Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / Anonymous2011

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A man appears in the beginning to admit that the story is just an intellectual exercise, not hard history.

to:

** A man DerekJacobi appears in the beginning to admit that the story is just an intellectual exercise, not hard history.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, that Queen Elizabeth was not a virgin but had several bastard children. [[spoiler:[[RefugeInAudacity And that Edward De Vere was her bastard son]] [[IncestIsRelative who she then had sex with.]]]]

to:

** Also, that Queen Elizabeth was not a virgin but had several bastard children. [[spoiler:[[RefugeInAudacity And that Edward De Vere was her bastard son]] [[IncestIsRelative who she then had sex with.]]]]]] Who fathered ''another'' one of the Queen's bastards.]]

Added: 206

Changed: 19

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''''Anonymous''''' is a 2011 historical drama from director Creator/RolandEmmerich. Like many of Emmerich's films, it revolves around conspiracy theories and features a major world landmark being destroyed, even if it isn't a disaster movie like his previous work. It's based on the theory that Creator/WilliamShakespeare did not author his plays, but was given them by the Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere.

to:

'''''Anonymous''''' is a 2011 historical drama from director Creator/RolandEmmerich. Like many of Emmerich's films, it revolves around fringe conspiracy theories and features a major world landmark being destroyed, even if it isn't a disaster movie like his previous work. It's based on the conspiracy theory that Creator/WilliamShakespeare did not author his plays, but was given them by the Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere.



* AlternateHistory: The premise of the film is that Shakespeare never wrote his own plays, instead attributing them to Edward De Vere, the Earl of Oxford. The makers of the film, however, [[ConspiracyTheorist don't think that it's an "alternate" history.]]

to:

* AlternateHistory: The premise of the film is that Shakespeare never wrote his own plays, instead attributing them to Edward De Vere, the Earl of Oxford. The makers of the film, however, [[ConspiracyTheorist don't think that it's an "alternate" history.]]]]
** Also, that Queen Elizabeth was not a virgin but had several bastard children. [[spoiler:[[RefugeInAudacity And that Edward De Vere was her bastard son]] [[IncestIsRelative who she then had sex with.]]]]

Changed: 341

Removed: 148

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Anonymous'' is a 2011 drama from director Creator/RolandEmmerich.

The story is based on the theory that Creator/WilliamShakespeare did not author his plays, but was given them by the Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere.

to:

''Anonymous'' '''''Anonymous''''' is a 2011 historical drama from director Creator/RolandEmmerich.

The story is
Creator/RolandEmmerich. Like many of Emmerich's films, it revolves around conspiracy theories and features a major world landmark being destroyed, even if it isn't a disaster movie like his previous work. It's based on the theory that Creator/WilliamShakespeare did not author his plays, but was given them by the Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe figures out that Edward is writing the plays, because he realises that the character of Polonius in ''Hamlet'' is meant to signify William Cecil. Shakespeare murders him to prevent the truth from getting out. ''Hamlet'' was first performed in 1601 (1598 in the film.) '' '''MARLOWE DIED IN 1593.''' '' You see the problem here?

to:

** Also, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe figures out that Edward is writing the plays, because he realises that the character of Polonius in ''Hamlet'' is meant to signify William Cecil. Cecil, and Shakespeare murders him to prevent the truth from getting out. ''Hamlet'' was first performed in 1601 (1598 in the film.) '' '''MARLOWE DIED IN 1593.''' '' You see the problem here?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe figures out that Edward is writing the plays, because he realises that the character of Polonius in ''Hamlet'' is meant to signify William Cecil. Shakespeare murders him to prevent the truth from getting out. ''Hamlet'' was first performed in 1601 (1598 in the film.) '' '''Marlowe died in 1593.''' '' You see the problem here?

to:

** Also, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe figures out that Edward is writing the plays, because he realises that the character of Polonius in ''Hamlet'' is meant to signify William Cecil. Shakespeare murders him to prevent the truth from getting out. ''Hamlet'' was first performed in 1601 (1598 in the film.) '' '''Marlowe died in '''MARLOWE DIED IN 1593.''' '' You see the problem here?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Surprisingly, the Earl of Essex DID hire Shakespeare to stage a play about King Richard in order to incite a riot so he could seize the throne. However, rather than Richard III, as shown in the movie, the play was Richard II. Which makes sense, as Richard II is about a noble earl who does his solemn duty and deposes a corrupt and decadent monarch, whereas Richard III is about how wonderful Queen Elizabeth's family is, and isn't it ''great'' that they're in charge now?

to:

** Surprisingly, the Earl of Essex DID hire Shakespeare to stage a play about King Richard in order to incite a riot so he could seize the throne. However, rather than Richard III, ''Theatre/{{Richard III}}'', as shown in the movie, the play was Richard II. ''Theatre/{{Richard II}}''. Which makes sense, as Richard II ''Richard II'' is about a noble earl who does his solemn duty and deposes a corrupt and decadent monarch, whereas Richard III ''Richard III'' is about how wonderful Queen Elizabeth's family is, and isn't it ''great'' that they're in charge now?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, Christopher Marlowe figures out that Edward is writing the plays, because he realises that the character of Polonius in ''Hamlet'' is meant to signify William Cecil. Shakespeare murders him to prevent the truth from getting out. ''Hamlet'' was first performed in 1601 (1598 in the film.) '' '''Marlowe died in 1593.''' '' You see the problem here?
** The portrayal of [[RichardOfGloucester Richard III]] as an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as "[[BasedOnAGreatBigLie fact]]" in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia'', published in 1534 - over a decade before the births of both Edward and Shakespeare.

to:

** Also, Christopher Marlowe Creator/ChristopherMarlowe figures out that Edward is writing the plays, because he realises that the character of Polonius in ''Hamlet'' is meant to signify William Cecil. Shakespeare murders him to prevent the truth from getting out. ''Hamlet'' was first performed in 1601 (1598 in the film.) '' '''Marlowe died in 1593.''' '' You see the problem here?
** The portrayal of [[RichardOfGloucester [[UsefulNotes/RichardIII Richard III]] as an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as "[[BasedOnAGreatBigLie fact]]" in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia'', published in 1534 - over a decade before the births of both Edward and Shakespeare.



* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Most of the characters in the film, obviously.

to:

* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Most of the characters in the film, obviously. The ones with their own page on TV Tropes could be mentioned: Creator/WilliamShakespeare, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe and UsefulNotes/ElizabethI.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ReallyGetsAround: Queen Elizabeth, AKA TheVirginQueen (hilariously enough).

to:

* ReallyGetsAround: Queen Elizabeth, AKA TheVirginQueen UsefulNotes/ElizabethI (hilariously enough).



* TheVirginQueen: InNameOnly, if [[AnythingThatMoves the film is to be believed.]]

to:

* TheVirginQueen: UsefulNotes/ElizabethI : She is ''The Virgin Queen'' InNameOnly, if [[AnythingThatMoves the film is to be believed.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Cecil was actually ''against'' Elizabeth naming James of Scotland as her successor and for very good reason: it was Cecil, more than anyone else, who'd convinced Elizabeth to execute James's mother, Mary, Queen of Scots.
** Surprisingly, the Earl of Essex DID hire Shakespeare to stage a play about King Richard in order to incite a riot so he could seize the throne. However, rather than Richard III, as shown in the movie, the play was Richard II. Which makes sense, as Richard II is about a noble earl who does his solemn duty and deposes a corrupt and decadent monarch, whereas Richard III is about how great Queen Elizabeth's family is, and isn't it ''great'' that they're in charge now?

to:

** Cecil was actually ''against'' Elizabeth naming James of Scotland as her successor successor, and for very good reason: it was Cecil, more than anyone else, who'd convinced Elizabeth to execute James's mother, Mary, Queen of Scots.
** Surprisingly, the Earl of Essex DID hire Shakespeare to stage a play about King Richard in order to incite a riot so he could seize the throne. However, rather than Richard III, as shown in the movie, the play was Richard II. Which makes sense, as Richard II is about a noble earl who does his solemn duty and deposes a corrupt and decadent monarch, whereas Richard III is about how great wonderful Queen Elizabeth's family is, and isn't it ''great'' that they're in charge now?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, Christopher Marlowe figures out that Edward is writing the plays, because he realises that the character of Polonius in ''Hamlet'' is meant to signify William Cecil. Shakespeare murders him to prevent the truth from getting out. ''Hamlet'' was first performed in 1601 (1598 in the film.) '''Marlowe died in 1593.''' You see the problem here?

to:

** Also, Christopher Marlowe figures out that Edward is writing the plays, because he realises that the character of Polonius in ''Hamlet'' is meant to signify William Cecil. Shakespeare murders him to prevent the truth from getting out. ''Hamlet'' was first performed in 1601 (1598 in the film.) '' '''Marlowe died in 1593.''' '' You see the problem here?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
editing out repetition


** Surprisingly, the Earl of Essex DID hire Shakespeare to stage a play about King Richard in order to incite a riot so he could seize the throne. However, rather than Richard III, as shown in the movie, the play was Richard II, and not, as the film shows, Richard III. Which makes sense, as Richard II is about a noble earl who does his solemn duty and deposes a corrupt and decadent monarch, whereas Richard III is about how great Queen Elizabeth's family is, and isn't it great that they're in charge now?

to:

** Surprisingly, the Earl of Essex DID hire Shakespeare to stage a play about King Richard in order to incite a riot so he could seize the throne. However, rather than Richard III, as shown in the movie, the play was Richard II, and not, as the film shows, Richard III. II. Which makes sense, as Richard II is about a noble earl who does his solemn duty and deposes a corrupt and decadent monarch, whereas Richard III is about how great Queen Elizabeth's family is, and isn't it great ''great'' that they're in charge now?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Surprisingly, the Earl of Essex DID hire Shakespeare to stage a play about King Richard in order to incite a riot so he could seize the throne. However, rather than Richard III, as shown in the movie, the play was Richard II, and not, as the film shows, Richard III. Which makes sense, as Richard II is about a noble earl who does his solemn duty and deposes a corrupt and decadent monarch, whereas Richard III is about how great Queen Elizabeth's family is, and isn't it great that they're in charge now?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Cecil was actually against Elizabeth naming James of Scotland as her successor and for very good reason: it was Cecil, more than anyone else, who'd convinced Elizabeth to execute James's mother, Mary Queen of Scots.

to:

** Cecil was actually against ''against'' Elizabeth naming James of Scotland as her successor and for very good reason: it was Cecil, more than anyone else, who'd convinced Elizabeth to execute James's mother, Mary Mary, Queen of Scots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GeniusBonus: [[InvertedTrope Inverted]]. The film can be pretty hard to understand without some prior knowledge of Shakespeare and his time period, due to the AnachronicOrder of the plot. However, if you ''do'' have that knowledge, [[EnragedByIdiocy the inaccuracies in the film will drive you mad.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* GeniusBonus: [[InvertedTrope Inverted]]. The film can be pretty hard to understand without some prior knowledge of Shakespeare and his time period, due to the AnachronicOrder of the plot. However, if you ''do'' have that knowledge, [[EnragedByIdiocy the inaccuracies in the film will drive you mad.]]

Added: 77

Changed: 22

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ReallyGetsAround: Queen Elizabeth, AKA TheVirginQueen (hilariously enough).



* TheVirginQueen: InNameOnly, if the film is to be believed.

to:

* TheVirginQueen: InNameOnly, if [[AnythingThatMoves the film is to be believed.]]

Added: 432

Changed: 327

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateHistory: The premise of the film is that Shakespeare never wrote his own plays, instead attributing them to Edward De Vere, the Earl of Oxford. The makers of the film, however, [[ConspiracyTheorist don't think that it's an "alternate" history.]]



* AncientConspiracy

to:

* AncientConspiracyAncientConspiracy: To cover up the fact that Shakespeare never wrote his own plays... [[spoiler: and also that Edward De Vere was the child of Queen Elizabeth, as well as [[ParentalIncest the father of another one of her children.]]]]



* CoitusInterruptus: At one point, Shakespeare is interrupted while having sex with a prostitute.



* HistoricalVillainUpgrade: The Cecils and also William Shakespeare himself.

to:

* HistoricalFiction: Although not everyone [[ConspiracyTheorist thinks it's fiction.]]
* HistoricalVillainUpgrade: The Cecils and also Cecils, as well as William Shakespeare himself.

Added: 321

Changed: 896

Removed: 14

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BeethovenWasAnAlienSpy: William Shakespeare was actually a patsy for Edward De Vere, allowing him to publish poetry without affronting his aristocratic family.



* CriticalResearchFailure: Numerous, but one of the more baffling ones involves Edward De Vere plucking a red-and-white Tudor rose from a bush and admiring its beauty. For those unaware, ''there is no such thing as a RealLife Tudor rose''- it's a symbol of the unification of England under TheHouseOfTudor after [[UsefulNotes/WarsOfTheRoses the Wars of the Roses.]]
* DownerEnding

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: Numerous, but one DownerEnding: The fraudulent Shakespeare winds up taking credit for all of the more baffling ones involves Edward De Vere's work, De Vere plucking is a red-and-white Tudor rose from failure as both a bush playwright and admiring its beauty. For those unaware, ''there is no such thing as a RealLife Tudor rose''- it's human being, and Elizabeth dies without a symbol legitimate heir, marking the end of the unification of England under TheHouseOfTudor after [[UsefulNotes/WarsOfTheRoses the Wars of the Roses.]]
* DownerEnding
Tudor line.



* HistoricalDomainCharacter

to:

* HistoricalDomainCharacterHistoricalDomainCharacter: Most of the characters in the film, obviously.



* TheHouseOfTudor
* LargeHam: Shakespeare
* ParentalIncest

to:

* TheHouseOfTudor
TheHouseOfTudor: Queen Elizabeth herself plays a large role in the events of the film.
* LargeHam: Shakespeare
Shakespeare himself is one of the bigger offenders, although several of the actors ham it up throughout the film.
* ParentalIncestParentalAbandonment: [[spoiler: Queen Elizabeth gives birth to Edward out of wedlock, then gives him up to be raised by the Duke of Oxford to avoid a scandal.]]
* ParentalIncest: [[spoiler: Edward De Vere sleeps with Queen Elizabeth, who is secretly his mother. And [[{{Squick}} she gets pregnant]] from their coupling.]]



* TheVirginQueen

to:

* TheVirginQueenTheVirginQueen: InNameOnly, if the film is to be believed.

Added: 365

Removed: 323

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: Numerous, but one of the more baffling ones involves Edward De Vere plucking a red-and-white Tudor rose from a bush and admiring its beauty. For those unaware, ''there is no such thing as a RealLife Tudor rose''- it's a symbol of the unification of England under TheHouseOfTudor after [[UsefulNotes/WarsOfTheRoses the Wars of the Roses.]]



* RealLifeRelative: Vanessa Redgrave plays the older Elizabeth; the younger Elizabeth is played by Redgrave's daughter, Joely Richardson.
* RealitySubtext: Creator/DerekJacobi (the Narrator) is a very prominent Anti-Stratfordian advocate. He also played the Chorus (i.e. the narrator) in Creator/KennethBranagh's ''HenryV''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, Christopher Marlowe figures out that Edward is writing the plays, because he realises that the character of Polonius in ''Hamlet'' is meant to signify William Cecil. ''Hamlet'' was first performed in 1601 (1598 in the film.) '''Marlowe died in 1593.''' You see the problem here?

to:

** Also, Christopher Marlowe figures out that Edward is writing the plays, because he realises that the character of Polonius in ''Hamlet'' is meant to signify William Cecil. Shakespeare murders him to prevent the truth from getting out. ''Hamlet'' was first performed in 1601 (1598 in the film.) '''Marlowe died in 1593.''' You see the problem here?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The chronology is ''completely'' wrong. ''Theater/{{Macbeth}}'' is performed before ''Theater/{{Hamlet}}''. ''Macbeth'' is widely considered to be Shakespeare's last play, and directly references King James I (who ascends to the throne at the end of the film).

to:

** The chronology is ''completely'' wrong. ''Theater/{{Macbeth}}'' is performed before ''Theater/{{Hamlet}}''. ''Macbeth'' is widely considered to be Shakespeare's last play, a rather late production by Shakespeare, and directly references King James I (who ascends to the throne at the end of the film).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The portrayal of Richard III as an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as "[[BasedOnAGreatBigLie fact]]" in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia'', published in 1534 - over a decade before the births of both Edward and Shakespeare.

to:

** The portrayal of [[RichardOfGloucester Richard III III]] as an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as "[[BasedOnAGreatBigLie fact]]" in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia'', published in 1534 - over a decade before the births of both Edward and Shakespeare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The portrayal of Richard III as an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as a "[[BasedOnAGreatBigLie fact]]" in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia'', published in 1534. ''Anglica Historia'' not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Edward.
** Cecil was actually against Elizabeth naming James of Scotland as her successor while Edward was one of James' supporters. This really isn't that surprising because Cecil would have been very aware that he'd convinced Elizabeth to execute Mary Queen of Scots - and Mary was James' mother.

to:

** The portrayal of Richard III as an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as a "[[BasedOnAGreatBigLie fact]]" in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia'', published in 1534. ''Anglica Historia'' not only predates 1534 - over a decade before the play, but also the ''births'' births of both Shakespeare Edward and Edward.Shakespeare.
** Cecil was actually against Elizabeth naming James of Scotland as her successor while Edward was one of James' supporters. This really isn't that surprising because Cecil would have been and for very aware that he'd good reason: it was Cecil, more than anyone else, who'd convinced Elizabeth to execute James's mother, Mary Queen of Scots - and Mary was James' mother.Scots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The portrayal of Richard III as an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as fact in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia'', published in 1534. ''Anglica Historia'' not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Edward.

to:

** The portrayal of Richard III as an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as fact a "[[BasedOnAGreatBigLie fact]]" in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia'', published in 1534. ''Anglica Historia'' not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Edward.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The portrayal of Richard III as an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as fact in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia", published in 1534. "Anglica Historia" not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Edward.

to:

** The portrayal of Richard III as an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as fact in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia", Historia'', published in 1534. "Anglica Historia" ''Anglica Historia'' not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Edward.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The portrayal of Richard III as deformed or hunchback is found in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia.'' It was published in 1534, so it not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Edward.

to:

** The portrayal of Richard III as deformed or hunchback is found an EvilCripple wasn't Shakespeare's invention: it appears as fact in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia.'' It was Historia", published in 1534, so it 1534. "Anglica Historia" not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Edward.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The portrayal of Richard III as a hunchback is found in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia.'' It was published in 1534, so it not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Edward.
** Cecil was actually James succeeding Elizabeth while Edward was one of James' supporters. (Cecil was against it because James' mother, Mary Queen of Scots, had been executed on his and Elizabeth's orders.)

to:

** The portrayal of Richard III as a deformed or hunchback is found in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia.'' It was published in 1534, so it not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Edward.
** Cecil was actually James succeeding against Elizabeth naming James of Scotland as her successor while Edward was one of James' supporters. (Cecil was against it This really isn't that surprising because James' mother, Cecil would have been very aware that he'd convinced Elizabeth to execute Mary Queen of Scots, had been executed on his Scots - and Elizabeth's orders.)Mary was James' mother.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Cecil was actually James succeeding Elizabeth while Edward was one of James' supporters. (Cecil was against it because James' mother, Mary Queen of Scots, had been executed on his and Elizabeth's orders.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The portrayal of Richard III as a hunchback is found in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia.'' It was published in 1534, so it not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Essex.

to:

** The portrayal of Richard III as a hunchback is found in Polydore Vergil's ''Anglica Historia.'' It was published in 1534, so it not only predates the play, but also the ''births'' of both Shakespeare and Essex.Edward.

Top