Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / ApolloJusticeAceAttorney

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Trucy likely inherited some other features of Zak's that don't communicate well in anime style. She also could tan pretty dark in the sun, but she doesn't spend any time out in it where her skin is exposed thanks to her costume- her hat provides her face with shade, and her cloak covers a lot of her body (and would cast shade) plus her knee-high boots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Assume he knew how the trick was performed and you have your answer. He likely did since he would be present while she was practicing it. She had a very, very narrow window of time to move through the vents, so if he knew she'd be passing overhead at that exact moment, he knew she was a witness. Since she's blind, it didn't matter if she couldn't see the incident- he knew she heard it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Could have been to protect her as well, in case his killer was nearby. "Lamiroir" is a much more distinctive word no matter how it's pronounced than "siren", a word that could be mistaken for less distinct words when whispered or choked on- including, ironically, "Daryan".


Added DiffLines:

** Sometimes people struggle to think of ordinary words in their native languages. The woman did sustain a brain injury.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Not to mention, Valant is on the cusp of inheriting the Gramarye performance rights once Zak is declared dead in absentia, and Thalassa turning up again would’ve thrown a wrench into that as well. As Magnifi’s daughter, she would be eligible to inherit the rights before Valant, and she might not be keen on letting him have them. So yeah, telling everyone who she was would’ve been super-counterintuitive for him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Because there are laws that state you can’t legally inherit something from someone that you murdered. If Zak had been found guilty, it wouldn’t have mattered if he had the rights transferral notarized since he retroactively had no claim to the rights in the eyes of the law.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The green meter is identified as a “trust meter” in the game’s manual. It’s possible that if it runs out on the second day of trial, the judge loses faith in the Jurist System as well as the defense, and the ending is him dismissing the jury and taking back the authority to decide the case for himself. Like Phoenix said early on, Vera’s trial was a test for the new system, and that’s always risky.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This is pure conjecture, but it’s possible that Magnifi spent the day beforehand watching old recordings of his troupe’s performances on the TV in his room — performances that would include the shootout trick the guns were originally for. Anyone who came to investigate the sound of gunfire could be assured that it was just the TV, and they would naturally assume the same thing when the guns were actually fired that evening. Especially in a country where guns aren’t readily available, it would be easy to chalk the sound up to some other source.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In the case of Meraktis’s murder, we can assume that either Wocky was standing close enough or Alita was far enough that the presence or absence of gunpowder burn wasn’t that noteworthy. The only evidence they have about how close Wocky was is Wesley Stickler’s testimony, so there’s no way to be conclusive about it. As for Magnifi’s death, it being a suicide doesn’t make the gunpowder burn make “much more sense”. Zak and Valant were instructed to shoot square in the forehead, they only had one bullet each, the victim was confined to his bed, and they were in a hospital, so doing it execution-style would have helped to muffle the sound. Under those circumstances, there’s no reason why they would forgo putting the gun to his head before firing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As for where the piano at the agency came from, they’re actually really easy to get for free because they’re so difficult to move. Phoenix probably found one that was being given away and got some of his many friends to move it into his office. In fact, in the first ''Investigations'' game, Gumshoe mentions he used to work for a moving company.

to:

** As for where the piano at the agency came from, they’re actually really easy to get for free because they’re so difficult to move. They’re usually given away just to get rid of them and clear up space rather than for money, so they’ll be listed for free provided the “buyer” covers the moving cost. Phoenix probably found one like that was being given away and got some of his many friends to move it into his office. In (In fact, in the first ''Investigations'' game, Gumshoe mentions he used to work for a moving company.company. He’d be perfect for the job.)

Added: 349

Removed: 349

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As for where the piano at the agency came from, they’re actually really easy to get for free because they’re so difficult to move. Phoenix probably found one that was being given away and got some of his many friends to move it into his office. In fact, in the first ''Investigations'' game, Gumshoe mentions he used to work for a moving company.



** As for where the piano at the agency came from, they’re actually really easy to get for free because they’re so difficult to move. Phoenix probably found one that was being given away and got some of his many friends to move it into his office. In fact, in the first ''Investigations'' game, Gumshoe mentions he used to work for a moving company.

Added: 653

Changed: 138

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As for where the piano at the agency came from, they’re actually really easy to get for free because they’re so difficult to move. Phoenix probably found one that was being given away and got some of his many friends to move it into his office. In fact, in the first ''Investigations'' game, Gumshoe mentions he used to work for a moving company.



* Why was a dying cancer patient even allowed to keep a loaded gun he could use to shot himself in his hospital room? Yes, it's a one of his stage prop, not a "proper gun", but obviously it's fully capable of firing real shots, and it was ''loaded.''

to:

* Why was a dying cancer patient even allowed to keep a loaded gun he could use to shot himself in his hospital room? Yes, it's a one of his stage prop, props, not a "proper gun", but obviously it's fully capable of firing real shots, and it was ''loaded.''''
** Simple, he had either the guns or the ammunition smuggled in somehow. As a stage magician, it probably wouldn’t have been that hard. If Zak could escape from a courtroom and Trucy could smuggle herself between countries in a suitcase, Magnifi could have found a way to get two bullets into a hospital.



## Even if he had presented the diary page, it would have presented an even stronger motive for Zak to kill Magnifi than a vague sense of blackmail.

to:

## Even if he had presented the diary page, it would have presented an even stronger motive for Zak to kill Magnifi than a vague sense of blackmail.blackmail since it indicates he would’ve inherited something when the victim died.



* Please tell me I'm not the only one that has thought about this. Phoenix presents forged evidence without being aware of his crime and loses his attorney's badge. Edgeworth presented forged evidence without being aware of his crime in SL-9, three years before the events of ''Rise from the Ashes'', and his crime is overlooked. Okay, this may be due to bias toward prosecutors or something in the Ace Attorney-verse, and Edgeworth did nearly kill himself over his mistake. Still, what am I missing here?

to:

* Please tell me I'm not the only one that has thought about this. Phoenix presents forged evidence without being aware of his crime and loses his attorney's badge. Edgeworth presented forged evidence without being aware of his crime in SL-9, three years before the events of ''Rise from the Ashes'', and his crime is overlooked. Okay, this may be due to bias toward prosecutors or something in the Ace Attorney-verse, and Edgeworth did nearly kill himself over his mistake. Still, what am I missing here?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It’s implied that incuritis is a rare disease; the Chief Justice’s son is said to be the first case of it in the country, and Daryan’s testimony implies that the cocoons are tied more to the black market than they are to the healthcare industry. If the demand for a cure simply isn’t high enough, that would only aid in Borginia’s attempts to obscure the fact that there is a cure.

Added: 138

Changed: 846

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I thought he said Phoenix frequented his father's shop.

to:

** I thought he He said Phoenix frequented his father's shop.stand. The noodle stand thing was a family business.



** It wasn't just the connection to the Grammarye case that got him freaked out, it was the mention that she made the diary page. Klavier says that he felt something was off about the whole issue, if you recall. He mercilessly took down Phoenix because he thought Phoenix ordered it made, but then had doubts. He now suddenly has evidence that the situation was not at all what he thought, specifically that the real forager was not Drew Misham, but Vera. Notice that the thing he focuses on is confirming exactly what the evidence she forged was.

to:

** It wasn't just the connection to the Grammarye case that got him freaked out, it out. It was the mention that Vera admitted that she made had seen the diary page. when the client requested the forgery. In the Japanese version, it was explained that when Kristoph was still Zak’s attorney, Klavier says that he felt something was off about had let him borrow the whole issue, if you recall. He mercilessly took down diary along with the other evidence in the interest of a fair trial — whereas Phoenix never had access the diary until the day of the trial, so he couldn’t have been the client who showed it to Vera. Klavier freaks out because he thought realizes that someone had framed Phoenix ordered it made, but then had doubts. He now suddenly has evidence that the situation was not at all what he thought, specifically and that the real forager was not Drew Misham, but Vera. Notice that the thing he focuses on is confirming exactly what the evidence she forged was.client may have been his brother.


Added DiffLines:

** Even if Thalassa were as dark as Zak, it’s completely possible for dark-skinned parents to have a child who seems pale, and vice versa.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** When Apollo presses Lamiroir about the “small window”, she wonders whether that is the best term for it in English; before she can elaborate, though, Gavin tells her her English is impeccable because there ''is'' a small window in the dressing room. With him having said that, she had no reason to think he didn’t know what she was talking about, up until he brought up that the window was closed, at which point he wasn’t letting her get a word in to clarify.

Added: 947

Changed: 711

Removed: 426

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The problem with this answer is that one of Gavin’s arguments on the first trial day directly contradicts it. When the truth comes out that Machi isn’t truly blind, Gavin argues that it was his inexperience with a gun of that size that caused him to miss one of the two shots, rather than his alleged inability to see. If he was that inexperienced, how would he have avoided the physical repercussions of the gun’s recoil?



** Apollo suggests testing the residue to try and get Daryan to confess. It doesn’t need to be completely plausible in practice; it just needs to sound possible enough for Daryan to believe it.



** Klavier mentions at one point that his bassist and drummer also took part in the serenade performance.

to:

** Klavier mentions at one point The game implies that his bassist and drummer also took part basically everyone at the venue was in the serenade performance.audience to watch Lamiroir’s performance. It’s not a stretch to imagine that Gavin’s bandmates would have been watching it too.



** To frame Machi. If you re-examine the piano after finding the switch there, Apollo and Trucy conclude that it must’ve been left there after the Guitar’s Serenade performance, since it would affected Machi’s part if he’d tossed it in there during the song. The implication is that Daryan used the switch during the Gavinners’ next song to light the firecrackers, then left it in the piano deliberately. Machi did probably have another switch that was tied to the igniter inside the guitar, but he was trying to keep the smuggling plot under wraps, so he had no reason to bring it up.

to:

** *** To frame Machi. If you re-examine the piano after finding the switch there, Apollo and Trucy conclude that it must’ve been left there after the Guitar’s Serenade performance, since it would affected Machi’s part if he’d tossed it in there during the song. The implication is that Daryan used the switch during the Gavinners’ next song to light the firecrackers, then left it in the piano deliberately. Machi did probably have another switch that was tied to the igniter inside the guitar, but he was trying to keep the smuggling plot under wraps, so he had no reason to bring it up.



* On the first day of trial, Apollo claims to have told Prosecutor Gavin about LeTouse’s last words but that Gavin evidently didn’t listen. Is this a part of some secret optional dialogue or something? Going back to the initial investigation, the only one Apollo mentioned the last words to was Lamiroir; during the trial, he even says that he’s the only one who knew of LeTouse’s last message. So why is he claiming to have told Gavin about it?

to:

** Gavin had only played the guitar in question once before. He probably wasn’t familiar enough with it to notice such a minute difference in heavy it was.
* On the first day of trial, Apollo claims to have told Prosecutor Gavin about LeTouse’s [=LeTouse’s=] last words but that Gavin evidently didn’t listen. Is this a part of some secret optional dialogue or something? Going back to the initial investigation, the only one Apollo mentioned the last words to was Lamiroir; during the trial, he even says that he’s the only one who knew of LeTouse’s last message. So why is he claiming to have told Gavin about it?it?
* So how did Mr. [=LeTouse=] know that Lamiroir was a witness to his murder? Everyone assumes that he just glimpsed her looking in through the window, but it turns out she only heard the gunshots through the air vent, which is on the other side of the room. There’s no way he could’ve known she was there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It’s mentioned that ''silk'' from the cocoon is what’s needed to make the curative/poison. Presumably burning it first and then sending the residue would be enough to render the silk unusable for that purpose.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** What reason would Machi have to lie about Daryan being his accomplice? “Having an accomplice” isn’t what saves Machi from being deported to Borginia, and he’s not going to be convicted of murder either way. It would make no difference to Machi’s case whether he identified Daryan or not, so what motive does he have to lie about it?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Machi has an animation where he winces and grabs his arm, as though he’s in pain. It’s possible Daryan actually injured Machi himself to give people the impression that he had fired the gun, and that either the prosecution just didn’t mention it or Machi wouldn’t let them give him a proper examination to say for sure.

Added: 657

Changed: -22

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Alita has a tendency to be broken down easily and say more than she should once she’s on the witness stand, presumably to indicate that she’s not as clever or thick-skinned as she leads people to think. After all, she practically boasts about taking advantage of Wocky for his family’s money, during the trial which his parents are undoubtedly watching, and then tries to argue that she stole the chart because she was actually terrified of what the Kitakis would do if they found it. She probably just let slip about the B&E thinking it would help paint her as a desperate girl who was willing to stoop to that because she was in such fear for her life.



** Simply because it’s really obvious that Stickler wasn’t actually the killer. As Gavin points out, the only connection he had to the victim was his cell phone being founding the victim’s garage — which was because he hid Trucy’s panties there. And with no connection to the Kitakis or the police, he couldn’t easily have gotten his hands on a gun. Not only does he have no means or motive, but his actions would be viewed as completely illogical if he were assumed to be the killer. The police would have to believe that he was just an opportunistic psychopath who happened upon a crime to which Wocky had already admitted, then decided to intervene and shoot the victim himself, ''then'' decided to leave the crime scene to report the incident to the police, then return to the crime scene to wait so he could be registered as a witness, without which no one would have known who he was. Taking all of that to be true would make him the most irrational and self-defeating murderer of all time, in addition to ignoring the much more reasonable explanations behind his actions.

to:

** Simply because it’s really obvious that Stickler wasn’t actually the killer. As Gavin points out, the only connection he had to the victim was his cell phone being founding found in the victim’s garage — which was because he hid Trucy’s panties there. And with no connection to the Kitakis or the police, he couldn’t easily have gotten his hands on a gun. Not only does he have no means or motive, but his actions would be viewed as completely illogical if he were assumed to be the killer. The police would have to believe that he was just an opportunistic psychopath who happened upon a crime to which Wocky had already admitted, then decided to intervene and shoot the victim himself, ''then'' decided to leave the crime scene to report the incident to the police, then return to the crime scene to wait so he could be registered as a witness, without which no one would have known who he was. Taking all of that to be true would make him the most irrational and self-defeating murderer of all time, in addition to ignoring the much more reasonable explanations behind his actions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Simply because it’s really obvious that Stickler wasn’t actually the killer. As Gavin points out, the only connection he had to the victim was his cell phone being founding the victim’s garage — which was because he hid Trucy’s panties there. And with no connection to the Kitakis or the police, he couldn’t easily have gotten his hands on a gun. Not only does he have no means or motive, but his actions would be viewed as completely illogical if he were assumed to be the killer. The police would have to believe that he was just an opportunistic psychopath who happened upon a crime to which Wocky had already admitted, then decided to intervene and shoot the victim himself, ''then'' decided to leave the crime scene to report the incident to the police, then return to the crime scene to wait so he could be registered as a witness, without which no one would have known who he was. Taking all of that to be true would make him the most irrational and self-defeating murderer of all time, in addition to ignoring the much more reasonable explanations behind his actions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
qyestion on 4-2

Added DiffLines:

* Why wasn't Stickler suspected of the murder, exactly? If you accuse him, Gavin demands evidence, and you can't respond, but there it is: a gun with prints wiped, which contradicts the situation with Wocky and the knife, and him coming from the "NOODLE" direction, from which he could have shot the victim in his right temple. Trucy points it out quite well, and Gavin just uses his authority to dismiss it out of hand and lead us to the panties tomfoolery. He should at least have been arrested as a possible suspect, like Meekins in 1-5. Now, when Stickler admitted to stealing the bloomers from the SOUTH side, I could see Gavin pouncing on to question the validity of his whole testimony (he should have seen "ELDOON", not "NOODLE"), and then encouraging to stick to the basic facts. But that whole issue was just left in the plothole.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, technically speaking, Wocky’s parents could have been told about the bullet in his heart before the complete check-up results were sent to them. All it would take is a look at the X-ray results to know that something was wrong. The court record only says that the health check was performed sometime in June; that’s an entire two weeks in which it could happened before the day of the murder, plenty of time for Big Wins to have started compiling a legitimate fortune.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Remember, the bracelet tightens on his wrist because Apollo subconsciously feels tense in response to other people’s tells. But Apollo is also a pretty nervous guy himself, so he has that excuse for the bracelet to feel funny instead of connecting it to other people. It’s not until he’s in his element in the courtroom (and has had his sensitivity pointed out by Phoenix) that he’s able to realize it’s not just him feeling nervous.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Phoenix probably was also interested in reforming the legal system whether or not he was able to nail Kristoph for the forgery. He could’ve used any old case to prove that the Jurist System was a success, and then it would’ve been in place for whenever something did happen to the Mishams. Either that or he was waiting for something to happen to Drew or Vera and never had another case in mind before then, but that’s obviously not something he can tell anyone, so he had to act as though it wasn’t so personal.

to:

** Phoenix probably was also interested in reforming the legal system whether or not he was able to nail Kristoph for the forgery. He could’ve used any old case to prove that the Jurist System was a success, and then it would’ve been in place for whenever something did happen to the Mishams. Either that or he was waiting for something to happen to Drew or Vera and never had another case in mind before then, but that’s obviously not something he can tell anyone, so he had to act as though the timing of it wasn’t so personal.was a coincidence.

Added: 515

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* So what was Phoenix's original plan for the jurist system? He seemingly overhauled the legal system solely to get Kristoph to pay for his actions or to get himself freed from the forgery accusation that lost him his badge, but it was a mere stroke of luck that one of the Misham's died RIGHT at the time he was about to implement the system. He even says that he changed the original planned case in favor of the Misham case. But no case that didn't involve the Misham's would help him, so what could his original plan have been?

to:

* So what was Phoenix's original plan for the jurist system? He seemingly overhauled the legal system solely to get Kristoph to pay for his actions or to get himself freed from the forgery accusation that lost him his badge, but it was a mere stroke of luck that one of the Misham's died RIGHT at the time he was about to implement the system. He even says that he changed the original planned case in favor of the Misham case. But no case that didn't involve the Misham's Mishams would help him, so what could his original plan have been?been?
** Phoenix probably was also interested in reforming the legal system whether or not he was able to nail Kristoph for the forgery. He could’ve used any old case to prove that the Jurist System was a success, and then it would’ve been in place for whenever something did happen to the Mishams. Either that or he was waiting for something to happen to Drew or Vera and never had another case in mind before then, but that’s obviously not something he can tell anyone, so he had to act as though it wasn’t so personal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** He ''does'' say what the reason was. He says he was used to entrapment from when he worked as a lawyer, so when he found the card he knew enough to assume it might be the setup for a similar trap.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The case is also meant to demonstrate the massive failings of the current court system, in part so that they can be rectified by the Jurist System in the next case.


Added DiffLines:

* On the first day of trial, Apollo claims to have told Prosecutor Gavin about LeTouse’s last words but that Gavin evidently didn’t listen. Is this a part of some secret optional dialogue or something? Going back to the initial investigation, the only one Apollo mentioned the last words to was Lamiroir; during the trial, he even says that he’s the only one who knew of LeTouse’s last message. So why is he claiming to have told Gavin about it?

Changed: 537

Removed: 2062

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Perhaps Magnifi, his grandfather, took care of him between Thalassa's shooting and his own death? Though this means Apollo would have to have been sent elsewhere (adoptive parents?) after Magnifi fell too ill to take care of him, though.
*** But then shouldn't Apollo know who Thalassa is and that Trucy is :his sister?
*** There is evidence that Apollo recognizes Thalassa on some level. Think back to what he thinks when he meets her during case 3:
---> '''Apollo''': (I can't put my finger on why, but I like this Lamiroir.)
*** ...suggesting that there's a faint degree of familiarity, say, if he'd last seen her when he was very young. As for Trucy, well, if the shooting happened when they were both relatively young, then Zak and Magnifi probably didn't let their personal lives mingle very much after that...
** This troper was confused by the entire idea that Apollo doesn't know who Troupe Gramarye is even though theyare his family, so I looked back in the game. Here is the story: Thalassa, part of the troupe, married another performer. She went off with him for a year and had Apollo. Her husband died, she gave up the baby for adoption, came back to the troupe and pretended nothing happened. She then married Zak and had Trucy before getting shot when Trucy was around four.
*** Five, actually.
*** And also, even if Apollo doesn't remember Trucy's name specifically, if he'd been living with the Grammaryes around the time of the accident, you'd think he'd be old enough to remember at least having a sister. But he doesn't.
** My question is, why did Thalassa give up Apollo? I get why she would give him one of her bracelets (she would be able to identify him if she ever saw him again), but why couldn't she take him with her when she went back to Troupe Gramarye? Was she forbidden to go back unless she gave him up?
*** She may have considered keeping Apollo to be too painful of a reminder of her first marriage or something similar. That, or she thought that having the child she had with a different performer, outside the troupe, would make things too awkward either for Apollo or for everyone else. I don't think it's stated in-game, but either of those explanations are pretty plausible.
** Thalassa never brought him back after his father died. ''Spirit of Justice'' explains why.

to:

** Perhaps Magnifi, his grandfather, took care of him between Thalassa's shooting and his own death? Though this means Apollo would have to have been sent elsewhere (adoptive parents?) after Magnifi fell too ill to take care of him, though.
*** But then shouldn't Apollo know who
Thalassa is and lost track of Apollo after the fire that Trucy killed his father, who he was with at the time, and she ended up assuming that the fire had killed him too. Unbeknownst to her, Apollo was rescued from the fire and raised in another country before returning to America some years later. This is :his sister?
*** There is evidence
referenced in this game when Brushel said that Apollo recognizes Thalassa on some level. Think back to what he thinks when he meets her during case 3:
---> '''Apollo''': (I can't put my finger on why, but I like this Lamiroir.)
*** ...suggesting that there's a faint degree of familiarity, say, if he'd last seen her when he was very young. As for Trucy, well, if
had “fallen through the shooting happened when they were both relatively young, then Zak cracks” or something, and Magnifi probably didn't let their personal lives mingle very much after that...
** This troper was confused by the entire idea that Apollo doesn't know who Troupe Gramarye is even though theyare his family, so I looked back
explained in the game. Here is the story: Thalassa, part of the troupe, married another performer. She went off with him for a year and had Apollo. Her husband died, she gave up the baby for adoption, came back to the troupe and pretended nothing happened. She then married Zak and had Trucy before getting shot when Trucy was around four.
*** Five, actually.
*** And also, even if Apollo doesn't remember Trucy's name specifically, if he'd been living with the Grammaryes around the time of the accident, you'd think he'd be old enough to remember at least having a sister. But he doesn't.
** My question is, why did Thalassa give up Apollo? I get why she would give him one of her bracelets (she would be able to identify him if she ever saw him again), but why couldn't she take him with her when she went back to Troupe Gramarye? Was she forbidden to go back unless she gave him up?
*** She may have considered keeping Apollo to be too painful of a reminder of her first marriage or something similar. That, or she thought that having the child she had with a different performer, outside the troupe, would make things too awkward either for Apollo or for everyone else. I don't think it's stated in-game, but either of those explanations are pretty plausible.
** Thalassa never brought him back after his father died.
detail in ''Spirit of Justice'' explains why. Justice''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The above seems especially appropriate if you consider that we don’t know when the locket was stolen. Olga Orly had initially assumed that Phoenix was strangling Shadi to death when he took the necklace, so she probably witnessed said “strangling” after she was clubbed with the bottle. Think of it this way: Phoenix phones the police and then Kristoph shortly afterward, then realizes what will happen if a locket with Trucy’s picture is found on the victim’s person. He hurries to take the locket off, but Olga happens to regain consciousness just then and mistakes the scene for him strangling Shadi.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** It could be that he was thrown off by Phoenix and Trucy’s cavalier portrayal of their relationship. They don’t act much like you’d expect a typical father and daughter to behave, but they‘re so nonchalant about it that it’s hard for him to get where they’re coming from. Apollo may not have had a strictly normal childhood, but he was still raised alongside his “brother” by a “father” who acted like a normal father.

Top