Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / LawfulGood

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Anyone from the Belmont clan in {{Castlevania}} (save for [[CastlevaniaLordsOfShadow Gabriel]], who is totally unrelated and is TrueNeutral) can be categorized as LawfulGood, as they carry their duty from the vampire killer bloodline to hunt down Dracula to protect mankind.

to:

* Anyone from the Belmont clan in {{Castlevania}} (save for [[CastlevaniaLordsOfShadow Gabriel]], who is totally unrelated and is TrueNeutral) can be categorized as LawfulGood, as they carry their duty from the vampire killer bloodline to hunt down Dracula to protect mankind.
mankind. Alucard fits as well, as he fights in part because of his loyalty to his mother and her people.

Added: 192

Changed: 199

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** But, like Captain Carrot, it ''works'' for her. For bonus, she's the cleric ''and'' TeamMom for a bunch of {{Heroic Sociopath}}s, and Heaven ''help'' you if you make their MoralityPet cry.

to:

** It's said in a one strip-gag that she's heavily in denial about her Artax and Yeagar.
***
But, like Captain Carrot, it ''works'' for her. For bonus, she's the cleric ''and'' TeamMom for a bunch of {{Heroic Sociopath}}s, and Heaven ''help'' you if you make their MoralityPet cry.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Anyone from the Belmont clan in Castlevania (save for [[CastlevaniaLordsOfShadow Gabriel]], who is totally unrelated and is TrueNeutral) can be categorized as LawfulGood, as they carry their duty from the vampire killer bloodline to hunt down Dracula to protect mankind.

to:

* Anyone from the Belmont clan in Castlevania {{Castlevania}} (save for [[CastlevaniaLordsOfShadow Gabriel]], who is totally unrelated and is TrueNeutral) can be categorized as LawfulGood, as they carry their duty from the vampire killer bloodline to hunt down Dracula to protect mankind.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Anyone from the Belmont clan in Castlevania (save for [[CastlevaniaLordsOfShadow Gabriel]], who is totally unrelated) can be categorized as LawfulGood, as they carry their duty from the vampire killer bloodline to hunt down Dracula to protect mankind.

to:

* Anyone from the Belmont clan in Castlevania (save for [[CastlevaniaLordsOfShadow Gabriel]], who is totally unrelated) unrelated and is TrueNeutral) can be categorized as LawfulGood, as they carry their duty from the vampire killer bloodline to hunt down Dracula to protect mankind.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Anyone from the Belmont clan in Castlevania (save for [[CastlevaniaLordsOfShadow Gabriel]], who is totally unrelated) can be categorized as LawfulGood, as they carry their duty from the vampire killer bloodline to hunt down Dracula to protect mankind.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Readers more familiar with [[GreenLantern Hal Jordan's]] more ChaoticGood-ish modern persona often forget that for many years he was solidly LawfulGood, emphasis on the Lawful. This was especially true during the Green Lantern/Green Arrow series with Oliver Queen representing the 60s Counter-Culture and Hal representing the Establishment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A Lawful Good character believes in [[RousseauWasRight the goodness inherent in all beings]] (unless they're a KnightInSourArmor), in a code of conduct - be it a personal one or a set of laws, and that an ideal world comes from promoting this dualism of structure and benevolence. Differing interpretations of 'good' may lead a LawfulGood character to become LawfulStupid. In most {{RPG}}s, it is compulsory for [[KnightInShiningArmor Paladins]] to be Lawful Good. If they stop being Lawful Good, they lose their powers. Likely to take a theoretical approach to TheGoldenRule, with lots of complex rules built around it to clarify how it is to be applied.

to:

A Lawful Good character believes in [[RousseauWasRight the goodness inherent in all beings]] (unless they're a KnightInSourArmor), in a code of conduct - be it a personal one or a set of laws, and that an ideal world comes from promoting this dualism of structure and benevolence. Differing interpretations of 'good' may lead a LawfulGood character to become LawfulStupid. In most {{RPG}}s, it is compulsory for [[KnightInShiningArmor Paladins]] ThePaladin to be Lawful Good. If they stop being Lawful Good, they lose their powers. Likely to take a theoretical approach to TheGoldenRule, with lots of complex rules built around it to clarify how it is to be applied.



* [[{{Paladin}} Paladins]], though NeutralGood paladins are possible.

to:

* [[{{Paladin}} Paladins]], ThePaladin, though NeutralGood paladins are possible.



** The Draenei, the Naaru, and really [[KnightInShiningArmor paladins]] in general.

to:

** The Draenei, the Naaru, and really [[KnightInShiningArmor [[ThePaladin paladins]] in general.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Any incarnation of [[PowerRangers Power Rangers]], lets just say Bulk and Skull weren't wrong when they called the [[MightyMorphingPowerRangers Power Rangers]] goody-goods.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Page discussion


* HeroAntagonist (usually)

Added: 420

Changed: 52

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The United States faction (of course) from CommandAndConquer: Generals

to:

* CommandAndConquer:
** GDI in the first game of the Tiberium series. Beginning with TS, they already become less Paladin like, and by TW their politicians are a corrupt bunch. The high military people except Solomon however are always LawfulGood though.
** Allied Nations faction from Red Alert (until Uprising, since they have a Guantanamo Bay equivalent).
**
The United States faction (of course) from CommandAndConquer: GeneralsGenerals, including a unit named the Paladin Tank.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** But it does mean ''Lawful''. Defying cultural expectations (especially in an emotional way in a logic-driven society) is not a lawful act. Nor is later when he beats the tar out of Kirk after being provoked, or earlier when he takes on the Vulcan bullies. He's a NeutralGood character who tries desperately to live up to his LawfulNeutral / LawfulGood society but stumbles repeatedly on his human half. Arguably for the better.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Whether the Captain was being naive or not (and we do know that [[spoiler:Lex was counting on Superman to spot the 'bomb' and react and thus can hardly be considered wholly innocent]]), in this case his actions arguably reflected the lawful good 'gold standard' better than Superman's kneejerk response did.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HeroAntagonist (usually)


Added DiffLines:

* [[{{Paladin}} Paladins]], though NeutralGood paladins are possible.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Spongebob has Sandy, Krabs (Post movie he is LawfulNeutral or NeutralEvil DependingOnTheWirter), Mermaid Man and Barnacle Boy, and Neptune.

to:

* Spongebob In SpongeBob has Sandy, Krabs (Post movie he is LawfulNeutral or NeutralEvil DependingOnTheWirter), (Pre-movie), Mermaid Man and Barnacle Boy, and Neptune.

Added: 730

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also President Roslin at the beginning of the series, although by the end she has also been tarnished by events.

to:

** Also President Roslin at the beginning of the series, although by the end she has also been tarnished by events.events.
*** This is made problematic at several points; most notably, the fact that the Colonials are the protagonists sometimes unduly sways analysis of the morality of her character. Her all-consuming concern is the survival of the human race, which is not a morally good goal but a neutral one (*everyone* wants to survive), and she tears ass through rules and ignore protocols, as well as stacks up a hefty supply of dead bodies (mostly though a sudden an non-consensual exit through an airlock) in pursuit of that goal. The only thing that prevents her from slipping into NeutralEvil territory is her indications on a couple of points that there are lines she will not cross, and her willingness to compromise with other authorities.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Role played well, a Lawful Good character can be incredibly interesting, and occasionally face some very difficult decisions. What's really right? Shall I do the Lawful thing, or do the Good thing? Obey the letter of the law, or save the innocents? This can lead to a {{To Be Lawful Or Good}} decision. And, just because one is Lawful, doesn't mean that they automatically agree with other Lawful characters. There are, after all, differing laws and codes of conduct; some can co-exist. Some cannot.

to:

Role played well, a Lawful Good character can be incredibly interesting, and occasionally face some very difficult decisions. What's really right? Shall I do the Lawful thing, or do the Good thing? Obey the letter of the law, or save the innocents? This can lead to a {{To Be Lawful Or Good}} decision. And, just because one is Lawful, doesn't mean that they automatically agree with other Lawful characters. There are, after all, differing laws and codes of conduct; some can co-exist. Some cannot.
cannot. If the Lawful Good character answers to a higher authority, this authority may be willing to forgive occasionally violating the letter of the law if its spirit is upheld or if the greater good is otherwise upheld. Saving the innocents tends to be more important than capturing the bad guy, even if a Lawful Good character laments having to let the villain escape.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I'd lean toward Chaotic Good for Jet, since he relates in the movie that he left the police force because people were either corrupt or too concerned about their careers to worry about things like JUSTICE. Arguably he just took up a new code when the one he'd been following came up wanting.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Richard Rider, aka Nova, the premier member of the Nova Corps (Marvel's answer to the Green Lantern Corps), is so much of a boy scout he seems like he fell straight from the Silver Age. His recently-ended series went from one CrowningMomentOfAwesome to another, with Richard refusing to compromise doing the right thing for ''any'' reason. The guy even chooses to stay behind on a doomed planet to make sure that ''everyone'' escapes before Galactus eats it, even if it means he would have to fight an impossible against Galactus and his herald, the SilverSurfer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not related to this page.


** There's a case to be made that the majority of the Jedi Order is Lawful Good.
*** There's an even stronger case to be made that the majority of the Jedi Order is LawfulStupid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Jorge Garcia of ''BackyardSports'' tries to help the other kids have better morals for the greater good, a genuine Lawful Good character.

to:

* [[TheWhitePrince Jorge Garcia Garcia]] of ''BackyardSports'' tries to help the other kids have better morals for the greater good, a genuine Lawful Good character.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HeroAntagonist (sometimes)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Batman picks and chooses a lot of the rules that he follows. For example, he insists on leaving justice to the law and he would never steal, but he's more then happy to hack any computer, including police ones, break and enter,take evidence from a crime scene, resist arrest, break out of jail when he does get arrested, and use some mild amounts of torture to get his information. This is pretty evident in all of his incarnations, so nine times out of ten he's almost all chaotic neutral.

to:

** Batman picks and chooses a lot of the rules that he follows. For example, he insists on leaving justice to the law and he would never steal, but he's more then happy to hack any computer, including police ones, break and enter,take evidence from a crime scene, resist arrest, break out of jail when he does get arrested, and use some mild amounts of torture to get his information. This is pretty evident in all of his incarnations, so nine times out of ten he's almost all chaotic neutral.good.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**Batman picks and chooses a lot of the rules that he follows. For example, he insists on leaving justice to the law and he would never steal, but he's more then happy to hack any computer, including police ones, break and enter,take evidence from a crime scene, resist arrest, break out of jail when he does get arrested, and use some mild amounts of torture to get his information. This is pretty evident in all of his incarnations, so nine times out of ten he's almost all chaotic neutral.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Written well, a Lawful Good character can be incredibly interesting, and occasionally face some very difficult decisions. What's really right? Shall I do the Lawful thing, or do the Good thing? Obey the letter of the law, or save the innocents? This can lead to a {{To Be Lawful Or Good}} decision. And, just because one is Lawful, doesn't mean that they automatically agree with other Lawful characters. There are, after all, differing laws and codes of conduct; some can co-exist. Some cannot.

to:

Written Role played well, a Lawful Good character can be incredibly interesting, and occasionally face some very difficult decisions. What's really right? Shall I do the Lawful thing, or do the Good thing? Obey the letter of the law, or save the innocents? This can lead to a {{To Be Lawful Or Good}} decision. And, just because one is Lawful, doesn't mean that they automatically agree with other Lawful characters. There are, after all, differing laws and codes of conduct; some can co-exist. Some cannot.



'''Lawful Good character types include:'''

to:

'''Lawful Good character types include:''''''Character archetypes particularly prone to this alignment includes:'''



* KnightInSourArmor (this is their PREFERRED alignment. Whether they live up to it...)

to:

* KnightInSourArmor (this is their PREFERRED alignment. Whether they live up to it...)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Most ChaoticGood characters don't constantly break the law, but they cannot see much value in laws (or, for weaker-{{CCGs}}, do not see the value in laws that do not function solely to punish evil). They believe that their own consciences are their best guides, and that tying themselves to any given code of conduct would be limiting their own ability to do good. They do not get along with anyone who tries to instill any kind of order over the ChaoticGood character or others, believing these people to be restricting their freedom and the freedom of others; however, most ChaoticGood characters will respect the right of others to impose strong codes of conduct on themselves. ChaoticGood characters often focus very strongly on individual rights and freedoms, and will strongly resist any form of oppression of themselves or anyone else.

to:

* Most ChaoticGood characters don't constantly break the law, but they cannot see much value in laws (or, for weaker-{{CCGs}}, do not see the value in laws that do not function solely to punish evil). They believe that their own consciences are their best guides, and that tying themselves to any given code of conduct would be limiting their own ability to do good. They do not get along with anyone who tries to instill any kind of order over the ChaoticGood character or others, believing these people to be restricting their freedom and the freedom of others; however, most ChaoticGood characters will respect the right of others to impose strong codes of conduct on themselves. It's also not uncommon to find ChaoticGood characters working with a LawfulGood force to bring down a ChaoticEvil psychopath, showing that Good comes ''before'' Chaotic. ChaoticGood characters often focus very strongly on individual rights and freedoms, and will strongly resist any form of oppression of themselves or anyone else.

Added: 368

Changed: 9

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Uncle Iroh from Avatar:the Last Airbender is this alignment, amongst others. He is polite and friendly even to his enemies, and does not use violence without warrant. He also uses his firebending lawfully, using passion and drive to power it as opposed to anger and hate, he also only uses it when completely necesarry. He also recognizes and respects Aang, the avatar, and Zuko, who he regards as the true Firelord, despite the fact he himself could assume the throne if he wanted to.

to:

* Uncle Iroh from Avatar:the Last Airbender ''AvatarTheLastAirbender'' is this alignment, amongst others. He is polite and friendly even to his enemies, and does not use violence without warrant. He also uses his firebending lawfully, using passion and drive to power it as opposed to anger and hate, he also only uses it when completely necesarry. He also recognizes and respects Aang, the avatar, and Zuko, who he regards as the true Firelord, despite the fact he himself could assume the throne if he wanted to.to.
* Finn from ''AdventureTimeWithFinnAndJake,'' often to HonorBeforeReason levels (for example, refusing to imprison [[JerkassWoobie the Ice King]] even when [[spoiler:it's necessary to stop a disease]]). Caused an identity crisis when [[JerkWithAHeartOfGold Marceline]] tricked him into swearing loyalty to her, then started to order him to do (apparently) evil things.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Captain Carrot from the ''{{Discworld}}'' novels. As a prime example of how CharacterAlignment is only part of character, rather than the whole of it, Samuel Vimes is also Lawful Good, albeit of a very different sort than Carrot's. Despite being arguably the most cynical and misanthropic bastard in the series (see Batman comment above), Samuel Vimes is also one of the most moral people in the series. The law is the rock to which Vimes clings in a world that makes no sense to him -- [[spoiler:when demons possessed him, he kicked them out of his mind by ''sheer force of Lawful Good'']]. He does things by the book (well, mostly) and gives people their due process. Lawful Good all over.

to:

* Captain Carrot from the ''{{Discworld}}'' novels. As a prime example of how CharacterAlignment is only part of character, rather than the whole of it, Samuel Vimes is also Lawful Good, albeit of a very different sort than Carrot's. Despite being arguably the most cynical and misanthropic bastard in the series (see Batman comment above), Samuel Vimes is also one of the most moral people in the series. The law is the rock to which Vimes clings in a world that makes no sense to him -- [[spoiler:when demons possessed him, he kicked them out of his mind by ''sheer force of Lawful Good'']].Good'', and created the Guarding Dark]]. He does things by the book (well, mostly) and gives people their due process. Lawful Good all over.

Changed: 106

Removed: 358

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Phrases like "the strong should not harm the weak" or "dignity, honor, and justice" do not equate moral righteousness with lawfulness... if anything, they're probably better suited to Neutral Good.


->''"To bring about the rule of righteousness in the land, so that the strong should not harm the weak."''
-->--Paraphrase of the ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Hammurabi Code of Hammurabi]]'' from ''{{Civilization}} IV''

to:

->''"To bring about the rule of righteousness in the land, so that the strong should not harm the weak."''
-->--Paraphrase of the ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Hammurabi Code of Hammurabi]]'' from ''{{Civilization}} IV''



-> ''"Dreams save us. Dreams lift us up and transform us. And on my soul, I swear -- until my dream of a world where dignity, honor and justice becomes the reality we all share -- I'll never stop fighting. Ever."''
-->-- '''Superman'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Even though there are some situations where they can't always use this method, Lawful Good characters believe the best way is to have a specific, strict code of conduct, whether self-imposed or codified as a law. Their first impulse when making a moral decision is to refer back to this code; those with externally imposed systems (codes of laws, hierarchies, etc.) will try to work within the system when those systems go wrong. Depending on whether they are more Lawful or more Good, they will either refuse to break the code even though it would hurt someone, or else break it only very reluctantly, and only when it would hurt someone if they kept their code. LawfulGood characters have to be very good at TakingAThirdOption.

to:

* Even though there are some situations where they can't always use this method, Lawful Good LawfulGood characters believe the best way is to have a specific, strict code of conduct, whether self-imposed or codified as a law. Their first impulse when making a moral decision is to refer back to this code; those with externally imposed systems (codes of laws, hierarchies, etc.) will try to work within the system when those systems go wrong. Depending on whether they are more Lawful or more Good, they will either refuse to break the code even though it would hurt someone, or else break it only very reluctantly, and only when it would hurt someone if they kept their code. LawfulGood characters have to be very good at TakingAThirdOption.



* Most chaotic good characters don't constantly break the law, but they cannot see much value in laws (or, for weaker-CCGs, do not see the value in laws that do not function solely to punish evil). They believe that their own consciences are their best guides, and that tying themselves to any given code of conduct would be limiting their own ability to do good. They do not get along with anyone who tries to instill any kind of order over the ChaoticGood character or others, believing these people to be restricting the freedom of others; however, most ChaoticGood characters will respect the right of others to impose strong codes of conduct on themselves. ChaoticGood characters often focus very strongly on individual rights and freedoms, and will strongly resist any form of oppression of themselves or anyone else.

to:

* Most chaotic good ChaoticGood characters don't constantly break the law, but they cannot see much value in laws (or, for weaker-CCGs, weaker-{{CCGs}}, do not see the value in laws that do not function solely to punish evil). They believe that their own consciences are their best guides, and that tying themselves to any given code of conduct would be limiting their own ability to do good. They do not get along with anyone who tries to instill any kind of order over the ChaoticGood character or others, believing these people to be restricting their freedom and the freedom of others; however, most ChaoticGood characters will respect the right of others to impose strong codes of conduct on themselves. ChaoticGood characters often focus very strongly on individual rights and freedoms, and will strongly resist any form of oppression of themselves or anyone else.



** BenevolentBoss

to:

** ** BenevolentBoss



Others, as characters with SuperOCD and CreatureOfHabit, can vary between LawfulGood, LawfulNeutral and LawfulEvil

to:

Others, such as characters with SuperOCD and CreatureOfHabit, can vary between LawfulGood, LawfulNeutral and LawfulEvil
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A Lawful Good character believes in [[RousseauWasRight the goodness inherent in all beings]] (unless they're a KnightInSourArmor), and in a code of conduct, be it a personal one or a set of laws, and that an ideal world comes from promoting this dualism of structure and benevolence. Differing interpretations of 'good' may lead a LawfulGood character to become LawfulStupid. In most {{RPG}}s, it is compulsory for [[KnightInShiningArmor Paladins]] to be Lawful Good. If they stop being Lawful Good, they lose their powers. Likely to take a theoretical approach to TheGoldenRule, with lots of complex rules built around it to clarify how it is to be applied.

to:

A Lawful Good character believes in [[RousseauWasRight the goodness inherent in all beings]] (unless they're a KnightInSourArmor), and in a code of conduct, conduct - be it a personal one or a set of laws, and that an ideal world comes from promoting this dualism of structure and benevolence. Differing interpretations of 'good' may lead a LawfulGood character to become LawfulStupid. In most {{RPG}}s, it is compulsory for [[KnightInShiningArmor Paladins]] to be Lawful Good. If they stop being Lawful Good, they lose their powers. Likely to take a theoretical approach to TheGoldenRule, with lots of complex rules built around it to clarify how it is to be applied.

Top