadable. Journalists [[GenreSavvy know]] that anyone can be made to look stupid in an interview simply by exactly writing down their speech, word for word. Verbal imperfections that we automatically filter out face-to-face become grating when written down. [[note]]A detailed exploration of this can be found [[http://gavthorpe.co.uk/2008/05/07/realism-is-fake/ here]].[[/note]] We enjoy the fruits of script-writing and acting more when they are free to be polished. Part of the reason is to make speech come across [[RealityIsUnrealistic the way it's heard]] [[RuleOfPerception rather than the way it is]]; humans are well-adapted to interpret speech, and as a result, what we experience is an interpretation of speech rather than a recording of it. Also falls under TheLawOfConservationOfDetail -- because the time it takes for a character to correct themselves could be used for more dialogue.

to:

Note that this trope is an AcceptableBreakFromReality; real dialogue can be unreadable. Journalists [[GenreSavvy know]] that anyone can be made to look stupid in an interview simply by exactly writing down their speech, word for word. Verbal imperfections that we automatically filter out face-to-face become grating and irritating when written down. [[note]]A detailed exploration of this can be found [[http://gavthorpe.co.uk/2008/05/07/realism-is-fake/ here]].[[/note]] We enjoy the fruits of script-writing and acting more when they are free to be polished. Part of the reason is to make speech come across [[RealityIsUnrealistic the way it's heard]] [[RuleOfPerception rather than the way it is]]; humans are well-adapted to interpret speech, and as a result, what we experience is an interpretation of speech rather than a recording of it. Also falls under TheLawOfConservationOfDetail -- because the time it takes for a character to correct themselves could be used for more dialogue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note that this trope is an AcceptableBreakFromReality; real dialogue can be unreadable. Journalists [[GenreSavvy know]] that anyone can be made to look stupid in an interview simply by exactly writing down their speech, word-for-word. Verbal imperfections that we automatically filter out face-to-face become grating when written down. [[note]]A detailed exploration of this can be found [[http://gavthorpe.co.uk/2008/05/07/realism-is-fake/ here]].[[/note]] We enjoy the fruits of script-writing and acting more when they are free to be polished. Part of the reason is to make speech come across [[RealityIsUnrealistic the way it's heard]] [[RuleOfPerception rather than the way it is]]; humans are well-adapted to interpret speech, and as a result, what we experience is an interpretation of speech rather than a recording of it. Also falls under TheLawOfConservationOfDetail -- because the time it takes for a character to correct themselves could be used for more dialogue.

to:

Note that this trope is an AcceptableBreakFromReality; real dialogue can be unreadable. Journalists [[GenreSavvy know]] that anyone can be made to look stupid in an interview simply by exactly writing down their speech, word-for-word.word for word. Verbal imperfections that we automatically filter out face-to-face become grating when written down. [[note]]A detailed exploration of this can be found [[http://gavthorpe.co.uk/2008/05/07/realism-is-fake/ here]].[[/note]] We enjoy the fruits of script-writing and acting more when they are free to be polished. Part of the reason is to make speech come across [[RealityIsUnrealistic the way it's heard]] [[RuleOfPerception rather than the way it is]]; humans are well-adapted to interpret speech, and as a result, what we experience is an interpretation of speech rather than a recording of it. Also falls under TheLawOfConservationOfDetail -- because the time it takes for a character to correct themselves could be used for more dialogue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


People in fiction don't speak like we do. In Real Life, people repeat themselves, stutter, pause, correct themselves, go off an tangents, have verbal tics, use, like, filler words, trail off, drone on, mumble or slur their words, repeat themselves, talk over each other, use bad grammar, and more.

to:

People in fiction don't speak like we do. In Real Life, people repeat themselves, stutter, pause, correct themselves, go off an on tangents, have verbal tics, use, like, filler words, trail off, drone on, mumble or slur their words, repeat themselves, talk over each other, use bad grammar, and more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note that this trope is an AcceptableBreakFromReality; real dialogue can be unreadable. Journalists [[GenreSavvy know]] that anyone can be made to look stupid in an interview simply by exactly writing down their speech, word-for-word. Verbal imperfections that we automatically filter out face-to-face becomes grating when written down. [[note]]A detailed exploration of this can be found [[http://gavthorpe.co.uk/2008/05/07/realism-is-fake/ here]].[[/note]] We enjoy the fruits of script-writing and acting more when they are free to be polished. Part of the reason is to make speech come across [[RealityIsUnrealistic the way it's heard]] [[RuleOfPerception rather than the way it is]]; humans are well-adapted to interpret speech, and as a result, what we experience is an interpretation of speech rather than a recording of it. Also falls under TheLawOfConservationOfDetail -- because the time it takes for a character to correct themselves could be used for more dialogue.

to:

Note that this trope is an AcceptableBreakFromReality; real dialogue can be unreadable. Journalists [[GenreSavvy know]] that anyone can be made to look stupid in an interview simply by exactly writing down their speech, word-for-word. Verbal imperfections that we automatically filter out face-to-face becomes become grating when written down. [[note]]A detailed exploration of this can be found [[http://gavthorpe.co.uk/2008/05/07/realism-is-fake/ here]].[[/note]] We enjoy the fruits of script-writing and acting more when they are free to be polished. Part of the reason is to make speech come across [[RealityIsUnrealistic the way it's heard]] [[RuleOfPerception rather than the way it is]]; humans are well-adapted to interpret speech, and as a result, what we experience is an interpretation of speech rather than a recording of it. Also falls under TheLawOfConservationOfDetail -- because the time it takes for a character to correct themselves could be used for more dialogue.

Changed: 1903

Removed: 4732

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


People in fiction don't speak like we do. In RealLife, we encounter:

* Repetition.
* [[PorkyPigPronunciation Stu-stut-stuttering]], slllurrring, lithping, or mumbrbl[[note]]mumbling[[/note]].
* [[{{Malaproper}} Collecting]] yourself, sorry, no, correcting yourself.
* Whatsitcalled, um… disfluencies, you know, placeholders while you think.
* And, like, being [[LikeIsLikeAComma all, like, incorrigible]] with their use of "like."
* Some sentence when the grammar ain't no good.
* [[{{Angrish}} Stupid people talking like they're god-damned angry]], you stupid[[SymbolSwearing @#$%]]razzafrazza*mumblegrumble*...
* [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment Repetition]].
* Going off on [[LeftFielder tangents]] which aren't [[SeinfeldianConversation relevant]] to the plot. [[InherentlyFunnyWords Like platypi. Or falafels]]. (This is heard quite frequently in fiction thanks to RuleOfFunny, but in RealLife it's unlikely that listeners would [[BigLippedAlligatorMoment just let the tangents slide]]).
* Making private references or inside jokes that casual listeners would never understand. Isn't that right, Reginald?
* People getting interrupted hal--
* Awkward silences and spaces where people… [[note]]think[[/note]].
* [[RunningGag Repetition.]]
* [[VerbalTic Verbal Tics]], [[MemeticMutation desu]].
* [[PerfectHealth Sneezing, coughing]] and *cough* *cough*, ahem, and so on.
* Gasping, hiccuping, e-e-e-especially if you're ''*gasp*'' crying.
* Just letting sentences kinda…
* Pauses or, y'know, interjections -- right? -- to make sure that the person understands. Get it?
* [[{{Malaproper}} Saying the wrong word by accident]], and hoping nobody else involved in the [[SelfDemonstratingArticle constipation]] will notice.
* Being unable to choose from bemongst two words before the sentence comes out and blixing them. (This only ever happens in fiction to set up an unintentional DoubleEntendre or ThatCameOutWrong situation.)
* Oh, and sentence fragments. Obviously.
* Mispronounication and neologisms (to describe unwordiness).
* Children not talking as eloquently as [[MostWritersAreAdults adults do]].
* Uptalking? As if people were pronouncing every sentence as if it were a question? Except the last.
* Foreigners, which often apply [[StrangeSyntaxSpeaker speech constructs from own native tongue]] only because, that they not grew in English-speaking medium. More subtle than the PoirotSpeak.
* Disjointed syntax and backpedaling. For example, making a LongList of things, trailing off, starting to move on to the next topic, and ''then'' remembering one or two more things for the list and mentioning them, such as "We need [[BreadEggsMilkSquick eggs, milk, bread]]… basic, everyday things, you know… cold cuts, cheese, [[BuffySpeak that kind of thing]]."
* Impossibly long sentences where the speaker drones on and on but never stops to begin a new sentence so they just keep tossing in conjunctions like "and," "but," and "so" and in that way turn what should be a paragraph into a single sentence… and, unlike in fiction, people who speak this way may also pause at regular intervals… drawing the never-ending sentence out ''even more''.
* [[StupidlyLongFillerSound Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....]] fillers sounds. Such as, uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....
* Excessive out-loud description of events or objects in front of the speaker, often to the person performing whatever is being described or [[LeaningOnTheFourthWall to an audience that the speaker isn't actually aware of]].
* Sentence structure with oddness.
* [[OverlyLongGag Oh, and did we mention]] [[{{Bookends}} repetition?]]

In fiction, characters inevitably come out with well-formed sentences. They may have a poetic flavor filled with Creator/WilliamShakespeare-like [[TalksLikeASimile similes]] and luminous golden metaphors that most people in real life aren't clever enough to come up with on the spot or even at all. They never stumble over their words or say the wrong thing except for [[RuleOfFunny deliberate comedic effect]]. Even "realistic" dialogue is relatively free of errors and padding. It's almost as if it was written by a professional.

This trope is an AcceptableBreakFromReality; real dialogue can be unreadable. Journalists [[GenreSavvy know]] that anyone can be made to look stupid in an interview simply by exactly writing down their speech, word-for-word. Verbal imperfections that we automatically filter out face-to-face become stark and grating when written down. [[note]]A detailed exploration of this can be found [[http://gavthorpe.co.uk/2008/05/07/realism-is-fake/ here]].[[/note]] We enjoy the fruits of scriptwriting and acting more when they are free to be polished. Part of the reason is to make speech come across [[RealityIsUnrealistic the way it's heard]] [[RuleOfPerception rather than the way it is]]; humans are well-adapted to interpret speech, and as a result, what we experience is an interpretation of speech rather than a recording of it. Also falls under TheLawOfConservationOfDetail -- because the time it takes for a character to correct themselves could be used for more dialogue.

to:

People in fiction don't speak like we do. In RealLife, we encounter:

* Repetition.
* [[PorkyPigPronunciation Stu-stut-stuttering]], slllurrring, lithping, or mumbrbl[[note]]mumbling[[/note]].
* [[{{Malaproper}} Collecting]] yourself, sorry, no, correcting yourself.
* Whatsitcalled, um… disfluencies, you know, placeholders while you think.
* And, like, being [[LikeIsLikeAComma all, like, incorrigible]] with their use of "like."
* Some sentence when the grammar ain't no good.
* [[{{Angrish}} Stupid
Real Life, people talking like they're god-damned angry]], you stupid[[SymbolSwearing @#$%]]razzafrazza*mumblegrumble*...
* [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment Repetition]].
* Going
repeat themselves, stutter, pause, correct themselves, go off on [[LeftFielder tangents]] which aren't [[SeinfeldianConversation relevant]] to the plot. [[InherentlyFunnyWords Like platypi. Or falafels]]. (This is heard quite frequently in fiction thanks to RuleOfFunny, but in RealLife it's unlikely that listeners would [[BigLippedAlligatorMoment just let the tangents slide]]).
* Making private references or inside jokes that casual listeners would never understand. Isn't that right, Reginald?
* People getting interrupted hal--
* Awkward silences and spaces where people… [[note]]think[[/note]].
* [[RunningGag Repetition.]]
* [[VerbalTic Verbal Tics]], [[MemeticMutation desu]].
* [[PerfectHealth Sneezing, coughing]] and *cough* *cough*, ahem, and so on.
* Gasping, hiccuping, e-e-e-especially if you're ''*gasp*'' crying.
* Just letting sentences kinda…
* Pauses or, y'know, interjections -- right? -- to make sure that the person understands. Get it?
* [[{{Malaproper}} Saying the wrong word by accident]], and hoping nobody else involved in the [[SelfDemonstratingArticle constipation]] will notice.
* Being unable to choose from bemongst two words before the sentence comes out and blixing them. (This only ever happens in fiction to set up
an unintentional DoubleEntendre or ThatCameOutWrong situation.)
* Oh, and sentence fragments. Obviously.
* Mispronounication and neologisms (to describe unwordiness).
* Children not talking as eloquently as [[MostWritersAreAdults adults do]].
* Uptalking? As if people were pronouncing every sentence as if it were a question? Except the last.
* Foreigners, which often apply [[StrangeSyntaxSpeaker speech constructs from own native tongue]] only because, that they not grew in English-speaking medium. More subtle than the PoirotSpeak.
* Disjointed syntax and backpedaling. For example, making a LongList of things, trailing
tangents, have verbal tics, use, like, filler words, trail off, starting to move on to the next topic, drone on, mumble or slur their words, repeat themselves, talk over each other, use bad grammar, and ''then'' remembering one or two more things for the list and mentioning them, such as "We need [[BreadEggsMilkSquick eggs, milk, bread]]… basic, everyday things, you know… cold cuts, cheese, [[BuffySpeak that kind of thing]]."
* Impossibly long sentences where the speaker drones on and on but never stops to begin a new sentence so they just keep tossing in conjunctions like "and," "but," and "so" and in that way turn what should be a paragraph into a single sentence… and, unlike in fiction, people who speak this way may also pause at regular intervals… drawing the never-ending sentence out ''even more''.
* [[StupidlyLongFillerSound Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....]] fillers sounds. Such as, uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....
* Excessive out-loud description of events or objects in front of the speaker, often to the person performing whatever is being described or [[LeaningOnTheFourthWall to an audience that the speaker isn't actually aware of]].
* Sentence structure with oddness.
* [[OverlyLongGag Oh, and did we mention]] [[{{Bookends}} repetition?]]

more.

In fiction, characters inevitably come out with always communicate in well-formed sentences. They may have a poetic flavor filled Sometimes they go further and speak with Creator/WilliamShakespeare-like eloquence, using [[TalksLikeASimile similes]] and luminous golden metaphors that most people in real life aren't clever enough to come up with on the spot or even at all. They never stumble over their words or say the wrong thing except for [[RuleOfFunny deliberate comedic effect]].(unless it's important to the plot that they do). Even "realistic" dialogue is relatively free of errors and padding. It's almost as if it was written by a professional.

This Note that this trope is an AcceptableBreakFromReality; real dialogue can be unreadable. Journalists [[GenreSavvy know]] that anyone can be made to look stupid in an interview simply by exactly writing down their speech, word-for-word. Verbal imperfections that we automatically filter out face-to-face become stark and becomes grating when written down. [[note]]A detailed exploration of this can be found [[http://gavthorpe.co.uk/2008/05/07/realism-is-fake/ here]].[[/note]] We enjoy the fruits of scriptwriting script-writing and acting more when they are free to be polished. Part of the reason is to make speech come across [[RealityIsUnrealistic the way it's heard]] [[RuleOfPerception rather than the way it is]]; humans are well-adapted to interpret speech, and as a result, what we experience is an interpretation of speech rather than a recording of it. Also falls under TheLawOfConservationOfDetail -- because the time it takes for a character to correct themselves could be used for more dialogue.

Top