This is discussion archived from a time before the current discussion method was installed.
Leigh Sabio: Just clearing up some misunderstandings.
- * After you point out the Unfortunate Implications inherent in the gendering of positive and negative sides of the wiki, she smiles understandingly, and gives you a detailed, well-thought-out and non-insulting rebuttal that provides several reasons why it's not.** When you explain that this seems like an Informed Ability because, "how?" and also point out further Fridge Logic that she's something of a Mary Sue, she shrugs and says that Tropes Are Not Bad. When you say that that is a handwave which doesn't explain anything, she reminds you that Candle Jack was invoked up there and still needs to collect someo
OK. Sorry. I wasn't trying to be a Straw Feminist or anything, and I didn't mean to offend anyone when I made the article. I started writhing it in female pronouns, and then thought "Why not?" and decided to go with it and apply Always Female tropes. I didn't think of the Unfortunate Implications I can change it if it offended someone.
Haven: I didn't really mean that seriously. I...yeah, I should probably just remove that because it was supposed to be funny and, uh, isn't.
I like this page.
Leigh Sabio: Okay. Sorry for the misunderstanding. But should I probably clear out some of the overly gender-specific and the purely filler items?
Egregious Eric:
"She never uses Wikipedia Formatting, because she hates Wikipedia and all that it stands for."
I'm actually starting to hate her.
Cliche: This...is obviously a Purity Sue parody, right?
