Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / AwardCategoryFraud

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There was some grumbling about Creator/LouiseFletcher's Best Actress win, since it's a bit of stretch to call Nurse Ratched a lead character in ''Film/OneFlewOverTheCuckoosNest''; she's more of a recurring {{Antagonist}}. Fletcher only appears in [[https://www.screentimecentral.com/leading-actress-winners 17% of the film]], a record low for either leading category. Still, 1975 had a fairly weak crop of Best Actress nominees,[[note]]The meatier female roles for that year were in EnsembleCast films like ''Film/{{Nashville}}'' and ''Film/{{Shampoo}}'' while the only other Best Actress contender from that year that anyone remembers was Creator/AnnMargret in ''Film/{{Tommy}}'', and it wasn't for her acting that she's remembered[[/note]] and Fletcher's performance was iconic.

to:

** There was some grumbling about Creator/LouiseFletcher's Best Actress win, since it's a bit of stretch to call Nurse Ratched a lead character in ''Film/OneFlewOverTheCuckoosNest''; she's more of a recurring {{Antagonist}}. Fletcher only appears in [[https://www.screentimecentral.com/leading-actress-winners 17% of the film]], a record low for a winner in either leading category. Still, 1975 had a fairly weak crop of Best Actress nominees,[[note]]The meatier female roles for that year were in EnsembleCast films like ''Film/{{Nashville}}'' and ''Film/{{Shampoo}}'' while the only other Best Actress contender from that year that anyone remembers was Creator/AnnMargret in ''Film/{{Tommy}}'', and it wasn't for her acting that she's remembered[[/note]] and Fletcher's performance was iconic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), arguing that Creator/GretaGerwig and Creator/NoahBaumbach created enough of a unique storyline and setting for the characters that it didn't truly count as an adaptation. Despite that, speculation was rampant that the ''real'' reason Warner did this was that an Original Screenplay nomination for ''Barbie'' would give it one topline Oscar category where it wouldn't be facing fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'', and would have a good chance to win. But the Academy ultimately did not play ball and put it in the Adapted Screenplay category, where it eventually got a nomination. However, to the surprise of everyone, ''Flower Moon'' didn't get a Screenplay nomination.

to:

* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), arguing that Creator/GretaGerwig and Creator/NoahBaumbach created enough of a unique storyline and setting for the characters that it didn't truly count as an adaptation. Despite that, speculation was rampant that the ''real'' reason Warner did this was that an Original Screenplay nomination for ''Barbie'' would give it one topline Oscar category where it wouldn't be facing fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'', and would have a good chance to win. But the Academy ultimately did not play ball and put it in the Adapted Screenplay category, where it eventually got a nomination. However, to the surprise of everyone, nomination, but ''Flower Moon'' didn't get a Screenplay nomination.
surprisingly did not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/Cleopatra1963'' is famously one of the many pairings of then-married stars Creator/ElizabethTaylor and Creator/RichardBurton, portraying Cleopatra and Marc Antony, respectively. Naturally, they headlined the production and it is remembered as ''their'' filme. Rex Harrison, on screen for one hour of a five-hour film, played Julius Caesar. He was the only nominee between the three. And it was for Best Actor.

to:

* ''Film/Cleopatra1963'' ''Film/{{Cleopatra}}'' is famously one of the many pairings of then-married stars Creator/ElizabethTaylor and Creator/RichardBurton, portraying Cleopatra and Marc Antony, respectively. Naturally, they headlined the production production, and it is remembered as ''their'' filme.film. Rex Harrison, on screen for one hour of a five-hour film, played Julius Caesar. He was the only nominee between the three. And it was for Best Actor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/Cleopatra1963'' is famously one of the many pairings of then-married stars Creator/ElizabethTaylor and Creator/RichardBurton, portraying Cleopatra and Marc Antony, respectively. Naturally, they headlined the production and it is remembered as ''their'' filme. Rex Harrison, on screen for one hour of a five-hour film, played Julius Caesar. He was the only nominee between the three. And it was for Best Actor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Tatum O'Neil won Best Supporting Actress for ''Film/PaperMoon'', even though she's in almost the whole film and is clearly a co-lead. O'Neal's performance is in fact [[https://www.screentimecentral.com/supporting-actress-winners the longest]] to ever win a "Supporting" Oscar, with 1:06:58 of screen time and appearing in 65.49% of the film.

to:

** Tatum O'Neil Creator/TatumONeal won Best Supporting Actress for ''Film/PaperMoon'', even though she's in almost the whole film and is clearly a co-lead. O'Neal's performance is in fact [[https://www.screentimecentral.com/supporting-actress-winners the longest]] to ever win a "Supporting" Oscar, with 1:06:58 of screen time and appearing in 65.49% of the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), arguing that Creator/GretaGerwig and Creator/NoahBaumbach created enough of a unique storyline and setting for the characters that it didn't truly count as an adaptation. Despite that, speculation was rampant that the ''real'' reason Warner did this was that an Original Screenplay nomination for ''Barbie'' would give it one topline Oscar category where it wouldn't be facing fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'', and would have a good chance to win. However, the Academy ultimately did not play ball and put it in the Adapted Screenplay category.

to:

* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), arguing that Creator/GretaGerwig and Creator/NoahBaumbach created enough of a unique storyline and setting for the characters that it didn't truly count as an adaptation. Despite that, speculation was rampant that the ''real'' reason Warner did this was that an Original Screenplay nomination for ''Barbie'' would give it one topline Oscar category where it wouldn't be facing fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'', and would have a good chance to win. However, But the Academy ultimately did not play ball and put it in the Adapted Screenplay category.
category, where it eventually got a nomination. However, to the surprise of everyone, ''Flower Moon'' didn't get a Screenplay nomination.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** In 2023, ''Film/MayDecember'' was nominated for Best Musical or Comedy, and while the film does contain a scant few laughs, it's ultimately a serious drama focusing on the very heavy themes of statutory rape, grooming, and exploitation, leading to much questioning as to why it was submitted in that category.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''Series/TheBear'' was nominated for and won the 2023 Emmy for Best ''Comedy'' Series. Most people who have seen the show knows it would consider it a {{Dramedy}} ''at best'' and its most critically acclaimed episodes ("Review" and "Fishes") involved [[TrueArtIsAngsty very little laughs]]. Many viewers have speculated that submitting it in Comedy instead of Drama was a calculated move to avoid having the show go up against juggernauts such as ''Series/BetterCallSaul'', ''Series/TheLastOfUs'' and ''Series/{{Succession}}'' (the eventual Best Drama Series winner).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'' episode "Behind the Laughter", the family's cheesy pop song "[[ChristmasSongs Simpsons Christmas Boogie]]" somehow manages to win the grammy for "Best Hardcore Thrash Metal", much to Music/OzzyOsbourne's disgust.

to:

* In ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'' episode "Behind the Laughter", satirizing the Jethro Tull Grammy fiasco, the family's cheesy pop song "[[ChristmasSongs Simpsons Christmas Boogie]]" somehow manages to win the grammy Grammy for "Best Hardcore Thrash Metal", much to Music/OzzyOsbourne's disgust.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), arguing that the film's unorthodox approach toward the franchise made it transcend mere adaptation. Despite that, speculation was rampant that the ''real'' reason was that an Original Screenplay nomination for ''Barbie'' would give it one topline Oscar category where it wouldn't be facing fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'', and a very reasonable chance to win. However, the Academy ultimately did not play ball and put it in the Adapted Screenplay category.

to:

* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), arguing that Creator/GretaGerwig and Creator/NoahBaumbach created enough of a unique storyline and setting for the film's unorthodox approach toward the franchise made characters that it transcend mere didn't truly count as an adaptation. Despite that, speculation was rampant that the ''real'' reason Warner did this was that an Original Screenplay nomination for ''Barbie'' would give it one topline Oscar category where it wouldn't be facing fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'', and would have a very reasonable good chance to win. However, the Academy ultimately did not play ball and put it in the Adapted Screenplay category.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), though speculation abounds that it's to avoid fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'' and to give ''Barbie'' a winning chance. The Academy ultimately did not play ball and put it in the Adapted Screenplay category.

to:

* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), though arguing that the film's unorthodox approach toward the franchise made it transcend mere adaptation. Despite that, speculation abounds was rampant that it's to avoid the ''real'' reason was that an Original Screenplay nomination for ''Barbie'' would give it one topline Oscar category where it wouldn't be facing fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'' ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'', and a very reasonable chance to give ''Barbie'' a winning chance. The win. However, the Academy ultimately did not play ball and put it in the Adapted Screenplay category.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One of the strangest examples of all time happened with ''Film/JudasAndTheBlackMessiah'', which starred Lakeith Stanfield as Bill O'Neal, a petty crook turned FBI informant who gets in deep with the Chicago Black Panther Party in order to spy on its leader, Fred Hampton, played by Daniel Kaluuya. It's difficult to say what really happened here. Both men played the title character (O'Neal the Judas while Hampton was the Black Messiah). Both men had roughly equal screentime, with Stanfield perhaps leading there by a hair. Both were protagonists. Both had their own arc and character growth. Kaluuya was a slightly bigger star, having made a name for himself a couple of years earlier with ''Film/GetOut'', but Stanfield had headlined other films himself. Kaluuya took top billing, but both men had their names above the title. Kaluuya, who was considered the showier performance and the main draw, was campaigned for Best Supporting Actor, due to his far greater likelihood of winning, which paid off, while Stanfield was campaigned for Best Actor, but was expected to be snubbed. Possibly, enough voters nominated Kaluuya for Lead and Stanfield for Supporting to allow Stanfield to break into the fifth supporting slot, while the majority of votes for Kaluuya were for supporting, and those voters may not have nominated Stanfield at all.

to:

* One of the strangest examples of all time happened with ''Film/JudasAndTheBlackMessiah'', which starred Lakeith Stanfield as Bill O'Neal, a petty crook turned FBI informant who gets in deep with the Chicago Black Panther Party in order to spy on its leader, Fred Hampton, played by Daniel Kaluuya. It's difficult to say what really happened here. Both men played the title character (O'Neal the Judas while Hampton was the Black Messiah). Both men had roughly equal screentime, with Stanfield perhaps leading there by a hair. Both were protagonists. Both had their own arc and character growth. Kaluuya was a slightly bigger star, having made a name for himself a couple of years earlier with ''Film/GetOut'', ''Film/GetOut2017'', but Stanfield had headlined other films himself. Kaluuya took top billing, but both men had their names above the title. Kaluuya, who was considered the showier performance and the main draw, was campaigned for Best Supporting Actor, due to his far greater likelihood of winning, which paid off, while Stanfield was campaigned for Best Actor, but was expected to be snubbed. Possibly, enough voters nominated Kaluuya for Lead and Stanfield for Supporting to allow Stanfield to break into the fifth supporting slot, while the majority of votes for Kaluuya were for supporting, and those voters may not have nominated Stanfield at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Updating with the Academy’s (very unsuprising) decision


* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), though speculation abounds that it's to avoid fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'' and to give ''Barbie'' a winning chance. What category it'll ultimately be nominated for is up to the Academy to decide, however.

to:

* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), though speculation abounds that it's to avoid fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'' and to give ''Barbie'' a winning chance. What category it'll The Academy ultimately be nominated for is up to did not play ball and put it in the Academy to decide, however.
Adapted Screenplay category.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Writing example: if it's based on a previous work, the Academy only considers it for Adapted Screenplay. Sequels are almost always considered adapted because they're based on existing characters (''WesternAnimation/ToyStory3'').

to:

* Writing example: if it's based on a previous work, the Academy only considers it for Adapted Screenplay. Sequels are almost always considered adapted because they're based on existing characters (''WesternAnimation/ToyStory3'').(''WesternAnimation/ToyStory3'', ''Film/BoratSubsequentMoviefilm'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In a decision that left many people scratching their heads, ''Film/TheMartian'' won the 2015 Golden Globe in the category "Best Motion Picture: ''Musical or Comedy''." (As anyone who has seen the film knows, it has light-hearted moments but overall remains a serious [[{{Robinsonade}} adventure drama]], and contains much disco but no diagetic singing.)

to:

* In a decision that left many people scratching their heads, ''Film/TheMartian'' won the 2015 Golden Globe in the category "Best Motion Picture: ''Musical or Comedy''." (As anyone who has seen the film knows, it has light-hearted moments but overall remains a serious [[{{Robinsonade}} adventure drama]], and contains much disco but no diagetic diegetic singing.)

Added: 272

Changed: -16

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Another sports case revolves around the NBA Sixth Man of the Year Award, presented since the 1982–83 season to the league's top bench player. The distaff counterpart is the WNBA Sixth Player of the Year Award,[[note]]originally the "Sixth Woman" award; the word "Woman" was replaced by "Player" in 2021[[/note]] presented since the 2007 season. To be eligible, players must come off the bench in more games than they start. However, this ignores another possible definition of "bench player"—someone who plays fewer minutes than typical starters. The most extreme example of this (at least in the NBA) was in 2008–09, when Jason Terry won the award with the Dallas Mavericks. While he started in only 11 games out of the 74 he played in the regular season, he averaged 33.7 minutes—more than two-thirds of the standard game length of 48 minutes, and more than three of the team's nominal starters in that season.

to:

* Another sports case revolves around the NBA Sixth Man of the Year Award, presented since the 1982–83 season to the league's top bench player. The distaff counterpart is the WNBA Sixth Player of the Year Award,[[note]]originally the "Sixth Woman" award; the word "Woman" was replaced by "Player" in 2021[[/note]] presented since the 2007 season. To be eligible, players must come off the bench in more games than they start. However, this ignores another possible definition of "bench player"—someone who plays fewer minutes than typical starters. The most extreme example of this (at least in the NBA) was in 2008–09, when Jason Terry won the award with the Dallas Mavericks. While he started in only 11 games out of the 74 he played in the regular season, he averaged 33.7 minutes—more than two-thirds of the standard game length of 48 minutes, and more than three of the team's nominal starters in that season.season.

!! InUniverse Examples
* In ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'' episode "Behind the Laughter", the family's cheesy pop song "[[ChristmasSongs Simpsons Christmas Boogie]]" somehow manages to win the grammy for "Best Hardcore Thrash Metal", much to Music/OzzyOsbourne's disgust.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* It's still unknown why the producers behind ''Film/GangsOfNewYork'' decided to campaign both Creator/LeonardoDiCaprio and Creator/DanielDayLewis for Best Actor, with Day-Lewis getting the much stronger push. Day-Lewis is on screen for less than 25% of the film, and portrays the antagonist. DiCaprio plays the main protagonist and as such is on screen for nearly half the film, and received top billing. It's true that critics were more wowed by Day-Lewis's performance, but if he had been campaigned for Supporting, where he belonged, he would have walked away with an easy win, while the worst that could have happened for DiCaprio was no nomination at all (which is what ended up happening anyway). As it was, Day-Lewis, despite still being the favorite to win, lost to Creator/AdrienBrody in ''Film/ThePianist''. Most considered this a worthy outcome, but still, both men could have been winners if Day-Lewis had been nominated where he belonged.

to:

* It's still unknown why the producers behind ''Film/GangsOfNewYork'' decided to campaign both Creator/LeonardoDiCaprio and Creator/DanielDayLewis for Best Actor, with Day-Lewis getting the much stronger push. Day-Lewis is on screen for less than 25% of the film, and portrays the antagonist. DiCaprio [=DiCaprio=] plays the main protagonist and as such is on screen for nearly half the film, and received top billing. It's true that critics were more wowed by Day-Lewis's performance, but if he had been campaigned for Supporting, where he belonged, he would have walked away with an easy win, while the worst that could have happened for DiCaprio [=DiCaprio=] was no nomination at all (which is what ended up happening anyway). As it was, Day-Lewis, despite still being the favorite to win, lost to Creator/AdrienBrody in ''Film/ThePianist''. Most considered this a worthy outcome, but still, both men could have been winners if Day-Lewis had been nominated where he belonged.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/{{Friends}}'' {{invoked}} this when the EnsembleCast decided that they would only ever submit their work for Supporting. Creator/DavidSchwimmer, Creator/MatthewPerry, Creator/JenniferAniston and Creator/CourteneyCox, arguably the four most prominent of the six leads (the other two were primarily comic relief), each competed for Supporting categories. Once the show entered the second half of its 10-year run, the agreement may have changed, as Perry, Aniston and Creator/MattLeBlanc all received Leading nominations, and Aniston won. (The sixth cast member, Creator/LisaKudrow, also won Supporting in '98. Cox was [[AwardSnub never nominated]].)

to:

* ''Series/{{Friends}}'' {{invoked}} this when the EnsembleCast decided that they would only ever submit their work for Supporting. Creator/DavidSchwimmer, Creator/MatthewPerry, Creator/JenniferAniston and Creator/CourteneyCox, arguably the four most prominent of the six leads (the other two were primarily comic relief), each competed for Supporting categories. Once This changed with season eight, when the show entered the second half of its 10-year run, the agreement may have changed, as actors decided to all submit in lead instead. Perry, Aniston and Creator/MattLeBlanc all received Leading went on to receive nominations, and Aniston won. (The sixth cast member, Creator/LisaKudrow, also won Supporting in '98. Cox was [[AwardSnub never nominated]].)

Added: 340

Changed: 519

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Biopics are an iffy case: generally, any biographical film based on a book, which most of them are, will get an Adapted Screenplay nomination, while any of them that doesn't credit anything as source material will get an Original Screenplay nomination, even though all biopics are technically adaptations in the loosest sense of the word.




to:

* Creator/WarnerBros submitted ''Film/{{Barbie|2023}}'' for Best Original Screenplay consideration, despite it falling into the Academy's standards for what's considered as an adaptation (being based on a [[Franchise/{{Barbie}} well-established franchise]]), though speculation abounds that it's to avoid fierce competition from ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' and ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'' and to give ''Barbie'' a winning chance. What category it'll ultimately be nominated for is up to the Academy to decide, however.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/MichelleWilliams was considered a frontrunner for Best Supporting Actress when ''Film/TheFabelmans'' premiered in the fall of 2022. However, she decided to campaign in the Lead category, where she didn't have much chance against frontrunners Creator/MichelleYeoh and Creator/CateBlanchett. While Williams does have the largest female role as Mitzi in the film, its point of view dominantly belongs to Sammy (Gabrielle [=LaBelle=]). Mitzi is almost entirely absent from the third act, but she does have her own defined story and arc when she is on-screen. There were reports that Williams was concerned that a Supporting nomination for a borderline role would damage her ability to bargain for larger salaries.

to:

* Creator/MichelleWilliams was considered a frontrunner for Best Supporting Actress when ''Film/TheFabelmans'' premiered in the fall of 2022. However, she decided to campaign in the Lead category, where she didn't have much chance against frontrunners Creator/MichelleYeoh and Creator/CateBlanchett. While Williams does have the largest female role as Mitzi in the film, its point of view dominantly belongs to Sammy (Gabrielle (Gabriel [=LaBelle=]). Mitzi is almost entirely absent from the third act, but she does have her own defined story and arc when she is on-screen. There were reports that Williams was concerned that a Supporting nomination for a borderline role would damage her ability to bargain for larger salaries.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* It's still unknown why the producers behind ''Film/GangsOfNewYork'' decided to campaign both Creator/LeonardoDiCaprio and Creator/DanielDayLewis for Best Actor, with Day-Lewis getting the much stronger push. Day-Lewis is on screen for less than 25% of the film, and portrays the antagonist. DiCaprio plays the main protagonist and as such is on screen for nearly half the film, and received top billing. It's true that critics were more wowed by Day-Lewis's performance, but if he had been campaigned for Supporting, where he belonged, he would have walked away with an easy win, while the worst that could have happened for DiCaprio was no nomination at all (which is what ended up happening anyway). As it was, Day-Lewis, despite still being the favorite to win, lost to Creator/AdrienBrody in ''Film/ThePianist''. Most considered this a worthy outcome, but still, both men could have been winners if Day-Lewis had been nominated where he belonged.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In another ''very'' iffy case, ''Film/GangsOfNewYork'' was submitted for, and ultimately nominated for, Best Original Screenplay, despite its very credits admitting it was based off the eponymously titled non-fiction novel by Herbert Asbury. On what grounds could it be considered "original", then? Well, according to writer Jay Cocks, "This is a world we conjured out of whole cloth, out of a whole lot of unassimilated historical research.” He said that Asbury’s book, which Cocks and Martin Scorcese discovered in the late ‘70s, served primarily as an introduction to the history of the draft riots depicted in the film, and that he borrowed only a few particularly pungent gang names (including the Dead Rabbits and the Plug Uglies), the sketchy outlines of two key characters (Bill the Butcher and Monk McGinn), and Asbury’s “great title” from the book. The rest, he says, was original, with guidance from about 50 historical sources. It's hard to tell how seriously to take that claim.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator KeHuyQuan was a co-lead with Creator/MichelleYeoh in ''Film/EverythingEverywhereAllAtOnce'' by almost any objective standard and he was onscreen, and received more character growth and motivation, than several of the Lead Actor and Actress roles of that year. But he was nominated for, and won, Best Supporting Actor. This was not only a "make sure he wins" move, as throughout award season he was only ever nominated or awarded in Supporting categories.


to:

* Creator KeHuyQuan Creator/KeHuyQuan was a co-lead with Creator/MichelleYeoh in ''Film/EverythingEverywhereAllAtOnce'' by almost any objective standard and he was onscreen, and received more character growth and motivation, than several of the Lead Actor and Actress roles of that year. But he was nominated for, and won, Best Supporting Actor. This was not only a "make sure he wins" move, as throughout award season he was only ever nominated or awarded in Supporting categories.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n* Creator KeHuyQuan was a co-lead with Creator/MichelleYeoh in ''Film/EverythingEverywhereAllAtOnce'' by almost any objective standard and he was onscreen, and received more character growth and motivation, than several of the Lead Actor and Actress roles of that year. But he was nominated for, and won, Best Supporting Actor. This was not only a "make sure he wins" move, as throughout award season he was only ever nominated or awarded in Supporting categories.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/MichelleWilliams was considered a frontrunner for Best Supporting Actress when ''Film/TheFabelmans'' premiered in the fall of 2022. However, she decided to campaign in the Lead category, where she didn't have much chance against frontrunners Creator/MichelleYeoh and Creator/CateBlanchett. While Williams does have the largest female role as Mitzi in the film, its point of view dominantly belongs to Sammy (Gabrielle LaBelle). Mitzi is almost entirely absent from the third act, but she does have her own defined story and arc when she is on-screen. There were reports that Williams was concerned that a Supporting nomination for a borderline role would damage her ability to bargain for larger salaries.

to:

* Creator/MichelleWilliams was considered a frontrunner for Best Supporting Actress when ''Film/TheFabelmans'' premiered in the fall of 2022. However, she decided to campaign in the Lead category, where she didn't have much chance against frontrunners Creator/MichelleYeoh and Creator/CateBlanchett. While Williams does have the largest female role as Mitzi in the film, its point of view dominantly belongs to Sammy (Gabrielle LaBelle).[=LaBelle=]). Mitzi is almost entirely absent from the third act, but she does have her own defined story and arc when she is on-screen. There were reports that Williams was concerned that a Supporting nomination for a borderline role would damage her ability to bargain for larger salaries.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/MichelleWilliams was considered a frontrunner for Best Supporting Actress when ''Film/TheFabelmans'' premiered in the fall of 2022. However she was campaigned in the Lead category, where she didn't have much chance. While she does have the largest female role in the film, the film is entirely dominated by Gabrielle LaBelle's point of view. There were reports that Williams was concerned that a Supporting nomination for a borderline role would damage her ability to bargain for larger salaries.

to:

* Creator/MichelleWilliams was considered a frontrunner for Best Supporting Actress when ''Film/TheFabelmans'' premiered in the fall of 2022. However However, she was campaigned decided to campaign in the Lead category, where she didn't have much chance. chance against frontrunners Creator/MichelleYeoh and Creator/CateBlanchett. While she Williams does have the largest female role as Mitzi in the film, the film its point of view dominantly belongs to Sammy (Gabrielle LaBelle). Mitzi is almost entirely dominated by Gabrielle LaBelle's point of view.absent from the third act, but she does have her own defined story and arc when she is on-screen. There were reports that Williams was concerned that a Supporting nomination for a borderline role would damage her ability to bargain for larger salaries.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Creator/MichelleWilliams was considered a frontrunner for Best Supporting Actress when ''Film/TheFabelmans'' premiered in the fall of 2022. However she was campaigned in the Lead category, where she didn't have much chance. While she does have the largest female role in the film, the film is entirely dominated by Gabrielle LaBelle's point of view. There were reports that Williams was concerned that a Supporting nomination for a borderline role would damage her ability to bargain for larger salaries.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* While Creator/BetteDavis was billed first, Creator/MaryAstor was essentially a co-lead in ''Film/TheGreatLie''. She plays the new bride of George Brent, who leaves her for his first, and true, love (Davis) not knowing his new bride is pregnant. The rest of the movie concerns Davis and Astor conspiring to pass off the baby as Davis's so that it won't be considered illegitimate. Aster was ultimately nominated for Supporting Actress.
* 1941's ''Film/TheDevilAndMissJones'' starred Charles Coburn as a corporate executive who decides to see how life (and working conditions) is on the bottom rung of his department store, and hires himself under an alias as salesperson. He's the lead character under any definition of the term. He was nominated for Best Supporting Actor.

to:

* While Creator/BetteDavis was billed first, Creator/MaryAstor was essentially a co-lead in ''Film/TheGreatLie''. She plays the new bride of George Brent, who leaves her for his first, and true, love (Davis) not knowing his new bride is pregnant. The rest of the movie concerns Davis and Astor conspiring to pass off the baby as Davis's so that it won't be considered illegitimate. Aster Astor was ultimately nominated for Supporting Actress.
Actress, and won.
* 1941's ''Film/TheDevilAndMissJones'' starred Charles Coburn as a corporate executive who decides to see how life (and working conditions) is conditions are on the bottom rung of his department store, and hires himself under an alias as salesperson. He's the lead character under any definition of the term. He was nominated for Best Supporting Actor.



* Jason Miller was nominated in supporting for ''Film/TheExorcist'', even though he's pretty equal to lead nominee Creator/EllenBurstyn in terms of focus, and his character is the true protagonist.

to:

* Jason Miller was nominated in supporting for ''Film/TheExorcist'', even though he's pretty equal to lead nominee Creator/EllenBurstyn in terms of focus, and his character is the true protagonist.protagonist and title character.



* Creator/JamieFoxx was nominated for Best Supporting Actor for ''Film/{{Collateral}}'', a film where he was the viewpoint character and clear lead, because he was already up for Best Actor in ''Film/{{Ray}}'', which he ended up winning.

to:

* Creator/JamieFoxx was nominated for Best Supporting Actor for ''Film/{{Collateral}}'', a film where he was the viewpoint character and clear lead, because he was already up for Best Actor in ''Film/{{Ray}}'', which he ended up winning. He was also second-billed to Creator/TomCruise who must headline almost any movie he makes, even if in this case he was the clear antagonist and at best second lead. If the part had been played by, say, Ray Liotta, it would easily have been considered the supporting performance.



* Creator/CaseyAffleck plays the main character of Robert Ford in ''Film/TheAssassinationOfJesseJamesByTheCowardRobertFord'' but was nominated mainly as the supporting role.

to:

* Creator/CaseyAffleck plays the main character of Robert Ford in ''Film/TheAssassinationOfJesseJamesByTheCowardRobertFord'' but he received second billing behind Creator/BradPitt, who was playing the much better-known role of James, and thus was nominated mainly as the supporting role.



* ''Film/TheFavourite'' is a film about three women who could all be considered leads. When awards season came around, it was decided to submit Creator/OliviaColman in the Lead Actress categories while Creator/RachelWeisz and Creator/EmmaStone had to settle for Supporting Actress. All three received Oscar nominations in those respective categories. In terms [[https://www.screentimecentral.com/supporting-actress-nominees of screen time]], Stone appeared in 48% of the film (and much of it is from her perspective), Colman in 42%, and Weisz in 36%. Colman likely got priority because she played Queen Anne, whose life is ultimately the main subject and setting of the story. This ended up working out as Weisz and Stone both lost Supporting Actress to Creator/ReginaKing, while Colman pulled off an upset victory over the heavily-favored Creator/GlennClose for the Oscar.

to:

* ''Film/TheFavourite'' is a film about three women who women, at least two of whom could all be considered leads. When awards season came around, it was decided to submit Creator/OliviaColman in the Lead Actress categories while Creator/RachelWeisz and Creator/EmmaStone had to settle for Supporting Actress. All three received Oscar nominations in those respective categories. In terms [[https://www.screentimecentral.com/supporting-actress-nominees of screen time]], Stone appeared in 48% of the film (and much of it is from her perspective), Colman in 42%, and Weisz in 36%. Colman likely got priority because she played Queen Anne, whose life is ultimately the main subject and setting of the story. This ended up working out as Weisz and Stone both lost Supporting Actress to Creator/ReginaKing, while Colman pulled off an upset victory over the heavily-favored Creator/GlennClose for the Oscar.



* One of the strangest examples of all time happened with ''Film/JudasAndTheBlackMessiah'', which starred Lakeith Stanfield as Bill O'Neal, a petty crook turned FBI informant who gets in deep with the Chicago Black Panther Party in order to spy on its leader, Fred Hampton, played by Daniel Kaluuya. In terms of pure screen time, it's arguable both men are leads, though it's really O'Neal's story in terms of focus, while Kaluuya gets top billing. For whatever reason, possibly confusing billing order with focus, ''both'' men ended up being nominated by the Academy for Best Supporting Actor, possibly the only time two leads ended up both nominated here, rather than one being shunted to supporting or both ending up in the Lead category. Stanfield was campaigned for Best Actor, but was expected to be snubbed. Some have theorized that voters decided to place him in the more open supporting category so that he could be recognized alongside Kaluuya, who was deemed the frontrunner there (and indeed, it was Kaluuya who eventually took home the trophy).


to:

* One of the strangest examples of all time happened with ''Film/JudasAndTheBlackMessiah'', which starred Lakeith Stanfield as Bill O'Neal, a petty crook turned FBI informant who gets in deep with the Chicago Black Panther Party in order to spy on its leader, Fred Hampton, played by Daniel Kaluuya. In terms It's difficult to say what really happened here. Both men played the title character (O'Neal the Judas while Hampton was the Black Messiah). Both men had roughly equal screentime, with Stanfield perhaps leading there by a hair. Both were protagonists. Both had their own arc and character growth. Kaluuya was a slightly bigger star, having made a name for himself a couple of pure screen time, it's arguable years earlier with ''Film/GetOut'', but Stanfield had headlined other films himself. Kaluuya took top billing, but both men are leads, though it's really O'Neal's story in terms of focus, while Kaluuya gets top billing. For whatever reason, possibly confusing billing order with focus, ''both'' men ended up being nominated by had their names above the Academy title. Kaluuya, who was considered the showier performance and the main draw, was campaigned for Best Supporting Actor, possibly the only time two leads ended up both nominated here, rather than one being shunted due to supporting or both ending up in the Lead category. his far greater likelihood of winning, which paid off, while Stanfield was campaigned for Best Actor, but was expected to be snubbed. Some have theorized that Possibly, enough voters decided nominated Kaluuya for Lead and Stanfield for Supporting to place him in allow Stanfield to break into the more open fifth supporting category so that he could be recognized alongside Kaluuya, who was deemed slot, while the frontrunner there (and indeed, it was majority of votes for Kaluuya who eventually took home the trophy).

were for supporting, and those voters may not have nominated Stanfield at all.




** There was some grumbling about Creator/LouiseFletcher's Best Actress win, since it's a bit of stretch to call Nurse Ratched a lead character in ''Film/OneFlewOverTheCuckoosNest''; she's more of a recurring {{Antagonist}}. Fletcher only appears in [[https://www.screentimecentral.com/leading-actress-winners 17% of the film]], a record low for either leading category. Still, 1975 had a fairly weak crop of Best Actress nominees,[[note]]The meatier female roles for that year were in EnsembleCast films like ''Film/{{Nashville}}'' and ''Film/{{Shampoo}}''[[/note]] and Fletcher's performance was iconic.

to:

** There was some grumbling about Creator/LouiseFletcher's Best Actress win, since it's a bit of stretch to call Nurse Ratched a lead character in ''Film/OneFlewOverTheCuckoosNest''; she's more of a recurring {{Antagonist}}. Fletcher only appears in [[https://www.screentimecentral.com/leading-actress-winners 17% of the film]], a record low for either leading category. Still, 1975 had a fairly weak crop of Best Actress nominees,[[note]]The meatier female roles for that year were in EnsembleCast films like ''Film/{{Nashville}}'' and ''Film/{{Shampoo}}''[[/note]] ''Film/{{Shampoo}}'' while the only other Best Actress contender from that year that anyone remembers was Creator/AnnMargret in ''Film/{{Tommy}}'', and it wasn't for her acting that she's remembered[[/note]] and Fletcher's performance was iconic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Possessive "its" does not need an apostrophe


Because the ceremony splits its' awards across specific genres, there is an added layer where the category in question doesn't match the content of the work.

to:

Because the ceremony splits its' its awards across specific genres, there is an added layer where the category in question doesn't match the content of the work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* For ''Series/{{Big Little Lies}}'', Shailene Woodley was nominated for Outstanding Supporting Actress, along with Laura Dern, although her character had more time than Dern's, had more storylines, and was considered a lead character. Dern ended up winning the Emmy. This is also strange considering that Reese Witherspoon and Nicole Kidman, who were also billed as leads, were nominated for Outstanding Lead Actress. It may have been done to limit the amount of lead characters in the category so no one could get cancelled out.

to:

* For ''Series/{{Big Little Lies}}'', ''Series/BigLittleLies'', Shailene Woodley was nominated for Outstanding Supporting Actress, along with Laura Dern, although her character had more time than Dern's, had more storylines, and was considered a lead character. Dern ended up winning the Emmy. This is also strange considering that Reese Witherspoon and Nicole Kidman, who were also billed as leads, were nominated for Outstanding Lead Actress. It may have been done to limit the amount of lead characters in the category so no one could get cancelled out.



* The 2002 Oscars were seen as a significant achievement for black actors, as Creator/HalleBerry became the first black woman to win Best Actress for ''Film/MonstersBall'', Creator/DenzelWashington became the second black man to win Best Actor (behind Creator/SidneyPoitier, who was coincidentally given an Honorary Award at the same ceremony) for ''Film/TrainingDay'', and the two becane the first (and thus-far only) pair of black leads to win in the same year. However, ''Training Day'''s main character is played by Creator/EthanHawke, and the story is entirely centered around his character's point of view. Denzel's character is eventually revealed to be the film's antagonist.


to:

* The 2002 Oscars were seen as a significant achievement for black actors, as Creator/HalleBerry became the first black woman to win Best Actress for ''Film/MonstersBall'', Creator/DenzelWashington became the second black man to win Best Actor (behind Creator/SidneyPoitier, who was coincidentally given an Honorary Award at the same ceremony) for ''Film/TrainingDay'', and the two becane became the first (and thus-far only) pair of black leads to win in the same year. However, the main character of ''Training Day'''s main character Day'' is the one played by Best Supporting Actor nominee Creator/EthanHawke, and as the story is entirely centered around his character's point of view. Denzel's character is eventually revealed to be the film's antagonist.

antagonist.

Top