Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / AwardCategoryFraud

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Although the ''Franchise/StarWars'' prequel trilogy centers on Anakin Skywalker's ProtagonistJourneyToVillain, Creator/HaydenChristensen won the Razzie for Worst Supporting Actor for playing Anakin in ''Film/AttackOfTheClone'' and ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith''.

to:

* Although the ''Franchise/StarWars'' prequel trilogy centers on Anakin Skywalker's ProtagonistJourneyToVillain, Creator/HaydenChristensen won the Razzie for Worst Supporting Actor for playing Anakin in ''Film/AttackOfTheClone'' ''Film/AttackOfTheClones'' and ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith''.

Added: 1091

Removed: 681

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!! Golden Raspberry Awards

* The UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward for Remake or Sequel (since appended with Prequel and Rip-Off), as noted by Website/LeBeausLeBlog's [[https://lebeauleblog.com/category/movies/awards/razzies/ recap series on the "award"]], often play very loose with what that means (many are LiveActionAdaptation and TheFilmOfTheSeries). The very first winner was ''Wyatt Earp'', which at most was a story that had been told before. The second was ''Film/{{The Scarlet Letter|1995}}'', which is an adaptation of a book, not a remake. And only a few noms had RuleOfFunny as an excuse (''Film/{{Showgirls}}'' being claimed as a remake of both ''Film/AllAboutEve'' and ''Film/TheLonelyLady'').
* Aileen Quinn won the Razzie Award for Worst Supporting Actress in ''Film/Annie1982'' despite playing ''the titular Annie.''
* Although the ''Franchise/StarWars'' prequel trilogy centers on Anakin Skywalker's ProtagonistJourneyToVillain, Creator/HaydenChristensen won the Razzie for Worst Supporting Actor for playing Anakin in ''Film/AttackOfTheClone'' and ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith''.



* The UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward for Remake or Sequel (since appended with Prequel and Rip-Off), as noted by Website/LeBeausLeBlog's [[https://lebeauleblog.com/category/movies/awards/razzies/ recap series on the "award"]], often play very loose with what that means (many are LiveActionAdaptation and TheFilmOfTheSeries). The very first winner was ''Wyatt Earp'', which at most was a story that had been told before. The second was ''Film/{{The Scarlet Letter|1995}}'', which is an adaptation of a book, not a remake. And only a few noms had RuleOfFunny as an excuse (''Film/{{Showgirls}}'' being claimed as a remake of both ''Film/AllAboutEve'' and ''Film/TheLonelyLady'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Because a SoapOpera typically has a huge cast and lots of juggled storylines, the Daytime Emmy categories for Lead and Supporting acting can seem arbitrary in how they divide performers up, often boiling down to cast seniority, with the veteran players getting Lead nominations even if their character has been OutOfFocus, and others nominating for Supporting even if they appeared frequently over the course of the season. One example is Kelly Thiebaud, whose character Britt Westbourne was involved in several prominent storylines in the 2021-22 season. She'd thought about submitting herself for Lead Actress, but fellow cast member Steve Burton (Jason Morgan) advised her that the committee generally doesn't consider anyone who's been on a soap for less than ten years for Lead, so she submitted for Supporting Actress instead (and won).

Added: 1268

Removed: 1268

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Despite the film's title, ''Film/AllAboutEve'' is really about Bette Davis' Margo Channing character, with the titular Eve Harrington, played by Creator/AnneBaxter, having significantly less screen-time, with only a few key scenes told from her perspective. Baxter could have been submitted under Best Supporting Actress, but she campaigned for a Best Actress nomination instead since she believed she wouldn't have a shot in that category again (and she would ultimately be correct). Since both Davis and Baxter received Best Actress nominations (still the only time the category has seen two nominees for the same film), the vote was split. That, along with additional competition from Creator/GloriaSwanson (''Film/SunsetBoulevard''), is usually cited as the reason why Creator/JudyHolliday from ''Film/BornYesterday'' won the Oscar, one of the most famous upsets in the award's history. In later years, Baxter came to regret not conceding to a Supporting Actress nomination, and Davis agreed. For what it's worth, the film did have two nominations in that category (for Creator/CelesteHolm and Creator/ThelmaRitter's performances), but they aren't as well-remembered, and it's usually agreed that Baxter would easily have won the category had she been nominated.


Added DiffLines:

* Despite the film's title, ''Film/AllAboutEve'' is really about Bette Davis' Margo Channing character, with the titular Eve Harrington, played by Creator/AnneBaxter, having significantly less screen-time, with only a few key scenes told from her perspective. Baxter could have been submitted under Best Supporting Actress, but she campaigned for a Best Actress nomination instead since she believed she wouldn't have a shot in that category again (and she would ultimately be correct). Since both Davis and Baxter received Best Actress nominations (still the only time the category has seen two nominees for the same film), the vote was split. That, along with additional competition from Creator/GloriaSwanson (''Film/SunsetBoulevard''), is usually cited as the reason why Creator/JudyHolliday from ''Film/BornYesterday'' won the Oscar, one of the most famous upsets in the award's history. In later years, Baxter came to regret not conceding to a Supporting Actress nomination, and Davis agreed. For what it's worth, the film did have two nominations in that category (for Creator/CelesteHolm and Creator/ThelmaRitter's performances), but they aren't as well-remembered, and it's usually agreed that Baxter would easily have won the category had she been nominated.

Added: 1268

Removed: 1268

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Despite the film's title, ''Film/AllAboutEve'' is really about Bette Davis' Margo Channing character, with the titular Eve Harrington, played by Creator/AnneBaxter, having significantly less screen-time, with only a few key scenes told from her perspective. Baxter could have been submitted under Best Supporting Actress, but she campaigned for a Best Actress nomination instead since she believed she wouldn't have a shot in that category again (and she would ultimately be correct). Since both Davis and Baxter received Best Actress nominations (still the only time the category has seen two nominees for the same film), the vote was split. That, along with additional competition from Creator/GloriaSwanson (''Film/SunsetBoulevard''), is usually cited as the reason why Creator/JudyHolliday from ''Film/BornYesterday'' won the Oscar, one of the most famous upsets in the award's history. In later years, Baxter came to regret not conceding to a Supporting Actress nomination, and Davis agreed. For what it's worth, the film did have two nominations in that category (for Creator/CelesteHolm and Creator/ThelmaRitter's performances), but they aren't as well-remembered, and it's usually agreed that Baxter would easily have won the category had she been nominated.


Added DiffLines:

* Despite the film's title, ''Film/AllAboutEve'' is really about Bette Davis' Margo Channing character, with the titular Eve Harrington, played by Creator/AnneBaxter, having significantly less screen-time, with only a few key scenes told from her perspective. Baxter could have been submitted under Best Supporting Actress, but she campaigned for a Best Actress nomination instead since she believed she wouldn't have a shot in that category again (and she would ultimately be correct). Since both Davis and Baxter received Best Actress nominations (still the only time the category has seen two nominees for the same film), the vote was split. That, along with additional competition from Creator/GloriaSwanson (''Film/SunsetBoulevard''), is usually cited as the reason why Creator/JudyHolliday from ''Film/BornYesterday'' won the Oscar, one of the most famous upsets in the award's history. In later years, Baxter came to regret not conceding to a Supporting Actress nomination, and Davis agreed. For what it's worth, the film did have two nominations in that category (for Creator/CelesteHolm and Creator/ThelmaRitter's performances), but they aren't as well-remembered, and it's usually agreed that Baxter would easily have won the category had she been nominated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Despite the film's title, ''Film/AllAboutEve'' is really about Bette Davis' Margo Channing character, with the titular Eve Harrington, played by Creator/AnneBaxter, having significantly less screen-time, with only a few key scenes told from her perspective. Baxter could have been submitted under Best Supporting Actress, but she campaigned for a Best Actress nomination instead since she believed she wouldn't have a shot in that category again (and she would ultimately be correct). Since both Davis and Baxter received Best Actress nominations (still the only time the category has seen two nominees for the same film), the vote was split. That, along with additional competition from Creator/GloriaSwanson (''Film/SunsetBoulevard''), is usually cited as the reason why Creator/JudyHolliday from ''Creator/BornYesterday'' won the Oscar, one of the most famous upsets in the award's history. In later years, Baxter came to regret not conceding to a Supporting Actress nomination, and Davis agreed. For what it's worth, the film did have two nominations in that category (for Creator/CelesteHolm and Creator/ThelmaRitter's performances), but they aren't as well-remembered, and it's usually agreed that Baxter would easily have won the category had she been nominated.

to:

* Despite the film's title, ''Film/AllAboutEve'' is really about Bette Davis' Margo Channing character, with the titular Eve Harrington, played by Creator/AnneBaxter, having significantly less screen-time, with only a few key scenes told from her perspective. Baxter could have been submitted under Best Supporting Actress, but she campaigned for a Best Actress nomination instead since she believed she wouldn't have a shot in that category again (and she would ultimately be correct). Since both Davis and Baxter received Best Actress nominations (still the only time the category has seen two nominees for the same film), the vote was split. That, along with additional competition from Creator/GloriaSwanson (''Film/SunsetBoulevard''), is usually cited as the reason why Creator/JudyHolliday from ''Creator/BornYesterday'' ''Film/BornYesterday'' won the Oscar, one of the most famous upsets in the award's history. In later years, Baxter came to regret not conceding to a Supporting Actress nomination, and Davis agreed. For what it's worth, the film did have two nominations in that category (for Creator/CelesteHolm and Creator/ThelmaRitter's performances), but they aren't as well-remembered, and it's usually agreed that Baxter would easily have won the category had she been nominated.

Added: 429

Changed: 1242

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/LanaTurner was nominated for Best Actress for ''Film/PeytonPlace'' in 1957 (her only Oscar nomination ever), while Diane Varsi, who played her daughter and the main character, received a Supporting Actress nomination (competing with Hope Lange's nomination for the same film) despite having far more screen time. This was likely due to Turner's star power at the time, and being the biggest name in the film.

to:

* Despite the film's title, ''Film/AllAboutEve'' is really about Bette Davis' Margo Channing character, with the titular Eve Harrington, played by Creator/AnneBaxter, having significantly less screen-time, with only a few key scenes told from her perspective. Baxter could have been submitted under Best Supporting Actress, but she campaigned for a Best Actress nomination instead since she believed she wouldn't have a shot in that category again (and she would ultimately be correct). Since both Davis and Baxter received Best Actress nominations (still the only time the category has seen two nominees for the same film), the vote was split. That, along with additional competition from Creator/GloriaSwanson (''Film/SunsetBoulevard''), is usually cited as the reason why Creator/JudyHolliday from ''Creator/BornYesterday'' won the Oscar, one of the most famous upsets in the award's history. In later years, Baxter came to regret not conceding to a Supporting Actress nomination, and Davis agreed. For what it's worth, the film did have two nominations in that category (for Creator/CelesteHolm and Creator/ThelmaRitter's performances), but they aren't as well-remembered, and it's usually agreed that Baxter would easily have won the category had she been nominated.
* Creator/LanaTurner was nominated for Best Actress for ''Film/PeytonPlace'' in 1957 (her only Oscar nomination ever), while Diane Varsi, who played her daughter and was the actual main character, received a Supporting Actress nomination (competing with Hope Lange's nomination for the same film) despite having far more screen time. This was likely due to Turner's star power at the time, and being the biggest name in the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Creator/LilyGladstone as Mollie Burkhart in ''Film/KillersOfTheFlowerMoon'' was singled out by critics as a standout performance after the film's debut, but since she only appears in barely more than a quarter of the film, initial buzz had her as a potential Best Supporting Actress nominee. Instead, [[Creator/{{Apple}} Apple Original Films]] and Creator/{{Paramount}} decided to submit Gladstone for Best Actress, largely on the basis that Mollie was both the film's largest female role, and the most significant member of the Osage Nation in the story, a decision that drew comparisons to the Michelle Williams situation mentioned above. Gladstone won two of the most of the most important Oscar precursors, the Golden Globe and the Screen Actors Guild award, and was rated as a slight favorite in a tight Oscar race with Creator/EmmaStone (for ''Film/PoorThings''), but Stone won, leading to commentary that Gladstone should've gone ahead and submitted for Best Supporting Actress after all.




* In another ''very'' iffy case, ''Film/GangsOfNewYork'' was submitted for, and ultimately nominated for, Best Original Screenplay, despite its very credits admitting it was based off the eponymously titled non-fiction novel by Herbert Asbury. On what grounds could it be considered "original", then? Well, according to writer Jay Cocks, "This is a world we conjured out of whole cloth, out of a whole lot of unassimilated historical research.” He said that Asbury’s book, which Cocks and Martin Scorcese discovered in the late ‘70s, served primarily as an introduction to the history of the draft riots depicted in the film, and that he borrowed only a few particularly pungent gang names (including the Dead Rabbits and the Plug Uglies), the sketchy outlines of two key characters (Bill the Butcher and Monk McGinn), and Asbury’s “great title” from the book. The rest, he says, was original, with guidance from about 50 historical sources. It's hard to tell how seriously to take that claim.

to:

* In another ''very'' iffy case, ''Film/GangsOfNewYork'' was submitted for, and ultimately nominated for, Best Original Screenplay, despite its very credits admitting it was based off the eponymously titled non-fiction novel by Herbert Asbury. On what grounds could it be considered "original", then? Well, according to writer Jay Cocks, "This is a world we conjured out of whole cloth, out of a whole lot of unassimilated historical research.” He said that Asbury’s book, which Cocks and Martin Scorcese Scorsese discovered in the late ‘70s, served primarily as an introduction to the history of the draft riots depicted in the film, and that he borrowed only a few particularly pungent gang names (including the Dead Rabbits and the Plug Uglies), the sketchy outlines of two key characters (Bill the Butcher and Monk McGinn), and Asbury’s “great title” from the book. The rest, he says, was original, with guidance from about 50 historical sources. It's hard to tell how seriously to take that claim.

Top