Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagicSeason2

Go To

OR

Added: 321

Changed: 134

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Plus, there was almost a full season between episodes. What's there to say they DIDN'T strengthen their bond some in all that time?
** There's also the age difference. You can be close to siblings, but still have trouble relating simply because you're not THAT close in age to them. Obviously, this won't apply to everyone ever, but Apple Bloom's still really young, and AJ's pretty much an adult. SHe was a filly once, but she thinks like an adult NOW.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Applejack herself has the answer to this question in Best Night Ever: "Uh, beg pardon, Rarity, but, uh, ''we don't normally wear clothes''." Some ponies might wear them regularly, but around Ponyville, at least, it's implied that clothes are generally for celebrities or special occasions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Another possibility: ''Nightmare Moon'' really couldn't have cared less, but when ''Luna'' paid Ponyville her first major return visit she wanted to make the best impression she could and so took pains to be on her very best royal behavior -- formal speech as she remembered it from happier times and all. That is, she doesn't ''actually'' still talk like that all the time (she doesn't seem to when we see her again at the end of the season in "A Canterlot Wedding", though she doesn't have many lines there either), but she dusted off her old lessons on proper princessly protocol specifically for this occasion.

to:

** Another possibility: ''Nightmare Moon'' really couldn't have cared less, but when ''Luna'' paid Ponyville her first major return visit she wanted to make the best impression she could and so took pains to be on her very best royal behavior -- formal speech as she remembered it from happier times and all. That is, she doesn't ''actually'' still talk like that all the time (she certainly doesn't seem to when we see her again at the end in any of the season later episodes in "A Canterlot Wedding", though which she doesn't have many lines there either), finally shows up again), but she dusted off her old lessons on [[AddedAlliterativeAppeal proper princessly protocol protocol]] specifically for this occasion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** We may also want to take Celestia's age and position into account. She's over a thousand years old (how much older exactly hasn't been revealed, but it's at least that) and she's been, as far as we know, the sole Royal Princess of Equestria ever since she had to banish her sister back then. That's a lot of experience, both in general life terms and in [[TheWomanWearingTheQueenlyMask wearing the queenly mask]] -- ''of course'' not many of the "surprises" that her little ponies might happen to throw her way by accident or design would faze her anymore!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Aside from the party cannon, bullets in real life are at least as old as slings. As for tanks...well, ''some'' apparently self-powered vehicles are in evidence in Equestria, so while they may not precisely have an equivalent of the M1 Abrams or even "just" the M4 Sherman, some counterpart to the earliest tank designs of WWI (basically a slow metal box on tracks carrying a few unicorn "gunners") actually wouldn't be that much of a stretch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** What could she have done? She was no longer connected to the Elements, without which she wouldn't have had a chance against Discord anyway if his backstory and the ease with which we see him playing around with day and night all by himself is any indication. And joining the Mane Six in person would have run the risk of ''distracting'' them from their mission at a crucial time, at least in part by giving Discord simply another nice target of opportunity (that they all conveniently happen to care about) to torment. So, all of a sudden staying behind in hopes of perhaps coming up with ''some'' last desperate gambit or other while Discord is busy in turn doesn't sound like such a bad call anymore...and that's without even going into the common fan explanations that Discord had ''already'' imprisoned or otherwise incapacitated her offscreen.

to:

** What could she have done? She was no longer connected to the Elements, without which she wouldn't have had a chance against Discord anyway if his backstory and the ease with which we see him playing around with day and night all by himself is any indication. And joining the Mane Six in person would have run the risk of ''distracting'' them from their mission at a crucial time, moment, at least in part by giving Discord simply another nice target of opportunity (that they all conveniently happen to care about) to torment. So, all of a sudden staying behind in hopes of perhaps coming up with ''some'' last desperate gambit or other while Discord is busy in turn doesn't sound like such a bad call anymore...and that's without even going into the common fan explanations that Discord had ''already'' imprisoned or otherwise incapacitated her offscreen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** What could she have done? She was no longer connected to the Elements, without which she wouldn't have had a chance against Discord anyway if his backstory and the ease with which we see him playing around with day and night all by himself is any indication. And joining the Mane Six in person would have run the risk of ''distracting'' them from their mission at a crucial time, at least in part by giving Discord simply another nice target of opportunity (that they all conveniently happen to care about) to torment. So, all of a sudden staying behind in hopes of perhaps coming up with ''some'' last desperate gambit or other while Discord is busy in turn doesn't sound like such a bad call anymore...and that's without even going into the common fan explanations that Discord had ''already'' imprisoned or otherwise incapacitated her offscreen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Because apparently Twilight was allowed in that section, even if Twilight herself had forgotten about it, and honestly, what can be more natural than a Twilight Sparkle in a library? Or maybe Celestia knew what was going on and didn't want to interfere in the time loop.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n** Also, Arrogance and being proud of your accomplishments aren't the same, and it's more of an attitude. "I'm the fastest thing alive" depends heavily on the tone and circumstance is said: after performing good in a race, and with a happy voice? it's ok. Blurting it out of nowhere and with people who you know can't challenge you? Bragging, arrogant AND obnoxious.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** And Applejack is the only pony around wearing a hat all the time, and Rarity some times puts on dresses and so on. It's just a matter of habit or taste, apparently.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. ''And that's it''. Nothing more, nothing less. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority in anything else. And even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has completely equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use. Those with greater ability should care less about preening their feathers and more about applying their talents. If contempt is somehow justified, then so is ''every single collapse of every single interpersonal relationship due to it'', and your complaint about "bullying" is completely myopic and hypocritical.


to:

** Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. ''And that's it''. Nothing more, nothing less. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority in anything else. And even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has completely equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use. Those with greater ability should care less about preening their feathers and more about applying their talents. If contempt is somehow justified, then so is ''every single collapse of every single interpersonal relationship due to it'', and your complaint about "bullying" is completely myopic and hypocritical.

talents.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. ''And that's it''. Nothing more, nothing less. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority in anything else. And even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has completely equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use. Those with greater ability should care less about preening their feathers and more about applying their talents. If antisocial smugness arrogance is somehow justified, then so is ''every single collapse of every single interpersonal relationship due to it'', and your complaint about "bullying" is completely myopic and hypocritical.


to:

** Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. ''And that's it''. Nothing more, nothing less. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority in anything else. And even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has completely equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use. Those with greater ability should care less about preening their feathers and more about applying their talents. If antisocial smugness arrogance contempt is somehow justified, then so is ''every single collapse of every single interpersonal relationship due to it'', and your complaint about "bullying" is completely myopic and hypocritical.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. ''And that's it''. Nothing more, nothing less. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority in anything else. And even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has completely equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use. Those with greater ability should care less about preening their feathers and more about applying their talents.


to:

** Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. ''And that's it''. Nothing more, nothing less. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority in anything else. And even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has completely equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use. Those with greater ability should care less about preening their feathers and more about applying their talents.

talents. If antisocial smugness arrogance is somehow justified, then so is ''every single collapse of every single interpersonal relationship due to it'', and your complaint about "bullying" is completely myopic and hypocritical.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. ''And that's it''. Nothing more, nothing less. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority in anything else. And even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has completely equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use.


to:

** Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. ''And that's it''. Nothing more, nothing less. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority in anything else. And even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has completely equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use.

use. Those with greater ability should care less about preening their feathers and more about applying their talents.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. Superior as a person? Not even close to necessarily true. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority as a complete person. Even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use.


to:

* ** Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. Superior as a person? Not even close to necessarily true. ''And that's it''. Nothing more, nothing less. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority as a complete person. Even in anything else. And even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has completely equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n* Superior in terms of intellect? Yes. Superior as a person? Not even close to necessarily true. Superiority in innate ability or skill does not necessarily equate to superiority as a complete person. Even if it has basis in fact, arrogance is unjustifiably ''obnoxious'' and antisocial behavior. Nobody has equal potential or ability, but that doesn't mean those with lesser ablity should be put down; they should be made to put whatever abilities they do have to good use.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**Of course there is. The only reason it's seen as "bad" is because, to be blunt, it makes people who can't keep up feel insecure. And we do it all the time. It's one of the reasons why people who are scientists or intellectuals are so maligned. And yes, it's ''bullying''. Of course a genius (for example) should feel superior to someone who isn't...he '''is'''. It's of course more egalitarian to say otherwise, but "egalitarian" and "in concert with demonstrable fact" are in most cases mutually exclusive. For obvious reasons. Or put another way: it is, literally, ''not'' bragging if you can actually do it, it's a statement of fact. "I'm the fastest thing alive" you say, then you fly faster than the speed of sound. Arrogant? Yes. Demonstrably true? Also yes.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** There's no excuse for being arrogant. Ever. Not good genes, not hard work, not ''anything''. There's also an enormous gap between that and being outright ashamed of one's abilities.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I think we found the answer right here. They were drunk. That pretty much explains everything, especially since A--we know they drink "cider", and B--Twilight was basically doing what I call the "Standard Drunk Sorority Girl Dance". It's that special combination of a girl almost falling over while also trying to look cool for her friends that only happens after a girl knocks back a few too many..."ciders"...for her own good. It's cute, but always embarrassing in retrospect. I'm sure the next morning included a lot of "Oh Celestia, I did ''what''? With ''who''? W-wait was (insert boy here) there? He ''was''? [[BigNo Nooooo!]]"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Has anyone else thought that maybe, just MAYBE, the Mane 6 were...put bluntly, bullshitting their reasons here. Were they trying to make Rainbow Dash "more humble" (forget the morality of this, and how it equates like it or not to '''bullying''') or were they just jealous that Dash actually had, like, done important stuff ''without'' them (for once). Put it this way, between the five of them you have OCD "Teacher's Pet" type who wants to succeed at everything to impress her parents and mentor, a haughty pretty girl, a born follower with the ego of a wet news paper, someone who would do this JUST FOR FUN with no other provocation, and another girl who is so egotistical in her own right she nearly died of exhaustion trying to impress her own brother. Under the best of circumstances personalities like that can't abide by being "shown up", but especially by their best friend and '''especially''' in such an ostentatious way. It's entirely plausible they really were just trying to get famous, and what they said in the cafe reflected their actual beliefs (e.g., Rarity compliments HER OWN designs, Twilight compliments HER OWN magic) but when they got caught they kludged together some smoke and mirrors explanation and Rainbow Dash wasn't quick witted enough to see through it (Look, I love her too, but she's kind of a BrainlessBeauty...they had a whole episode about that). Yeah, I know, it's a conspiracy theory but really it's a valid interpretation of the events.

to:

* Has anyone else thought that maybe, just MAYBE, the Mane 6 were...put bluntly, bullshitting their reasons here. Were they trying to make Rainbow Dash "more humble" (forget the morality of this, and how it equates like it or not to '''bullying''') or were they just jealous that Dash actually had, like, done important stuff ''without'' them (for once). Put it this way, between the five of them you have have: OCD "Teacher's Pet" type who wants to succeed at everything to impress her parents and mentor, a haughty pretty girl, a born follower with the ego of a wet news paper, someone who would do this JUST FOR FUN with no other provocation, and another girl who is so egotistical in her own right she nearly died of exhaustion trying to impress her own brother. Under the best of circumstances personalities like that can't abide by being "shown up", but especially by their best friend and '''especially''' in such an ostentatious way. It's entirely plausible they really were just trying to get famous, and what they said in the cafe reflected their actual beliefs (e.g., Rarity compliments HER OWN designs, Twilight compliments HER OWN magic) but when they got caught they kludged together some smoke and mirrors explanation and Rainbow Dash wasn't quick witted enough to see through it (Look, I love her too, but she's kind of a BrainlessBeauty...they had a whole episode about that). Yeah, I know, it's a conspiracy theory but really it's a valid interpretation of the events.




to:

**I don't think that assessment of American values, or Donald Trump (who's an actor more than anything, and most of what he does is faked for cameras) or athletes (which frankly reads more like a stereotypical jock-joke than reality). But even if it all '''were true''' it does not make that any more right. Punishing her for feeling "arrogant" about skills she spent her ''entire life'' to build up, skills she probably put a huge amount of time in, as much or more as Twilight puts into magic and learning, is simply not fair. And in fact, it's bullying, plain and simple. It's one of the reasons why the stereotypical portrayal of jocks in media is so lopsided: yeah, the star quarterback is arrogant about his skills...skills he trains constantly to maintain and took years to build up and even then he had to be born with most of the speed and hand-eye coordination to do well with. See the problem? By that very logic, smart people should be ashamed of being smart, or attractive people ashamed of their appearance. NO ONE lives up to standards of "humility" that are that self-righteous, American values or no American values.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*Has anyone else thought that maybe, just MAYBE, the Mane 6 were...put bluntly, bullshitting their reasons here. Were they trying to make Rainbow Dash "more humble" (forget the morality of this, and how it equates like it or not to '''bullying''') or were they just jealous that Dash actually had, like, done important stuff ''without'' them (for once). Put it this way, between the five of them you have OCD "Teacher's Pet" type who wants to succeed at everything to impress her parents and mentor, a haughty pretty girl, a born follower with the ego of a wet news paper, someone who would do this JUST FOR FUN with no other provocation, and another girl who is so egotistical in her own right she nearly died of exhaustion trying to impress her own brother. Under the best of circumstances personalities like that can't abide by being "shown up", but especially by their best friend and '''especially''' in such an ostentatious way. It's entirely plausible they really were just trying to get famous, and what they said in the cafe reflected their actual beliefs (e.g., Rarity compliments HER OWN designs, Twilight compliments HER OWN magic) but when they got caught they kludged together some smoke and mirrors explanation and Rainbow Dash wasn't quick witted enough to see through it (Look, I love her too, but she's kind of a BrainlessBeauty...they had a whole episode about that). Yeah, I know, it's a conspiracy theory but really it's a valid interpretation of the events.
**And not to bash the other characters: they all have great personalities and good traits obviously, but we've had ''entire episodes'' about their own ego problems, OCD, emotional fragility etc. It's something you have to consider.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Alternatively, it may not even be that she ''couldn't'' master that spell just as well as her brother -- simply that she ''hasn't'' yet and wouldn't have the time before the wedding, either. (She's also younger than he is and so may for all her raw power and potential be less able to ''sustain'' that kind of effort.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I call this a petty plot hole and I don\'t really believe this, but it needs adressing. I even have my own counterpoint to this.

Added DiffLines:

* It's been established that 1) Twilight has a far greater magical potential than any other Unicorn, having enough strength to create a lullaby and lift a Ursa Minor from Ponyville to a cave, and 2) that she can create shields just like Shining Armor. Why doesn't she offer to take up Shining Armor's spot in creating the shield?
** One possible theory is that Shining Armor is more talented at the shields than Twilight, despite her great magic potential. We've only seen her use the shields on her own house where as Shining Armor could create one that can encompass an entire kingdom. It could be that Twilight is simply a JackOfAllTrades, MasterOfNone, where she can ''learn'' these spells, yet she can't ''master'' them as well as someone whose special talent is that spell alone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Ties into the question why the Elements aren't being used more often to begin with. For example, right at the start of the next season? When Celestia sends Twilight and friends off to help out in the Crystal Empire? She doesn't get the Elements of Harmony out of their vault for that mission, either...and while there's always the [[WatsonianVersusDoylist out-of-universe argument]] that just blasting King Sombra with the Prismatic Friendship Cannon at the first opportunity would have made for a pretty short story, alternatively it could also point at the Elements having some ''in''-universe constraints on their use that just haven't been spelled out yet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I'm more bothered about why the mane six weren't given the elements as soon as they arrived, or at the very least, make Rarity work the fancy necklaces and crown thingie into the fancy dresses they'll be wearing anyway. If they get attacked, the elements are ready, if they aren't, hey, the elements of harmony attended the royal wedding!

Added: 1581

Changed: 1051

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why did Celestia even ALLOW the wedding to take place? Clearly, everyone in Canterlot is aware of the threat that is assumed to be the Changelings. It doesn't matter if the wedding plans were made before or after the moment of the threat announcement. Whereas it is entirely plausable that Chrysalis controlled Shining Armor to want to have the wedding ASAP, Celestia is not mind controlled, and it would be absolutely absurd to approve and foresee the wedding of your Royal Guard Commander and your niece in the middle of a crisis when it could easily be postponed and rescheduled. Don't even throw the "weddings are hard to reschedule after so much planning" argument, because seriously, she's the Princess, there's a bucking crisis, and they ended up being clearly able to reschedule it to a later date, and it was at least two days later, considering that they used at LEAST one more day to repeat all the preparations again.

to:

** I'm going with the "she used what she had available" theory here. Her swarm wasn't ''there'' yet, the Royal Guards presumably at least keep tabs on their own making it hard for any of them to "disappear" for any significant length of time...so putting the bridesmaids she no longer really needs because she has a new (if not necessarily welcome) set anyway to use actually makes some degree of sense.
* Why did Celestia even ALLOW the wedding to take place? Clearly, everyone in Canterlot is aware of the threat that is assumed to be the Changelings. It doesn't matter if the wedding plans were made before or after the moment of the threat announcement. Whereas it is entirely plausable that Chrysalis controlled Shining Armor to want to have the wedding ASAP, Celestia is not mind controlled, and it would be absolutely absurd to approve and foresee the wedding of your Royal Guard Commander and your niece in the middle of a crisis when it could easily be postponed and rescheduled. Don't even throw the "weddings are hard to reschedule after so much planning" argument, because seriously, she's the Princess, there's a bucking crisis, and they ended up being clearly able to reschedule it to a later date, and it was at least two days later, considering that they used at LEAST one more day to repeat all the preparations again. again.
** It's a ''royal'' wedding -- as much a major political event as anything else. You don't lightly cancel those just on account of a random vague threat or three because it'd set a bad precedent and make your government look weak; instead you do your best to tighten up security and then go ahead as planned anyway. Which is exactly what Celestia did. (And if her security measures had in fact been sufficient to meet the threat, we would be seeing compliments for her quick thinking and decisive statesmareship rather than the complaint above. Of course, then we'd have needed something else to fill the ''second'' episode with at the very least...)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I'm not too bothered by this. Sure, Rainbow Dash, Fluttershy and Rarity broke their promise to not eat the cake Pinkie Pie tried to protect, but given how Pinkie earlier [[FoodPorn described the cake in such a vivid and delectable way]], I'm not surprised that they fell to their temptations. It's like that SouthPark episode where Butters allegedly commits suicide, a PetSematary grave digger arrives at his parents' home and warns them not to try and bring back their son, despite giving them specific instructions and locations. Also, the mane 6 don't always follow their elements to the letter: Fluttershy was seen to be mean and angry when she took advice from Iron Will; Rarity tries to take gems from that dragon from Dragonshy and guilt-trips Spike into handing over his gem to her on his birthday; Rainbow Dash isn't necessarily the most dependable of ponies (as she's often seen napping and generally being lazy unless called upon). The ponies are fallible, make mistakes and can give-in to temptation (especially if unintentionally goaded into doing it).

to:

** I'm not too bothered by this. Sure, Rainbow Dash, Fluttershy and Rarity broke their promise to not eat the cake Pinkie Pie tried to protect, but given how Pinkie earlier [[FoodPorn described the cake in such a vivid and delectable way]], I'm not surprised that they fell to their temptations. It's like that SouthPark WesternAnimation/SouthPark episode where Butters allegedly commits suicide, a PetSematary grave digger arrives at his parents' home and warns them not to try and bring back their son, despite giving them specific instructions and locations. Also, the mane 6 don't always follow their elements to the letter: Fluttershy was seen to be mean and angry when she took advice from Iron Will; Rarity tries to take gems from that dragon from Dragonshy and guilt-trips Spike into handing over his gem to her on his birthday; Rainbow Dash isn't necessarily the most dependable of ponies (as she's often seen napping and generally being lazy unless called upon). The ponies are fallible, make mistakes and can give-in to temptation (especially if unintentionally goaded into doing it).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Why did Celestia even ALLOW the wedding to take place? Clearly, everyone in Canterlot is aware of the threat that is assumed to be the Changelings. It doesn't matter if the wedding plans were made before or after the moment of the threat announcement. Whereas it is entirely plausable that Chrysalis controlled Shining Armor to want to have the wedding ASAP, Celestia is not mind controlled, and it would be absolutely absurd to approve and foresee the wedding of your Royal Guard Commander and your niece in the middle of a crisis when it could easily be postponed and rescheduled. Don't even throw the "weddings are hard to reschedule after so much planning" argument, because seriously, she's the Princess, there's a bucking crisis, and they ended up being clearly able to reschedule it to a later date, and it was at least two days later, considering that they used at LEAST one more day to repeat all the preparations again.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Why was Celestia in the locked and secluded old library before sunrise? And why do neither she nor the guard question WHY Twilight is there. The guard is understandable, because maybe, he didn't even know that Twilight left Canterlot. Celestia, on the other hand, casually walks by Twilight, greets her, then leaves, no questions asked. Was she not wondering why her student looked like she was cosplaying [[MetalGearSolid Snake]]? Did she not wonder why her most faithful student decided to sneak/break into the castle (even though she could've just asked) in an impromptu "visit," and not to visit her mentor? I guess the automatic answer is "Trollestia," but still!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


*Where was Princess Celestia while the gals faced Discord, and why didn't she help out more? In the first episode, she explains how serious the threat is to the Mane Six, and she freaks out when the Elements are gone...but she stays in the palace while the friends run out to check the hedge maze. We don't hear from her again until after the first, failed attempt to banish Discord with the elements, when she starts sending Twilight the letters. If she really thought Discord was that big a problem, shouldn't she have joined in the search?

Top