Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing ROCEJ sinkhole as part of cleanup
.
.Changed line(s) 45 (click to see context) from:
** He adds Anita Sarkeesian's new mess to his 2013 controversies. [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment And that is all I'll say on the subject.]]
to:
** He adds Anita Sarkeesian's new mess to his 2013 controversies. [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment And that is all I'll say on the subject.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 48,49 (click to see context) from:
* Do all of Joe's topics in his Gaming Controversies list really qualify as a controversies? They all sound like high profile news events with bringing up; but some of them like company going under, launch failures, the rise in swatting in 2014 don't sound controversial. Calling them "controversies" implies that people defend them. Those just sound like events that spark anger.
* So, I’m sure this is baseless conjecture, but I’ve noticed the both OJ and Alex (OJ especially) tend to look pretty uncomfortable around Joe in the non-scripted videos and the livestream clips, mainly when Joe’s ranting. I know that we have no clue what’s going on inside their heads, and I personally have no clue how strong the trio’s friendship is; but why do the two of them stick around when Joe seems to be a bit of a dick to them?
* So, I’m sure this is baseless conjecture, but I’ve noticed the both OJ and Alex (OJ especially) tend to look pretty uncomfortable around Joe in the non-scripted videos and the livestream clips, mainly when Joe’s ranting. I know that we have no clue what’s going on inside their heads, and I personally have no clue how strong the trio’s friendship is; but why do the two of them stick around when Joe seems to be a bit of a dick to them?
to:
* Do all of Joe's topics in his Gaming Controversies list really qualify as a controversies? They all sound like high profile news events with bringing up; but some of them like company going under, launch failures, the rise in swatting in 2014 don't sound controversial. Calling them "controversies" implies that people defend them. Those just sound like events that spark anger.
* So, I’m sure this is baseless conjecture, but I’ve noticed the both OJ and Alex (OJ especially) tend to look pretty uncomfortable around Joe in the non-scripted videos and the livestream clips, mainly when Joe’s ranting. I know that we have no clue what’s going on inside their heads, and I personally have no clue how strong the trio’s friendship is; but why do the two of them stick around when Joe seems to be a bit of a dick to them?anger.
* So, I’m sure this is baseless conjecture, but I’ve noticed the both OJ and Alex (OJ especially) tend to look pretty uncomfortable around Joe in the non-scripted videos and the livestream clips, mainly when Joe’s ranting. I know that we have no clue what’s going on inside their heads, and I personally have no clue how strong the trio’s friendship is; but why do the two of them stick around when Joe seems to be a bit of a dick to them?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
* Do all of Joe's topics in his Gaming Controversies list really qualify as a controversies? They all sound like high profile news events with bringing up; but some of them like company going under, launch failures, the rise in swatting in 2014 don't sound controversial. Calling them "controversies" implies that people defend them. Those just sound like events that spark anger.
to:
* Do all of Joe's topics in his Gaming Controversies list really qualify as a controversies? They all sound like high profile news events with bringing up; but some of them like company going under, launch failures, the rise in swatting in 2014 don't sound controversial. Calling them "controversies" implies that people defend them. Those just sound like events that spark anger.anger.
* So, I’m sure this is baseless conjecture, but I’ve noticed the both OJ and Alex (OJ especially) tend to look pretty uncomfortable around Joe in the non-scripted videos and the livestream clips, mainly when Joe’s ranting. I know that we have no clue what’s going on inside their heads, and I personally have no clue how strong the trio’s friendship is; but why do the two of them stick around when Joe seems to be a bit of a dick to them?
* So, I’m sure this is baseless conjecture, but I’ve noticed the both OJ and Alex (OJ especially) tend to look pretty uncomfortable around Joe in the non-scripted videos and the livestream clips, mainly when Joe’s ranting. I know that we have no clue what’s going on inside their heads, and I personally have no clue how strong the trio’s friendship is; but why do the two of them stick around when Joe seems to be a bit of a dick to them?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
** He adds Anita Sarkeesian's new mess to his 2013 controversies. [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment And that is all I'll say on the subject.]]
to:
** He adds Anita Sarkeesian's new mess to his 2013 controversies. [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment And that is all I'll say on the subject.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 43 (click to see context) from:
*** Well, he did spend ten minutes or so in his 'Top 10 Controversies of 2013' discussing this very issue. Worth a look, and what he had to say earns a place in the CrowningMomentOfAwesome secton.
to:
*** Well, he did spend ten minutes or so in his 'Top 10 Controversies of 2013' discussing this very issue. Worth a look, and what he had to say earns a place in the CrowningMomentOfAwesome SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome secton.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 38 (click to see context) from:
* If Corporate Commander is supposed to represent ExecutiveMeddling and MoneyDearBoy, then what is the [[InspectorGadget Doctor Claw]][[{{Expy}} -esque Overlord]] supposed to be?
to:
* If Corporate Commander is supposed to represent ExecutiveMeddling and MoneyDearBoy, then what is the [[InspectorGadget [[WesternAnimation/InspectorGadget Doctor Claw]][[{{Expy}} -esque Overlord]] supposed to be?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 46 (click to see context) from:
** The single player aspect is a big selling point for him, but he does take a look at the multiplayer games (or multiplayer aspects of games that have single-player modes) - he's even reviewed some games that are pretty much mostly (if not all) multiplayer, such as [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9aMpjYFaTk&t=21s Overwatch]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkFP1cKZaec Battleborn]], and he also did [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvFRVOV469Y a rant]] on Activision's decision to split the Userbase of ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyInfiniteWarfare''.
to:
** The single player aspect is a big selling point for him, but he does take a look at the multiplayer games (or multiplayer aspects of games that have single-player modes) - he's even reviewed some games that are pretty much mostly (if not all) multiplayer, such as [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9aMpjYFaTk&t=21s Overwatch]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkFP1cKZaec Battleborn]], and he also did [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvFRVOV469Y a rant]] on Activision's decision to split the Userbase of ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyInfiniteWarfare''.''VideoGame/CallOfDutyInfiniteWarfare''.
* Do all of Joe's topics in his Gaming Controversies list really qualify as a controversies? They all sound like high profile news events with bringing up; but some of them like company going under, launch failures, the rise in swatting in 2014 don't sound controversial. Calling them "controversies" implies that people defend them. Those just sound like events that spark anger.
* Do all of Joe's topics in his Gaming Controversies list really qualify as a controversies? They all sound like high profile news events with bringing up; but some of them like company going under, launch failures, the rise in swatting in 2014 don't sound controversial. Calling them "controversies" implies that people defend them. Those just sound like events that spark anger.
