Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Just For Pun has been disambiguated.
Changed line(s) 28,29 (click to see context) from:
* WellIntentionedExtremist: The Hunter kills people ruthlessly but he sees it as a way to put an end to Gotham's [[JustForPun nightmare]]-and is very careful not to spread his blood, since it would bring out the scourge of beasts, the last thing he wants- which is what brings him to support (temporarily at least) [[spoiler: Lex Luthor as president]].
* WifeHusbandry: A reverse example: The '''''Doll''''' is implied to do this, judging her monologue midway of chapter 7.
* WifeHusbandry: A reverse example: The '''''Doll''''' is implied to do this, judging her monologue midway of chapter 7.
to:
* WellIntentionedExtremist: The Hunter kills people ruthlessly but he sees it as a way to put an end to Gotham's [[JustForPun nightmare]]-and nightmare -- and is very careful not to spread his blood, since it would bring out the scourge of beasts, the last thing he wants- wants -- which is what brings him to support (temporarily at least) [[spoiler: Lex Luthor as president]].
* WifeHusbandry: A reverse example: The '''''Doll''''' is implied to do this, judging her monologue midway of chapter7.7.
----
* WifeHusbandry: A reverse example: The '''''Doll''''' is implied to do this, judging her monologue midway of chapter
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dewicked trope
Deleted line(s) 11 (click to see context) :
* BareYourMidriff: Huntress's outfit. The Hunter lampshades this, wondering how the hell nobody shot her there and calling it dangerous (and indecent).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** The hunter surrendered and told Batman he would walk free , which is why he surrendered. Batman didn't believe him (seems more like a state of denial than any kind of belief, as it was absurdly obvious that this is exactly what was going to happen since it's just superheroes and maybe a few other legal system fanatics who really care about the good-being one of the villains ) . Naturally, despite all of the video footage, etc. and the hunter not even trying to hide or deny what he did, the jury finds him ''not guilty''. Isn't justice great?
to:
** The hunter surrendered and told Batman he would walk free , which is why he surrendered. Batman didn't believe him (seems more like a state of denial than any kind of belief, as it was absurdly obvious that this is exactly what was going to happen since it's just superheroes and maybe a few other legal system fanatics who really care about the good-being one of the villains ) . Naturally, despite all of the video footage, etc. and the hunter not even trying to hide or deny what he did, the jury finds him ''not guilty''. Isn't justice great?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** The hunter surrendered and told Batman he would walk free (seems more like a state of denial than any kind of belief, as it was absurdly obvious that this is exactly what was going to happen since it's just superheroes and maybe a few other legal system fanatics who really care about the good- being one of the villains) , which is why he surrendered. Batman didn't believe him. Naturally, despite all of the video footage, etc. and the hunter not even trying to hide or deny what he did, the jury finds him ''not guilty''. Isn't justice great?
to:
** The hunter surrendered and told Batman he would walk free , which is why he surrendered. Batman didn't believe him (seems more like a state of denial than any kind of belief, as it was absurdly obvious that this is exactly what was going to happen since it's just superheroes and maybe a few other legal system fanatics who really care about the good- being good-being one of the villains) , which is why he surrendered. Batman didn't believe him.villains ) . Naturally, despite all of the video footage, etc. and the hunter not even trying to hide or deny what he did, the jury finds him ''not guilty''. Isn't justice great?
