Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / ThomasTheTankEngine

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Maybe they just thought being a play site for the children might finally lighten up the miserable sod.

Added: 207

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This troper is under the impression that Bulstrode's brutal punishment was a result of his aggravating the freight cars and Percy, thus directly causing the accident.

to:

This **This troper is under the impression that Bulstrode's brutal punishment was a result of his aggravating the freight cars and Percy, thus directly causing the accident.accident.
* Episode continuity: In the US, why was "Thomas Comes to Breakfast" aired before "Toby the Tram Engine", "Donald and Douglas" and "The Deputation", since Toby, Donald and Douglas hadn't been introduced yet?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** [[FridgeBrilliance It was actually a building for engines or gear that wasn't used - so the barber bought it out and repurposed it into his shop.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
headscratchers is not to complaining


* This troper outright refuses to consider the new series canon on account of certain things he's seen in more recent episodes. One of the worst is "Fiery Flynn"'. Sure the moral of the story is okay (don't jump into situations you don't understand) but the "fire engine" we're supposed to be rooting for is a total idiot. For on thing, why would you have a fire engine that apparently cannot tell when an engine is on fire. In one episode he is told to help a "blue engine" and leaves before finding out which engine and where, but he ends up spraying ''three different'' engines and reacting with genuine shock when they pointed out they weren't on fire. Then when he finally found the engine who was burning, it ended up being a couple workmen who saved the day by pouring buckets of water on the fire (if they could do that why didn't they just do that to begin with?), then thanks the diesels who did ''absolutely nothing'' (it was their drivers who helped).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** He was able to answer Sir Topham Hatt's request to pulling a train however, suggesting he could talk, but was weak from lack of steam and unable to whistle back, so unlikely to be heard by the noisy engines passing by.



This troper is under the impression that Bulstrode's brutal punishment was a result of his aggravating the freight cars and Percy, thus directly causing the accident.

to:

This troper is under the impression that Bulstrode's brutal punishment was a result of his aggravating the freight cars and Percy, thus directly causing the accident.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n** What, like dual controls on a car? I see it as that engines can move and do things like whistle, but not braking as established in ''Thomas Comes To Breakfast'', but drivers can override the engines if necessary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**Oh, let's not forget "fatface"!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** How about Henry after he was bricked up in the tunnel? The narrative says he doesn't have the strength to answer any of the passing engines because his fire has gone out, yet he seems awake and alone with his thoughts. It seems like the locomotive version of ''locked in syndrome''!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** [[WesterbAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic You know there is ANOTHER show with a fanbase similar to this one]]. So there you go.

Added: 166

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why exactly was Bulstrode punished so harshly? According to Percy's driver the worst he ever did before the truck incident was just being whiny and annoying. And the truck incident was a lot more Percy's fault than Bulstrode's. Sure, Bulstrode was in the wrong place at the wrong time, but even if he wasn't directly below the dock, the result would've hardly been any better. In fact, if he hadn't been there, all the materials the trucks were carrying would have been lost, similar to Diesel's mishap with the trucks back in season 3. At least then, some of the materials could be salvaged. And going back to Percy, he's done a lot more damage (and would eventually do even more) including his misadventures involving crashing into some trucks in a siding, plunging into the tide, smashing a collection of fruit (the trucks didn't even have anything to do with that one), and smashing passenger's luggage among other things, and still gets merely scolded. Bulstrode gets plundered by trucks once? [[DisproportionateRetribution He gets towed to the beach and left there for life.]]

to:

* Why exactly was Bulstrode punished so harshly? According to Percy's driver the worst he ever did before the truck incident was just being whiny and annoying. And the truck incident was a lot more Percy's fault than Bulstrode's. Sure, Bulstrode was in the wrong place at the wrong time, but even if he wasn't directly below the dock, the result would've hardly been any better. In fact, if he hadn't been there, all the materials the trucks were carrying would have been lost, similar to Diesel's mishap with the trucks back in season 3. At least then, some of the materials could be salvaged. And going back to Percy, he's done a lot more damage (and would eventually do even more) including his misadventures involving crashing into some trucks in a siding, plunging into the tide, smashing a collection of fruit (the trucks didn't even have anything to do with that one), and smashing passenger's luggage among other things, and still gets merely scolded. Bulstrode gets plundered by trucks once? [[DisproportionateRetribution He gets towed to the beach and left there for life.]]]]
This troper is under the impression that Bulstrode's brutal punishment was a result of his aggravating the freight cars and Percy, thus directly causing the accident.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Very true on Duke's case, but there are two things I must point out. His interns, Falcon/Sir Handel and Stuart/Peter Sam. In the books, it takes them forever just to speak up about him. What was going on? If they missed him so much, why didn't they mention him to Skarloey when they first got there? (Rheanes, Rusty and Duncan came later.) Duke could have been found years before and overhauled no problem.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why was Percy even allowed to go to the quarry in Toby's place in "Percy's Predicament"? After all, the whole reason that the Fat Controller bought Toby was because it's illegal for engines without cowcatchers and sideplates to travel on the quarry tramway, and Percy doesn't have either.

to:

* Why was Percy even allowed to go to the quarry in Toby's place in "Percy's Predicament"? After all, the whole reason that the Fat Controller bought Toby was because it's illegal for engines without cowcatchers and sideplates to travel on the quarry tramway, and Percy doesn't have either.either.
* Why exactly was Bulstrode punished so harshly? According to Percy's driver the worst he ever did before the truck incident was just being whiny and annoying. And the truck incident was a lot more Percy's fault than Bulstrode's. Sure, Bulstrode was in the wrong place at the wrong time, but even if he wasn't directly below the dock, the result would've hardly been any better. In fact, if he hadn't been there, all the materials the trucks were carrying would have been lost, similar to Diesel's mishap with the trucks back in season 3. At least then, some of the materials could be salvaged. And going back to Percy, he's done a lot more damage (and would eventually do even more) including his misadventures involving crashing into some trucks in a siding, plunging into the tide, smashing a collection of fruit (the trucks didn't even have anything to do with that one), and smashing passenger's luggage among other things, and still gets merely scolded. Bulstrode gets plundered by trucks once? [[DisproportionateRetribution He gets towed to the beach and left there for life.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Sodor is a DysfunctionJunction. Really, the number of engines who ''don't'' have a personality issue of some kind can be counted on one hand.

to:

** Sodor is a DysfunctionJunction. Really, the number of engines who ''don't'' have a personality issue of some kind can be counted on one hand.hand.
* Why was Percy even allowed to go to the quarry in Toby's place in "Percy's Predicament"? After all, the whole reason that the Fat Controller bought Toby was because it's illegal for engines without cowcatchers and sideplates to travel on the quarry tramway, and Percy doesn't have either.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Quoting from the Wikia regarding Godred's RealLife counterpart, L.A.D.A.S:
-->"Once [L.A.D.A.S] rolled down the mountain, it was a [[http://ttte.wikia.com/wiki/File:CrashedLADAS.png complete wreck with only the pistons, motion, frames and wheels still intact]]. [[YouHaveOutlivedYourUsefulness It was beyond repair]], so it was scrapped."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Errr

Added DiffLines:

"Brakevan"
* How can the spiteful brakevan take a dislike to only Douglas? And not Donald? They are identical twins!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** My theory is that with enough effort, engines can defy their crew as long as their "power" is on. Perhaps they made up an excuse and ran off while their crew weren't looking. Also more engines being scrapped means more metal to be recycled, which to everyone else but the engine in question is a good thing.



* Why are the engines such assholes to each other? Maybe it's just a British thing, but it seems like for a toddler story, the characters are remarkably rude to each other, often for no real reason. Standouts include Gordon saying Edward should "give up and be preserved" and James calling Toby and Henrietta "dirty objects." Maybe it's a reflection of how cruel children can be to one another?

to:

* Why are the engines such assholes to each other? Maybe it's just a British thing, but it seems like for a toddler story, the characters are remarkably rude to each other, often for no real reason. Standouts include Gordon saying Edward should "give up and be preserved" and James calling Toby and Henrietta "dirty objects." Maybe it's a reflection of how cruel children can be to one another?another?
** Sodor is a DysfunctionJunction. Really, the number of engines who ''don't'' have a personality issue of some kind can be counted on one hand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Most stories involving an accident have the accident caused by hubris or carelessness by the engines or what have you. The Runaway doesn't seem to have any of that. Thomas is sick, he goes to get mended, Duck takes over in his absence, Thomas' brakes were adjusted, and a replacement workman forgets to set the adjusted brakes properly, causing Thomas to run away, who is saved by Harold. Maybe in the original book the story made more sense, but this episode has always felt quite bizarre, smacking of RandomEventsPlot.

to:

* Most stories involving an accident have the accident caused by hubris or carelessness by the engines or what have you. The Runaway doesn't seem to have any of that. Thomas is sick, he goes to get mended, Duck takes over in his absence, Thomas' brakes were adjusted, and a replacement workman forgets to set the adjusted brakes properly, causing Thomas to run away, who is saved by Harold. Maybe in the original book the story made more sense, but this episode has always felt quite bizarre, smacking of RandomEventsPlot.RandomEventsPlot.
* Why are the engines such assholes to each other? Maybe it's just a British thing, but it seems like for a toddler story, the characters are remarkably rude to each other, often for no real reason. Standouts include Gordon saying Edward should "give up and be preserved" and James calling Toby and Henrietta "dirty objects." Maybe it's a reflection of how cruel children can be to one another?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* We frequently see a lot of diesels plotting against the steam engines, and in one or two cases actively ''trying to murder them'', like when 'Arry and Bert were trying to kill Stephney. However it is clearly shown that engines on Sodor require people to operate them, so to what extent are the drivers in on it? Are the drivers actually steamophobes themselves and fully supporting the diesels (which is actually a somewhat creepy and not totally implausible explanation) or do they just go along with what the engine wants?

to:

* We frequently see a lot of diesels plotting against the steam engines, and in one or two cases actively ''trying to murder them'', like when 'Arry and Bert were trying to kill Stephney. However it is clearly shown that engines on Sodor require people to operate them, so to what extent are the drivers in on it? Are the drivers actually steamophobes themselves and fully supporting the diesels (which is actually a somewhat creepy and not totally implausible explanation) or do they just go along with what the engine wants?wants?
* Most stories involving an accident have the accident caused by hubris or carelessness by the engines or what have you. The Runaway doesn't seem to have any of that. Thomas is sick, he goes to get mended, Duck takes over in his absence, Thomas' brakes were adjusted, and a replacement workman forgets to set the adjusted brakes properly, causing Thomas to run away, who is saved by Harold. Maybe in the original book the story made more sense, but this episode has always felt quite bizarre, smacking of RandomEventsPlot.

Added: 112

Changed: 835

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** If you want the Doylist explanation, in the first story in which he appeared, he was just a fat director - a pompous character to act as a figurehead for the passengers. By the final story in that book, he had become "the Fat Director," a specific character who could be kind as well as authoritative. The railways of Britain were Nationalised when the third book came out, and therefore there were no directors on the railway any more. Obviously the Fat Director had become established as the de facto authority figure in the stories and Rev W. Awdry didn't want to lose that, so he became Controller of the North Western Region of British Railways (which only consisted of Sodor and one town on the Mainland). The name Sir Topham Hatt came later, as did the Thin Controller and Small Controller (who is bigger than the other two).


Added DiffLines:

** It wasn't specifically a track for runaway trains. In the normal scheme of things, it would just be a siding.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I figured that the engines can be awake when cold, but not fully. It's like the difference between lying awake in bed and actually getting out of bed and starting the day.


Added DiffLines:

** And in the current series, the writing and animation are actually pretty good.


Added DiffLines:

*** The technology to build an underwater tunnel is OlderThanTheyThink. The Thames tunnel, which became part of the LondonUnderground, was built in 1843. Long before that, miners were digging tunnels out under the seabed. Plans for a Channel tunnel were first devised in the 18th century. The real question about the Misty Island tunnel is, why? Misty Island appears to be largely uninhabited, with the sole industry being logging. Traffic is nowhere near enough to justify such an expensive investment, which is presumably why the tunnel was abandoned.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**Keep in mind that, in the books, there was also a Thin Controller. It was probably easier to refer to him by the name "the Fat Controller" to show the contrast between the two.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
New question.

Added DiffLines:

****Where does the fact that Henry uses coal imported from somewhere else than Sodor tie into this theory?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** The Thomas comics (which for some reason include ''Railway Series'' characters that never appeared in the show) took a middle path, Godred is real, [[SparedByTheAdaptation but still a live and functioning engine]], meaning likely had the crash, but was in repairable state and learned from his mistakes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** The Thomas comics (which for some reason include ''Railway Series'' characters that never appeared in the show) took a middle path, Godred is real, [[SparedByTheAdaptation but still a live and functioning engine]], meaning likely had the crash, but was in repairable state and learned from his mistakes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Speaking of Godred, it's worth nothing his crash is a rare case of a GoryDiscretionShot, with only a panel showing the passengers and crew looking aghast at the supposed smoking mess below. Given the state some engines were visibly depicted as in the books, whatever happened to Godred [[FridgeHorror must have been a pretty awful sight]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The biggest headscratcher I feel there is with Misty Island Rescue is that it '''promotes bullying.''' Early on in the film, Diesel suggests that he could take the train of jobi logs to the Search and Rescue Centre. Thomas, however, says that Diesel cannot take the train because Diesel is not a steam engine. (Something along the lines of "No, Diesel. I'm sure the Fat Controller meant that he wanted a really useful ''steamie'' to do the job."). Diesel tries to prove himself by delivering the logs. When Thomas spots diesel doing this, he chases after him, resulting in Diesel trying to run away from Thomas. This leads up to Thomas chasing Diesel to a dead end at an unfinished bridge, resulting in the jobi logs and the flatbeds toppling off of the edge and into the sea. Note that had Thomas not been what was effectively racist to Diesel, Diesel may not have tried to take the train of logs in order to prove his worth. Even then, had Thomas not chased after Diesel, it's likely that Diesel would have delivered the jobi logs safely. Following this, the Fat Controller praises Thomas for his actions. The Fat Controller is not remotely cross with Thomas for a) undermining diesel engines. (Imagine if, say, Mavis, BoCo or Daisy was in Diesel's role?) and b) Chasing after Diesel for no good reason, and being responsible for the loss of the jobi wood. (If Thomas wasn't chasing Diesel, Diesel would have been going slowly enough to stop and back up, though I'm not entirely sure why the track was set to the unfinished bridge anyway).

to:

** The biggest headscratcher I feel there is with Misty Island Rescue is that it '''promotes bullying.''' Early on in the film, Diesel suggests that he could take the train of jobi logs to the Search and Rescue Centre. Thomas, however, says that Diesel cannot take the train because Diesel is not a steam engine. (Something along the lines of "No, Diesel. I'm sure the Fat Controller meant that he wanted a really useful ''steamie'' to do the job."). Diesel tries to prove himself by delivering the logs. When Thomas spots diesel doing this, he chases after him, resulting in Diesel trying to run away from Thomas. This leads up to Thomas chasing Diesel to a dead end at an unfinished bridge, resulting in the jobi logs and the flatbeds toppling off of the edge and into the sea. Note that had Thomas not been what was effectively racist to Diesel, Diesel may not have tried to take the train of logs in order to prove his worth. Even then, had Thomas not chased after Diesel, it's likely that Diesel would have delivered the jobi logs safely. Following this, the Fat Controller praises Thomas for his actions. The Fat Controller is not remotely cross with Thomas for a) undermining diesel engines. (Imagine if, say, Mavis, BoCo [=BoCo=] or Daisy was in Diesel's role?) and b) Chasing after Diesel for no good reason, and being responsible for the loss of the jobi wood. (If Thomas wasn't chasing Diesel, Diesel would have been going slowly enough to stop and back up, though I'm not entirely sure why the track was set to the unfinished bridge anyway).

Added: 1122

Changed: 2941

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The biggest headscratcher I feel there is with Misty Island Rescue is that it '''promotes bullying.''' Early on in the film, Diesel suggests that he could take the train of jobi logs to the Search and Rescue Centre. Thomas, however, says that Diesel cannot take the train because Diesel is not a steam engine. (Something along the lines of "No, Diesel. I'm sure the Fat Controller meant that he wanted a really useful ''steamie'' to do the job."). Diesel tries to prove himself by delivering the logs. When Thomas spots diesel doing this, he chases after him, resulting in Diesel trying to run away from Thomas. This leads up to Thomas chasing Diesel to a dead end at an unfinished bridge, resulting in the jobi logs and the flatbeds toppling off of the edge and into the sea. Note that had Thomas not been what was effectively racist to Diesel, Diesel may not have tried to take the train of logs in order to prove his worth. Even then, had Thomas not chased after Diesel, it's likely that Diesel would have delivered the jobi logs safely. Following this, the Fat Controller praises Thomas for his actions. The Fat Controller is not remotely cross with Thomas for a) undermining diesel engines. (Imagine if, say, Mavis, BoCo or Daisy was in Diesel's role?) and b) Chasing after Diesel for no good reason, and being responsible for the loss of the jobi wood. (If Thomas wasn't chasing Diesel, Diesel would have been going slowly enough to stop and back up, though I'm not entirely sure why the track was set to the unfinished bridge anyway). Later, when Thomas is on Misty Island, he doesn't ask Bash Dash and Ferdinand for help right away because they're different. He later does seek help from them, not because he feels it's necessarily the right thing to do, but because there is no one else to ask. The logging locos get a kick out of watching an old, dysfunctional crane, throwing logs about, most of which end up hitting Thomas. This behaviour is not amended. A little further on, Bash, Dash and Ferdinand encourage Thomas to try and cross the shake shake bridge, a bridge which is falling apart and very clearly unsafe. Thomas hesitates at first, but the logging locos keep on pressurising him until he gives in and crosses the bridge, to which he responds with "Maybe I was wrong to say no." Basically, Thomas was bullied into doing something highly dangerous just for the hell of it. Thomas the Tank Engine & Friends, despite having universal appeal, has always been a show for young children, who are impressionable. Misty Island Rescue showcased a turning point in the series, where it got to the point where the writing was so poor that it was, quite frankly, unfit for young children. The film showcased racism, performing dangerous stunts and throwing heavy objects around just for fun, all in a positive light. Neither Thomas nor anyone else learns from their mistakes in the film, and in some cases they are praised for them. And throughout the film, we have cheesy, repetitive, alliterative dialogue to listen to (which is not good for children that are just starting to learn to talk). Picture a human child playing the role of Thomas in the film, having heavy logs slung at him and being bullied into crossing an unsafe bridge. Thankfully, Series 17 has undone most of the damage that this film injected into the series. To me, that's the main headscratcher regarding Misty Island Rescue. How could such a child-unfriendly film intended for preschool audiences have possibly been greenlit?

to:

** The biggest headscratcher I feel there is with Misty Island Rescue is that it '''promotes bullying.''' Early on in the film, Diesel suggests that he could take the train of jobi logs to the Search and Rescue Centre. Thomas, however, says that Diesel cannot take the train because Diesel is not a steam engine. (Something along the lines of "No, Diesel. I'm sure the Fat Controller meant that he wanted a really useful ''steamie'' to do the job."). Diesel tries to prove himself by delivering the logs. When Thomas spots diesel doing this, he chases after him, resulting in Diesel trying to run away from Thomas. This leads up to Thomas chasing Diesel to a dead end at an unfinished bridge, resulting in the jobi logs and the flatbeds toppling off of the edge and into the sea. Note that had Thomas not been what was effectively racist to Diesel, Diesel may not have tried to take the train of logs in order to prove his worth. Even then, had Thomas not chased after Diesel, it's likely that Diesel would have delivered the jobi logs safely. Following this, the Fat Controller praises Thomas for his actions. The Fat Controller is not remotely cross with Thomas for a) undermining diesel engines. (Imagine if, say, Mavis, BoCo or Daisy was in Diesel's role?) and b) Chasing after Diesel for no good reason, and being responsible for the loss of the jobi wood. (If Thomas wasn't chasing Diesel, Diesel would have been going slowly enough to stop and back up, though I'm not entirely sure why the track was set to the unfinished bridge anyway). Later,
***Later,
when Thomas is on Misty Island, he doesn't ask Bash Dash and Ferdinand for help right away because they're different. He later does seek help from them, not because he feels it's necessarily the right thing to do, but because there is no one else to ask. The logging locos get a kick out of watching an old, dysfunctional crane, throwing logs about, most of which end up hitting Thomas. This behaviour is not amended. A little further on, Bash, Dash and Ferdinand encourage Thomas to try and cross the shake shake bridge, a bridge which is falling apart and very clearly unsafe. Thomas hesitates at first, but the logging locos keep on pressurising him until he gives in and crosses the bridge, to which he responds with "Maybe I was wrong to say no." Basically, Thomas was bullied into doing something highly dangerous just for the hell of it. Thomas

***Thomas
the Tank Engine & Friends, despite having universal appeal, has always been a show for young children, who are impressionable. Misty Island Rescue showcased a turning point in the series, where it got to the point where the writing was so poor that it was, quite frankly, unfit for young children. The film showcased racism, performing dangerous stunts and throwing heavy objects around just for fun, all in a positive light. Neither Thomas nor anyone else learns from their mistakes in the film, and in some cases they are praised for them. And throughout the film, we have cheesy, repetitive, alliterative dialogue to listen to (which is not good for children that are just starting to learn to talk). Picture a human child playing the role of Thomas in the film, having heavy logs slung at him and being bullied into crossing an unsafe bridge. Thankfully,

***Thankfully,
Series 17 has undone most of the damage that this film injected into the series. To series.

***To
me, that's the main headscratcher regarding Misty Island Rescue. How could such a child-unfriendly film intended for preschool audiences have possibly been greenlit?

Changed: 2001

Removed: 1983

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The biggest issue with Misty Island Rescue is that it '''promotes bullying.''' Early on in the film, Diesel suggests that he could take the train of jobi logs to the Search and Rescue Centre. Thomas, however, says that Diesel cannot take the train because Diesel is not a steam engine. (Something along the lines of "No, Diesel. I'm sure the Fat Controller meant that he wanted a really useful ''steamie'' to do the job."). Diesel tries to prove himself by delivering the logs. When Thomas spots diesel doing this, he chases after him, resulting in Diesel trying to run away from Thomas. This leads up to Thomas chasing Diesel to a dead end at an unfinished bridge, resulting in the jobi logs and the flatbeds toppling off of the edge and into the sea. Note that had Thomas not been what was effectively racist to Diesel, Diesel may not have tried to take the train of logs in order to prove his worth. Even then, had Thomas not chased after Diesel, it's likely that Diesel would have delivered the jobi logs safely. Following this, the Fat Controller praises Thomas for his actions. The Fat Controller is not remotely cross with Thomas for a) undermining diesel engines. (Imagine if, say, Mavis, BoCo or Daisy was in Diesel's role?) and b) Chasing after Diesel for no good reason, and being responsible for the loss of the jobi wood. (If Thomas wasn't chasing Diesel, Diesel would have been going slowly enough to stop and back up, though I'm not entirely sure why the track was set to the infinished bridge anyway)

*** Later, when Thomas is on Misty Island, he doesn't ask Bash Dash and Ferdinand for help right away because they're different. He later does seek help from them, not because he feels it's necessarily the right thing to do, but because there is no one else to ask. The logging locos get a kick out of watching an old, dysfunctional crane, throwing logs about, most of which end up hitting Thomas. This behaviour is not amended.

*** A little further on, Bash, Dash and Ferdinand encourage Thomas to try and cross the shake shake bridge, a bridge which is falling apart and very clearly unsafe. Thomas hesitates at first, but the logging locos keep on pressurising him until he gives in and crosses the bridge, to which he responds with "Maybe I was wrong to say no." Basically, Thomas was bullied into doing something highly dangerous just for the hell of it.

*** Thomas the Tank Engine & Friends, despite having universal appeal, has always been a show for young children, who are impressionable. Misty Island Rescue showcased a turning point in the series, where it got to the point where the writing was so poor that it was, quite frankly, unfit for young children. The film showcased racism, performing dangerous stunts and throwing heavy objects around just for fun, all in a positive light. Neither Thomas nor anyone else learns from their mistakes in the film, and in some cases they are praised for them. And throughout the film, we have cheesy, repetitive, alliterative dialogue to listen to (which is not good for children that are just starting to learn to talk). Picture a human child playing the role of Thomas in the film, having heavy logs slung at him and being bullied into crossing an unsafe bridge.

*** Thankfully, Series 17 has undone most of the damage that this film injected into the series.

*** To me, that's the main headscratcher regarding Misty Island Rescue. How could such a child-unfriendly film intended for preschool audiences have possibly been greenlit?

to:

** The biggest issue headscratcher I feel there is with Misty Island Rescue is that it '''promotes bullying.''' Early on in the film, Diesel suggests that he could take the train of jobi logs to the Search and Rescue Centre. Thomas, however, says that Diesel cannot take the train because Diesel is not a steam engine. (Something along the lines of "No, Diesel. I'm sure the Fat Controller meant that he wanted a really useful ''steamie'' to do the job."). Diesel tries to prove himself by delivering the logs. When Thomas spots diesel doing this, he chases after him, resulting in Diesel trying to run away from Thomas. This leads up to Thomas chasing Diesel to a dead end at an unfinished bridge, resulting in the jobi logs and the flatbeds toppling off of the edge and into the sea. Note that had Thomas not been what was effectively racist to Diesel, Diesel may not have tried to take the train of logs in order to prove his worth. Even then, had Thomas not chased after Diesel, it's likely that Diesel would have delivered the jobi logs safely. Following this, the Fat Controller praises Thomas for his actions. The Fat Controller is not remotely cross with Thomas for a) undermining diesel engines. (Imagine if, say, Mavis, BoCo or Daisy was in Diesel's role?) and b) Chasing after Diesel for no good reason, and being responsible for the loss of the jobi wood. (If Thomas wasn't chasing Diesel, Diesel would have been going slowly enough to stop and back up, though I'm not entirely sure why the track was set to the infinished unfinished bridge anyway)

***
anyway). Later, when Thomas is on Misty Island, he doesn't ask Bash Dash and Ferdinand for help right away because they're different. He later does seek help from them, not because he feels it's necessarily the right thing to do, but because there is no one else to ask. The logging locos get a kick out of watching an old, dysfunctional crane, throwing logs about, most of which end up hitting Thomas. This behaviour is not amended.

***
amended. A little further on, Bash, Dash and Ferdinand encourage Thomas to try and cross the shake shake bridge, a bridge which is falling apart and very clearly unsafe. Thomas hesitates at first, but the logging locos keep on pressurising him until he gives in and crosses the bridge, to which he responds with "Maybe I was wrong to say no." Basically, Thomas was bullied into doing something highly dangerous just for the hell of it. \n\n*** Thomas the Tank Engine & Friends, despite having universal appeal, has always been a show for young children, who are impressionable. Misty Island Rescue showcased a turning point in the series, where it got to the point where the writing was so poor that it was, quite frankly, unfit for young children. The film showcased racism, performing dangerous stunts and throwing heavy objects around just for fun, all in a positive light. Neither Thomas nor anyone else learns from their mistakes in the film, and in some cases they are praised for them. And throughout the film, we have cheesy, repetitive, alliterative dialogue to listen to (which is not good for children that are just starting to learn to talk). Picture a human child playing the role of Thomas in the film, having heavy logs slung at him and being bullied into crossing an unsafe bridge. \n\n*** Thankfully, Series 17 has undone most of the damage that this film injected into the series.

***
series. To me, that's the main headscratcher regarding Misty Island Rescue. How could such a child-unfriendly film intended for preschool audiences have possibly been greenlit?

Changed: 3611

Removed: 260

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The biggest issue with Misty Island Rescue is that it '''promotes bullying.''' Early on in the film, Diesel suggests that he could take the train of jobi logs to the Search and Rescue Centre. Thomas, however, says that Diesel cannot take the train because Diesel is not a steam engine. (Something along the lines of "No, Diesel. I'm sure the Fat Controller meant that he wanted a really useful ''steamie'' to do the job."). Diesel tries to prove himself by delivering the logs. When Thomas spots diesel doing this, he chases after him, resulting in Diesel trying to run away from Thomas. This leads up to Thomas chasing Diesel to a dead end at an unfinished bridge, resulting in the jobi logs and the flatbeds toppling off of the edge and into the sea. Note that had Thomas not been what was effectively racist to Diesel, Diesel may not have tried to take the train of logs in order to prove his worth. Even then, had Thomas not chased after Diesel, it's likely that Diesel would have delivered the jobi logs safely. Following this, the Fat Controller praises Thomas for his actions. The Fat Controller is not remotely cross with Thomas for

a) undermining diesel engines. (Imagine if, say, Mavis, BoCo or Daisy was in Diesel's role?)

b) Chasing after Diesel for no good reason, and being responsible for the loss of the jobi wood. (If Thomas wasn't chasing Diesel, Diesel would have been going slowly enough to stop and back up, though I'm not entirely sure why the track was set to the infinished bridge anyway)

Later, when Thomas is on Misty Island, he doesn't ask Bash Dash and Ferdinand for help right away because they're different. He later does seek help from them, not because he feels it's necessarily the right thing to do, but because there is no one else to ask. The logging locos get a kick out of watching an old, dysfunctional crane, throwing logs about, most of which end up hitting Thomas. This behaviour is not amended.

A little further on, Bash, Dash and Ferdinand encourage Thomas to try and cross the shake shake bridge, a bridge which is falling apart and very clearly unsafe. Thomas hesitates at first, but the logging locos keep on pressurising him until he gives in and crosses the bridge, to which he responds with "Maybe I was wrong to say no." Basically, Thomas was bullied into doing something highly dangerous just for the hell of it.

Thomas the Tank Engine & Friends, despite having universal appeal, has always been a show for young children, who are impressionable. Misty Island Rescue showcased a turning point in the series, where it got to the point where the writing was so poor that it was, quite frankly, unfit for young children. The film showcased racism, performing dangerous stunts and throwing heavy objects around just for fun, all in a positive light. Neither Thomas nor anyone else learns from their mistakes in the film, and in some cases they are praised for them. And throughout the film, we have cheesy, repetitive, alliterative dialogue to listen to (which is not good for children that are just starting to learn to talk). Picture a human child playing the role of Thomas in the film, having heavy logs slung at him and being bullied into crossing an unsafe bridge.

Thankfully, Series 17 has undone most of the damage that this film injected into the series.

To me, that's the main headscratcher regarding Misty Island Rescue. How could such a child-unfriendly film intended for preschool audiences have possibly been greenlit?

to:

** The biggest issue with Misty Island Rescue is that it '''promotes bullying.''' Early on in the film, Diesel suggests that he could take the train of jobi logs to the Search and Rescue Centre. Thomas, however, says that Diesel cannot take the train because Diesel is not a steam engine. (Something along the lines of "No, Diesel. I'm sure the Fat Controller meant that he wanted a really useful ''steamie'' to do the job."). Diesel tries to prove himself by delivering the logs. When Thomas spots diesel doing this, he chases after him, resulting in Diesel trying to run away from Thomas. This leads up to Thomas chasing Diesel to a dead end at an unfinished bridge, resulting in the jobi logs and the flatbeds toppling off of the edge and into the sea. Note that had Thomas not been what was effectively racist to Diesel, Diesel may not have tried to take the train of logs in order to prove his worth. Even then, had Thomas not chased after Diesel, it's likely that Diesel would have delivered the jobi logs safely. Following this, the Fat Controller praises Thomas for his actions. The Fat Controller is not remotely cross with Thomas for

for a) undermining diesel engines. (Imagine if, say, Mavis, BoCo or Daisy was in Diesel's role?)

role?) and b) Chasing after Diesel for no good reason, and being responsible for the loss of the jobi wood. (If Thomas wasn't chasing Diesel, Diesel would have been going slowly enough to stop and back up, though I'm not entirely sure why the track was set to the infinished bridge anyway)

Later, ***Later, when Thomas is on Misty Island, he doesn't ask Bash Dash and Ferdinand for help right away because they're different. He later does seek help from them, not because he feels it's necessarily the right thing to do, but because there is no one else to ask. The logging locos get a kick out of watching an old, dysfunctional crane, throwing logs about, most of which end up hitting Thomas. This behaviour is not amended.

A ***A little further on, Bash, Dash and Ferdinand encourage Thomas to try and cross the shake shake bridge, a bridge which is falling apart and very clearly unsafe. Thomas hesitates at first, but the logging locos keep on pressurising him until he gives in and crosses the bridge, to which he responds with "Maybe I was wrong to say no." Basically, Thomas was bullied into doing something highly dangerous just for the hell of it.

Thomas ***Thomas the Tank Engine & Friends, despite having universal appeal, has always been a show for young children, who are impressionable. Misty Island Rescue showcased a turning point in the series, where it got to the point where the writing was so poor that it was, quite frankly, unfit for young children. The film showcased racism, performing dangerous stunts and throwing heavy objects around just for fun, all in a positive light. Neither Thomas nor anyone else learns from their mistakes in the film, and in some cases they are praised for them. And throughout the film, we have cheesy, repetitive, alliterative dialogue to listen to (which is not good for children that are just starting to learn to talk). Picture a human child playing the role of Thomas in the film, having heavy logs slung at him and being bullied into crossing an unsafe bridge.

Thankfully, ***Thankfully, Series 17 has undone most of the damage that this film injected into the series.

To ***To me, that's the main headscratcher regarding Misty Island Rescue. How could such a child-unfriendly film intended for preschool audiences have possibly been greenlit?

Top