Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** They're not the same boys. There's a war on. That means lots of orphans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
----
Deleted line(s) 9 (click to see context) :
----
Changed line(s) 12,13 (click to see context) from:
----
* In the beggining, Peter and the other boys in the orphanage all get kidnapped by pirates. At the end, Peter and the gang come back to the orphanage and take the orphans to become the lost boys. When did they get back to the orphanage?
* In the beggining, Peter and the other boys in the orphanage all get kidnapped by pirates. At the end, Peter and the gang come back to the orphanage and take the orphans to become the lost boys. When did they get back to the orphanage?
to:
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I couldn't resist
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Obvious sequel hook, we were supposed to leave the theater asking exactly that, how James Hook and Peter Pan went from best buddies to bitter friends. The movie flopped hard and won't generate any sequels, so the answer to that question is lost.
to:
** Obvious sequel hook, hook (no pun intended), we were supposed to leave the theater asking exactly that, how James Hook and Peter Pan went from best buddies to bitter friends. The movie flopped hard and won't generate any sequels, so the answer to that question is lost.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
----
to:
* In the beggining, Peter and the other boys in the orphanage all get kidnapped by pirates. At the end, Peter and the gang come back to the orphanage and take the orphans to become the lost boys. When did they get back to the orphanage?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
---
to:
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
** I'm not sure. I assume that Wendy would have only appeared in the climax, setting up the real story of Peter Pan. In the original book, Neverland is created by her stories that she tells to her brothers - so maybe that was the ending they were going for. And they'd planned several films, so presumably Wendy would have featured in them. But with this being such a bomb, obviously that put a kibosh on those plans.
to:
** I'm not sure. I assume that Wendy would have only appeared in the climax, setting up the real story of Peter Pan. In the original book, Neverland is created by her stories that she tells to her brothers - so maybe that was the ending they were going for. And they'd planned several films, so presumably Wendy would have featured in them. But with this being such a bomb, obviously that put a kibosh on those plans.plans.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* I know Hook becomes the villian, but how? I mean he gets the ultimate happy ending. He gets the girl, has a purpose, and good friends to boot. What could possibly go wrong might be tempting fate, but it still dosent make sense to me.
to:
* I know Hook becomes the villian, villain, but how? I mean he gets the ultimate happy ending. He gets the girl, has a purpose, and good friends to boot. What could possibly go wrong might be tempting fate, but it still dosent doesn't make sense to me.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
to:
** There is some merit to this in the original books. Pan frequently changes sides during fights between the Lost Boys and pirates, just to liven things up.
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* I know hook becomes the villian, but how? I mean he gets the ultimate happy ending. He gets the girl, has a purpose, and good friends to boot. What could possibly go wrong might be tempting fate, but it still dosent make sense to me.
to:
* I know hook Hook becomes the villian, but how? I mean he gets the ultimate happy ending. He gets the girl, has a purpose, and good friends to boot. What could possibly go wrong might be tempting fate, but it still dosent make sense to me.
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
to:
** They were intending to make this a franchise, with about six films planned. Presumably they didn't want to go down the route of ''Film/OzTheGreatAndPowerful'' by turning one of their future villains evil right away.
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* Leni Zieglmeier was supposed to play Wendy Darling. What happened?!
to:
* Leni Zieglmeier was supposed to play Wendy Darling. What happened?!happened?!
** I'm not sure. I assume that Wendy would have only appeared in the climax, setting up the real story of Peter Pan. In the original book, Neverland is created by her stories that she tells to her brothers - so maybe that was the ending they were going for. And they'd planned several films, so presumably Wendy would have featured in them. But with this being such a bomb, obviously that put a kibosh on those plans.
** I'm not sure. I assume that Wendy would have only appeared in the climax, setting up the real story of Peter Pan. In the original book, Neverland is created by her stories that she tells to her brothers - so maybe that was the ending they were going for. And they'd planned several films, so presumably Wendy would have featured in them. But with this being such a bomb, obviously that put a kibosh on those plans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
** Apparently, he doesn't. It was meant to be a "twist on the traditional Peter Pan story."
to:
** Apparently, he doesn't. It was meant to be a "twist on the traditional Peter Pan story.""
---
* Leni Zieglmeier was supposed to play Wendy Darling. What happened?!
---
* Leni Zieglmeier was supposed to play Wendy Darling. What happened?!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Obvious sequel hook, we were supposed to leave the theater asking exactly that, how James Hook and Peter Pan went from best buddies to bitter friends. The movie flopped hard and won't generate any sequels, so the answer to that question is lost.
to:
** Obvious sequel hook, we were supposed to leave the theater asking exactly that, how James Hook and Peter Pan went from best buddies to bitter friends. The movie flopped hard and won't generate any sequels, so the answer to that question is lost.lost.
** Apparently, he doesn't. It was meant to be a "twist on the traditional Peter Pan story."
** Apparently, he doesn't. It was meant to be a "twist on the traditional Peter Pan story."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* I know hook becomes the villian, but how? I mean he gets the ultimate happy ending. He gets the girl, has a purpose, and good friends to boot. What could possibly go wrong might be tempting fate, but it still dosent make sense to me.
to:
* I know hook becomes the villian, but how? I mean he gets the ultimate happy ending. He gets the girl, has a purpose, and good friends to boot. What could possibly go wrong might be tempting fate, but it still dosent make sense to me.me.
** Obvious sequel hook, we were supposed to leave the theater asking exactly that, how James Hook and Peter Pan went from best buddies to bitter friends. The movie flopped hard and won't generate any sequels, so the answer to that question is lost.
** Obvious sequel hook, we were supposed to leave the theater asking exactly that, how James Hook and Peter Pan went from best buddies to bitter friends. The movie flopped hard and won't generate any sequels, so the answer to that question is lost.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
----
to:
* I know hook becomes the villian, but how? I mean he gets the ultimate happy ending. He gets the girl, has a purpose, and good friends to boot. What could possibly go wrong might be tempting fate, but it still dosent make sense to me.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Because the constant stream of Peter Pan prequels seem to think they're being really clever by having Pan and Hook as friends, because it supposedly makes it all the more poignant (or something) when they inevitably turn against each other.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Why isn't Blackbeard Hook ? He displays many characteristics that would perfectly fit the character of Hook, and even says Hook's common line of "Good Form", and yet Hook here is just in-name only who suffers from AdaptionalHeroism and who is upgraded to Tiger Lily's love interest.
to:
* Why isn't Blackbeard Hook ? He displays many characteristics that would perfectly fit the character of Hook, and even says Hook's common line of "Good Form", and yet Hook here is just in-name only who suffers from AdaptionalHeroism AdaptationalHeroism and who is upgraded to Tiger Lily's love interest.interest.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Why isn't Blackbeard Hook ? He displays many characteristics that would perfectly fit the character of Hook, and even says Hook's common line of "Good Form", and yet Hook here is just in-name only who suffers from AdaptionalHeroism and who is upgraded to Tiger Lily's love interest.
