Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Tenet

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** That's the movie timeline. The timeline the previous response is arguing with is the original bullet point in this section, not the original movie.
Tabs MOD

Changed: 17

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
dewicking disambiguation page


** Do you remember the scene where Sator flees Ives and his men into the turnstyle and seems to disappear? The Protagonist asks where he went and Ives answers "into the past." If something enter a turnstyle they seem to disappear from the point of view of other people going forward in time, and [[JustForPun inversely]] if they enter the turnstyle while inverted, they seem to spring from nothing just like the Protagonist suddenly appeared to Neil and his older self in the Freeport. So, if someone were to put a rock in a turnstyle without going to they'd see the future version of the rock on the other side of the proving window when they arrive and it falling inside the turnstyle as they put it in and then it would seem to disappear.

to:

** Do you remember the scene where Sator flees Ives and his men into the turnstyle and seems to disappear? The Protagonist asks where he went and Ives answers "into the past." If something enter a turnstyle they seem to disappear from the point of view of other people going forward in time, and [[JustForPun inversely]] 'inversely' if they enter the turnstyle while inverted, they seem to spring from nothing just like the Protagonist suddenly appeared to Neil and his older self in the Freeport. So, if someone were to put a rock in a turnstyle without going to they'd see the future version of the rock on the other side of the proving window when they arrive and it falling inside the turnstyle as they put it in and then it would seem to disappear.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's a rather interesting theory that [[spoiler:Neil is actually Kat's son. If that's the case, then The Protagonist could have watched over the boy as he grew up, befriended him once he was old enough, and formally recruited him into TENET when he was ready.]]

to:

** There's a rather interesting theory that [[spoiler:Neil Neil is actually Kat's son. If that's the case, then The Protagonist could have watched over the boy as he grew up, befriended him once he was old enough, and formally recruited him into TENET when he was ready.]]



[[folder: Where do inverted objects spacially go?]]

to:

[[folder: Where [[folder:Where do inverted objects spacially spatially go?]]



[[folder: Kat being a loose end]]

to:

[[folder: Kat [[folder:Kat being a loose end]]



[[folder: Sator's dead drops and the dual futures of inverted objects]]

to:

[[folder: Sator's [[folder:Sator's dead drops and the dual futures of inverted objects]]



[[folder: Inverting the world]]

to:

[[folder: Inverting [[folder:Inverting the world]]



** I’m not sure if you’re reading too much into it or not, but from the sound of things in the movie the people of the future want to invert the earth to collide it with the uninverted earth. Remember the conversation about Anhilation? Sounds like they want to go that plantwide, the second the earth is inverted it will occupy the same timespace as the earth moments before it was inverted. Which creates a paradox for those in the future, if the earth was destroyed in their past then how can they exist in their present?

to:

** I’m I'm not sure if you’re reading too much into it or not, but from the sound of things in the movie the people of the future want to invert the earth to collide it with the uninverted earth. Remember the conversation about Anhilation? Sounds like they want to go that plantwide, the second the earth is inverted it will occupy the same timespace as the earth moments before it was inverted. Which creates a paradox for those in the future, if the earth was destroyed in their past then how can they exist in their present?



[[folder: Freeport, Round 2]]

to:

[[folder: Freeport, [[folder:Freeport, Round 2]]



[[folder: Who Would Make &/ Use Such a Doomsday Weapon?]]

to:

[[folder: Who [[folder:Who Would Make &/ Use Such a Doomsday Weapon?]]



[[folder: The collected aftermath of the future war]]

to:

[[folder: The [[folder:The collected aftermath of the future war]]



[[folder: What actually arms the algorithm at the end?]]

to:

[[folder: What [[folder:What actually arms the algorithm at the end?]]



** They were fighting against Sator's men. The troper writing this agrees the scene wasn't shot well, including not showing much or any enemies on camera (I understood the overall battle actions after a Youtube video, though this doesn't fix some other issues. Grr, missed opportunities there....but this isn't a review). They were trying to fight their way to the opening of the tunnel where the Algorithm was, clear Sator's people nearby, and get the main team/strike team/whatever you call them in without anyone noticing.

to:

** They were fighting against Sator's men. The troper writing this agrees the scene wasn't shot well, including not showing much or any enemies on camera (I understood the overall battle actions after a Youtube [=YouTube=] video, though this doesn't fix some other issues. Grr, missed opportunities there....but this isn't a review). They were trying to fight their way to the opening of the tunnel where the Algorithm was, clear Sator's people nearby, and get the main team/strike team/whatever you call them in without anyone noticing.



[[folder: Senses while inverted]]

to:

[[folder: Senses [[folder:Senses while inverted]]



[[folder: Taking a sledgehammer to the Algorithm]]

to:

[[folder: Taking [[folder:Taking a sledgehammer to the Algorithm]]

Added: 1149

Changed: 110

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The film clearly establishes that an inverted object can only logically exist in the universe *prior* to the point at which it was inverted, that's why Sator inverting at Tallinn causes him to "vanish" from a red-entropy perspective, by definition a blue-entropy object can only progress from the future to the past the same way a red-entropy object can only progress from past to future. You can invert a sample of radioactive material but only if you could find both the red and blue versions of it and place them into opposite ends of the turnstile at the same time, at which point the material would appear to make a "u-turn" on the timeline and both versions would disappear from your present and future. So an inverted nuclear rod would indeed appear to increase in radioactivity, but only to a point where it matches the original uninverted sample, at which time it would deterministically have to have been inverted: It's not like its magically gaining more energy out of nowhere, the observed increase in radioactivity is just the same dissipation of energy it would otherwise experience just playing out in reverse from our perspective.



** The Turnstile wouldn't invert the rock unless you found the future, inverted version of the rock and put it in the blue side of the turnstile at the same time that you put the original rock into the red side, that's why Ives has to explain the proving window to the Protag. A good way to visualize it would be an object traveling in a given direction along a timeline before "bouncing" off of a turnstile to begin going in the opposite direction instead.

to:

** The Turnstile wouldn't invert the rock unless you found the future, inverted version of the rock and put it in the blue side of the turnstile at the same time that you put the original rock into the red side, that's why Ives has to explain the proving window to the Protag. A good way to visualize it would be an object traveling in a given direction along a timeline before "bouncing" off of a turnstile to begin going in the opposite direction instead.instead: It's passing over the same portion of the same timeline, just at a different point in its personal worldline.

Added: 3296

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The movie clearly shows the cracks slowly forming over time after they enter the room, same with the cracked rearview mirror in the Tallinn chase, you weren't paying attention.



** The Turnstile wouldn't invert the rock unless you found the future, inverted version of the rock and put it in the blue side of the turnstile at the same time that you put the original rock into the red side, that's why Ives has to explain the proving window to the Protag. A good way to visualize it would be an object traveling in a given direction along a timeline before "bouncing" off of a turnstile to begin going in the opposite direction instead.



** It's just a simple case of TimeAndRelativeDimensionsInSpace, two version enter at different ends of the machine from one perspective and exit at opposite ends from another.



** Their entropy is inverted (blue) so from a red-entropy perspective they begin to materialize out of the background disorder of wherever they ended up, then they get found by the CIA and stored at Barbara's lab, then the lab gets destroyed or whatever and the end up scattering out to wherever they got inverted in the future. From their own perspective they get built and inverted in the war, then they gte pulled back to the lab before the scientists take them and replace them wherever they were originally found to degrade and fall apart according to their own entropy.



*** The opening scene is deliberately very ambiguous as to who is fighting who, as its main purpose is actually to just establish the themes and tone of the "Twilight World" that the rest of the film is set in, the same way the opening scenes of Inception and the Dark Knight both set up elements of the plot without contributing anything directly.



*** Your timeline is backwards, that segment of the Alg. was inverted ''from'' the Tallinn freeport and then taken back to Stalsk 12, the version at the Opera is essentially fresh off the turnstile after being inverted in the far future and inserted into Russian nuclear stockpiles to travel backwards to the present.



* The Algorithm isn't "armed", it isn't the superweapon itself its just a schematic for how to build such a weapon.



*** The movie clearly establishes Rotas as having a large paramilitary component beefed up with funding and technology from the future. And most real life engagements rarely have anyone closer than a few dozen yards, just because everyone is too busy ''not getting shot'' to smile and wave for the camera or whatever it is you're complaining about doesn't mean its a bad scene.



** Because Neil already knows he has to die, "what's happened's happened." Plus he was only one out the three who'd be able to work the lock and Ives needed to make sure nobody could see the Alg. and live to tell the tale, if they tried to invert they would by Neil's logic get separated at some point before reaching the hypocenter at which point they would risk Ives or the Protag falling into Rotas hands.






A formula translated into physical form that can't be copied or communicated. A black box with one function. So, besides separating the nine pieces, why not just take those pieces to separate corners of the world and take a sledgehammer to them? Smash them, cut them, melt them, and turn them into useless pieces of slag? Then you can hide what's left.

to:

* A formula translated into physical form that can't be copied or communicated. A black box with one function. So, besides separating the nine pieces, why not just take those pieces to separate corners of the world and take a sledgehammer to them? Smash them, cut them, melt them, and turn them into useless pieces of slag? Then you can hide what's left.left.
** Because they had to hide it by inverting it, that's why Priya said to "continue the Algorithm's journey into the past." Even if they did smash it the people in the future would still be able to comb the world for the remnants, then they'd only need to plant an inverted tracker for Rotas to follow backwards to a point before they smashed it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
add possible justification to "Sator's dead drops and the dual futures of inverted objects"

Added DiffLines:

**** The papers included with the first drop he digs up could have included instructions to sell the gold to a trader, build the turnstyle with the profits and from then on use the turnstyle to invert for collecting dead drops (as suggested above). a later message from the future might have than told him to go back to the original trader and reacquire the original gold and bury it somewhere the future could retrieve it. Its a bit convoluted, but from the gold's point of view the future people mint the gold bars, and take it through a turnstyle so they can bury it, an 'old' Sator digs is up and gives it to a trader for a while, before a 'young' Sator retrieves it and buries it in the Stalsk-12.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** If you believe that the cars were inverted during this scene, rather than just being driven by inverted drivers, then there's another possible explanation. If Kat had been able to try the brake of the inverted car (and maybe she did, in the time before the protagonist caught up with her) it would only have caused the car to go faster. (From the car's perspective: it was going at the speed the protagonist saw it at, and that was after a period of time with the brake depressed, so before then it must have been going ''even faster''.)[[note]]I'm not sure if that matches what was shown onscreen, but in any case any situation with inverted drivers driving non-inverted cars just doesn't work out in terms of the physics. The cars are reacting to the positions of their pedals, not the direction they are moved.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** One line of dialogue that didn't get enough of a highlight or explanation was during the red team briefing, where Ives says (effectively) "For most of you, your mission is to ''fail'' to disarm the bomb." The vast majority of the red team and blue team soldiers were acting as if they were trying get to the location of the bomb that Sator was using to bury his dead-drop, so they could disarm it. Sator's men were fighting to prevent them from doing so, so that the dead drop would go as planned. At the end, both ends of Sator's temporal pincer movement were able to report that the bomb did go off and claim victory, not realising that it had only been cover for the Protagonist and Ives to swipe the algorithm out from under the bomb.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** That is correct. Kat says her husband vanished that particular day, from which the Protagonist and Neil conclude he was directing the opera attack (it was on the same day) and indeed we see his helicopter leave the yacht when older!Kat arrives. Furthermore, the Sator she shoots is familiar with the Protagonist and recognizes the "despair or anger" line, proving he has already lived through the other events of the movie.

to:

*** That is correct. Kat says her husband vanished that particular day, from which the Protagonist and Neil conclude he was directing the opera attack (it was on the same day) and indeed we see his helicopter leave the yacht when older!Kat older Kat arrives. Furthermore, the Sator she shoots is familiar with the Protagonist and recognizes the "despair or anger" line, proving he has already lived through the other events of the movie.



*** The big question is, how was it put into storage from it’s perspective? Invertedly (yes I’m using that) it was taken out of storage and put into the ground by Laura (assuming she found it) but Invertedly how did it get into storage? From normal time perspective, someone will have to take it out of storage and put it somewhere for it to end up returning to its point of origin in time.

to:

*** The big question is, how was it put into storage from it’s it's perspective? Invertedly (yes I’m using that) it was taken out of storage and put into the ground by Laura (assuming she found it) but Invertedly how did it get into storage? From normal time perspective, someone will have to take it out of storage and put it somewhere for it to end up returning to its point of origin in time.



*** But this makes no sense. If the injury is inflicted by a 'forwards' knife then the wound should be moving forwards on inverted!Protagonist up util he became inverted in the future at which point it wither disappears--or continues onto non-inverted!Protagonist. Either way he would have noticed at some point. If it is more about the direction of the injured party, then inverted!Protagonist would have no wound until he was stabbed from his perspective. As we see the wound running forwards and go with this explanation then why does the wound appear so suddenly? This also calls into question the nature of the inverted shot Kat suffers, the injury having a linear progression on her no matter which way she is going, though Protagonist is stabbed while inverted and by himself, maybe making his injury of a different nature. but in both cases the attacker is inverted (though the status of the weapons is unclear.)

to:

*** But this makes no sense. If the injury is inflicted by a 'forwards' knife then the wound should be moving forwards on inverted!Protagonist inverted Protagonist up util he became inverted in the future at which point it wither disappears--or continues onto non-inverted!Protagonist.non-inverted Protagonist. Either way he would have noticed at some point. If it is more about the direction of the injured party, then inverted!Protagonist inverted Protagonist would have no wound until he was stabbed from his perspective. As we see the wound running forwards and go with this explanation then why does the wound appear so suddenly? This also calls into question the nature of the inverted shot Kat suffers, the injury having a linear progression on her no matter which way she is going, though Protagonist is stabbed while inverted and by himself, maybe making his injury of a different nature. but in both cases the attacker is inverted (though the status of the weapons is unclear.)



** So, at the beginning of the scene, there are bullet holes in the glass pane. This troper thinks this is a mistake. From the point of view of the inverted!bullet: the bullet is fired from the gun / the bullet flies from the gun to the glass pane / the bullet strikes the glass pane / Due to impact, there is a hole in the glass pane / the bullet falls to the ground. From the point of view of the glass pane: the bullet un-falls from the ground and strikes the glass pane / Due to impact, there is a hole in the glass pane / the bullet flies from the glass pane to the gun / the bullet is un-fired. The bullet hole appears because of the impact between the bullet and the glass pane. But the glass pane is not inverted, therefore the hole (effect) should appear AFTER impact (cause). Therefore, at the beginning of the scene, the glass pane should be intact. The bullet holes should appear only after impact, later in the scene. This is not what happens in the movie. In the movie, the bullet holes exist before impact and disappear after impact.

to:

** So, at the beginning of the scene, there are bullet holes in the glass pane. This troper thinks this is a mistake. From the point of view of the inverted!bullet: inverted bullet: the bullet is fired from the gun / the bullet flies from the gun to the glass pane / the bullet strikes the glass pane / Due to impact, there is a hole in the glass pane / the bullet falls to the ground. From the point of view of the glass pane: the bullet un-falls from the ground and strikes the glass pane / Due to impact, there is a hole in the glass pane / the bullet flies from the glass pane to the gun / the bullet is un-fired. The bullet hole appears because of the impact between the bullet and the glass pane. But the glass pane is not inverted, therefore the hole (effect) should appear AFTER impact (cause). Therefore, at the beginning of the scene, the glass pane should be intact. The bullet holes should appear only after impact, later in the scene. This is not what happens in the movie. In the movie, the bullet holes exist before impact and disappear after impact.



* Here's a question that applies to most inversion (including the bullet in the demo), but most obviously to Sator's dead drops. At future time x, the dead drop is inverted and buried in Russia. For the dead drop, time runs opposite: (x-1), (x-2), so on. Up until time = 0 when it is unearthed by Sator, it has been in the ground. Now, (non-inverted) Sator and company unearth the dead drop at time = 0, and move it to the ship. So where is the dead drop at time = 1? time = 2? It is both in Sator's posession and buried which is a paradox.

to:

* Here's a question that applies to most inversion (including the bullet in the demo), but most obviously to Sator's dead drops. At future time x, the dead drop is inverted and buried in Russia. For the dead drop, time runs opposite: (x-1), (x-2), so on. Up until time = 0 when it is unearthed by Sator, it has been in the ground. Now, (non-inverted) Sator and company unearth the dead drop at time = 0, and move it to the ship. So where is the dead drop at time = 1? time = 2? It is both in Sator's posession possession and buried which is a paradox.



** I hope to have a big write up of tenet physics at some point. For light, the way you see is that light hits a pigment molecule and excites it,,the excited molecule than sets off a nerve signal. To see using opposite time light, all that is needed is that the light can transfer energy to the pigment, once this happens, a nerve signal goes and you can see. A "flames cool you" situation is unlikely since less than excited pigments don't exist. The most likely hiccup is if "pigment excites magically like bullet damage appearing, than emits light" is the sequence. (So no actual answer, but the movie's physics isn't consistent) Most cameras use a similar "light excites something, which sends a signal" principle, so would work or not work along with eyes.

to:

** I hope to have a big write up of tenet physics at some point. For light, the way you see is that light hits a pigment molecule and excites it,,the it, the excited molecule than sets off a nerve signal. To see using opposite time light, all that is needed is that the light can transfer energy to the pigment, once this happens, a nerve signal goes and you can see. A "flames cool you" situation is unlikely since less than excited pigments don't exist. The most likely hiccup is if "pigment excites magically like bullet damage appearing, than emits light" is the sequence. (So no actual answer, but the movie's physics isn't consistent) Most cameras use a similar "light excites something, which sends a signal" principle, so would work or not work along with eyes.



** For shooting the gun: the standard explanation is that he misses on purpose so that his forward self can't use it (Also why he disassembles it.) Presumably, he doesn't want to take a chance his normal self gets his hands on a loaded gun and fires, changing the timeline and injuring hmself. Outside the story, inverted gunshots and disassembly make obvious to the audience that gas mask man is inverted: a pure hand to hand fight wouldn't be so clear.

to:

** For shooting the gun: the standard explanation is that he misses on purpose so that his forward self can't use it (Also why he disassembles it.) Presumably, he doesn't want to take a chance his normal self gets his hands on a loaded gun and fires, changing the timeline and injuring hmself.himself. Outside the story, inverted gunshots and disassembly make obvious to the audience that gas mask man is inverted: a pure hand to hand fight wouldn't be so clear.



** A related question is why Neil uninverts after seeing Volkov instead of just telling the red team as planned,and maybe than heading into battle again to help them. Answer to the original headscratcher might be stable time loop, plus they know that they stopped Sator, so no point in possibly messing with timeline. Tenet selects agents willing to self sacrifice, making Neil's death more acceptable. (Obvious outside the movie answer is to create drama.)

to:

** A related question is why Neil uninverts after seeing Volkov instead of just telling the red team as planned,and planned, and maybe than heading into battle again to help them. Answer to the original headscratcher might be stable time loop, plus they know that they stopped Sator, so no point in possibly messing with timeline. Tenet selects agents willing to self sacrifice, making Neil's death more acceptable. (Obvious outside the movie answer is to create drama.)



** The physics of the movie is tricky and not consistent, or just weird, but it does make sense that in erted air wouldn't be breathable while inverted light and sound are fine. For air to be breathed, it has to be pushed into the lungs, have oxygen diffuse into the blood, diffuse into the cells, than chemically react with body stuff. All of these steps are tricky, breathing itself might be doable since expansion and contraction is symmetric, so oxygen would enter on the exhale, from the air's view the lungs are expanding. Diffusing is a straight up entropy based process, chemicals will spread out in their own time direction. An inverted person would see oxygen seeming to move from their cells into the air. What really messes up respiration is reacting inverted air with something else. Which way chemical reactions go is also straight up entropy based, so a chemical reaction between opposite time chemicals is hard to work out: whether it happens, how much energy it makes, whether that energy can be harvested. Quantum effects also come into play, which I don't understand well, it's possible a normal and reversed time atom or particles don't interact the same way same time ones do. A body might by able to use food and air inverted from itself with reactions happening in reverse and harvesting energy, but reverse time oxygen diffusing out of the body and doing who knows what inside is a good recipe for bad or weird things that don't produce usable energy.

to:

** The physics of the movie is tricky and not consistent, or just weird, but it does make sense that in erted inverted air wouldn't be breathable while inverted light and sound are fine. For air to be breathed, it has to be pushed into the lungs, have oxygen diffuse into the blood, diffuse into the cells, than chemically react with body stuff. All of these steps are tricky, breathing itself might be doable since expansion and contraction is symmetric, so oxygen would enter on the exhale, from the air's view the lungs are expanding. Diffusing is a straight up entropy based process, chemicals will spread out in their own time direction. An inverted person would see oxygen seeming to move from their cells into the air. What really messes up respiration is reacting inverted air with something else. Which way chemical reactions go is also straight up entropy based, so a chemical reaction between opposite time chemicals is hard to work out: whether it happens, how much energy it makes, whether that energy can be harvested. Quantum effects also come into play, which I don't understand well, it's possible a normal and reversed time atom or particles don't interact the same way same time ones do. A body might by able to use food and air inverted from itself with reactions happening in reverse and harvesting energy, but reverse time oxygen diffusing out of the body and doing who knows what inside is a good recipe for bad or weird things that don't produce usable energy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The physics of the movie is tricky and not consistent, or just weird, but it does make sense that in erted air wouldn't be breathable while inverted light and sound are fine. For air to be breathed, it has to be pushed into the lungs, have oxygen diffuse into the blood, diffuse into the cells, than chemically react with body stuff. All of these steps are tricky, breathing itself might be doable since expansion and contraction is symmetric, so Oxygen would enter on the exhale. Diffusing is tricky, the air from the person's view would be flowing out of their body. What really messed up respiration is reacting inverted air with something else. A chemical reaction between opposite time chicas is hard to work out: whether it happens, how much energy it makes, whether it can be harvested. A body might by able to use food and air inverted from itself with reactions happening in reverse and harvesting energy, but oxygen diffusing out of the body and doing who knows what inside is a good recipe for bad things.
*** Sound and light are simpler. Force and pressure seem to work done inverted, so sound works, the pressure wave pushes against ear components as normal, bit since the person is going backwards to he pressure pattern seems reversed and you have backwards sound. Light probably works, but could go either way. Vision works by a photon hitting a Chicago in the eye, being absorbed and exciting said chemical, than the excited chemical sets off a nerve signal. It might be an inverted person has the chemical get excited from nowhere and emit light, like the bullet holes/mirror/wound appearing from nothing. It is also possible that a nerve signal appears from nothing crating vision and moving towards the eye, or that the light seems to move backwards but still excited the eye and works normally from the person's view from there. Either way, they could see.

to:

** The physics of the movie is tricky and not consistent, or just weird, but it does make sense that in erted air wouldn't be breathable while inverted light and sound are fine. For air to be breathed, it has to be pushed into the lungs, have oxygen diffuse into the blood, diffuse into the cells, than chemically react with body stuff. All of these steps are tricky, breathing itself might be doable since expansion and contraction is symmetric, so Oxygen oxygen would enter on the exhale. exhale, from the air's view the lungs are expanding. Diffusing is tricky, the air from the person's view a straight up entropy based process, chemicals will spread out in their own time direction. An inverted person would be flowing out of see oxygen seeming to move from their body. cells into the air. What really messed messes up respiration is reacting inverted air with something else. A Which way chemical reactions go is also straight up entropy based, so a chemical reaction between opposite time chicas chemicals is hard to work out: whether it happens, how much energy it makes, whether it that energy can be harvested. Quantum effects also come into play, which I don't understand well, it's possible a normal and reversed time atom or particles don't interact the same way same time ones do. A body might by able to use food and air inverted from itself with reactions happening in reverse and harvesting energy, but reverse time oxygen diffusing out of the body and doing who knows what inside is a good recipe for bad things.
or weird things that don't produce usable energy.
*** Sound and light are simpler. Force and pressure seem to work done fine inverted, so sound works, the pressure wave pushes against ear components as normal, bit but since the person is going backwards to he the air, the pressure pattern seems reversed and you have backwards sound. Light probably works, but could go either way. Vision works by a photon hitting a Chicago chemical in the eye, being absorbed and exciting said chemical, than the excited chemical sets off a nerve signal. It might be an inverted person has the chemical get excited from nowhere and emit light, like the bullet holes/mirror/wound appearing from nothing. It is also possible that a nerve signal appears from nothing crating creating vision and moving towards the eye, or that the light seems to move backwards but still excited the eye eye, setting off a nerve signal and works working normally from the person's view from there. Either way, they could see.see since a nerve signal existed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A formula translated into physical form that can't be copied or communicated. A black box with one function. So, besides separating the nine pieces, why not just take that those pieces to separate corners of the world and take a sledgehammer to them? Smash them, cut them, melt them, turn them into useless pieces of slag?

to:

A formula translated into physical form that can't be copied or communicated. A black box with one function. So, besides separating the nine pieces, why not just take that those pieces to separate corners of the world and take a sledgehammer to them? Smash them, cut them, melt them, and turn them into useless pieces of slag?slag? Then you can hide what's left.

Added: 336

Changed: 50

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[folder: Taking a sledgehammer to the Algorithm]]
A formula translated into physical form that can't be copied or communicated. A black box with one function. So, besides separating the nine pieces, why not just take that those pieces to separate corners of the world and take a sledgehammer to them? Smash them, cut them, melt them, turn them into useless pieces of slag?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Tenet capturing Satori also changes everything that happened before:. Satori wouldn't have been in the car to grab the case, and quite possibly wouldn't have gotten protag to the turnstile for interrogation, so a tenet that tried to capture him would have run into a different situation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The physics of the movie is tricky and not consistent, or just weird, but it does make sense that in erted air wouldn't be breathable while inverted light and sound are fine. For air to be breathed, it has to be pushed into the lungs, have oxygen diffuse into the blood, diffuse into the cells, than chemically react with body stuff. All of these steps are tricky, breathing itself might be doable since expansion and contraction is symmetric, so Oxygen would enter on the exhale. Diffusing is tricky, the air from the person's view would be flowing out of their body. What really messed up respiration is reacting inverted air with something else. A chemical reaction between opposite time chicas is hard to work out: whether it happens, how much energy it makes, whether it can be harvested. A body might by able to use food and air inverted from itself with reactions happening in reverse and harvesting energy, but oxygen diffusing out of the body and doing who knows what inside is a good recipe for bad things.
*** Sound and light are simpler. Force and pressure seem to work done inverted, so sound works, the pressure wave pushes against ear components as normal, bit since the person is going backwards to he pressure pattern seems reversed and you have backwards sound. Light probably works, but could go either way. Vision works by a photon hitting a Chicago in the eye, being absorbed and exciting said chemical, than the excited chemical sets off a nerve signal. It might be an inverted person has the chemical get excited from nowhere and emit light, like the bullet holes/mirror/wound appearing from nothing. It is also possible that a nerve signal appears from nothing crating vision and moving towards the eye, or that the light seems to move backwards but still excited the eye and works normally from the person's view from there. Either way, they could see.
*** Hopefully all that makes sense. Tenet's physics is clearly "what looks right on camera" and what works in story logic, the microscopic stuff or how energy, force, chemicals, etc. work wasn't as important.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[/folder]]





Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* So the writers wanted to look smart and include how you can't breathe air while inverted so you need a supply of inverted air but this is rather selective. If you continue this line of logic then an inverted person shouldn't be able to see as light is still moving forward and unable to hit their eyes for them to see anything. The same goes for sound, the soundwaves are still moving forwards. Maybe air is different for how it interacts with the body but an inverted person should be blind and deaf as well as sufocating.

to:

* So the writers wanted to look smart and include how you can't breathe air while inverted so you need a supply of inverted air but this is rather selective. If you continue this line of logic then an inverted person shouldn't be able to see as light is still moving forward and unable to hit their eyes for them to see anything. The same goes for sound, the soundwaves are still moving forwards. Maybe air is different for how it interacts with the body but an inverted person should be blind and deaf as well as sufocating. suffocating.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added on doomsday weapon, folder of inverted senses

Added DiffLines:

*** If the future people think their Earth would be preserved then what is the point of destroying Earth in the past? Presumably they think their world won't be affected but isn't that the whole point? They are doing this to stop their future of a Earth ravaged by global warming, but even if Earth does survive then it would now be a version where the past never happened and maybe have no humans on it, defeating the purpose. Deleting history if it doesn't alter the present is pointless.


Added DiffLines:


[[folder: Senses while inverted]]
* So the writers wanted to look smart and include how you can't breathe air while inverted so you need a supply of inverted air but this is rather selective. If you continue this line of logic then an inverted person shouldn't be able to see as light is still moving forward and unable to hit their eyes for them to see anything. The same goes for sound, the soundwaves are still moving forwards. Maybe air is different for how it interacts with the body but an inverted person should be blind and deaf as well as sufocating.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** There would be no literal 'merging'. Past Kat, who unknowingly saw her future self jump from the yacht, would eventually invert and become the Future Kat that jumps from the yacht, and presumably, Future Kat would step into Past Kat's place once Past Kat inverts, picking up where she left off, as it were.

to:

*** There would be no literal 'merging'. Past Kat, who unknowingly saw her future self jump from the yacht, would eventually invert and become the Future Kat that jumps from the yacht, and presumably, presumably Future Kat would step into Past Kat's place once Past Kat inverts, picking up where she left off, as it were.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Nobody else has raised this, and this wasn't answered in the movie, but if you invert a radioactive object, presumably from a "normal" perspective it is becoming *more* radioactive over time, not less. This has some pretty disturbing implications for the destabilizing effect of an inverted nuclear bomb. However, there is another secondary implication: Neil argues that the act of inversion and interacting with inverted objects causes them to ultimately push against the huge inertia of "normal" time's arrow: that is, over a long enough interval an inverted object could lose its inversion. As such, any would-be dirty bomb maker could take a spent nuclear fuel rod, invert it, and in doing so reverse all the beta decays to the point where the reactor had initially gone into steady-state operation, making the rod much more radioactive than should be, and have no fear of it going on forever as eventually the rod would "un-invert", and at that point the nefarious individual could handle the rod with all normal tools without fear of it suddenly jumping into their hand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The subtitles confirm that the button she pressed was for unlocking the doors.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*The movie certainly wants us to think Sator's death matters, but logically it shouldn't. His death sets off the nuke that records the position of where the algorithm is. Centuries later some future bad guys dig it up, use it in their timey machine and destroy reality. If at any point before the bad guys dig it up the protagonists move it, then it doesn't matter, the future bad guys can't use it. So logically they could have waited for Sator to die and all his mercenaries to burn through their pay checks and stop caring about this weird time conflict they've signed on for, and then dug it up and moved it still centuries before the future villains can use it. The movie tries to get out of it by saying that the weapon's power would transcend time and erase the past, but that also doesn't make sense as Sator's death wouldn't be a trigger that would cause the future bad guys to get the algorithm. All his death would do is cause them to check a specific place. So long as the protagonists fully intend to move it at some point, and eventually do, the future villains will never find it.


Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Inverting the Earth wouldn't help if the sun was exploding, as it would continue to orbit the same exploding sun. You'd need to invert the sun itself to stop that one.

Top