Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
** {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}: Look harder. You'll notice she's using her feet.
** {{@/Filby}}: WebAnimation/HomestarRunner has no arms and he gets along just fine.
** {{@/Filby}}: WebAnimation/HomestarRunner has no arms and he gets along just fine.
to:
** {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}: Look harder. You'll notice she's using her feet.
** {{@/Filby}}: ** WebAnimation/HomestarRunner has no arms and he gets along just fine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}: Look harder. You'll notice she's using her [[FootFocus feet]].
to:
** {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}: Look harder. You'll notice she's using her [[FootFocus feet]].feet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** {{@/Filby}}: WebAnimation/HomestarRunner has no arms and he gets along just fine.
to:
** {{@/Filby}}: WebAnimation/HomestarRunner has no arms and he gets along just fine.fine.
* In ASMBXT in one of the postgame levels, why would [[spoiler:Demo]] try to kill you for stealing the 1-up? Wouldn't it, y'know, destroy it completely?
* In ASMBXT in one of the postgame levels, why would [[spoiler:Demo]] try to kill you for stealing the 1-up? Wouldn't it, y'know, destroy it completely?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** {{@/Filby}}: HomestarRunner has no arms and he gets along just fine.
to:
** {{@/Filby}}: HomestarRunner WebAnimation/HomestarRunner has no arms and he gets along just fine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}: Look harder. You'll notice she's using her [[FootFocus feet]].
to:
** {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}: Look harder. You'll notice she's using her [[FootFocus feet]].feet]].
** {{@/Filby}}: HomestarRunner has no arms and he gets along just fine.
** {{@/Filby}}: HomestarRunner has no arms and he gets along just fine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
"This isn't the place for you to complain about SMWC's "double standards", that is what The Site section of the forum is for."
Changed line(s) 2,4 (click to see context) from:
** {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}: Look harder. You'll notice she's using her [[FootFocus feet]].
* '''From {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}:''' As a member of SMW Central, it Just Bugs Me™ that this hack, despite some blatant violations of the site's hack submission guidelines, gets accepted and FEATURED!!!, while those of us who work TWICE as hard get ours rejected! While this isn't necessarily evidence of {{Double Standard}}s on SMWC's part, it is pretty frustrating nonetheless...!
** This isn't the place for you to complain about SMWC's "double standards", that is what The Site section of the forum is for. If you have so much of an issue with it while your hack was rejected (twice), take it up with them in a civilized manner (not an awful "review" that you provided in your LJ.) And stop being unnecessary attention to yourself.
* '''From {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}:''' As a member of SMW Central, it Just Bugs Me™ that this hack, despite some blatant violations of the site's hack submission guidelines, gets accepted and FEATURED!!!, while those of us who work TWICE as hard get ours rejected! While this isn't necessarily evidence of {{Double Standard}}s on SMWC's part, it is pretty frustrating nonetheless...!
** This isn't the place for you to complain about SMWC's "double standards", that is what The Site section of the forum is for. If you have so much of an issue with it while your hack was rejected (twice), take it up with them in a civilized manner (not an awful "review" that you provided in your LJ.) And stop being unnecessary attention to yourself.
to:
** {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}: Look harder. You'll notice she's using her [[FootFocus feet]].
* '''From {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}:''' As a member of SMW Central, it Just Bugs Me™ that this hack, despite some blatant violations of the site's hack submission guidelines, gets accepted and FEATURED!!!, while those of us who work TWICE as hard get ours rejected! While this isn't necessarily evidence of {{Double Standard}}s on SMWC's part, it is pretty frustrating nonetheless...!
** This isn't the place for you to complain about SMWC's "double standards", that is what The Site section of the forum is for. If you have so much of an issue with it while your hack was rejected (twice), take it up with them in a civilized manner (not an awful "review" that you provided in your LJ.) And stop being unnecessary attention to yourself.feet]].
* '''From {{@/A-l-e-x-99}}:''' As a member of SMW Central, it Just Bugs Me™ that this hack, despite some blatant violations of the site's hack submission guidelines, gets accepted and FEATURED!!!, while those of us who work TWICE as hard get ours rejected! While this isn't necessarily evidence of {{Double Standard}}s on SMWC's part, it is pretty frustrating nonetheless...!
** This isn't the place for you to complain about SMWC's "double standards", that is what The Site section of the forum is for. If you have so much of an issue with it while your hack was rejected (twice), take it up with them in a civilized manner (not an awful "review" that you provided in your LJ.) And stop being unnecessary attention to yourself.
