Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* The peach In “Missing Milo” raises a few Questions. Disregard the fact that the peach is a product of a [[StableTimeLoop Bootstrap Paradox]], the peach would also need to have a few unusual properties. It would have to essentially be static. It can’t decay. It either can’t be bruised or it is from the start and can’t be again (When it hits his head). Otherwise the peach would eventually not be a peach anymore.
to:
* The peach In “Missing Milo” raises a few Questions. Disregard the fact that the peach is a product of a [[StableTimeLoop Bootstrap Paradox]], the peach would also need to have a few unusual properties. It would have to essentially be static. It can’t decay. It either can’t be bruised or it is from the start and can’t be again (When it hits his head). Otherwise the peach would eventually not be a peach anymore. The letter must be too because Milo seems to imply that he’s going to do the same with it. To avoid the problem with the letter you just write it on a new paper then it’s just the message that’s the product of the paradox which avoids the violation of the object having to be static.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* The peach In “Missing Milo” raises a few Questions. Disregard the fact that the peach is a product of a [[StableTimeLoop Bootstrap Paradox]], the peach would also need to have a few unusual properties. It would have to essentially be static. It can’t decay. It either can’t be bruised or it is from the start and can’t be again (When it hits his head). Otherwise the peach would eventually not be a peach anymore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** And as of "Fungus Among Us" we now know that it's likely the lead is actually a Pistachion replacement, since it was the Pistachion, not the original, who put the present over his hand to conceal his non-human limb.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
* How did Zack get convinced to go fishing in ''Time Out'' when he's terrified of fish (as shown in ''Murphy's Lard'')?
to:
* How did Why does Zack get convinced to go fishing in ''Time Out'' when he's terrified of fish (as shown in ''Murphy's Lard'')?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* How did Zack get convinced to go fishing in ''Time Out'' when he's terrified of fish (as shown in ''Murphy's Lard'')?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
**[[Main/DidntThinkThisThrough If you told this to Mister Block, this link would probably be his response.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* At the end of [[spoiler:"Missing Milo", Mr. Block doesn't remember the BadFuture.]] Does that mean he won't remember having sent Dakota and Cavendish to their pistachio-saving assignment if they ever fulfill it?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Probably would only put a dent in Milo's bad luck, like the roof caving in on his room on a sunny day vs a rainy day.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* With regards to the Doctor Zone Files, Milo and Sara state that the show has a 50 year history, clearly a nod to DoctorWho. However, in every iteration of the show that the Murphy siblings reference, the lead actor playing Doctor Zone seems to be the same individual, and he doesn't appear to be aging at all. So, has the same actor been playing Doctor Zone for fifty years? Or is the MML equivalent of the BBC just very good at pulling TheOtherDarrin?
to:
* With regards to the Doctor Zone Files, Milo and Sara state that the show has a 50 year history, clearly a nod to DoctorWho.''Series/DoctorWho''. However, in every iteration of the show that the Murphy siblings reference, the lead actor playing Doctor Zone seems to be the same individual, and he doesn't appear to be aging at all. So, has the same actor been playing Doctor Zone for fifty years? Or is the MML equivalent of the BBC just very good at pulling TheOtherDarrin?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** In one episode, it's revealed that even their pistachio-loving boss considers it their organization's most inconsequential assignment and sees Cavendish and Dakota's constant failures at it as a reason not to trust them with anything else.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* With regards to the Doctor Zone Files, Milo and Sara state that the show has a 50 year history, clearly a nod to DoctorWho. However, in every iteration of the show that the Murphy siblings reference, the lead actor playing Doctor Zone seems to be the same individual, and he doesn't appear to be aging at all. So, has the same actor been playing Doctor Zone for fifty years? Or is the MML equivalent of the BBC just very good at pulling TheOtherDarrin.
to:
* With regards to the Doctor Zone Files, Milo and Sara state that the show has a 50 year history, clearly a nod to DoctorWho. However, in every iteration of the show that the Murphy siblings reference, the lead actor playing Doctor Zone seems to be the same individual, and he doesn't appear to be aging at all. So, has the same actor been playing Doctor Zone for fifty years? Or is the MML equivalent of the BBC just very good at pulling TheOtherDarrin.TheOtherDarrin?
** The creators of the show have hinted that there's more to Doctor Zone than meets the eye. That probably has something to do with it.
** The creators of the show have hinted that there's more to Doctor Zone than meets the eye. That probably has something to do with it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** Also, there IS one episode where they actually do attempt to protect a live pistachio plant. But that just raises further questions about subsequent episodes...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Given the dismissive attitude of other time agents and their boss towards them, it's likely Cavendish and Dakota were given a completely pointless assignment with no possibility of success simply because everybody hates them. Sort of like how [[Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000 Joel's bosses didn't like him so they shot him into space.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Furthermore, couldn't they just be assigned to protect nuts ''away'' from Milo's hometown?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* So, we're told that Vinnie and Balthazar are protecting pistachios because the pistachio plants will go extinct by their time. However, the nuts they're protecting are in pistachio carts and stands, meaning they're likely roasted and no longer capable of germinating new plants. So, then wouldn't a more effective strategy for them be to guard pistachio plants, and/or bring back raw pistachios to their timeline to repopulate the species.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* With regards to the Doctor Zone Files, Milo and Sara state that the show has a 50 year history, clearly a nod to DoctorWho. However, in every iteration of the show that the Murphy siblings reference, the lead actor playing Doctor Zone seems to be the same individual, and he doesn't appear to be aging at all. So, has the same actor been playing Doctor Zone for fifty years? Or is the MML equivalent of the BBC just very good at pulling TheOtherDarrin.
to:
* With regards to the Doctor Zone Files, Milo and Sara state that the show has a 50 year history, clearly a nod to DoctorWho. However, in every iteration of the show that the Murphy siblings reference, the lead actor playing Doctor Zone seems to be the same individual, and he doesn't appear to be aging at all. So, has the same actor been playing Doctor Zone for fifty years? Or is the MML equivalent of the BBC just very good at pulling TheOtherDarrin.TheOtherDarrin.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** Dr. Doofenshmirtz already built one and used it on himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
** To be fair, all he was doing was cheering for a team. You can cheer for the enemy team all you want; he wasn't doing anything against the rules, because everything that happened as a result was only caused indirectly by him.
to:
** To be fair, all he was doing was cheering for a team. You can cheer for the enemy team all you want; he wasn't doing anything against the rules, because everything that happened as a result was only caused indirectly by him.him.
* With regards to the Doctor Zone Files, Milo and Sara state that the show has a 50 year history, clearly a nod to DoctorWho. However, in every iteration of the show that the Murphy siblings reference, the lead actor playing Doctor Zone seems to be the same individual, and he doesn't appear to be aging at all. So, has the same actor been playing Doctor Zone for fifty years? Or is the MML equivalent of the BBC just very good at pulling TheOtherDarrin.
* With regards to the Doctor Zone Files, Milo and Sara state that the show has a 50 year history, clearly a nod to DoctorWho. However, in every iteration of the show that the Murphy siblings reference, the lead actor playing Doctor Zone seems to be the same individual, and he doesn't appear to be aging at all. So, has the same actor been playing Doctor Zone for fifty years? Or is the MML equivalent of the BBC just very good at pulling TheOtherDarrin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
** Milo is already a major optimist. He sees his disasters as fun. If his luck warped itself around his interpretations, it'd stop making bad things happen so he has less fun. So if he was a masochist or psycho, bad stuff would still happen, he'd just enjoy it even more.
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
** To be fair, the Middletown Tigers were already cheating with having teenagers/adults as their football team by holding them back for years. But yeah, I don't know if affecting the other team with Murphy's Law can really be justified. At the least, it's better for Milo to use his luck to support his team than to unintentionally weaken them.
to:
** To be fair, the Middletown Tigers were already cheating with having teenagers/adults as their football team by holding them back for years. But yeah, I don't know if affecting the other team with Murphy's Law can really be justified. At the least, it's better for Milo to use his luck to support his team than to unintentionally weaken them.them.
** To be fair, all he was doing was cheering for a team. You can cheer for the enemy team all you want; he wasn't doing anything against the rules, because everything that happened as a result was only caused indirectly by him.
** To be fair, all he was doing was cheering for a team. You can cheer for the enemy team all you want; he wasn't doing anything against the rules, because everything that happened as a result was only caused indirectly by him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* In the football episode why was it deemed morally acceptable for Milo to weaponize his bad luck against the opposing team? If that happened in ''WesternAnimation/GravityFalls'' that would be considered cheating. IS it cheating to do something like that?
to:
* In the football episode why was it deemed morally acceptable for Milo to weaponize his bad luck against the opposing team? If that happened in ''WesternAnimation/GravityFalls'' that would be considered cheating. IS it cheating to do something like that?that?
** To be fair, the Middletown Tigers were already cheating with having teenagers/adults as their football team by holding them back for years. But yeah, I don't know if affecting the other team with Murphy's Law can really be justified. At the least, it's better for Milo to use his luck to support his team than to unintentionally weaken them.
** To be fair, the Middletown Tigers were already cheating with having teenagers/adults as their football team by holding them back for years. But yeah, I don't know if affecting the other team with Murphy's Law can really be justified. At the least, it's better for Milo to use his luck to support his team than to unintentionally weaken them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** According to Dan Povenmire on [[https://twitter.com/DanPovenmire/status/793844686666493952 Twitter]], '''Milo Murphy's Law'' takes place immediately after the end of ''Phineas and Ferb''. So, at the earliest, the show could've started the first day of school, and at the latest, it could be about month since then.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* I know this is a weird question, but what if Milo was some sort of masochist or psycho who WANTS bad things to happen? Luck is a subjective thing, what is seen as good luck by one person can be seen as bad luck by another person, [[LogicBomb so what would happen]]?
to:
* I know this is a weird question, but what if Milo was some sort of masochist or psycho who WANTS bad things to happen? Luck is a subjective thing, what is seen as good luck by one person can be seen as bad luck by another person, [[LogicBomb so what would happen]]?happen]]?
* In the football episode why was it deemed morally acceptable for Milo to weaponize his bad luck against the opposing team? If that happened in ''WesternAnimation/GravityFalls'' that would be considered cheating. IS it cheating to do something like that?
* In the football episode why was it deemed morally acceptable for Milo to weaponize his bad luck against the opposing team? If that happened in ''WesternAnimation/GravityFalls'' that would be considered cheating. IS it cheating to do something like that?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* While it's established that this show and ''WesternAnimation/PhineasAndFerb'' takes place in the same universe, when exactly does the show take place? Does it take place after the events of the SeriesFinale of ''Phineas and Ferb'' or before?
to:
* While it's established that this show and ''WesternAnimation/PhineasAndFerb'' takes place in the same universe, when exactly does the show take place? Does it take place after the events of the SeriesFinale of ''Phineas and Ferb'' or before?before?
* I know this is a weird question, but what if Milo was some sort of masochist or psycho who WANTS bad things to happen? Luck is a subjective thing, what is seen as good luck by one person can be seen as bad luck by another person, [[LogicBomb so what would happen]]?
* I know this is a weird question, but what if Milo was some sort of masochist or psycho who WANTS bad things to happen? Luck is a subjective thing, what is seen as good luck by one person can be seen as bad luck by another person, [[LogicBomb so what would happen]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Or maybe the ray wouldn't hit him. Murphy's Law might make it impossible for such an event to transpire. Aside from which, who would build a "Good Luck-Inator" in Danville? It has "Good" right there in the title, so we can rule out the League Of Villainous Evildoers Maniacally United For Frightening Investments In Naughtiness.
to:
** Or maybe the ray wouldn't hit him. Murphy's Law might make it impossible for such an event to transpire. Aside from which, who would build a "Good Luck-Inator" in Danville? It has "Good" right there in the title, so we can rule out the League Of Villainous Evildoers Maniacally United For Frightening Investments In Naughtiness.Naughtiness.
* While it's established that this show and ''WesternAnimation/PhineasAndFerb'' takes place in the same universe, when exactly does the show take place? Does it take place after the events of the SeriesFinale of ''Phineas and Ferb'' or before?
* While it's established that this show and ''WesternAnimation/PhineasAndFerb'' takes place in the same universe, when exactly does the show take place? Does it take place after the events of the SeriesFinale of ''Phineas and Ferb'' or before?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** Then he'd probably be a normal boy. The good luck would balance out the bad luck.
to:
** Then he'd probably be a normal boy. The good luck would balance out the bad luck.luck.
** Or maybe the ray wouldn't hit him. Murphy's Law might make it impossible for such an event to transpire. Aside from which, who would build a "Good Luck-Inator" in Danville? It has "Good" right there in the title, so we can rule out the League Of Villainous Evildoers Maniacally United For Frightening Investments In Naughtiness.
** Or maybe the ray wouldn't hit him. Murphy's Law might make it impossible for such an event to transpire. Aside from which, who would build a "Good Luck-Inator" in Danville? It has "Good" right there in the title, so we can rule out the League Of Villainous Evildoers Maniacally United For Frightening Investments In Naughtiness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* What would happen if Milo was shot with a Good Luck-Inator?
to:
* What would happen if Milo was shot with a Good Luck-Inator?Luck-Inator?
** Then he'd probably be a normal boy. The good luck would balance out the bad luck.
** Then he'd probably be a normal boy. The good luck would balance out the bad luck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Milo''': ''He's not supposed to be in the street.''
to:
-->'''Milo''': ''He's not supposed to be in the street.''''
* What would happen if Milo was shot with a Good Luck-Inator?
* What would happen if Milo was shot with a Good Luck-Inator?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Why does Milo get rid of Diogee so easily?? Does he do worst than Milo in terms of luck??
to:
* Why does Milo get rid of Diogee so easily?? Does he do worst worse than Milo in terms of luck??
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Wyhy does Milo get rid of Diogee so easily?? Does he do worst than Milo in terms of luck??
to:
* Wyhy Why does Milo get rid of Diogee so easily?? Does he do worst than Milo in terms of luck??luck??
** Milo's objections to Diogee's presence seem to be based largely on places where dogs would commonly not be allowed or encouraged to be, like school, school functions like football games, hospitals, and running freely in the street.
-->'''Milo''': ''He's not supposed to be in the street.''
** Milo's objections to Diogee's presence seem to be based largely on places where dogs would commonly not be allowed or encouraged to be, like school, school functions like football games, hospitals, and running freely in the street.
-->'''Milo''': ''He's not supposed to be in the street.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*Wyhy does Milo get rid of Diogee so easily?? Does he do worst than Milo in terms of luck??
